|
Please read WP:PAID for Wikipedia's policies on paid editing. You must disclose the name of your employer ie the public relations firm as well as the name of the client (SilverBridge?). Thank you. Jbh Talk 19:35, 6 October 2016 (UTC)
{{paid|employer=Rubicomm|client=SilverBridge}}
and {{connected contributor (paid)|User1=IwanP|U1-employer=Rubicom|U1-client=SilverBridge}}
Please remember that each time you take a contract you need to disclose your employer - the person who is paying you; the client - whomever you are making edits on the behalf of; and any additional affiliations - kind of a catch-all for stuff like intermediaries or if you got work through some noticeboard or if you work for a company which was hired by a PR firm to do work for a third party. Sometimes employer and client may be the same.
Also, please remember to indent your posts this brief tutorial on editing talk pages shows you how. Please let me know if I can be of help. Jbh Talk 21:16, 6 October 2016 (UTC)
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article SilverBridge (company) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/SilverBridge (company) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Jbh Talk 19:49, 6 October 2016 (UTC)
![]() | This account has been
blocked indefinitely as a
sock puppet of
silverbridge (
talk ·
contribs ·
global contribs ·
page moves ·
user creation ·
block log) that was created to violate Wikipedia policy. Note that using multiple accounts is
allowed, but using them for
illegitimate reasons is not, and that all edits made while evading a block or ban
may be reverted or deleted. If this account is not a sock puppet, and you would like to be unblocked, you may
appeal this block by first reading the
guide to appealing blocks, then adding the text {{
unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below.
Jimfbleak (
talk)
06:09, 7 October 2016 (UTC) |
IwanP ( block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser ( log))
Request reason:
Your reason here I do not feel it is correct to block the account for sock puppetry as I made it clear from the start I was commissioned to upload the page on a commission basis. My additional edits were made to ensure the entry complies with Wikipedia requirements IwanP ( talk) 06:21, 7 October 2016 (UTC)
Decline reason:
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{ unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
|
Please read WP:PAID for Wikipedia's policies on paid editing. You must disclose the name of your employer ie the public relations firm as well as the name of the client (SilverBridge?). Thank you. Jbh Talk 19:35, 6 October 2016 (UTC)
{{paid|employer=Rubicomm|client=SilverBridge}}
and {{connected contributor (paid)|User1=IwanP|U1-employer=Rubicom|U1-client=SilverBridge}}
Please remember that each time you take a contract you need to disclose your employer - the person who is paying you; the client - whomever you are making edits on the behalf of; and any additional affiliations - kind of a catch-all for stuff like intermediaries or if you got work through some noticeboard or if you work for a company which was hired by a PR firm to do work for a third party. Sometimes employer and client may be the same.
Also, please remember to indent your posts this brief tutorial on editing talk pages shows you how. Please let me know if I can be of help. Jbh Talk 21:16, 6 October 2016 (UTC)
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article SilverBridge (company) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/SilverBridge (company) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Jbh Talk 19:49, 6 October 2016 (UTC)
![]() | This account has been
blocked indefinitely as a
sock puppet of
silverbridge (
talk ·
contribs ·
global contribs ·
page moves ·
user creation ·
block log) that was created to violate Wikipedia policy. Note that using multiple accounts is
allowed, but using them for
illegitimate reasons is not, and that all edits made while evading a block or ban
may be reverted or deleted. If this account is not a sock puppet, and you would like to be unblocked, you may
appeal this block by first reading the
guide to appealing blocks, then adding the text {{
unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below.
Jimfbleak (
talk)
06:09, 7 October 2016 (UTC) |
IwanP ( block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser ( log))
Request reason:
Your reason here I do not feel it is correct to block the account for sock puppetry as I made it clear from the start I was commissioned to upload the page on a commission basis. My additional edits were made to ensure the entry complies with Wikipedia requirements IwanP ( talk) 06:21, 7 October 2016 (UTC)
Decline reason:
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{ unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.