This is Italia2006's talk page, where you can send him messages and comments. |
|
Hello, I noticed that you are rather new here (at least as a registered user). I further noticed that you have changed the infoboxes of various UEFA Champions League season articles to display a flag on the left side of the top goalscorer of the respective year. Well, Wikipedia is the encyclopedia everyone can edit, but nevertheless, there are guidelines which every user should follow.
One of these guidelines is WP:FLAG, which states that emphasizing the nationality of a person by using flags should be avoided. Another reason not to include these into infoboxes is the restricted space of the boxes. Adding a flag is, in this case, just a case of unnecessary decoration as it simply disrupts the accessibility of the information there. The final and perhaps most important reason is that it is general and wide-spread consensus not to include any flags for persons into the boxes, at least in articles under the auspices of WP:FOOTY (I don't know how other projects handle this).
So, it's basically not the reluctance against your contributions but rather the binding policies which led to the reversal of your edits. So, in a nutshell, I would like to ask you to remove the flags in order to avoid further conflicts. By the way, please note as well that content disputes should be settled by discussing, not by reverts and re-reverts of edits as the latter is not very well-liked here and could possibly lead to a block (see also WP:3RR). Have a nice day, Soccer-holic I hear voices in my head... 14:38, 17 April 2010 (UTC)
Is there a way we can put the club emblem of the top scorer in the info boxes? I think that is appropriate. PatoMilan
Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. When you make a change to an article, please provide an edit summary, which you forgot to do before saving your recent edit to Francesco Totti. Doing so helps everyone to understand the intention of your edit. It is also helpful to users reading the edit history of the page. Thank you. I dream of horses If you reply here, please leave me a {{ Talkback}} message on my talk page. @ 02:15, 30 April 2010 (UTC)
While Lukas Podolski, Thomas Müller, and Cacau play as strikers or wingers for their clubs, and usually for their country as well, the current official DFB squad list (found here) lists all three as midfielders and they should therefore also be listed as such on our squad list. Sir Sputnik ( talk) 21:52, 1 September 2010 (UTC)
Welcome to Wikipedia and thank you for your contributions. However, I noticed that your username (PatoMilan) may not meet Wikipedia's username policy because it is a violation of username policy as a misleading username. Impersanating Alexandre Pato (Pato) who plays for A.C. Milan (Milan). If you believe that your username does not violate our policy, please leave a note here explaining why. As an alternative, you may ask for a change of username, or you may simply create a new account to use for editing. Thank you. Avenue X at Cicero ( talk) 14:50, 14 August 2011 (UTC)
This discussion has been closed. Please do not modify it. |
---|
The following discussion has been closed. Please do not modify it. |
Okay, so just follow the instructions here:
Regards. Avenue X at Cicero ( talk) 16:34, 14 August 2011 (UTC)
|
I suggest you usurp Italia2006 as your username, not Italia2006@23&12. Avenue X at Cicero ( talk) 06:11, 15 August 2011 (UTC)
Hello. Here is the original discussion that was had with respect to the club names for use on the Ronaldo article. If you look through the archives of WT:FOOTY you will see that the issue has come up many, many times without any kind of project-wide consensus being reached. I would love for the issue to be settled once and for all but it needs to be a project-wide consensus. The fact that many/most articles use "Internazionale" and "Milan" is interesting but does not prove a consensus has been reached (in fact if you look through the histories of various articles you'll see that starting about three or four years ago several editors began a program of changing these club names and while discussions ensued no overall consensus was reached and those editors continued to make the changes) it just demonstrates that those articles have been changed. Personally I feel that since this is an English language encyclopedia and a general one at that (i.e., not a football encyclopedia) that we should use the names that are most used in the English press which are, by far, "Inter Milan" and "AC Milan". But again, I would love a consensus to be reached and for WP:FOOTY to make it "official". SQGibbon ( talk) 05:51, 28 August 2011 (UTC)
I want to edit all the archive of 2002 FIFA World Cup qualification and 2006 FIFA World Cup qualification to this format:
2006 FIFA World Cup qualification – CAF Second Round#Group 2
Please help me to that.
Thanks! Banhtrung1 ( talk) 13:45, 1 September 2011 (UTC)
Although I do not believe neither policy nor universal consensus exists regarding the explicit display of player names, the vast majority of club season articles, especially the major ones, utilize a player's last name or common name in instances where only one name is displayed, such as match displays. The notable exception is FC Barcelona. But the issued was addressed at length on its talk page and further addressed at greater length at Wikipedia's dispute resolution, which I have copied below for your convenience, with the mediation favoring the use of common/family names over jersey names on grounds of consistency within a project and clarity.
Your cross-season consistency argument was mentioned in the Barcelona case, with an implying conclusion that although multi-season consistency is good, it does not have more weight over consistency across a project, in this case WikiProject Football, in instances where contradiction occurs. Furthermore, the argument for cross-season consistency is baseless if the initial format used was less-favored, which appeared to be the case for Barcelona and this current issue. As a result, I strongly recommend adhering to the current popular project usage of common/family names by keeping "Diarra" for this season's page and changing "Lass" to "L. Diarra" on the previous seasons' pages. Bobby ( talk) 04:27, 3 October 2011 (UTC)
Discussion stalled. — TransporterMan ( TALK) 02:20, 21 August 2011 (UTC) |
Closed discussion |
---|
Cards make it difficult to read those articles and in an accessible manner find out when the goals have been scored. And with all due respect, cards can change games, but are not part of the end result unless one team goes down to six players, resulting in a forfeited match. With regards to Italian matches, I follow a simple template, where I just type in round, teams, goals and result, all in all to save editing time, since I've done Calcio research on a massive scale (from 1984 onwards). Regards//J Roslagen ( talk) 20:12, 8 October 2011 (UTC)
I'm going to go ahead and transliterate the five regional football federations in Spain ( list) without an enWiki counterpart. Football federation pages are always titled in English and the English names of these federations are listed here so redlinks should go to a page like Country Basque Football Federation instead of es:Federación Vasca de Fútbol. Bobby ( talk) 07:11, 28 October 2011 (UTC)
I noticed that you helped work on the 2010–11 SV Werder Bremen season article. Would you be able to help with 2011–12 SV Werder Bremen season article? Kingjeff ( talk) 01:27, 20 December 2011 (UTC)
Please be sure to provide edit summaries when editing article. Thanks and keep up with the good work! ;) Luxic ( talk) 17:54, 21 December 2011 (UTC)
The reason I used "quarterfinal" was simply because that was what the Copa del Rey main page used. MOS:HYPHEN doesn't provide an explicit example for this case (although I didn't look through these), but the second use case implies this is a US v British English preference. Since the Copa del Rey is a Spanish tournament, either spelling would satisfy the MOS. However note that RFEF usage in Spanish uses no hyphens, implying to me the direct translation is unhyphenated. Recent Copa del Rey articles have also omitted hyphens so for now I reverted the edits to match the main page. If you decide to add hyphens in all CDR articles, make sure to also modify Template:Fb round2 2011-12 Copa del Rey QF and parallel ones for previous seasons/rounds. Thanks! Bobby ( talk) 06:18, 20 January 2012 (UTC)
Hey
Thanks for helping me out. Would you please also edit the time above the article (in CET)when you edit the table.
Hey About Cisse: Goals only count for the first club they played for. If they transfer to a new club, new goals won't be added up to their clubs from old club.
Here is official list of golden shoe: http://www.eurotopfoot.com/gb/soulierdor.php3
That's why Aleksandrs Čekulajevs still has 46 goals, he went to new club in winter transfer window, but again this goals for his new club won't be added up at the ones scored for his previous club.
Matthi1603 (
talk) 17:31, 12 March 2012 (UTC)
Hi I reverted your edits to 2011–12 Real Madrid C.F. season regarding the a.e.t. display. Note that Template:Football_box_collapsible (the one used on the page) and Template:Football box are similar but separate templates. If you feel the football box a.e.t. display is better, please edit it on the Template:football box collapsible page for changes to be consistent across Wikipedia. Thanks. Bobby ( talk) 21:50, 26 April 2012 (UTC)
there is important discussion about messi's page at [ footbal]
the discussion about :
1-adding back the assists which have been removed ( and i think its really important ) especially most notable players have it and even less known player than messi have this statistics which is important for any striker .(remember the debate about messi vs ronalod have lots about messi makes more assists than ronaldo )
2-adding back the youth and under -23 goals because they are different statistics from senior one and u cant merge them together . since fifa themself separate them differently .
3-about the table of messi goals and if its important info or just long statistics(useless one).
Thank you all . adnan talk 12 pm 16 october 2012 (UTC)
Then why in every UEFA Champions League season article is Inter Milan "Internazionale" and A.C. Milan "Milan". Wikipedia should use the names for Italian clubs that are most often used in Italy. I can tell you that no one calls Internazionale "Inter Milan", for which reason no one calls Milan "A.C. Milan". It's Internazionale, and Milan. I don't see what the discussion is about. Italia2006 (talk) 13:08, 28 August 2011 (UTC)
So if you feel like Internazionale and Milan should be represented as they are in Italy across Wikipedia, why on earth do you feel the need to change team names for countries in regards to how the team is called, that you obviously are not clear on? subzzee ( talk) 22:49, 5 September 2012 (UTC)
I go by the names in UEFA Champions League articles which should be the standard for this site. Olympique Lyonnais is LYON. A.C. Milan is MILAN. Hamburger SV is HAMBURG. You make it sound like I ruin "your" articles by a simple name change? You're the one who refuses to follow the standard on this site. Italia2006 ( talk) 03:13, 6 September 2012 (UTC)
Wrong, there is no agreed upon standard for any team name on this site. How the team names are represented on the Champions League articles therefore is not necessarily correct either. Easiest solution therefore is to actually go by the teams name. The actual name the team goes by. As you correctly stated in the argument you posted above. Maybe one day there will be an agreed upon standard, but for now there isn't, so since you are not the author of the articles that I have published on Wikipedia, I would appreciate if you respect the fact that I would like to call a team by it's name, and not refer to it by it's geographical location, or some kinf of nick name. Thanks subzzee ( talk) 03:20, 6 September 2012 (UTC)
Well I guess we're gonna have to agree to disagree, but I can assure you in this regard your articles are one of a kind. No other page on this site calls Olympique Lyonnais by its full name. Even the season articles for Lyon use "Lyon" not "Olympique Lyonnais." And Lyon is by no means a nickname or an unofficial name. Italia2006 ( talk) 03:27, 6 September 2012 (UTC)
There are many errors on the Olympique Lyonnais season articles, in regards to how the teams are called, such as Hanover for Hannover 96, or simply Salzburg for Red Bull Salzburg (SV Austria Salzburg is the city's other club), so I would rather not imitate mistakes, but rather call a team by it's name, and not make up a new name for it. Thanks for the exchange, you can delete this convo now, unless you still have something to add, we can continue this argument on my talk page, but I am not going to write a book on yours. Cheers. subzzee ( talk) 03:37, 6 September 2012 (UTC)
Why you reverse my edit on CL standings on this page? Stigni ( talk) 18:56, 2 October 2012 (UTC)
Some other user said that my template is ok, and I change only Man Uni because the existing table and my template is the same, so I try to copy the ManUni in the Arsenal page and change that too in the hope that you do not reverse and edit that not modify anything in the layout.-- Stigni ( talk) 05:49, 6 October 2012 (UTC)
The Community Shield is no longer considered a competitive competition as of this season. It's been moved to pre season friendly status. Please don't change competitive goal totals anymore. A prime example of this is the fact that Branislav Ivanovic was given a red card in the match but wasn't held out of any of the regular season matches.
