You are removing information for the sake of a rule. You insist, although I gave a material reason for restoring the information. -- Joachim Wuttke 16:39, 13 April 2007 (UTC)
Can I ask why you're so against adding a link to Muse (band) on Muse. They are like one of the most popular britsh bands there is. I'd imagine many people end up there wanting to know about the band. It's not hurting anybody for it to be there, it's done on many other articles like that. :) GrahamGRA 00:44, 18 April 2007 (UTC)
Thanks for your comment. I know a lot about wikiformatting, but I was unaware numbered lists could be continued like that. - Mgm| (talk) 07:49, 18 April 2007 (UTC)
I just wanted to thank you for your welcome ^^
I work mainly on Catalan Wikipedia, but I'll be wandering around here as well :)
-- Meldor 08:10, 18 April 2007 (UTC)
"Macron usage in the name of a modern figure should adhere to the following, in order of preference:
1. Use the official trade name if available in English/Latin alphabet; 2. Use the form found in a dictionary entry from a generally-accepted English dictionary; 3. Use the form publicly used on behalf of the person in the English-speaking world; 4. Use the form publicly used on behalf of the person in any other popular Latin-alphabet-using language (French, Spanish, Italian, Portuguese, German, and Dutch, or variations); or 5. If none of the above is available, use the macronned form."
That leaves us with three options: Itcho Ito, Iccho Ito, and Iccho Itoh.
Ito is now known in English because his death was reported via various press sources around the world. WhisperToMe 15:59, 18 April 2007 (UTC)
Cross-posted from my talk::I'm glad you asked me about this. First, I did remove the warning, since I was clearly incorrect about the usage. Second, normally, yeah, and almost always, I do a level 1. However, given my initial assumption that you were a vandal, a given that you made quite a few edits in a short time period, I think uw-3 was justified. A few weeks ago, I saw a somewhat senior admin "jump" to 3 on what I thought was rather minor abuse, and I asked him about it. He said, "hey, this way they'll stop." To sum, I am incredibly ashamed of my grammatical error, but given the situation, uw3 was probably the way to go. 17:46, 18 April 2007 (UTC)
Cross-posted from my talk::The discussion will hold some sway. However, please also see Special:Contributions/58.169.188.195 and User_talk:58.169.188.195. Otheus 12:36, 19 April 2007 (UTC)
I think I know you. Assuming you are this person, we've worked together before (on various GURPS collaborative projects and playtests). I just wanted to welcome you to the wonderful world of Wikipedia, where everything is collaborative, and you don't even get a free copy of the book when it's finished. :) — Brian ( talk) 21:44, 20 April 2007 (UTC)
See this link for the following usage note: "The traditional rule states that the whole comprises the parts and the parts compose the whole. In strict usage: The Union comprises 50 states. Fifty states compose (or constitute or make up) the Union. Even though careful writers often maintain this distinction, comprise is increasingly used in place of compose, especially in the passive: The Union is comprised of 50 states. Our surveys show that opposition to this usage is abating. In the 1960s, 53 percent of the Usage Panel found this usage unacceptable; in 1996, only 35 percent objected." You are entitled to spend your time on Wikipedia "cleaning up" non-issues. I would strongly recommend finding more important issues to fry. There is simply no reason to expend your time "correcting" what is now accepted usage. Alansohn 19:22, 22 April 2007 (UTC)
Hi JHunterJ -
Apologies for accidenatally removing those links from Happy (disambiguation). Thanks for the heads up. David. MidgleyDJ 20:24, 25 April 2007 (UTC)
Thanks for reverting my revert. I missed that the change was the ip correcting their earlier change. Rider kabuto 15:33, 26 April 2007 (UTC)
FYI I've changed the warning I left on User talk:Petraid15 to just a test edits one.
