![]() | This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
I'd already decided to
disengage from the
Singular they discussion before
your post there. Without saying whether I share your hunch, I avoid speculating editors' motives and I do my best to assume their
WP:GOODFAITH. My editing concerns re articles (but not necessarily talk pages) are limited to semantically and substantively sound writing. As for other editors: I cringe when they
evince a blind spot re their own
core competencies but nonetheless proceed to edit articles as if they know what they're talking about.
So, don't ask me why a certain editor hasn't reverted this mostly well considered edit, which reflects the majority of concerns I had expressed (and which one particular editor had refuted) on the talk page. Beyond disinterest in quixotic motives, I plead ignorance regarding whatever makes certain editors tick overall. Cheers. -- Kent Dominic·(talk) 19:27, 3 February 2022 (UTC)
This diff to Metoidioplasty was not rewritten or removed when I checked the article just now. I have removed the violating text. Please be more diligent at CCI, especially since other copyright editors rarely review checks. Only mark an entry with ? if it not worth checking if the original was a copyright violation when the text has been rewritten. We don't always do this with every case; in this case, we know that most of the big imports are copyright violations, so it is more of a matter of cleaning the article of any text added. Furthermore, Clitoroplasty was entirely copied and closely paraphrased from this, which required blanking and has been listed at WP:CP now for further action. Sennecaster ( Chat) 04:59, 5 February 2022 (UTC)
![]() | This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
I'd already decided to
disengage from the
Singular they discussion before
your post there. Without saying whether I share your hunch, I avoid speculating editors' motives and I do my best to assume their
WP:GOODFAITH. My editing concerns re articles (but not necessarily talk pages) are limited to semantically and substantively sound writing. As for other editors: I cringe when they
evince a blind spot re their own
core competencies but nonetheless proceed to edit articles as if they know what they're talking about.
So, don't ask me why a certain editor hasn't reverted this mostly well considered edit, which reflects the majority of concerns I had expressed (and which one particular editor had refuted) on the talk page. Beyond disinterest in quixotic motives, I plead ignorance regarding whatever makes certain editors tick overall. Cheers. -- Kent Dominic·(talk) 19:27, 3 February 2022 (UTC)
This diff to Metoidioplasty was not rewritten or removed when I checked the article just now. I have removed the violating text. Please be more diligent at CCI, especially since other copyright editors rarely review checks. Only mark an entry with ? if it not worth checking if the original was a copyright violation when the text has been rewritten. We don't always do this with every case; in this case, we know that most of the big imports are copyright violations, so it is more of a matter of cleaning the article of any text added. Furthermore, Clitoroplasty was entirely copied and closely paraphrased from this, which required blanking and has been listed at WP:CP now for further action. Sennecaster ( Chat) 04:59, 5 February 2022 (UTC)