It's okay to have one line at the top and none below it. Kingjeff ( talk) 17:07, 3 October 2012 (UTC)
That's WP:OWN. Kingjeff ( talk) 17:21, 3 October 2012 (UTC)
You don't need to "write it from scratch." You go back to a previous edition of the article and copy the templates you want and paste it in the relevant section. Kingjeff ( talk) 17:49, 3 October 2012 (UTC)
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. Thank you. Stigni ( talk) 06:19, 7 October 2012 (UTC)
Why do you keep on insisting on having all those lines? Also, there is a template that has the group standings. There is no need to put a table in the article since there is a template with the table. The whole purpose of the template is so that the table can be changed in one place which would show up in multiple articles all at the same time. Kingjeff ( talk) 05:34, 24 October 2012 (UTC)
I am quoted above in another discussion on your talk page as saying "the reason is the matches were not up to date. I find it bothersome to put in information for opposing teams in." This clearly explains why I changed it on 2012–13 FC Schalke 04 season. I have barely been on that page at all since that discussion and it looks like you haven't been on it either. From the previous discussion, it sounds like you have taken on too many club season articles. So, you, as an editor on Wikipedia, have a choice of either editing the 2012–13 FC Schalke 04 season or not editing this article. I haven't done anything to prevent you from doing so. So, instead of turning this into an edit war, how about constructively discussing the issues and come to a consensus. Kingjeff ( talk) 02:19, 25 October 2012 (UTC)
Unfortunately there are too many club season articles for one person to enforce a strict code of how a club season article should look. Anyways, one person should not be determining it as you are trying to do. However, you do have the freedom to help build consensus on issues that you feel that need to be dealt with. Kingjeff ( talk) 05:36, 25 October 2012 (UTC)
Did you note that it's not using the template?? please, view the code, you are reverting without note the code I introduced. - tot-futbol ( talk) 23:27, 29 October 2012 (UTC)
What is the style guide for make these changes that you insist in doing it? Are you following any style guide for changing name of Betis to Real Betis, and some players only with the surname, which can make confusions, it's explicit its name for some reason. If you don't know what are the shortened names for some teams and players, please do not change it. I am agree with constructive edits, but not for applying hardly rigorous changes, imposing personal criteria and the worst: changing without knowledge about someone is editing. I am Spaniard and I hear everyday how is named some players and teams in the shortened form, I am 200km out of Valencia, and you? Please, do not insist to make changes imposing your personal point of view. Be respectable with the work of others and the consensus accepted between the rest of editors. - tot-futbol ( talk) 00:23, 24 November 2012 (UTC)
What exactly are you taking issue with? Kingjeff ( talk) 21:02, 28 November 2012 (UTC)
We don't need a link to the Borussia Dortmund article 40 or 50 times throughout the article. I don't understand why such a small thing like "Fixtures and results" = Matches is such a big deal. The "group standings", "group table summary" and all these divisions is for good article structure. You're making out that I made these big huge changes to the article. Most of the stuff I did was just a reorganization. You shouldn't cluster a table, which you must edit under your structure, and match templates together. Kingjeff ( talk) 21:17, 28 November 2012 (UTC)
Just because you've work on Borussia Dortmund's season article three years running now doesn't mean it isn't broken. Kingjeff ( talk) 21:36, 28 November 2012 (UTC)
There have been other editors that have disagreed with you. Kingjeff ( talk) 21:45, 28 November 2012 (UTC)
FYI, these articles were moved based on a RM discussion [ [1]]. Personally I don't care what type of dash there is in the title but do note that my brain spun out of shape moving about a 100 such articles. I suggest that you don't move them without getting some sort of consensus. -- regentspark ( comment) 01:53, 22 February 2013 (UTC)
Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to 2012–13 Atlético Madrid season may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "{}"s. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page. Thanks, BracketBot ( talk) 17:24, 9 May 2013 (UTC)
I would like to know your view about the necessity of assists tables in league articles here: Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Football#Assists_in_season_article. -- Bogu Slav 15:24, 26 May 2013 (UTC)
Template:2012–13 UEFA Champions League group B standings has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Kingjeff ( talk) 01:40, 2 June 2013 (UTC)
Why leave the fatuous and unhistorical Dominion flags on the battle pages you've been amending? What we need is a template which takes the reader to a British Empire page treating the UK and the rest of the entity as the same thing, with varying geography but all subject to Whitehall. What we get now are vanity icons as if Canada et al. were sovereign states, not that I'm bitter mind.;O) Keith-264 ( talk) 17:46, 27 June 2013 (UTC)
Hi there ITALIA, AL from Portugal here,
please, the club name here at WP has been changed to INTER MILAN (it used to be F.C. INTERNAZIONALE MILANO), that's how he should go now. Please let's reach a compromise.
Happy weekend - -- AL ( talk) 16:47, 12 July 2013 (UTC)
No comments? Fair enough. -- AL ( talk) 14:53, 15 July 2013 (UTC)
Not completely true, at least as far as oldies go, and you heard the administrator, but that's OK, i won't edit war. -- AL ( talk) 19:24, 15 July 2013 (UTC)
Hello, I'm Mattythewhite. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Tottenham Hotspur F.C., but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Mattythewhite ( talk) 15:58, 1 August 2013 (UTC)
Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to 2013–14 Real Madrid C.F. season may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "{}"s. If you have, don't worry, just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.
Thanks, BracketBot ( talk) 12:38, 30 August 2013 (UTC)
Hi there ITALIA, AL "here",
here on English WP, we use INTER MILAN, not INTERNAZIONALE. But i give up, it's a lost battle, you told me last month it was a consensus and it is not, an administrator told me we use INTER MILAN here.
I repeat i give up, i want peace and not edit wars. Do as you want, happy day and weekend -- AL ( talk) 04:23, 17 August 2013 (UTC)
About the administrator bit, i referred to him because they are supposed to be above all reasonable doubt. And you're wrong again with all due respect, administrators are also users, so they can (and do) edit articles.
Happy Saturday -- AL ( talk) 17:43, 17 August 2013 (UTC)
See my friend? I was not making up, what's your reply to this please? -- AL ( talk) 16:46, 20 August 2013 (UTC)
Hi - I see that you reverted my move of the article with no explanation. I'm happy to leave it there for now to see how things pan out in the British media and have added a comment to that effect on the article's talk page. Best wishes. -- Daemonic Kangaroo ( talk) 06:27, 21 August 2013 (UTC)
Thanks for replying, even though not in my page. I apologize for the "I give up, top class these two guys!" sentence, but i was feeling very frustrated for not getting a reply, sorry for any inconvenience. I also feel it's worth noting i only started summarily reverting you after the administrator told me (and you) INTER MILAN was the name we should go by in this particular Wikipedia. I am going to start a WP:FOOTY discussion just to get many more inputs.
On a related note, you seem to have summarily removed my last message to you, thus indicating some very negative feeling towards me. Rather than that "top class these two guys" comment for which i have already apologized, is there anything else you feel i should apologize for? I will immediately do so if i see you have a point, no problem, i hate it when misunderstandings end like this, with people ceasing all communications with me even though i apologize sincerely (i'm only human, and in no way the boss of WP).
Cheers -- AL ( talk) 17:19, 27 August 2013 (UTC)
Few opinions but that's not my fault. Those (few) opinions, however, seem to "illustrate" that it's OK to write INTERNAZIONALE even though the article has another name. I will abide by from now on and write INTERNAZIONALE as well, a Portuguese promise. Kind regards, sorry for the trouble i put you through and happy work -- AL ( talk) 20:33, 27 August 2013 (UTC)
Hi. I edit the Real Madrid season page, and a current large-scale discussion regarding the deletion of the assists section is undergoing at Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Football#Assists. Can you please comment on that page? Thanks.
Hi.
Just wanted to know why you keep removing the template inserted for these tables. Me and another user add these tables because they are the same as in the original articles that these sections refer to and the also look better with the borders. Please discuss this instead of reverting and come up with a good argument to use your table or your edits will be considered as disruptive.
Related articles:
As I said please discuss this on one of the talkpages (I will open discussion on one of them shortly) or your reverts will be considered disruptive. QED237 (talk) 20:06, 19 September 2013 (UTC)
Hi there ITALIA06, AL "here",
can we please reach a compromise in this player's article? Earlier into this year we had a bit of a "wiki-misunderstanding" on the name we should use on INTER MILAN players and, even though i don't agree, i have complied, and use INTERNAZIONALE nowadays.
Could you do the same for me in this case? It's just a case of box compression, in there we don't need the "da" or the "do" or the "de", and full name appears in storyline anyway.
Attentively -- AL ( talk) 17:28, 14 November 2013 (UTC)
Likewise. -- AL ( talk) 21:37, 14 November 2013 (UTC)
What exactly is the problem with using nobars? Lots of pages use it and it is much more aesthetic. I can't find anything on the official pages that says they are not allowed. Cheers. Vanguard Scot 14:38, 14 December 2013 (UTC)
Where exactly are you sourcing these changes to the club trigrams in UEFA club competition articles from? – Pee Jay 03:54, 15 December 2013 (UTC)
Hello, the layout you are removing is encouraged at Wikipedia:WikiProject Football/Players#Career statistics, which is the community-decided player MoS. Your argument appears to be based on WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS; but just because a number of articles adhere to a certain standard doesn't mean they are correct to do so. Mattythewhite ( talk) 00:29, 22 January 2014 (UTC)
Hi mate. As I understand it, the rules of the FA Cup (see here) state that the round before the Final (with a capital F) is referred to as the Semi-Finals (both S and F capitalised). I assume the issue here is a stylistic one; do we go along with the "official" terminology or attempt to correct a perceived grammatical error? – Pee Jay 18:57, 22 January 2014 (UTC)
Hi there ITALIA, AL "here",
indeed, my summary was as confusing as they get! What i meant is you either pipe all the clubs in storyline or none, not just some. Sorry for any inconvenience, i have the utmost respect for your work.
Happy writings -- AL ( talk) 04:04, 1 February 2014 (UTC)
That's what happens when you drink one beer too many (meaning ME, was partying a bit tonight after my edits in Postiga and others), i did not read your message thoroughly, hence missed the bit about someone else editing with your account. Still, offer my apologies to your relative, he would not have reacted like he did if my summary was 100% correct, which it was not (i mean it was not insulting, but it was quite confusing and open to interpretation). Best regards -- AL ( talk) 06:07, 1 February 2014 (UTC)
Hi. I just wanted to let you know that all football players are listed by their FIFA nationality and that is the national team they last played for. Diego Costa did last play for brazil and is therefore considered brazilian which is also the case at his article Diego Costa. It has been mentioned shortly on his talkpage. Please do not change nationality to Spain. Thank you. QED237 (talk) 10:54, 2 February 2014 (UTC)
About your run-in with User:Gringoladomenega, the following opinions: 1 - i agree with you in the Diego Ribas da Cunha bit, his footballing name is "Diego" not "Diego Ribas" (if i understood correctly what you tell me he's doing there); 2 - i don't agree with you in the Diego Costa situation, his intro has to read "...is a BRAZILIAN footballer..." or "...is a footballer...", it will only read "...is a Spanish footballer..." when he makes (if) debut for Spain OK? And we should not ever write "...is a Brazilian-Spanish footballer...", intros must be kept simple, and the nationality of the player should be that of last country represented.
I will say the exact same thing in Gringo's page. Cheers -- AL ( talk) 18:22, 2 February 2014 (UTC)
Hi Italia2006,
Please dont remove the middle names in the squad. The reason for this is that the source includes the middle names of some players that is why it should be included. Also the same reason why Kaka is considered as a forward (though he is a an attacking midfielder). Thanks!