Hi JHunterJ,
Fair enough; thanks for pointing me toward WP:NOPRO. Glad to see the article has already been unprotected. Best wishes, David Kernow (talk) 16:15, 26 April 2007 (UTC)
Don't know if you have noticed, but an entire section of Wien bridge oscillator has been wiped out by an anonymous user. It might have been an accident or vandalism, not sure, but I doubt it was intentional. Do you have the authority to revert articles? I can't seem to do it. Madhu 15:13, 29 April 2007 (UTC)
Thanks, J... I'm totally new to this, and will take all the assistance I can get! The sculpture I posted about is well-known in the Huntsville, Texas area - would it be appropriate to add to the Huntsville, Texas Wiki entry? While not as easily noticed as the Sam Houston statue on the south side of the city, this piece of art is very illustrative of the communities deep-rooted commitment to remembering the past and changing the future. Any suggestions and/or assistance you can give me in recognizing this sculpture is much appreciated. ( BaylorDad 22:52, 29 April 2007 (UTC))
you reverted my edits based on mos:dab, but your synthesis is incorrect. the use of the see also template is appropriate, and since i know you will more than likely not be persuaded by my challenge, why don't we just go right to arbitration? -- emerson7 | Talk 01:00, 1 May 2007 (UTC)
You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Smith. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions in a content dispute within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content which gains a consensus among editors. Thank you. -- emerson7 01:47, 1 May 2007 (UTC)
You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Morris. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions in a content dispute within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content which gains a consensus among editors. Thank you. -- emerson7 01:47, 1 May 2007 (UTC)
I've just seen your message at my Talk page, but have to dash. I'll reply tomorrow morning — sorry for any discourtesy, which is unintentional. -- Mel Etitis ( Talk) 23:16, 1 May 2007 (UTC)
Hi JHunterJ,
You recently used AutoWikiBrowser to edit Wikipedia's article on the dinosaur genus Tarchia here, changing "comprised of" to "composed of". However, the original was not an error: "comprised of" means "to include". The original sentence read:
The original sentence meant that the genera Ankylosaurus and Euoplocephalus are included in one clade, while Pinacosaurus, Saichania, etc, are included in another clade, which is exactly the correct meaning. Changing the wording to "composed of" may indicate to readers that the first clade is composed of (made up of) just two genera, while the second is composed of (made up of) just four genera, which is not the case: other genera are included in both clades.
You can read up on the difference between "composed of" and "comprised of" here. I have changed the wording back to the original, as that version is correct. Best wishes and happy editing, Firsfron of Ronchester 00:27, 2 May 2007 (UTC)
I am giving you a heads up, there was no consensus on the merger and I will be reverting the merge. If you can show me different, then I ask you to, but a consensus or a vote should have been taken. I will await your response before reverting. -- Maniwar ( talk) 14:52, 2 May 2007 (UTC)
It would be more like dabs that do not have "(disambiguation)" in the title; dabs with "(disambiguation)" in the title should lead with the base name meaning as the primary topic. See WP:MOSDAB#Linking to a primary topic. OTOH, if the current Curve were moved to Curve (geometry) or Curve (mathematics) and the disambig page were moved to Curve, then that meaning should become just another bullet in the list, but that second move would require an administrator (which I'm not), and it would need to be proposed and discussed on the Talk:Curve and Talk:Curve (disambiguation) pages. (But given the recent discussion, I think the consensus would end up being to keep the geometry meaning at the base name.) -- JHunterJ 12:49, 5 May 2007 (UTC)
Thanks, fixed. Rich Farmbrough, 17:10 3 May 2007 (GMT).
I've corrected my incorrect correction of your correction to
User:The Transhumanist/Virtual classroom/Dweller, on Featured Article Candidates.
Thank you for pointing out my error to me.
The Transhumanist
01:45, 4 May 2007 (UTC)
I added some parentheses to your heavy metal addition to AWB Typo fixes. If you have a $1 in the replacement text, it corresponds to the text captured by the first set of parentheses in the match. AWB's own replacement section has the capability to test your regexps for you, which you should use before adding them to the Typo list, just to be sure they work. Yours at least compiled; some additions (missing a closing parenthesis usually) generate an error when AWB loads them. Cheers! -- JHunterJ 13:07, 4 May 2007 (UTC)
Hello... Do you really think things named for the Alps should come before actual Alps ranges? Perhaps I spend too much time working with geographic and surname disambiguation pages, but I've found in the bulk of those pages that the sort of random references such as were at the beginning of the Alps page work better near the end. Was there a particular Alps that I moved that you consider important? Feel free to improve. -- Ken Gallager 18:48, 4 May 2007 (UTC)
hi, when you state piping is ok when not the entry itself i assume your referring to this line from WP:MOSDAB: "If a word in the description is linked (an unusual occurrence), you may use piping in that link."
but, considering that Jack (webcomic) is the article users are directed to, that IS the entry itself. i.e. "Do not pipe the name of the links to the articles being listed". here, Jack (webcomic) is the article being listed. its not "a word in the description".
