This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Re the deletion nomination - he is playing his first pro game as I write - see ref given in article.-- Egghead06 ( talk) 13:47, 7 January 2012 (UTC)
Your comment is self-contradictory -
[1], and (edit) shoulld should probably be revised.
Dru of Id (
talk) 18:00, 8 January 2012 (UTC)
why is my page deleted inspite of the fact that i gave many references — Preceding unsigned comment added by Virinchi523 ( talk • contribs) 05:28, 9 January 2012 (UTC)
ok thankss for the reply can you help me on how to make this a wiki article?? — Preceding
unsigned comment added by
14.139.69.1 (
talk) 05:11, 10 January 2012 (UTC)
Many thanks for correcting my blunder. memphisto 21:59, 9 January 2012 (UTC)
Hey ItsZippy, just wanted to ask why you put that my new page, Moladah, needed additional citations. There are 4 primary sources and 3 secondary. Just like to know why. Thanks! JZCL ( talk) 18:06, 10 January 2012 (UTC)
Hi, I hope you had a pleasant holiday season and that all is well with you. Things have been going well on my end, I got a couple more "unconventional" religious leader articles up to Good Article status. The 2nd peer reviewer that I tried to line up for Prosperity Theology backed out, so if you still want to try for Featured article, feel free to nominate it at your leisure. I'll be right beside you, I'm trying to start reviewing more at FAC--it's quite an education! Mark Arsten ( talk) 07:11, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
Please explain your reasoning for the "primary sources" tag from Ohio high school mock trial because according to WP:PRIMARY, A primary source may only be used on Wikipedia to make straightforward, descriptive statements that any educated person, with access to the source but without specialist knowledge, will be able to verify are supported by the source. The statements on this page are based on the source listed, and any person could verify this by looking in the source, or even by going to a mock trial-- Jackstormson ( talk) 17:05, 16 January 2012 (UTC).
SarahStierch ( talk) 22:03, 19 January 2012 (UTC)
Why did you close this dispute resolution request? NimbusWeb ( talk) 22:03, 22 January 2012 (UTC) My point was that the whole 'musical structure' section was deleted. Soem of its referenced components were very simple information about key and chord structure which the guidelines require NimbusWeb ( talk) 22:57, 22 January 2012 (UTC)
In fact, by shutting down the dispute resolution discussion so rapidly what you did was make it less likely that a wider range of editors and hence a broader consensus could develop. So in effect you ensured the contentious consensus remained confined to the small group who were initially involved. How is this good, transparent governance? NimbusWeb ( talk) 02:04, 24 January 2012 (UTC)
Hi. When you recently edited Theodicy, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Benevolence ( check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 11:05, 23 January 2012 (UTC)
Hey ItsZippy, sorry for taking a while to get back to you. I've added you to the WikiAlerter approved users list. If you have any issues or questions please let me know. - Kingpin 13 ( talk) 16:53, 23 January 2012 (UTC)
hello ; i just created a new version of ndnkkr page kindly have a look and give me your suggestions iam having problems uploading the vidoes so could you kindly update me on that i have many more bideos /pics for verification will be posting them once the page is accepted kindly guide me further this is the link http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia_talk:Articles_for_creation/No_Dada_No_Kkr Virinchi523 ( talk) 16:26, 29 January 2012 (UTC)
This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Re the deletion nomination - he is playing his first pro game as I write - see ref given in article.-- Egghead06 ( talk) 13:47, 7 January 2012 (UTC)
Your comment is self-contradictory -
[1], and (edit) shoulld should probably be revised.
Dru of Id (
talk) 18:00, 8 January 2012 (UTC)
why is my page deleted inspite of the fact that i gave many references — Preceding unsigned comment added by Virinchi523 ( talk • contribs) 05:28, 9 January 2012 (UTC)
ok thankss for the reply can you help me on how to make this a wiki article?? — Preceding
unsigned comment added by
14.139.69.1 (
talk) 05:11, 10 January 2012 (UTC)
Many thanks for correcting my blunder. memphisto 21:59, 9 January 2012 (UTC)
Hey ItsZippy, just wanted to ask why you put that my new page, Moladah, needed additional citations. There are 4 primary sources and 3 secondary. Just like to know why. Thanks! JZCL ( talk) 18:06, 10 January 2012 (UTC)
Hi, I hope you had a pleasant holiday season and that all is well with you. Things have been going well on my end, I got a couple more "unconventional" religious leader articles up to Good Article status. The 2nd peer reviewer that I tried to line up for Prosperity Theology backed out, so if you still want to try for Featured article, feel free to nominate it at your leisure. I'll be right beside you, I'm trying to start reviewing more at FAC--it's quite an education! Mark Arsten ( talk) 07:11, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
Please explain your reasoning for the "primary sources" tag from Ohio high school mock trial because according to WP:PRIMARY, A primary source may only be used on Wikipedia to make straightforward, descriptive statements that any educated person, with access to the source but without specialist knowledge, will be able to verify are supported by the source. The statements on this page are based on the source listed, and any person could verify this by looking in the source, or even by going to a mock trial-- Jackstormson ( talk) 17:05, 16 January 2012 (UTC).
SarahStierch ( talk) 22:03, 19 January 2012 (UTC)
Why did you close this dispute resolution request? NimbusWeb ( talk) 22:03, 22 January 2012 (UTC) My point was that the whole 'musical structure' section was deleted. Soem of its referenced components were very simple information about key and chord structure which the guidelines require NimbusWeb ( talk) 22:57, 22 January 2012 (UTC)
In fact, by shutting down the dispute resolution discussion so rapidly what you did was make it less likely that a wider range of editors and hence a broader consensus could develop. So in effect you ensured the contentious consensus remained confined to the small group who were initially involved. How is this good, transparent governance? NimbusWeb ( talk) 02:04, 24 January 2012 (UTC)
Hi. When you recently edited Theodicy, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Benevolence ( check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 11:05, 23 January 2012 (UTC)
Hey ItsZippy, sorry for taking a while to get back to you. I've added you to the WikiAlerter approved users list. If you have any issues or questions please let me know. - Kingpin 13 ( talk) 16:53, 23 January 2012 (UTC)
hello ; i just created a new version of ndnkkr page kindly have a look and give me your suggestions iam having problems uploading the vidoes so could you kindly update me on that i have many more bideos /pics for verification will be posting them once the page is accepted kindly guide me further this is the link http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia_talk:Articles_for_creation/No_Dada_No_Kkr Virinchi523 ( talk) 16:26, 29 January 2012 (UTC)