RRD13 (
talk) 17:17, 10 February 2014 (UTC)
I am actually not the main editor for the article. I think you need to stop insisting on having club season articles done by your way only. Especially since pre–season for Austrian clubs started last June and you only made your first edits a few days ago and also the fact that Wikipedia is based on consensus building. The only need right now for the article is a few more sources for the prose. Kingjeff ( talk) 19:49, 24 February 2014 (UTC)
Spain:
2013–14 Real Madrid C.F. season
2013–14 FC Barcelona season
2013–14 Atlético Madrid season
Italy:
2013–14 Juventus F.C. season
2013–14 A.S. Roma season
2013–14 ACF Fiorentina season
2013–14 A.C. Milan season
2013–14 S.S.C. Napoli season
2013–14 F.C. Internazionale Milano season
France:
2013–14 Paris Saint-Germain F.C. season
2013–14 AS Monaco FC season
2013–14 Lille OSC season
England:
2013–14 Chelsea F.C. season
2013–14 Arsenal F.C. season
2013–14 Manchester City F.C. season
2013–14 Liverpool F.C. season
Tell me my friend, what do you notice? Who's going by the consensus, me or you?
Italia2006 (
talk) 02:23, 26 February 2014 (UTC)
I am replied to you because he came to me with your comment. I have actually gone by consensus before. I actually went by consensus in this season's Bayern Munich season article. So, he used commas. I wouldn't say that it is incorrect. There is nothing wrong with what other articles use. I don't use a "competition" and not likely to ever use it. Out of all those articles that you listed above, how many of them will get featured article status under their current format? Bayern Munich's current season article has a better chance of getting featured article status under it's current format than any of those articles that you mentioned. You stated to User:Werner100359 "Please stop editing this article or at least ask for help." You have a lot of nerve to tell another user to stop editing and you in noway helped him improve the way he edits. Kingjeff ( talk) 05:15, 27 February 2014 (UTC)
"No one cares what you like or don't like. Your articles will be gradually converted to the proper model. Honestly, stop." Consensus means that everyone's opinion counts. What is proper model? Users who edit Manchester United club season articles might disagree with you on what "proper model" model is. Kingjeff ( talk) 03:05, 2 March 2014 (UTC)
I was a bit of a talk page stalker on User talk:CYl7EPTEMA777, due to me recently interacting with them, and noticed that you had asked User:CYl7EPTEMA777 to revert the move they had made that resulted in Template:Andromeda Galaxy moving to Template:Andromeda galaxy. Unfortunately, this editor has been blocked for disruptive editing and other reasons. However, I went ahead and posted on your request to revert the move at Wikipedia:Requested moves/Technical requests#Requests to revert undiscussed moves. Hopefully this resolves the issue, provided an administrator agrees with reverting the move. Steel1943 ( talk) 03:12, 10 March 2014 (UTC)
I saw your tidy-up and wondered if you would nominate a Great War infobox which is the most accurate so that I could copy from it? When I go round completing pages which are short of B1 and B2, I'm apt to overlook the box or only add items that I'm sure about. Keith-264 ( talk) 07:55, 18 March 2014 (UTC)
I've undone your bold move of the American Expeditionary Forces article as it seems the move was undiscused and an objection has been raised on the talk page, so per WP:BRD please join the discussion there to seek consensus. Vsmith ( talk) 02:25, 19 March 2014 (UTC)
Wikipedia:Good article reassessment/Atlético Madrid/1
Atlético Madrid, an article which you may be interested in, is currently under a Good Article Review. You may want to leave a comment on the link provided. Thank you. '''tAD''' ( talk) 19:08, 22 March 2014 (UTC)
Hi there ITA, AL "here",
i tried to present my arguments: we read the storyline and the infobox and we know he played all those years for Deportivo de La Coruña, so when we reach the chart below "Deportivo" suffices 100% for ANY reader (not just those familiar with football). You reverted me fair enough, can't be bothered all that much anymore and, after 12 JULY 2014, can't be bothered at all, will leave WP for good.
Happy editing -- AL ( talk) 05:34, 3 April 2014 (UTC)
No offense there man (too strong a word, in this case i mean!). I know, consistency is good, but that is what i was trying to get accross, we say "Deportivo LC" in box, "Deportivo LC" in storyline, if we say "Deportivo" only in the stats chart would people be confused? I know i would not, even if i knew NOTHING about football and read article for the first time!
Your question: am leaving because i have been here for eight years now, and am not having fun anymore, am doing this almost like a job. Am sick and tired of the lousy vandals destroying all of our hard work, and plus can't seem to follow most of the guidelines.
Cheers -- AL ( talk) 15:27, 3 April 2014 (UTC)
Hi, there is no need to change the links, as per [ guidelines for redirects] it has few if any benefits but can have some drawbacks. DuncanHill ( talk) 21:25, 22 April 2014 (UTC)
Please do not use styles that are unusual, inappropriate or difficult to understand in articles, as you did in Raheem Sterling. There is a Manual of Style, and edits should not deliberately go against it without special reason. Per Wikipedia:WikiProject Football/Players#Career statistics. Mattythewhite ( talk) 17:30, 25 April 2014 (UTC)
1991–92 Arsenal F.C. season, 1996–97 Arsenal F.C. season, 1997–98 Arsenal F.C. season, 1998–99 Arsenal F.C. season, 1999–2000 Arsenal F.C. season, 2000–01 Arsenal F.C. season, 2001–02 Arsenal F.C. season, 2002–03 Arsenal F.C. season, 2005–06 Arsenal F.C. season...........
What's your point? Lemonade51 ( talk) 20:58, 30 May 2014 (UTC)
Do you think this article should be renamed to João Nunes (footballer, born 1995)? Fixed4u ( talk) 20:18, 15 July 2014 (UTC)
There is also Carlos Jorge Neto Martins... 20:21, 15 July 2014 (UTC)
And Petit (Portuguese footballer)... Fixed4u ( talk) 20:36, 15 July 2014 (UTC)
As far as we're concerned, rows should not be merged according to the MOS at WP:FOOTY. I do not agree with everything in Wikipedia but if there is consensus on anything, it stays that way. If you think that should be changed, you should gather consensus at WP:FOOTY. Otherwise, follow the agreed consensus. LRD NO ( talk) 14:50, 1 August 2014 (UTC)
Hi, although it is good to include many editor in the discussion you should no go around inviting editors that only supports your cause as you did at user talk:Usman afif. WP:CAN is a page you might be interested in reading. When inviting people please keep a neutral tone and not your personal opinion. Thank you. QED237 (talk) 17:45, 21 August 2014 (UTC)
I understand that when two people belong in the same gens but in a different cognomen (branch) of the gens, they can be very distant relatives. Still, I would like to ask what -if anything- can Ancient Roman genealogy tell us about the exact relation between Crassus and Lucullus.-- 2A02:580:A39A:6D00:4D12:DC12:E9DA:35AD ( talk) 21:42, 8 September 2014 (UTC)
Winter operations 1914–15 You might be interested in developments here since you've edited the page. Keith-264 ( talk) 22:03, 7 November 2014 (UTC)
The term Deutsches Reich (German Empire/Realm) was the official name of Germany until 1943. So, no, we don't always use German Empire where the official name of Germany in German translates that way. Also, the official name of Austrai-Hungary was "Austro-Hungarian Monarchy". Not to mention the official names of the Allies... What other infoboxes do is their business, but let's try to be consistent within this one. Srnec ( talk) 01:38, 24 February 2015 (UTC)
Technically, those list should not have bold text either. I'm just reluctant to do so because I always get into an edit war with others like you when I try to change them.
According to WP:Accessibility it says, "By default, most screen readers do not indicate presentational text attributes (bold, italic, underline) or even semantic text attributes (emphasis, importance, text deletion), so struck-out text is read normally along with any other text." In other words, it will when a blind person is having the article dictated to him or her via a screen reader, it confuse the reader of how the list is read with no indication of the winner.
If you want to change something, change the bold lettering to daggers in every ceremony.
Reverting vandalism? Are you kidding me? If something is produced from 1974 to 1991, you don't need to put 1974–1991. The proper format is 1974–91. Italia2006 ( talk) 19:00, 3 April 2015 (UTC)
You have been invited to the discussion on versions of Template:History of Iran. There are two versions. The current one and this one. Please share your opinion on which version you like/support more. We need users' opinion for consensus. Thank you. -- Ulugh Arslan Bilge Khan 18:30, 05 June 2015 (UTC)
I just saw you removed the kit colors from 2015–16 F.C. Internazionale Milano season any reason for this ? :) thank you Adnan ( talk) 08:16, 25 June 2015 (UTC)
And related to that article, you added links back to China. WP:OVERLINK argues against that as it's "major geographic ... location". And as for piping Inter Milan, a move discussion was just closed on the article's talk page stating that Inter Milan is the WP:COMMONNAME and no move to F.C. Internazionale Milano or any variant should be made. So in respect of that discussion and decision, I don't think we should be piping the name like this:[[Inter Milan|Internazionale]] as it seems to be trying to get around that decision. That was actually suggested in the move discussion. Finally, I have requested that the season article be moved as well. 208.81.212.222 ( talk) 02:17, 14 July 2015 (UTC)
I can't explain it either, mate. Unfortunately the rest of Wikipedia isn't as enlightened as you and I. – Pee Jay 19:30, 16 July 2015 (UTC)
Talk:2014–15 Inter Milan season. Please offer your comments. 208.81.212.222 ( talk) 22:14, 16 July 2015 (UTC)
I really understand my friend , I already feel the same myself! he isn't even really improving the article he thinks he can act as a monitor for other editors work, which really is a bothersome act,I can't really understand this IP actions and why he is really obsessed with just changing the name I have no Idea and I am not interested in working under someone supervision as if he is my boss or something it is just silly . I am sure he will in few weeks stop even bothering to check this article which makes the thing even worse .I just don't like also WP:COMMONSENSE as an answer when you ask about why did you revert/moved or edited my contribution. I really hear you man Adnan ( talk) 04:53, 17 July 2015 (UTC)
Hi, the name of the Stadio Olimpico Di Torino page is a translation error. If you look at the actual stadium name on any source, it is known as the "Stadio Olimpico".