its ambiguous but i'd like to raise it at WP:DAB to clarify. 82.3.64.139 13:38, 5 May 2007 (UTC)
Thanks for the editing!-- Lepeu1999 03:06, 6 May 2007 (UTC)
About: Undid revision 128823536 by Rjgodoy (talk) dabs are in order of likelihood, not alphabetical. What criteria for "likelihood" do you refer? Rjgodoy 17:58, 7 May 2007 (UTC)
Thanks for your message. Yes, "spam" links are to be avoided, and it looks bad that an editor called "Presser" is adding Presser links. But I have no affiliation with any publisher; I simply wish to ensure that the composers' work is fully documented for our readers. In the case of several of the composers, they have no primary "official site" other than the bio and list of works on the Presser site, which is usually quite well done. Though such sites are ostensibly commercial, they are, as I've described before, also highly informational (music publishing for contemporary art music often having extremely tiny profit margins), and thus do meet our criteria for inclusion. You're doing good things but in this case it's just not helping our readers learn as much as possible about these composers. Badagnani 00:17, 11 May 2007 (UTC)
I see you have edited Campbell's Soup Cans (disambiguation). I spent a great deal of time editing the article so that '''Campbell's Soup Cans''' and Campbell's Soup Cans were used correctly during the WP:FAC process because they are different things. However, several editors including you have revised the dab page. Do you agree with its current format. Should the series of artworks and the single artwork share the same line in the dab page. I guess an analogy would be the original Star Wars and the Star Wars saga. They are different things. How should this be handled in the dab? TonyTheTiger ( talk/ cont/ bio) 20:51, 11 May 2007 (UTC)
Well, I'm going to disagree with your assessment. We only need to assume good faith to the point where it is clear that the user is acting in bad faith. My judgment is this user is clearly acting in bad faith, as their later edits to Teacher shows. Using Wikipedia articles to attack other people is not acceptable. By the way, when you leave a {{ welcome}} message its a good idea to sign it. Thanks, Gwernol 12:25, 16 May 2007 (UTC)
Thanks for the cleanup. Why did you delink the songs and Weird Al's album? davidwr 09f9( talk) 23:32, 19 May 2007 (UTC)
I wanted to give you a heads up on the AfD I started for Uncle Tom's Cabin (disambiguation). While I appreciate you creating the disambig page, I don't think we need it for the reasons stated at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Uncle Tom's Cabin (disambiguation). But I wanted you to be aware of this discussion so you could give your view why the article should not be deleted. Best, -- Alabamaboy 02:17, 21 May 2007 (UTC)
I haven't placed any links... where did I supposedly put links up at? 68.74.121.67 21:08, 22 May 2007 (UTC)
Thanks for cleaning up my little mistake! [2] Jouster ( whisper) 13:15, 26 May 2007 (UTC)
Hello, this is a message from
an automated bot. A tag has been placed on
Hand (onomastics), by
Shoeofdeath, another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be
speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because
Hand (onomastics) fits the criteria for speedy deletion for the following reason:
To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting
Hand (onomastics), please affix the template {{hangon}}
to the page, and put a note on its talk page. This bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion, it did not nominate
Hand (onomastics) itself. Feel free to leave a message on
the bot operator's talk page if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot. Thanks. --
Android Mouse Bot 2
22:02, 26 May 2007 (UTC)
Hey there, thanks for helping me with the disambiguation page on mystery. Do you have any clue how we can stop the (senseless) reverting of your/my edits? This is getting really annoying. I do not know if you are aware of the RfC on this guy. It doesn't seem to do any good, but maybe you can contribute by posting a reaction there as well and work toward a block. Thanks again! - Catneven 12:22, 29 May 2007 (UTC)
The robot simply check the wikilinks on a page in one language. If there are some interwiki, than robot follow the pages and put the interwiki back to the first page (if there isn't). In this case (en:PD) the problem was originated from fr wikipedia where the page "PD" has been transformed to a redirect to "Democratic Party" without removing interwikis linking to the page (PD) before making thet operation. How fix the problem? I removed all interwiki linking to "tr:Demokrat Parti" and now is fixed ;) I'm not sure that I've been understood, I understand english better than I talk... u.u anyway, you can found all information here. Regards. -- Alleborgo 14:17, 1 June 2007 (UTC)
You are removing information for the sake of a rule. You insist, although I gave a material reason for restoring the information. -- Joachim Wuttke 16:39, 13 April 2007 (UTC)
Can I ask why you're so against adding a link to Muse (band) on Muse. They are like one of the most popular britsh bands there is. I'd imagine many people end up there wanting to know about the band. It's not hurting anybody for it to be there, it's done on many other articles like that. :) GrahamGRA 00:44, 18 April 2007 (UTC)
Thanks for your comment. I know a lot about wikiformatting, but I was unaware numbered lists could be continued like that. - Mgm| (talk) 07:49, 18 April 2007 (UTC)
I just wanted to thank you for your welcome ^^
I work mainly on Catalan Wikipedia, but I'll be wandering around here as well :)
-- Meldor 08:10, 18 April 2007 (UTC)
"Macron usage in the name of a modern figure should adhere to the following, in order of preference:
1. Use the official trade name if available in English/Latin alphabet; 2. Use the form found in a dictionary entry from a generally-accepted English dictionary; 3. Use the form publicly used on behalf of the person in the English-speaking world; 4. Use the form publicly used on behalf of the person in any other popular Latin-alphabet-using language (French, Spanish, Italian, Portuguese, German, and Dutch, or variations); or 5. If none of the above is available, use the macronned form."
