Talk is... cheaper than I am?
Nomination of Stewart Levenson for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Stewart Levenson is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Stewart Levenson (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Pam D 16:45, 17 January 2018 (UTC)
Hi, I have tag wrong on your comment on AfD and have revert on the page and your talk page. My apologies. CASSIOPEIA( talk) 22:22, 19 January 2018 (UTC)
You need to read and follow. Best Doc James ( talk · contribs · email) 04:51, 23 January 2018 (UTC)
 | This account has been
blocked indefinitely as a
sock puppet that was created to violate Wikipedia policy. Note that using multiple accounts is
allowed, but using them for
illegitimate reasons is not, and that all edits made while evading a block or ban
may be reverted or deleted. If this account is not a sock puppet, and you would like to be unblocked, you may
appeal this block by first reading the
guide to appealing blocks, then adding the text {{
unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below.
TonyBallioni (
talk)
12:50, 23 January 2018 (UTC) |
Talk is... cheaper than I am?
Nomination of Stewart Levenson for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Stewart Levenson is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Stewart Levenson (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Pam D 16:45, 17 January 2018 (UTC)
Hi, I have tag wrong on your comment on AfD and have revert on the page and your talk page. My apologies. CASSIOPEIA( talk) 22:22, 19 January 2018 (UTC)
You need to read and follow. Best Doc James ( talk · contribs · email) 04:51, 23 January 2018 (UTC)
|
| This account has been
blocked indefinitely as a
sock puppet that was created to violate Wikipedia policy. Note that using multiple accounts is
allowed, but using them for
illegitimate reasons is not, and that all edits made while evading a block or ban
may be reverted or deleted. If this account is not a sock puppet, and you would like to be unblocked, you may
appeal this block by first reading the
guide to appealing blocks, then adding the text {{
unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below.
TonyBallioni (
talk)
12:50, 23 January 2018 (UTC) |