"Di Torino" is not part of the actual name means literally "of Turin", hence the title of the page should be "Stadio Olimpico (Turin)" to differentiate it from the more well-known Stadio Olimpico in Rome. I have tried changing it but get an error message. Danieletorino2 ( talk) 06:03, 30 July 2015 (UTC)
May I ask how that is vandalism. The stadium is shown like that along with the city in all europa league and champions league articles. Not vandalism. Vaselineeeeeeee ( talk) 01:09, 29 August 2015 (UTC)
Why do you not put stack yes for the last one? Vaselineeeeeeee ( talk) 01:21, 29 August 2015 (UTC)
Ah, so that is the one page you update and it gets sent and updated to the Serie A season article automatically, correct? Does that go with club season articles too? Vaselineeeeeeee ( talk) 01:48, 29 August 2015 (UTC)
Designs can be found at Template:Football kit/pattern list and colours can be found at Web colors. Giant Snowman 20:50, 23 September 2015 (UTC)
@ GiantSnowman: Thank you so much. This is extremely helpful, I can't even begin to tell you. Italia2006 ( talk) 21:15, 23 September 2015 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current
Arbitration Committee election. The
Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia
arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose
site bans,
topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The
arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to
review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on
the voting page. For the Election committee,
MediaWiki message delivery (
talk) 14:11, 24 November 2015 (UTC)
Please improve Coppa Italia on English Wikipedia, the older seasons. Thank you very much.-- Alexiulian25 ( talk) 21:13, 29 November 2015 (UTC)
Use rsssf.com, the Italian Wikipedia use this source, and after the Italian FF finish the website, just verify if the results are same. I do same for my country, I also do other countries, I would help you, but if you say you can do it, I will read, thank you my friend.-- Alexiulian25 ( talk) 22:10, 29 November 2015 (UTC)
Hi there, Are the own goal sections in the goalscorer categories used to tally the goals the club scored on themselves or tally the own goals scored for the club? For example for Juve, there were two goals scored for us in Serie A, but Juve scored on themselves twice, once in Serie A, once in CL. There's an IP telling me it's the goals non-Juve players scored an own goal for Juve. Hope that wasn't too confusing, thanks! Vaselineeeeeeee ( talk) 14:59, 20 December 2015 (UTC)
Seeing the page history,you revert other user's edit rather than the "vandalism" user,then I look through the later page history and I your edit to repair those edit.-
Hi there, I appreciate your thanks. However, I think you may be mistaken in regards to other club articles. Maybe you are going off of the other Italian clubs articles, which I know most do not have the template... But if you look at 2010–11 Real Madrid C.F. season, 2007–08 FC Barcelona season, 2015–16 Manchester City F.C. season, 2015–16 FC Bayern Munich season, basically all Spanish and English clubs, etc. The seasons articles are obviously heavily about the club, which warrants the football club template. To keep with consistency of other football related club seasons, it should also be included for Italian articles. I only did Juventus and Lazio, as I'm sure you've noticed, I only really edit their pages, but I could help with the rest if needed. I'm going to go ahead and add them back... If you want to start a discussion on WikiFootball, go ahead, but for now, I just think they were always forgotten on Italian season articles. Thanks. Vaselineeeeeeee ( talk) 14:39, 16 January 2016 (UTC)
Now we talk, and when everyone gets bored with that someone will propose a course of action and everyone in favor will say something, and we can then move forward. TomStar81 ( Talk) 05:05, 27 January 2016 (UTC)
@ TomStar81: yeah nevermind, Peacemaker has decided everything for himself. And ignored a very polite and simple question, as well. So much for due process on this site. Italia2006 ( talk) 05:06, 27 January 2016 (UTC)
You might have noticed that a user insists on adding an image of the Lazio squad to the season article. I've removed it a few times and told the user that images are not usually used in season articles. He's said that that's a fallacy and would still help the article... Even though it is for consistency purposes. Do you think we should keep the image, or revert it and take higher action if the user persists? Thanks. Regards, Vaselineeeeeeee ( talk) 17:04, 7 February 2016 (UTC)
Hey Italia2006, can I ask that you reduce the amount of commenting that you are posting on the RfC? It can lead to "bludgeoning" of the RfC. I don't say this to "whack you over the head" or anything, only to let you be aware of it. It also helps to have "outside" commentary confirming the results rather than "involved" commentary. Anyway, just try to slow down on the comments and let the RfC run 'naturally'. Cheers, Doctor Crazy in Room 102 of The Mental Asylum 23:46, 7 February 2016 (UTC)
Hi, I am wondering if you could have a look at Fallschirm-Panzer Division 1 Hermann Göring. Two IP editors restored dubious and POV information uncited from 2013. Please see diffs: IP editor 1 and IP editor 2.
I also left an note on the Talk page: Problematic content. K.e.coffman ( talk) 00:01, 12 March 2016 (UTC)
A tiny punctuation correction you made at Belgium national football team, but that is the way to keep getting forward! Assuming you support Italy tomorrow I wish both your side and the Belgian team a spectacular and fair game, without injuries or red cards. Arrivederci, Kareldorado ( talk) 21:18, 12 June 2016 (UTC)
@ Kareldorado: Grazie mille per il tuo complemento! Best of luck to Belgium tomorrow and in the rest of the tournament! Italia2006 ( talk) 00:23, 13 June 2016 (UTC)
Hello, due to your edits to Roman army, i would like to request that you join a small group ( i am the only active member) known as Wikipedia:WikiProject Military history/Incubator/Roman military history, If you are willing to join, please do so. Iazyges ( talk) 17:12, 11 July 2016 (UTC)
Just so you know, I'm kinda on your side in that I don't think you did anything wrong by changing the links per se. However, I would suggest that in the future, if you must change the links, do it as part of a wider edit on the article. Per WP:NOTBROKEN, links to redirects aren't wrong since they get the reader to the correct page albeit by the wrong link, and therefore "fixing" the link is an unnecessary edit; however, if you want to do it as part of an edit to update the article's content, that would make sense. I've noticed that most of the time you correct a lot of links at once, which is also probably fine, but don't just change one link (or set of identical links) per edit. – Pee Jay 11:59, 19 July 2016 (UTC)
I have gone through all the steps to graduate us from the incubator, and added a userbox for us, if you would like to add it to your user page, please do so.
This user is a member of the Roman and Byzantine military history task force. |
Iazyges ( talk) 21:54, 24 August 2016 (UTC)
Hey, hope you're doing well. What do you make of a user removing the goalscoring and assist tables from all 2016-17 Italian football club season articles? I don't really see a dire need for them as he does have a point that you can see the goals from the team table above, and that assists are usually not tracked in general, but then again neither are clean sheets really, but he still kept that table there. Regards, Vaselineeeeeeee ★★★ 11:11, 9 September 2016 (UTC)
@ Vaselineeeeeeee: Re-add all the goalscorer tables because they're a ranking, not just a random list. I'll accept the assists loss. Italia2006 ( talk) 16:04, 9 September 2016 (UTC)
Hey man, what do you think of the bot request? Have you seen it? I don't know if anything will be done though. Real pain in the ass to remove all that code by hand... Vaselineeeeeeee ★★★ 18:01, 24 September 2016 (UTC)
I am not vandalizing the appearances table. Those are youth team players who are not members of the first team squad. They do not belong in that table and very likely will receive no first team callups. I have maintained that appearance table and squad tables for several years now and I do not appreciate you making inaccurate changes nor you threatening me. If you want to edit it fine, just make sure your information is correct and stop adding inappropriate players. If they do make official appearances then they will be included but until that happens they do not belong in that table.
-- 173.17.249.224 ( talk) 05:22, 28 September 2016 (UTC)
You are completely wrong. They are not first team players and DO NOT BELONG in that table. None of them will even make an appearance for the club this season. You are simply ruining that table with unnecessary information. This is the official squad list Offical First Team Squad. Stop being an arrogant jackass and get rid of that incorrect information. And yes, I have been monitoring and correcting that squad appearances table for years now, correcting inaccurate information that people like you post. I also created that squad table list under the Squad Information section. -- 173.17.249.224 ( talk) 00:45, 30 September 2016 (UTC)
Are you out of your mind? I literally provided you a direct link to the correct squad information. You are the one posting incorrect information. You are simply in denial. It's funny when people cannot admit they are wrong. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 173.17.249.224 ( talk) 03:37, 30 September 2016 (UTC)
You know what, now that I looked at it closer, the IP may have a point, despite his utter rudeness. From the official Roma page he provided, those players are not listed in the first team squad, so probably should not be included in the list on the season page. I also noticed on the Juve season page Rolando Mandragora, which is not listed on the Juve website, so I've removed him. If we look at 2016–17 Manchester City F.C. season as an example, they only include first team squad. I also noticed something on the Roma season page and the previous season page as well spanning a couple years back a "Kit" section with several kits listed. I remember reading a discussion recently on FOOTY that sections on kits in season articles like that are generally not accepted. I would also propose to delete those. Regards, Vaselineeeeeeee ★★★ 03:38, 30 September 2016 (UTC)
Thank you.-- 173.17.249.224 ( talk) 04:35, 30 September 2016 (UTC)
Actually, @ 173.17.249.224:, I've decided in your favor, upon further review. And also in the interests of avoiding a continual edit war going forward. Italia2006 ( talk) 04:51, 30 September 2016 (UTC)
That is completely speculative on your part. You cannot assume that the official club website does not have accurate information. In fact the club itself should absolutely be the de facto source on the members of its first team squad. These players that you are including are not first team players and should not be included in the appearances and goals section as they have not made any appearances nor have scored any goals. If they actually do they can be added. But as of now there is no use in congesting that table with a lot of unnecessary and inaccurate information with players that are not full members of the squad--
173.17.249.224 (
talk) 04:54, 30 September 2016 (UTC)
Ok, fair enough. -- 173.17.249.224 ( talk) 04:54, 30 September 2016 (UTC)
Thank you.-- 173.17.249.224 ( talk) 04:57, 30 September 2016 (UTC)
Hi. You may be interested in participating in the African Destubathon which starts on October 15. Africa currently has over 37,000 stubs and badly needs a quality improvement editathon/contest to flesh out basic stubs. There are proposed substantial prizes to give to editors who do the most articles, and planned smaller prizes for doing to most destubs for each of the 53 African countries, so should be enjoyable! So it would be a good chance to win something for improving stubs on African sportspeople, including footballers, athletes, Olympians and Paralympians etc, particularly female ones, but also male. Even if contests aren't your thing we would be grateful if you could consider destubbing a few African articles during the drive to help the cause and help reduce the massive 37,000 + stub count, of which many are rated high importance (think Regions of countries etc). If you're interested in competing or just loosely contributing a few expanded articles on African Paralympians, Olympians and committees etc, please add your name to the Contestants/participants section. Diversity of work from a lot of people will make this that bit more special. Thanks. -- MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 21:13, 6 October 2016 (UTC)
| |
---|---|
An opportunity for you and your country to contribute to the |
-- Ipigott ( talk) 10:45, 14 October 2016 (UTC)
(To subscribe, Women in Red/Invite list. Unsubscribe, Women in Red/Opt-out list)
Hello, Italia2006. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
What a shame to go out like that on penalties...and I understand Giovinco didn't play that good of a game, but to take him out in extra time with penalties looming, and him being a spot kick taker may have been the wrong call...Morrow's penalty reminded me of Trezeguet's from 2006! Bradley played amazing, but that penalty was God awful. We could've wrapped it up several times in open play, but didn't; Frei made a pretty good save in extra time...Seattle didn't even have a shot on...The better all-round team lost, but in the end, penalties are a raffle! Enjoy the rest of your weekend! Vaselineeeeeeee ★★★ 17:48, 11 December 2016 (UTC)