That leaves us with three options: Itcho Ito, Iccho Ito, and Iccho Itoh.
Ito is now known in English because his death was reported via various press sources around the world. WhisperToMe 15:59, 18 April 2007 (UTC)
Cross-posted from my talk::I'm glad you asked me about this. First, I did remove the warning, since I was clearly incorrect about the usage. Second, normally, yeah, and almost always, I do a level 1. However, given my initial assumption that you were a vandal, a given that you made quite a few edits in a short time period, I think uw-3 was justified. A few weeks ago, I saw a somewhat senior admin "jump" to 3 on what I thought was rather minor abuse, and I asked him about it. He said, "hey, this way they'll stop." To sum, I am incredibly ashamed of my grammatical error, but given the situation, uw3 was probably the way to go. 17:46, 18 April 2007 (UTC)
Cross-posted from my talk::The discussion will hold some sway. However, please also see Special:Contributions/58.169.188.195 and User_talk:58.169.188.195. Otheus 12:36, 19 April 2007 (UTC)
I think I know you. Assuming you are this person, we've worked together before (on various GURPS collaborative projects and playtests). I just wanted to welcome you to the wonderful world of Wikipedia, where everything is collaborative, and you don't even get a free copy of the book when it's finished. :) — Brian ( talk) 21:44, 20 April 2007 (UTC)
See this link for the following usage note: "The traditional rule states that the whole comprises the parts and the parts compose the whole. In strict usage: The Union comprises 50 states. Fifty states compose (or constitute or make up) the Union. Even though careful writers often maintain this distinction, comprise is increasingly used in place of compose, especially in the passive: The Union is comprised of 50 states. Our surveys show that opposition to this usage is abating. In the 1960s, 53 percent of the Usage Panel found this usage unacceptable; in 1996, only 35 percent objected." You are entitled to spend your time on Wikipedia "cleaning up" non-issues. I would strongly recommend finding more important issues to fry. There is simply no reason to expend your time "correcting" what is now accepted usage. Alansohn 19:22, 22 April 2007 (UTC)
Hi JHunterJ -
Apologies for accidenatally removing those links from Happy (disambiguation). Thanks for the heads up. David. MidgleyDJ 20:24, 25 April 2007 (UTC)
Thanks for reverting my revert. I missed that the change was the ip correcting their earlier change. Rider kabuto 15:33, 26 April 2007 (UTC)
FYI I've changed the warning I left on User talk:Petraid15 to just a test edits one.
