Hello, JCRB, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a
Wikipedian! Please
sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out
Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}}
on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! --
Kralizec! (
talk)
12:08, 19 July 2007 (UTC)
Hi, i suggest that you post a link on your user page to the Ip address that you used to edit under. This gives others the chance to see your previous edits and any previous discussions. Thanks Woodym555 20:33, 19 July 2007 (UTC)
You currently appear to be engaged in an
edit war according to the reverts you have made on
Spanish Empire. Note that the
three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the
three-revert rule. If you continue, you may be
blocked from editing. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content that gains a
consensus among editors. If necessary, pursue
dispute resolution.
EdJohnston (
talk)
16:21, 24 April 2009 (UTC)
You currently appear to be engaged in an
edit war according to the reverts you have made on
Philippines. Note that the
three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24-hour period. Additionally, users who perform several reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring even if they do not technically violate the
three-revert rule. When in dispute with another editor you should first try to
discuss controversial changes to work towards wording and content that gains a
consensus among editors. Should that prove unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek
dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request
page protection. Please stop the disruption, otherwise you may be
blocked from editing.
Lambanog (
talk)
03:59, 31 December 2009 (UTC)
You are involved in a recently-filed request for arbitration. Please review the request at Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration#Request for clarification: consensus and insertion of information on Philippines and, if you wish to do so, enter your statement and any other material you wish to submit to the Arbitration Committee. Additionally, the following resources may be of use—
Thanks,-- JL 09 q? c 14:46, 29 November 2009 (UTC)
You'll find I've started a thread on AN/I about your disruption of Gibraltar here. Justin talk 00:28, 20 January 2010 (UTC)
Talk:Gibraltar#RfC:_Self-government Guy ( Help!) 11:54, 23 January 2010 (UTC)
Hi. I removed others' names from your straw poll. It's best to let everyone sign themselves, otherwise you will get accused of trying to swing the vote. Tempers get very high on that page. I hope you don't mind. The Red Hat of Pat Ferrick t 01:06, 30 January 2010 (UTC)
You currently appear to be engaged in an
edit war according to the reverts you have made on
Australia. Note that the
three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24-hour period. Additionally, users who perform several reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring even if they do not technically violate the
three-revert rule. When in dispute with another editor you should first try to
discuss controversial changes to work towards wording and content that gains a
consensus among editors. Should that prove unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek
dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request
page protection. If the edit warring continues, you may be
blocked from editing without further notice. Regarding
this edit, you should be aware that the onus is on you to open a discussion to gain consensus to add the information to the article, not on others to gain consensus to delete. This is especially the case since the content you added has been deleted four times now by four different editors,
[1]
[2]
[3]
[4]. I suggest you review
Wikipedia:BOLD, revert, discuss cycle for more guidance before you actually breach
WP:3RR.
AussieLegend (
talk)
13:24, 6 September 2010 (UTC)
There is clearly no consensus to add the information that you keep adding to Australia, as you did today. [7] [8] If you persist in adding the information, you may find yourself blocked for edit-warring. -- AussieLegend ( talk) 12:35, 16 September 2010 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current
Arbitration Committee election. The
Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia
arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose
site bans,
topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The
arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to
review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on
the voting page. For the Election committee,
MediaWiki message delivery (
talk)
17:35, 23 November 2015 (UTC)
Hello, JCRB, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a
Wikipedian! Please
sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out
Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}}
on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! --
Kralizec! (
talk)
12:08, 19 July 2007 (UTC)
Hi, i suggest that you post a link on your user page to the Ip address that you used to edit under. This gives others the chance to see your previous edits and any previous discussions. Thanks Woodym555 20:33, 19 July 2007 (UTC)
You currently appear to be engaged in an
edit war according to the reverts you have made on
Spanish Empire. Note that the
three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the
three-revert rule. If you continue, you may be
blocked from editing. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content that gains a
consensus among editors. If necessary, pursue
dispute resolution.
EdJohnston (
talk)
16:21, 24 April 2009 (UTC)
You currently appear to be engaged in an
edit war according to the reverts you have made on
Philippines. Note that the
three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24-hour period. Additionally, users who perform several reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring even if they do not technically violate the
three-revert rule. When in dispute with another editor you should first try to
discuss controversial changes to work towards wording and content that gains a
consensus among editors. Should that prove unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek
dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request
page protection. Please stop the disruption, otherwise you may be
blocked from editing.
Lambanog (
talk)
03:59, 31 December 2009 (UTC)
You are involved in a recently-filed request for arbitration. Please review the request at Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration#Request for clarification: consensus and insertion of information on Philippines and, if you wish to do so, enter your statement and any other material you wish to submit to the Arbitration Committee. Additionally, the following resources may be of use—
Thanks,-- JL 09 q? c 14:46, 29 November 2009 (UTC)
You'll find I've started a thread on AN/I about your disruption of Gibraltar here. Justin talk 00:28, 20 January 2010 (UTC)
Talk:Gibraltar#RfC:_Self-government Guy ( Help!) 11:54, 23 January 2010 (UTC)
Hi. I removed others' names from your straw poll. It's best to let everyone sign themselves, otherwise you will get accused of trying to swing the vote. Tempers get very high on that page. I hope you don't mind. The Red Hat of Pat Ferrick t 01:06, 30 January 2010 (UTC)
You currently appear to be engaged in an
edit war according to the reverts you have made on
Australia. Note that the
three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24-hour period. Additionally, users who perform several reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring even if they do not technically violate the
three-revert rule. When in dispute with another editor you should first try to
discuss controversial changes to work towards wording and content that gains a
consensus among editors. Should that prove unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek
dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request
page protection. If the edit warring continues, you may be
blocked from editing without further notice. Regarding
this edit, you should be aware that the onus is on you to open a discussion to gain consensus to add the information to the article, not on others to gain consensus to delete. This is especially the case since the content you added has been deleted four times now by four different editors,
[1]
[2]
[3]
[4]. I suggest you review
Wikipedia:BOLD, revert, discuss cycle for more guidance before you actually breach
WP:3RR.
AussieLegend (
talk)
13:24, 6 September 2010 (UTC)
There is clearly no consensus to add the information that you keep adding to Australia, as you did today. [7] [8] If you persist in adding the information, you may find yourself blocked for edit-warring. -- AussieLegend ( talk) 12:35, 16 September 2010 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current
Arbitration Committee election. The
Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia
arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose
site bans,
topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The
arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to
review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on
the voting page. For the Election committee,
MediaWiki message delivery (
talk)
17:35, 23 November 2015 (UTC)