Hey, I wanted to ask you if you're willing to be one of the reviewers for my A-class nomination of the Iazyges article, which I recently improved and got past GA. Thanks, Iazyges Consermonor Opus meum 06:29, 11 December 2016 (UTC)
Hello! You are receiving this message because you have added yourself as a member of the Roman and Byzantine Milhist Project. This is the first such message, however we hope that this can be used to coordinate editing and development of articles later down the road. If you wish to opt out of further messages, please remove yourself from here. 05:07, 23 January 2017 (UTC)
Hey man, would you please weigh in on Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/1988–89 Juventus F.C. season? A user seems to think WP:NSEASONS translates to the deletion of a top flight season article just because it is not well sourced. What a joke, may as well delete all early year season articles! Thanks. Vaselineeeeeeee ★★★ 00:22, 12 February 2017 (UTC)
Hey, I've created 2017–18 Genoa C.F.C. season. If you could comment at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/A.C. Cesena in European football :) Thanks. Vaselineeeeeeee ★★★ 01:19, 30 June 2017 (UTC)
Come va? I was hoping you could take a look at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Atalanta B.C. in European football and comment, this guy is relentless. Saluti, Vaselineeeeeeee ★★★ 11:44, 21 August 2017 (UTC)
Hey man what's up? You heard about the 2017 International Champions Cup being in the States? You planning on going to any games? Juve and Roma both play in NJ. I really wanna take the trek out to Mass to see Juve-Roma, July 30, just still seeing if I can pull something together! Vaselineeeeeeee ★★★ 15:02, 10 July 2017 (UTC)
How's it going? Thanks for imputing the fixtures. I've noticed User:Sean Ago adding "season" sections to a lot of Inter Milan season articles recently, many of which contain really bad grammar. I know he's doing it with good intentions obviously, but some of the wording is just so bad. It's just annoying since I really don't want to sit there and read through and correct all his additions, and I don't want to just delete them because I don't think that would be right either. But if a native speaker of English read his additions, they'd think Wikipedia is a joke... Vaselineeeeeeee ★★★ 13:40, 28 July 2017 (UTC)
Hey hope all is well. I forget exactly what we do when matches are postponed like Lazio-Udinese. I know Roma-Samp were also postponed earlier, but Roma's wiki season still lists it in grey and postponed and P in results by round? Don't they know the day yet? Lazio's is rescheduled for January 24 2018. Don't we just end up removing the grey match and move it to the right point in time in the match list, then I think every subsequent matchday after the postponed match is considered the matchday 1 behind until the match is made up. I know that sounds confusing...but so if it was postponed match day 12, matchday 13 would count for 12, then 14 for 13, until the match is rescheduled as matchday 22, then it would be normal again. Is that it? Vaselineeeeeeee ★★★ 23:09, 7 November 2017 (UTC)
Dude............. How can we even begin to describe a World Cup without Italy??? Ventura seems as he was only destined for failure, and bringing our beloved team and reputation down with him. It's very sad to see, especially since his tactics were all over the place and could not get the team to gel properly. The formations he played most of the time were crazy, and leaving star quality on the bench and at home. He will likely resign or get fired, but it's too little too late and should've happened much sooner. Look at what Croatia did with their coaching situation, and they made it. It's painful to see the only goal coming from a horrid deflection off De Rossi in the first leg, especially when we had quite a few really good chances with Belotti and Darmian, and in the second leg as well, however, also many wasted opportunities. Bonucci since joining Milan has looked in worse form, making several blind passes up the middle which led to dangerous counter attacks. It was agonizing to watch the minutes wind down without a goal to show for it, that goal we so desperately needed just to take to extra time. We were fortunate not to get two penalties called on us, but at the same time, we could've had a penalty first. 60 years since this last happened and it comes at a time where Italy have been lackluster at the past two World Cups as well. So, so, so sad that Buffon, Chiellini, Barzagli, and De Rossi's careers end in such a fashion. Especially for Gigi...he always wanted to retire after the 2018 World Cup, play at 40 like Zoff, but never even came to fruition. It frustrates me that we were even in this situation, having to be in Spain's group, then coming second to play arguably the hardest second seed playoff team the Swedes. It also frustrates me how teams like Serbia and Denmark/Ireland are in the World Cup, but not Italy. It's just unbelievable. This summer will not be the same with all the football going on around us and not being able to take part. Toronto's Italian population is gonna be really quiet this summer, which is something I always loved about the World Cup, everyone coming together, which is something I'm sure you guys have in NYC as well! It's so very hard to swallow. Anyway, hopefully this will allow the national team to rebuild and give youngsters experience before Euro 2020 qualification. Regards, Vaselineeeeeeee ★★★ 02:38, 14 November 2017 (UTC)
Buongiorno da Coreca, ti scrivo per salutarti e sapere come stai. Io sto abbastanza bene per ora. Ti scrivo per chiederti un aiuto per ampliare e migliorare l'articolo sulla Ferilli che giace ta tempo nel limbo. Io ho provato a fare qualcosa con scarso successo, ho chiesto aiuto a tanti amici utenti ma niente di niente....spero di ricevere aiuto da te che ho visto che te la cavi bene, Naturalmente se posso fare qualcosa per te in qualche lingua del mondo, ho tanti amici e conoscenti in svedese, danese, indonesiano e cinese per citarne qualche lingua. Io avrei intenzione di ampliare altre due bio sempre se tu mi aiuterai. Nell'attesa di una tua certa risposta e aiuto ti ringrazio in anticipo di vero cuore e sappi che potrai contare su di me per qualsiasi problema.-- Luigi Salvatore Vadacchino ( talk) 11:37, 20 November 2017 (UTC)
Hi,
I apologize for my attitude, I'm at fault here, no point reporting, it won't happen again. I'm a regular contributor. RafaelS1979 ( talk) 01:37, 24 November 2017 (UTC)
@ RafaelS1979: fair enough, we're a community here and we try to work together. You haven't been reported yet anyway so we're all good. Italia2006 ( talk) 01:40, 24 November 2017 (UTC)
Hi. We're into the last five days of the Women in Red World Contest. There's a new bonus prize of $200 worth of books of your choice to win for creating the most new women biographies between 0:00 on the 26th and 23:59 on 30th November. If you've been contributing to the contest, thank you for your support, we've produced over 2000 articles. If you haven't contributed yet, we would appreciate you taking the time to add entries to our articles achievements list by the end of the month. Thank you, and if participating, good luck with the finale!
Hello, Italia2006. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)
Hi Italia2006, thanks for your contribution to the List of La Liga hat-tricks. But, why have you added the innecesary C.F?. -- Zigurat ( talk) 17:36, 11 January 2018 (UTC)
( talk page stalker) Because it is a direct link; how it should be. Vaselineeeeeeee ★★★ 18:08, 11 January 2018 (UTC)
Hey hope all is well. Wow that was an absolute insane match against Real Madrid. It was larceny. Anyway, before the ridiculous red card to Buffon, he was keeping a clean sheet. Szczęsny came in and was scored on by the resulting penalty. Does Buffon get a clean sheet? I know we've discussed this in the past with regards to keepers being substituted when they've been keeping a clean sheet, and opted to use an asterisk to indicate a "shared clean sheet". You think this may be something to add as a note like that as well for this instance? Best of luck to Roma as they came out on the better side. You a Roma fan no? or Milan? Regards, Vaselineeeeeeee ★★★ 18:51, 15 April 2018 (UTC)
Hi. There's a requested move at Inter Milan, and I thought you might like to know if you're not watching it knowing you deal heavily in Italian football. I am appropriately notifying you, and have had no past indication of which title you prefer. Vaselineeeeeeee ★★★ 21:28, 28 June 2018 (UTC)
Wait so what's going on? They're likely going to delete those position templates etc and replace them with a new one? Vaselineeeeeeee ★★★ 16:42, 6 September 2018 (UTC)
Why are you changing "Hat-tricks(+)" into "Hat-tricks"? -- Sb008 ( talk) 20:40, 4 November 2018 (UTC)
Well, if you're not wrong, you better contact all dictionaries and tell them they're wrong, since not both of you can be right. -- Sb008 ( talk) 23:34, 5 November 2018 (UTC)
Hi mate, I guess his argument is that the article is located at Inter Milan, so there's no need to pipe to any other title. I understand that argument, although you and I both know the article should be located at F.C. Internazionale Milano. – Pee Jay 22:53, 7 November 2018 (UTC)
Hello, Italia2006. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
An article you recently created,
2019–20 U.S. Lecce season, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from
reliable,
independent sources. (
?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (
verifiability is of
central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to
draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:
" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's
general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page.
CASSIOPEIA(
talk) 05:33, 11 July 2019 (UTC)
An article you recently created,
2019–20 Udinese Calcio season, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from
reliable,
independent sources. (
?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (
verifiability is of
central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to
draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:
" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's
general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page.
CASSIOPEIA(
talk) 06:25, 2 August 2019 (UTC)
Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:2019–20 U.S. Lecce season, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.
If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.
You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.
If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.
Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot ( talk) 01:26, 13 January 2020 (UTC)
Medhi Benatia transferred during the last season, and he is still present for the 2018–19 article in the table. Perin, Mandžukić and Han must be in the table too.-- 79.34.216.248 ( talk) 19:31, 17 January 2020 (UTC)
Hey man, hope you and your family have been well during this time. A user has been creating some 2020-21 season articles for Serie A clubs. He has included the "overview" section again in these articles. I removed it at the Juve page but was reverted. I thought I remembered a discussion at footy where it was decided not to implement this section. I tried searching for it but couldn't find it - do you remember something along those lines? Vaselineeeeeeee ★★★ 00:30, 8 July 2020 (UTC)
Hey man, yeah you’re totally in the right. I haven’t edited in a while but that’ll change soon so I’ll take a look. Italia2006 ( talk) 02:22, 8 July 2020 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Upper Satrapies, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Carmania. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 06:14, 18 February 2021 (UTC)
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited 2000–01 Celtic F.C. season, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page John Underhill.
( Opt-out instructions.) -- DPL bot ( talk) 06:04, 8 August 2021 (UTC)
Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review
the candidates and submit your choices on the
voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{
NoACEMM}}
to your user talk page.
MediaWiki message delivery (
talk) 01:09, 29 November 2022 (UTC)
Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review
the candidates and submit your choices on the
voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{
NoACEMM}}
to your user talk page.
MediaWiki message delivery (
talk) 00:34, 28 November 2023 (UTC)
This is Italia2006's talk page, where you can send him messages and comments. |
|
Hello, I noticed that you are rather new here (at least as a registered user). I further noticed that you have changed the infoboxes of various UEFA Champions League season articles to display a flag on the left side of the top goalscorer of the respective year. Well, Wikipedia is the encyclopedia everyone can edit, but nevertheless, there are guidelines which every user should follow.
One of these guidelines is WP:FLAG, which states that emphasizing the nationality of a person by using flags should be avoided. Another reason not to include these into infoboxes is the restricted space of the boxes. Adding a flag is, in this case, just a case of unnecessary decoration as it simply disrupts the accessibility of the information there. The final and perhaps most important reason is that it is general and wide-spread consensus not to include any flags for persons into the boxes, at least in articles under the auspices of WP:FOOTY (I don't know how other projects handle this).