Hi JHunterJ,
Fair enough; thanks for pointing me toward WP:NOPRO. Glad to see the article has already been unprotected. Best wishes, David Kernow (talk) 16:15, 26 April 2007 (UTC)
Don't know if you have noticed, but an entire section of Wien bridge oscillator has been wiped out by an anonymous user. It might have been an accident or vandalism, not sure, but I doubt it was intentional. Do you have the authority to revert articles? I can't seem to do it. Madhu 15:13, 29 April 2007 (UTC)
Thanks, J... I'm totally new to this, and will take all the assistance I can get! The sculpture I posted about is well-known in the Huntsville, Texas area - would it be appropriate to add to the Huntsville, Texas Wiki entry? While not as easily noticed as the Sam Houston statue on the south side of the city, this piece of art is very illustrative of the communities deep-rooted commitment to remembering the past and changing the future. Any suggestions and/or assistance you can give me in recognizing this sculpture is much appreciated. ( BaylorDad 22:52, 29 April 2007 (UTC))
you reverted my edits based on mos:dab, but your synthesis is incorrect. the use of the see also template is appropriate, and since i know you will more than likely not be persuaded by my challenge, why don't we just go right to arbitration? -- emerson7 | Talk 01:00, 1 May 2007 (UTC)
You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Smith. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions in a content dispute within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content which gains a consensus among editors. Thank you. -- emerson7 01:47, 1 May 2007 (UTC)
You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Morris. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions in a content dispute within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content which gains a consensus among editors. Thank you. -- emerson7 01:47, 1 May 2007 (UTC)
I've just seen your message at my Talk page, but have to dash. I'll reply tomorrow morning — sorry for any discourtesy, which is unintentional. -- Mel Etitis ( Talk) 23:16, 1 May 2007 (UTC)
Hi JHunterJ,
You recently used AutoWikiBrowser to edit Wikipedia's article on the dinosaur genus Tarchia here, changing "comprised of" to "composed of". However, the original was not an error: "comprised of" means "to include". The original sentence read:
The original sentence meant that the genera Ankylosaurus and Euoplocephalus are included in one clade, while Pinacosaurus, Saichania, etc, are included in another clade, which is exactly the correct meaning. Changing the wording to "composed of" may indicate to readers that the first clade is composed of (made up of) just two genera, while the second is composed of (made up of) just four genera, which is not the case: other genera are included in both clades.
You can read up on the difference between "composed of" and "comprised of" here. I have changed the wording back to the original, as that version is correct. Best wishes and happy editing, Firsfron of Ronchester 00:27, 2 May 2007 (UTC)
I am giving you a heads up, there was no consensus on the merger and I will be reverting the merge. If you can show me different, then I ask you to, but a consensus or a vote should have been taken. I will await your response before reverting. -- Maniwar ( talk) 14:52, 2 May 2007 (UTC)
It would be more like dabs that do not have "(disambiguation)" in the title; dabs with "(disambiguation)" in the title should lead with the base name meaning as the primary topic. See WP:MOSDAB#Linking to a primary topic. OTOH, if the current Curve were moved to Curve (geometry) or Curve (mathematics) and the disambig page were moved to Curve, then that meaning should become just another bullet in the list, but that second move would require an administrator (which I'm not), and it would need to be proposed and discussed on the Talk:Curve and Talk:Curve (disambiguation) pages. (But given the recent discussion, I think the consensus would end up being to keep the geometry meaning at the base name.) -- JHunterJ 12:49, 5 May 2007 (UTC)
Thanks, fixed. Rich Farmbrough, 17:10 3 May 2007 (GMT).
I've corrected my incorrect correction of your correction to
User:The Transhumanist/Virtual classroom/Dweller, on Featured Article Candidates.
Thank you for pointing out my error to me.
The Transhumanist
01:45, 4 May 2007 (UTC)
I added some parentheses to your heavy metal addition to AWB Typo fixes. If you have a $1 in the replacement text, it corresponds to the text captured by the first set of parentheses in the match. AWB's own replacement section has the capability to test your regexps for you, which you should use before adding them to the Typo list, just to be sure they work. Yours at least compiled; some additions (missing a closing parenthesis usually) generate an error when AWB loads them. Cheers! -- JHunterJ 13:07, 4 May 2007 (UTC)
Hello... Do you really think things named for the Alps should come before actual Alps ranges? Perhaps I spend too much time working with geographic and surname disambiguation pages, but I've found in the bulk of those pages that the sort of random references such as were at the beginning of the Alps page work better near the end. Was there a particular Alps that I moved that you consider important? Feel free to improve. -- Ken Gallager 18:48, 4 May 2007 (UTC)
hi, when you state piping is ok when not the entry itself i assume your referring to this line from WP:MOSDAB: "If a word in the description is linked (an unusual occurrence), you may use piping in that link."
but, considering that Jack (webcomic) is the article users are directed to, that IS the entry itself. i.e. "Do not pipe the name of the links to the articles being listed". here, Jack (webcomic) is the article being listed. its not "a word in the description".