So, it's basically not the reluctance against your contributions but rather the binding policies which led to the reversal of your edits. So, in a nutshell, I would like to ask you to remove the flags in order to avoid further conflicts. By the way, please note as well that content disputes should be settled by discussing, not by reverts and re-reverts of edits as the latter is not very well-liked here and could possibly lead to a block (see also WP:3RR). Have a nice day, Soccer-holic I hear voices in my head... 14:38, 17 April 2010 (UTC)
Is there a way we can put the club emblem of the top scorer in the info boxes? I think that is appropriate. PatoMilan
Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. When you make a change to an article, please provide an edit summary, which you forgot to do before saving your recent edit to Francesco Totti. Doing so helps everyone to understand the intention of your edit. It is also helpful to users reading the edit history of the page. Thank you. I dream of horses If you reply here, please leave me a {{ Talkback}} message on my talk page. @ 02:15, 30 April 2010 (UTC)
While Lukas Podolski, Thomas Müller, and Cacau play as strikers or wingers for their clubs, and usually for their country as well, the current official DFB squad list (found here) lists all three as midfielders and they should therefore also be listed as such on our squad list. Sir Sputnik ( talk) 21:52, 1 September 2010 (UTC)
Welcome to Wikipedia and thank you for your contributions. However, I noticed that your username (PatoMilan) may not meet Wikipedia's username policy because it is a violation of username policy as a misleading username. Impersanating Alexandre Pato (Pato) who plays for A.C. Milan (Milan). If you believe that your username does not violate our policy, please leave a note here explaining why. As an alternative, you may ask for a change of username, or you may simply create a new account to use for editing. Thank you. Avenue X at Cicero ( talk) 14:50, 14 August 2011 (UTC)
This discussion has been closed. Please do not modify it. |
---|
The following discussion has been closed. Please do not modify it. |
Okay, so just follow the instructions here:
Regards. Avenue X at Cicero ( talk) 16:34, 14 August 2011 (UTC)
|
I suggest you usurp Italia2006 as your username, not Italia2006@23&12. Avenue X at Cicero ( talk) 06:11, 15 August 2011 (UTC)
Hello. Here is the original discussion that was had with respect to the club names for use on the Ronaldo article. If you look through the archives of WT:FOOTY you will see that the issue has come up many, many times without any kind of project-wide consensus being reached. I would love for the issue to be settled once and for all but it needs to be a project-wide consensus. The fact that many/most articles use "Internazionale" and "Milan" is interesting but does not prove a consensus has been reached (in fact if you look through the histories of various articles you'll see that starting about three or four years ago several editors began a program of changing these club names and while discussions ensued no overall consensus was reached and those editors continued to make the changes) it just demonstrates that those articles have been changed. Personally I feel that since this is an English language encyclopedia and a general one at that (i.e., not a football encyclopedia) that we should use the names that are most used in the English press which are, by far, "Inter Milan" and "AC Milan". But again, I would love a consensus to be reached and for WP:FOOTY to make it "official". SQGibbon ( talk) 05:51, 28 August 2011 (UTC)
I want to edit all the archive of 2002 FIFA World Cup qualification and 2006 FIFA World Cup qualification to this format:
2006 FIFA World Cup qualification – CAF Second Round#Group 2
Please help me to that.
Thanks! Banhtrung1 ( talk) 13:45, 1 September 2011 (UTC)
Although I do not believe neither policy nor universal consensus exists regarding the explicit display of player names, the vast majority of club season articles, especially the major ones, utilize a player's last name or common name in instances where only one name is displayed, such as match displays. The notable exception is FC Barcelona. But the issued was addressed at length on its talk page and further addressed at greater length at Wikipedia's dispute resolution, which I have copied below for your convenience, with the mediation favoring the use of common/family names over jersey names on grounds of consistency within a project and clarity.
Your cross-season consistency argument was mentioned in the Barcelona case, with an implying conclusion that although multi-season consistency is good, it does not have more weight over consistency across a project, in this case WikiProject Football, in instances where contradiction occurs. Furthermore, the argument for cross-season consistency is baseless if the initial format used was less-favored, which appeared to be the case for Barcelona and this current issue. As a result, I strongly recommend adhering to the current popular project usage of common/family names by keeping "Diarra" for this season's page and changing "Lass" to "L. Diarra" on the previous seasons' pages. Bobby ( talk) 04:27, 3 October 2011 (UTC)
Discussion stalled. — TransporterMan ( TALK) 02:20, 21 August 2011 (UTC) |
Closed discussion |
---|
Cards make it difficult to read those articles and in an accessible manner find out when the goals have been scored. And with all due respect, cards can change games, but are not part of the end result unless one team goes down to six players, resulting in a forfeited match. With regards to Italian matches, I follow a simple template, where I just type in round, teams, goals and result, all in all to save editing time, since I've done Calcio research on a massive scale (from 1984 onwards). Regards//J Roslagen ( talk) 20:12, 8 October 2011 (UTC)
I'm going to go ahead and transliterate the five regional football federations in Spain ( list) without an enWiki counterpart. Football federation pages are always titled in English and the English names of these federations are listed here so redlinks should go to a page like Country Basque Football Federation instead of es:Federación Vasca de Fútbol. Bobby ( talk) 07:11, 28 October 2011 (UTC)
I noticed that you helped work on the 2010–11 SV Werder Bremen season article. Would you be able to help with 2011–12 SV Werder Bremen season article? Kingjeff ( talk) 01:27, 20 December 2011 (UTC)
Please be sure to provide edit summaries when editing article. Thanks and keep up with the good work! ;) Luxic ( talk) 17:54, 21 December 2011 (UTC)
The reason I used "quarterfinal" was simply because that was what the Copa del Rey main page used. MOS:HYPHEN doesn't provide an explicit example for this case (although I didn't look through these), but the second use case implies this is a US v British English preference. Since the Copa del Rey is a Spanish tournament, either spelling would satisfy the MOS. However note that RFEF usage in Spanish uses no hyphens, implying to me the direct translation is unhyphenated. Recent Copa del Rey articles have also omitted hyphens so for now I reverted the edits to match the main page. If you decide to add hyphens in all CDR articles, make sure to also modify Template:Fb round2 2011-12 Copa del Rey QF and parallel ones for previous seasons/rounds. Thanks! Bobby ( talk) 06:18, 20 January 2012 (UTC)
Hey
Thanks for helping me out. Would you please also edit the time above the article (in CET)when you edit the table.
Hey About Cisse: Goals only count for the first club they played for. If they transfer to a new club, new goals won't be added up to their clubs from old club.
Here is official list of golden shoe: http://www.eurotopfoot.com/gb/soulierdor.php3
That's why Aleksandrs Čekulajevs still has 46 goals, he went to new club in winter transfer window, but again this goals for his new club won't be added up at the ones scored for his previous club.
Matthi1603 (
talk) 17:31, 12 March 2012 (UTC)
Hi I reverted your edits to 2011–12 Real Madrid C.F. season regarding the a.e.t. display. Note that Template:Football_box_collapsible (the one used on the page) and Template:Football box are similar but separate templates. If you feel the football box a.e.t. display is better, please edit it on the Template:football box collapsible page for changes to be consistent across Wikipedia. Thanks. Bobby ( talk) 21:50, 26 April 2012 (UTC)
there is important discussion about messi's page at [ footbal]
the discussion about :
1-adding back the assists which have been removed ( and i think its really important ) especially most notable players have it and even less known player than messi have this statistics which is important for any striker .(remember the debate about messi vs ronalod have lots about messi makes more assists than ronaldo )
2-adding back the youth and under -23 goals because they are different statistics from senior one and u cant merge them together . since fifa themself separate them differently .
3-about the table of messi goals and if its important info or just long statistics(useless one).
Thank you all . adnan talk 12 pm 16 october 2012 (UTC)
Then why in every UEFA Champions League season article is Inter Milan "Internazionale" and A.C. Milan "Milan". Wikipedia should use the names for Italian clubs that are most often used in Italy. I can tell you that no one calls Internazionale "Inter Milan", for which reason no one calls Milan "A.C. Milan". It's Internazionale, and Milan. I don't see what the discussion is about. Italia2006 (talk) 13:08, 28 August 2011 (UTC)
So if you feel like Internazionale and Milan should be represented as they are in Italy across Wikipedia, why on earth do you feel the need to change team names for countries in regards to how the team is called, that you obviously are not clear on? subzzee ( talk) 22:49, 5 September 2012 (UTC)
I go by the names in UEFA Champions League articles which should be the standard for this site. Olympique Lyonnais is LYON. A.C. Milan is MILAN. Hamburger SV is HAMBURG. You make it sound like I ruin "your" articles by a simple name change? You're the one who refuses to follow the standard on this site. Italia2006 ( talk) 03:13, 6 September 2012 (UTC)
Wrong, there is no agreed upon standard for any team name on this site. How the team names are represented on the Champions League articles therefore is not necessarily correct either. Easiest solution therefore is to actually go by the teams name. The actual name the team goes by. As you correctly stated in the argument you posted above. Maybe one day there will be an agreed upon standard, but for now there isn't, so since you are not the author of the articles that I have published on Wikipedia, I would appreciate if you respect the fact that I would like to call a team by it's name, and not refer to it by it's geographical location, or some kinf of nick name. Thanks subzzee ( talk) 03:20, 6 September 2012 (UTC)
Well I guess we're gonna have to agree to disagree, but I can assure you in this regard your articles are one of a kind. No other page on this site calls Olympique Lyonnais by its full name. Even the season articles for Lyon use "Lyon" not "Olympique Lyonnais." And Lyon is by no means a nickname or an unofficial name. Italia2006 ( talk) 03:27, 6 September 2012 (UTC)
There are many errors on the Olympique Lyonnais season articles, in regards to how the teams are called, such as Hanover for Hannover 96, or simply Salzburg for Red Bull Salzburg (SV Austria Salzburg is the city's other club), so I would rather not imitate mistakes, but rather call a team by it's name, and not make up a new name for it. Thanks for the exchange, you can delete this convo now, unless you still have something to add, we can continue this argument on my talk page, but I am not going to write a book on yours. Cheers. subzzee ( talk) 03:37, 6 September 2012 (UTC)
Why you reverse my edit on CL standings on this page? Stigni ( talk) 18:56, 2 October 2012 (UTC)
Some other user said that my template is ok, and I change only Man Uni because the existing table and my template is the same, so I try to copy the ManUni in the Arsenal page and change that too in the hope that you do not reverse and edit that not modify anything in the layout.-- Stigni ( talk) 05:49, 6 October 2012 (UTC)
The Community Shield is no longer considered a competitive competition as of this season. It's been moved to pre season friendly status. Please don't change competitive goal totals anymore. A prime example of this is the fact that Branislav Ivanovic was given a red card in the match but wasn't held out of any of the regular season matches.
It's okay to have one line at the top and none below it. Kingjeff ( talk) 17:07, 3 October 2012 (UTC)
That's WP:OWN. Kingjeff ( talk) 17:21, 3 October 2012 (UTC)
You don't need to "write it from scratch." You go back to a previous edition of the article and copy the templates you want and paste it in the relevant section. Kingjeff ( talk) 17:49, 3 October 2012 (UTC)
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. Thank you. Stigni ( talk) 06:19, 7 October 2012 (UTC)
Why do you keep on insisting on having all those lines? Also, there is a template that has the group standings. There is no need to put a table in the article since there is a template with the table. The whole purpose of the template is so that the table can be changed in one place which would show up in multiple articles all at the same time. Kingjeff ( talk) 05:34, 24 October 2012 (UTC)
I am quoted above in another discussion on your talk page as saying "the reason is the matches were not up to date. I find it bothersome to put in information for opposing teams in." This clearly explains why I changed it on 2012–13 FC Schalke 04 season. I have barely been on that page at all since that discussion and it looks like you haven't been on it either. From the previous discussion, it sounds like you have taken on too many club season articles. So, you, as an editor on Wikipedia, have a choice of either editing the 2012–13 FC Schalke 04 season or not editing this article. I haven't done anything to prevent you from doing so. So, instead of turning this into an edit war, how about constructively discussing the issues and come to a consensus. Kingjeff ( talk) 02:19, 25 October 2012 (UTC)
Unfortunately there are too many club season articles for one person to enforce a strict code of how a club season article should look. Anyways, one person should not be determining it as you are trying to do. However, you do have the freedom to help build consensus on issues that you feel that need to be dealt with. Kingjeff ( talk) 05:36, 25 October 2012 (UTC)
Did you note that it's not using the template?? please, view the code, you are reverting without note the code I introduced. - tot-futbol ( talk) 23:27, 29 October 2012 (UTC)
What is the style guide for make these changes that you insist in doing it? Are you following any style guide for changing name of Betis to Real Betis, and some players only with the surname, which can make confusions, it's explicit its name for some reason. If you don't know what are the shortened names for some teams and players, please do not change it. I am agree with constructive edits, but not for applying hardly rigorous changes, imposing personal criteria and the worst: changing without knowledge about someone is editing. I am Spaniard and I hear everyday how is named some players and teams in the shortened form, I am 200km out of Valencia, and you? Please, do not insist to make changes imposing your personal point of view. Be respectable with the work of others and the consensus accepted between the rest of editors. - tot-futbol ( talk) 00:23, 24 November 2012 (UTC)
What exactly are you taking issue with? Kingjeff ( talk) 21:02, 28 November 2012 (UTC)
We don't need a link to the Borussia Dortmund article 40 or 50 times throughout the article. I don't understand why such a small thing like "Fixtures and results" = Matches is such a big deal. The "group standings", "group table summary" and all these divisions is for good article structure. You're making out that I made these big huge changes to the article. Most of the stuff I did was just a reorganization. You shouldn't cluster a table, which you must edit under your structure, and match templates together. Kingjeff ( talk) 21:17, 28 November 2012 (UTC)
Just because you've work on Borussia Dortmund's season article three years running now doesn't mean it isn't broken. Kingjeff ( talk) 21:36, 28 November 2012 (UTC)
There have been other editors that have disagreed with you. Kingjeff ( talk) 21:45, 28 November 2012 (UTC)
FYI, these articles were moved based on a RM discussion [ [1]]. Personally I don't care what type of dash there is in the title but do note that my brain spun out of shape moving about a 100 such articles. I suggest that you don't move them without getting some sort of consensus. -- regentspark ( comment) 01:53, 22 February 2013 (UTC)
Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to 2012–13 Atlético Madrid season may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "{}"s. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page. Thanks, BracketBot ( talk) 17:24, 9 May 2013 (UTC)
I would like to know your view about the necessity of assists tables in league articles here: Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Football#Assists_in_season_article. -- Bogu Slav 15:24, 26 May 2013 (UTC)
Template:2012–13 UEFA Champions League group B standings has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Kingjeff ( talk) 01:40, 2 June 2013 (UTC)
Why leave the fatuous and unhistorical Dominion flags on the battle pages you've been amending? What we need is a template which takes the reader to a British Empire page treating the UK and the rest of the entity as the same thing, with varying geography but all subject to Whitehall. What we get now are vanity icons as if Canada et al. were sovereign states, not that I'm bitter mind.;O) Keith-264 ( talk) 17:46, 27 June 2013 (UTC)
Hi there ITALIA, AL from Portugal here,
please, the club name here at WP has been changed to INTER MILAN (it used to be F.C. INTERNAZIONALE MILANO), that's how he should go now. Please let's reach a compromise.
Happy weekend - -- AL ( talk) 16:47, 12 July 2013 (UTC)
No comments? Fair enough. -- AL ( talk) 14:53, 15 July 2013 (UTC)
Not completely true, at least as far as oldies go, and you heard the administrator, but that's OK, i won't edit war. -- AL ( talk) 19:24, 15 July 2013 (UTC)
Hello, I'm Mattythewhite. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Tottenham Hotspur F.C., but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Mattythewhite ( talk) 15:58, 1 August 2013 (UTC)
Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to 2013–14 Real Madrid C.F. season may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "{}"s. If you have, don't worry, just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.
Thanks, BracketBot ( talk) 12:38, 30 August 2013 (UTC)
Hi there ITALIA, AL "here",
here on English WP, we use INTER MILAN, not INTERNAZIONALE. But i give up, it's a lost battle, you told me last month it was a consensus and it is not, an administrator told me we use INTER MILAN here.
I repeat i give up, i want peace and not edit wars. Do as you want, happy day and weekend -- AL ( talk) 04:23, 17 August 2013 (UTC)
About the administrator bit, i referred to him because they are supposed to be above all reasonable doubt. And you're wrong again with all due respect, administrators are also users, so they can (and do) edit articles.
Happy Saturday -- AL ( talk) 17:43, 17 August 2013 (UTC)
See my friend? I was not making up, what's your reply to this please? -- AL ( talk) 16:46, 20 August 2013 (UTC)
Hi - I see that you reverted my move of the article with no explanation. I'm happy to leave it there for now to see how things pan out in the British media and have added a comment to that effect on the article's talk page. Best wishes. -- Daemonic Kangaroo ( talk) 06:27, 21 August 2013 (UTC)
Thanks for replying, even though not in my page. I apologize for the "I give up, top class these two guys!" sentence, but i was feeling very frustrated for not getting a reply, sorry for any inconvenience. I also feel it's worth noting i only started summarily reverting you after the administrator told me (and you) INTER MILAN was the name we should go by in this particular Wikipedia. I am going to start a WP:FOOTY discussion just to get many more inputs.
On a related note, you seem to have summarily removed my last message to you, thus indicating some very negative feeling towards me. Rather than that "top class these two guys" comment for which i have already apologized, is there anything else you feel i should apologize for? I will immediately do so if i see you have a point, no problem, i hate it when misunderstandings end like this, with people ceasing all communications with me even though i apologize sincerely (i'm only human, and in no way the boss of WP).
Cheers -- AL ( talk) 17:19, 27 August 2013 (UTC)
Few opinions but that's not my fault. Those (few) opinions, however, seem to "illustrate" that it's OK to write INTERNAZIONALE even though the article has another name. I will abide by from now on and write INTERNAZIONALE as well, a Portuguese promise. Kind regards, sorry for the trouble i put you through and happy work -- AL ( talk) 20:33, 27 August 2013 (UTC)
Hi. I edit the Real Madrid season page, and a current large-scale discussion regarding the deletion of the assists section is undergoing at Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Football#Assists. Can you please comment on that page? Thanks.
Hi.
Just wanted to know why you keep removing the template inserted for these tables. Me and another user add these tables because they are the same as in the original articles that these sections refer to and the also look better with the borders. Please discuss this instead of reverting and come up with a good argument to use your table or your edits will be considered as disruptive.
Related articles:
As I said please discuss this on one of the talkpages (I will open discussion on one of them shortly) or your reverts will be considered disruptive. QED237 (talk) 20:06, 19 September 2013 (UTC)
Hi there ITALIA06, AL "here",
can we please reach a compromise in this player's article? Earlier into this year we had a bit of a "wiki-misunderstanding" on the name we should use on INTER MILAN players and, even though i don't agree, i have complied, and use INTERNAZIONALE nowadays.
Could you do the same for me in this case? It's just a case of box compression, in there we don't need the "da" or the "do" or the "de", and full name appears in storyline anyway.
Attentively -- AL ( talk) 17:28, 14 November 2013 (UTC)
Likewise. -- AL ( talk) 21:37, 14 November 2013 (UTC)
What exactly is the problem with using nobars? Lots of pages use it and it is much more aesthetic. I can't find anything on the official pages that says they are not allowed. Cheers. Vanguard Scot 14:38, 14 December 2013 (UTC)
Where exactly are you sourcing these changes to the club trigrams in UEFA club competition articles from? – Pee Jay 03:54, 15 December 2013 (UTC)
Hello, the layout you are removing is encouraged at Wikipedia:WikiProject Football/Players#Career statistics, which is the community-decided player MoS. Your argument appears to be based on WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS; but just because a number of articles adhere to a certain standard doesn't mean they are correct to do so. Mattythewhite ( talk) 00:29, 22 January 2014 (UTC)
Hi mate. As I understand it, the rules of the FA Cup (see here) state that the round before the Final (with a capital F) is referred to as the Semi-Finals (both S and F capitalised). I assume the issue here is a stylistic one; do we go along with the "official" terminology or attempt to correct a perceived grammatical error? – Pee Jay 18:57, 22 January 2014 (UTC)
Hi there ITALIA, AL "here",
indeed, my summary was as confusing as they get! What i meant is you either pipe all the clubs in storyline or none, not just some. Sorry for any inconvenience, i have the utmost respect for your work.
Happy writings -- AL ( talk) 04:04, 1 February 2014 (UTC)
That's what happens when you drink one beer too many (meaning ME, was partying a bit tonight after my edits in Postiga and others), i did not read your message thoroughly, hence missed the bit about someone else editing with your account. Still, offer my apologies to your relative, he would not have reacted like he did if my summary was 100% correct, which it was not (i mean it was not insulting, but it was quite confusing and open to interpretation). Best regards -- AL ( talk) 06:07, 1 February 2014 (UTC)
Hi. I just wanted to let you know that all football players are listed by their FIFA nationality and that is the national team they last played for. Diego Costa did last play for brazil and is therefore considered brazilian which is also the case at his article Diego Costa. It has been mentioned shortly on his talkpage. Please do not change nationality to Spain. Thank you. QED237 (talk) 10:54, 2 February 2014 (UTC)
About your run-in with User:Gringoladomenega, the following opinions: 1 - i agree with you in the Diego Ribas da Cunha bit, his footballing name is "Diego" not "Diego Ribas" (if i understood correctly what you tell me he's doing there); 2 - i don't agree with you in the Diego Costa situation, his intro has to read "...is a BRAZILIAN footballer..." or "...is a footballer...", it will only read "...is a Spanish footballer..." when he makes (if) debut for Spain OK? And we should not ever write "...is a Brazilian-Spanish footballer...", intros must be kept simple, and the nationality of the player should be that of last country represented.
I will say the exact same thing in Gringo's page. Cheers -- AL ( talk) 18:22, 2 February 2014 (UTC)
Hi Italia2006,
Please dont remove the middle names in the squad. The reason for this is that the source includes the middle names of some players that is why it should be included. Also the same reason why Kaka is considered as a forward (though he is a an attacking midfielder). Thanks!
RRD13 (
talk) 17:17, 10 February 2014 (UTC)
I am actually not the main editor for the article. I think you need to stop insisting on having club season articles done by your way only. Especially since pre–season for Austrian clubs started last June and you only made your first edits a few days ago and also the fact that Wikipedia is based on consensus building. The only need right now for the article is a few more sources for the prose. Kingjeff ( talk) 19:49, 24 February 2014 (UTC)
Spain:
2013–14 Real Madrid C.F. season
2013–14 FC Barcelona season
2013–14 Atlético Madrid season
Italy:
2013–14 Juventus F.C. season
2013–14 A.S. Roma season
2013–14 ACF Fiorentina season
2013–14 A.C. Milan season
2013–14 S.S.C. Napoli season
2013–14 F.C. Internazionale Milano season
France:
2013–14 Paris Saint-Germain F.C. season
2013–14 AS Monaco FC season
2013–14 Lille OSC season
England:
2013–14 Chelsea F.C. season
2013–14 Arsenal F.C. season
2013–14 Manchester City F.C. season
2013–14 Liverpool F.C. season
Tell me my friend, what do you notice? Who's going by the consensus, me or you?