its ambiguous but i'd like to raise it at WP:DAB to clarify. 82.3.64.139 13:38, 5 May 2007 (UTC)
Thanks for the editing!-- Lepeu1999 03:06, 6 May 2007 (UTC)
About: Undid revision 128823536 by Rjgodoy (talk) dabs are in order of likelihood, not alphabetical. What criteria for "likelihood" do you refer? Rjgodoy 17:58, 7 May 2007 (UTC)
Thanks for your message. Yes, "spam" links are to be avoided, and it looks bad that an editor called "Presser" is adding Presser links. But I have no affiliation with any publisher; I simply wish to ensure that the composers' work is fully documented for our readers. In the case of several of the composers, they have no primary "official site" other than the bio and list of works on the Presser site, which is usually quite well done. Though such sites are ostensibly commercial, they are, as I've described before, also highly informational (music publishing for contemporary art music often having extremely tiny profit margins), and thus do meet our criteria for inclusion. You're doing good things but in this case it's just not helping our readers learn as much as possible about these composers. Badagnani 00:17, 11 May 2007 (UTC)
I see you have edited Campbell's Soup Cans (disambiguation). I spent a great deal of time editing the article so that '''Campbell's Soup Cans''' and Campbell's Soup Cans were used correctly during the WP:FAC process because they are different things. However, several editors including you have revised the dab page. Do you agree with its current format. Should the series of artworks and the single artwork share the same line in the dab page. I guess an analogy would be the original Star Wars and the Star Wars saga. They are different things. How should this be handled in the dab? TonyTheTiger ( talk/ cont/ bio) 20:51, 11 May 2007 (UTC)
Well, I'm going to disagree with your assessment. We only need to assume good faith to the point where it is clear that the user is acting in bad faith. My judgment is this user is clearly acting in bad faith, as their later edits to Teacher shows. Using Wikipedia articles to attack other people is not acceptable. By the way, when you leave a {{ welcome}} message its a good idea to sign it. Thanks, Gwernol 12:25, 16 May 2007 (UTC)
Thanks for the cleanup. Why did you delink the songs and Weird Al's album? davidwr 09f9( talk) 23:32, 19 May 2007 (UTC)
I wanted to give you a heads up on the AfD I started for Uncle Tom's Cabin (disambiguation). While I appreciate you creating the disambig page, I don't think we need it for the reasons stated at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Uncle Tom's Cabin (disambiguation). But I wanted you to be aware of this discussion so you could give your view why the article should not be deleted. Best, -- Alabamaboy 02:17, 21 May 2007 (UTC)
I haven't placed any links... where did I supposedly put links up at? 68.74.121.67 21:08, 22 May 2007 (UTC)
Thanks for cleaning up my little mistake! [2] Jouster ( whisper) 13:15, 26 May 2007 (UTC)
Hello, this is a message from
an automated bot. A tag has been placed on
Hand (onomastics), by
Shoeofdeath, another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be
speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because
Hand (onomastics) fits the criteria for speedy deletion for the following reason:
To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting
Hand (onomastics), please affix the template {{hangon}}
to the page, and put a note on its talk page. This bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion, it did not nominate
Hand (onomastics) itself. Feel free to leave a message on
the bot operator's talk page if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot. Thanks. --
Android Mouse Bot 2
22:02, 26 May 2007 (UTC)
Hey there, thanks for helping me with the disambiguation page on mystery. Do you have any clue how we can stop the (senseless) reverting of your/my edits? This is getting really annoying. I do not know if you are aware of the RfC on this guy. It doesn't seem to do any good, but maybe you can contribute by posting a reaction there as well and work toward a block. Thanks again! - Catneven 12:22, 29 May 2007 (UTC)
The robot simply check the wikilinks on a page in one language. If there are some interwiki, than robot follow the pages and put the interwiki back to the first page (if there isn't). In this case (en:PD) the problem was originated from fr wikipedia where the page "PD" has been transformed to a redirect to "Democratic Party" without removing interwikis linking to the page (PD) before making thet operation. How fix the problem? I removed all interwiki linking to "tr:Demokrat Parti" and now is fixed ;) I'm not sure that I've been understood, I understand english better than I talk... u.u anyway, you can found all information here. Regards. -- Alleborgo 14:17, 1 June 2007 (UTC)