Italia2006 (
talk) 02:23, 26 February 2014 (UTC)
I am replied to you because he came to me with your comment. I have actually gone by consensus before. I actually went by consensus in this season's Bayern Munich season article. So, he used commas. I wouldn't say that it is incorrect. There is nothing wrong with what other articles use. I don't use a "competition" and not likely to ever use it. Out of all those articles that you listed above, how many of them will get featured article status under their current format? Bayern Munich's current season article has a better chance of getting featured article status under it's current format than any of those articles that you mentioned. You stated to User:Werner100359 "Please stop editing this article or at least ask for help." You have a lot of nerve to tell another user to stop editing and you in noway helped him improve the way he edits. Kingjeff ( talk) 05:15, 27 February 2014 (UTC)
"No one cares what you like or don't like. Your articles will be gradually converted to the proper model. Honestly, stop." Consensus means that everyone's opinion counts. What is proper model? Users who edit Manchester United club season articles might disagree with you on what "proper model" model is. Kingjeff ( talk) 03:05, 2 March 2014 (UTC)
I was a bit of a talk page stalker on User talk:CYl7EPTEMA777, due to me recently interacting with them, and noticed that you had asked User:CYl7EPTEMA777 to revert the move they had made that resulted in Template:Andromeda Galaxy moving to Template:Andromeda galaxy. Unfortunately, this editor has been blocked for disruptive editing and other reasons. However, I went ahead and posted on your request to revert the move at Wikipedia:Requested moves/Technical requests#Requests to revert undiscussed moves. Hopefully this resolves the issue, provided an administrator agrees with reverting the move. Steel1943 ( talk) 03:12, 10 March 2014 (UTC)
I saw your tidy-up and wondered if you would nominate a Great War infobox which is the most accurate so that I could copy from it? When I go round completing pages which are short of B1 and B2, I'm apt to overlook the box or only add items that I'm sure about. Keith-264 ( talk) 07:55, 18 March 2014 (UTC)
I've undone your bold move of the American Expeditionary Forces article as it seems the move was undiscused and an objection has been raised on the talk page, so per WP:BRD please join the discussion there to seek consensus. Vsmith ( talk) 02:25, 19 March 2014 (UTC)
Wikipedia:Good article reassessment/Atlético Madrid/1
Atlético Madrid, an article which you may be interested in, is currently under a Good Article Review. You may want to leave a comment on the link provided. Thank you. '''tAD''' ( talk) 19:08, 22 March 2014 (UTC)
Hi there ITA, AL "here",
i tried to present my arguments: we read the storyline and the infobox and we know he played all those years for Deportivo de La Coruña, so when we reach the chart below "Deportivo" suffices 100% for ANY reader (not just those familiar with football). You reverted me fair enough, can't be bothered all that much anymore and, after 12 JULY 2014, can't be bothered at all, will leave WP for good.
Happy editing -- AL ( talk) 05:34, 3 April 2014 (UTC)
No offense there man (too strong a word, in this case i mean!). I know, consistency is good, but that is what i was trying to get accross, we say "Deportivo LC" in box, "Deportivo LC" in storyline, if we say "Deportivo" only in the stats chart would people be confused? I know i would not, even if i knew NOTHING about football and read article for the first time!
Your question: am leaving because i have been here for eight years now, and am not having fun anymore, am doing this almost like a job. Am sick and tired of the lousy vandals destroying all of our hard work, and plus can't seem to follow most of the guidelines.
Cheers -- AL ( talk) 15:27, 3 April 2014 (UTC)
Hi, there is no need to change the links, as per [ guidelines for redirects] it has few if any benefits but can have some drawbacks. DuncanHill ( talk) 21:25, 22 April 2014 (UTC)
Please do not use styles that are unusual, inappropriate or difficult to understand in articles, as you did in Raheem Sterling. There is a Manual of Style, and edits should not deliberately go against it without special reason. Per Wikipedia:WikiProject Football/Players#Career statistics. Mattythewhite ( talk) 17:30, 25 April 2014 (UTC)
1991–92 Arsenal F.C. season, 1996–97 Arsenal F.C. season, 1997–98 Arsenal F.C. season, 1998–99 Arsenal F.C. season, 1999–2000 Arsenal F.C. season, 2000–01 Arsenal F.C. season, 2001–02 Arsenal F.C. season, 2002–03 Arsenal F.C. season, 2005–06 Arsenal F.C. season...........
What's your point? Lemonade51 ( talk) 20:58, 30 May 2014 (UTC)
Do you think this article should be renamed to João Nunes (footballer, born 1995)? Fixed4u ( talk) 20:18, 15 July 2014 (UTC)
There is also Carlos Jorge Neto Martins... 20:21, 15 July 2014 (UTC)
And Petit (Portuguese footballer)... Fixed4u ( talk) 20:36, 15 July 2014 (UTC)
As far as we're concerned, rows should not be merged according to the MOS at WP:FOOTY. I do not agree with everything in Wikipedia but if there is consensus on anything, it stays that way. If you think that should be changed, you should gather consensus at WP:FOOTY. Otherwise, follow the agreed consensus. LRD NO ( talk) 14:50, 1 August 2014 (UTC)
Hi, although it is good to include many editor in the discussion you should no go around inviting editors that only supports your cause as you did at user talk:Usman afif. WP:CAN is a page you might be interested in reading. When inviting people please keep a neutral tone and not your personal opinion. Thank you. QED237 (talk) 17:45, 21 August 2014 (UTC)
I understand that when two people belong in the same gens but in a different cognomen (branch) of the gens, they can be very distant relatives. Still, I would like to ask what -if anything- can Ancient Roman genealogy tell us about the exact relation between Crassus and Lucullus.-- 2A02:580:A39A:6D00:4D12:DC12:E9DA:35AD ( talk) 21:42, 8 September 2014 (UTC)
Winter operations 1914–15 You might be interested in developments here since you've edited the page. Keith-264 ( talk) 22:03, 7 November 2014 (UTC)
The term Deutsches Reich (German Empire/Realm) was the official name of Germany until 1943. So, no, we don't always use German Empire where the official name of Germany in German translates that way. Also, the official name of Austrai-Hungary was "Austro-Hungarian Monarchy". Not to mention the official names of the Allies... What other infoboxes do is their business, but let's try to be consistent within this one. Srnec ( talk) 01:38, 24 February 2015 (UTC)
Technically, those list should not have bold text either. I'm just reluctant to do so because I always get into an edit war with others like you when I try to change them.
According to WP:Accessibility it says, "By default, most screen readers do not indicate presentational text attributes (bold, italic, underline) or even semantic text attributes (emphasis, importance, text deletion), so struck-out text is read normally along with any other text." In other words, it will when a blind person is having the article dictated to him or her via a screen reader, it confuse the reader of how the list is read with no indication of the winner.
If you want to change something, change the bold lettering to daggers in every ceremony.
Reverting vandalism? Are you kidding me? If something is produced from 1974 to 1991, you don't need to put 1974–1991. The proper format is 1974–91. Italia2006 ( talk) 19:00, 3 April 2015 (UTC)
You have been invited to the discussion on versions of Template:History of Iran. There are two versions. The current one and this one. Please share your opinion on which version you like/support more. We need users' opinion for consensus. Thank you. -- Ulugh Arslan Bilge Khan 18:30, 05 June 2015 (UTC)
I just saw you removed the kit colors from 2015–16 F.C. Internazionale Milano season any reason for this ? :) thank you Adnan ( talk) 08:16, 25 June 2015 (UTC)
And related to that article, you added links back to China. WP:OVERLINK argues against that as it's "major geographic ... location". And as for piping Inter Milan, a move discussion was just closed on the article's talk page stating that Inter Milan is the WP:COMMONNAME and no move to F.C. Internazionale Milano or any variant should be made. So in respect of that discussion and decision, I don't think we should be piping the name like this:[[Inter Milan|Internazionale]] as it seems to be trying to get around that decision. That was actually suggested in the move discussion. Finally, I have requested that the season article be moved as well. 208.81.212.222 ( talk) 02:17, 14 July 2015 (UTC)
I can't explain it either, mate. Unfortunately the rest of Wikipedia isn't as enlightened as you and I. – Pee Jay 19:30, 16 July 2015 (UTC)
Talk:2014–15 Inter Milan season. Please offer your comments. 208.81.212.222 ( talk) 22:14, 16 July 2015 (UTC)
I really understand my friend , I already feel the same myself! he isn't even really improving the article he thinks he can act as a monitor for other editors work, which really is a bothersome act,I can't really understand this IP actions and why he is really obsessed with just changing the name I have no Idea and I am not interested in working under someone supervision as if he is my boss or something it is just silly . I am sure he will in few weeks stop even bothering to check this article which makes the thing even worse .I just don't like also WP:COMMONSENSE as an answer when you ask about why did you revert/moved or edited my contribution. I really hear you man Adnan ( talk) 04:53, 17 July 2015 (UTC)
Hi, the name of the Stadio Olimpico Di Torino page is a translation error. If you look at the actual stadium name on any source, it is known as the "Stadio Olimpico".
"Di Torino" is not part of the actual name means literally "of Turin", hence the title of the page should be "Stadio Olimpico (Turin)" to differentiate it from the more well-known Stadio Olimpico in Rome. I have tried changing it but get an error message. Danieletorino2 ( talk) 06:03, 30 July 2015 (UTC)
May I ask how that is vandalism. The stadium is shown like that along with the city in all europa league and champions league articles. Not vandalism. Vaselineeeeeeee ( talk) 01:09, 29 August 2015 (UTC)
Why do you not put stack yes for the last one? Vaselineeeeeeee ( talk) 01:21, 29 August 2015 (UTC)
Ah, so that is the one page you update and it gets sent and updated to the Serie A season article automatically, correct? Does that go with club season articles too? Vaselineeeeeeee ( talk) 01:48, 29 August 2015 (UTC)
Designs can be found at Template:Football kit/pattern list and colours can be found at Web colors. Giant Snowman 20:50, 23 September 2015 (UTC)
@ GiantSnowman: Thank you so much. This is extremely helpful, I can't even begin to tell you. Italia2006 ( talk) 21:15, 23 September 2015 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current
Arbitration Committee election. The
Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia
arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose
site bans,
topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The
arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to
review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on
the voting page. For the Election committee,
MediaWiki message delivery (
talk) 14:11, 24 November 2015 (UTC)
Please improve Coppa Italia on English Wikipedia, the older seasons. Thank you very much.-- Alexiulian25 ( talk) 21:13, 29 November 2015 (UTC)
Use rsssf.com, the Italian Wikipedia use this source, and after the Italian FF finish the website, just verify if the results are same. I do same for my country, I also do other countries, I would help you, but if you say you can do it, I will read, thank you my friend.-- Alexiulian25 ( talk) 22:10, 29 November 2015 (UTC)
Hi there, Are the own goal sections in the goalscorer categories used to tally the goals the club scored on themselves or tally the own goals scored for the club? For example for Juve, there were two goals scored for us in Serie A, but Juve scored on themselves twice, once in Serie A, once in CL. There's an IP telling me it's the goals non-Juve players scored an own goal for Juve. Hope that wasn't too confusing, thanks! Vaselineeeeeeee ( talk) 14:59, 20 December 2015 (UTC)
Seeing the page history,you revert other user's edit rather than the "vandalism" user,then I look through the later page history and I your edit to repair those edit.-
Hi there, I appreciate your thanks. However, I think you may be mistaken in regards to other club articles. Maybe you are going off of the other Italian clubs articles, which I know most do not have the template... But if you look at 2010–11 Real Madrid C.F. season, 2007–08 FC Barcelona season, 2015–16 Manchester City F.C. season, 2015–16 FC Bayern Munich season, basically all Spanish and English clubs, etc. The seasons articles are obviously heavily about the club, which warrants the football club template. To keep with consistency of other football related club seasons, it should also be included for Italian articles. I only did Juventus and Lazio, as I'm sure you've noticed, I only really edit their pages, but I could help with the rest if needed. I'm going to go ahead and add them back... If you want to start a discussion on WikiFootball, go ahead, but for now, I just think they were always forgotten on Italian season articles. Thanks. Vaselineeeeeeee ( talk) 14:39, 16 January 2016 (UTC)
Now we talk, and when everyone gets bored with that someone will propose a course of action and everyone in favor will say something, and we can then move forward. TomStar81 ( Talk) 05:05, 27 January 2016 (UTC)
@ TomStar81: yeah nevermind, Peacemaker has decided everything for himself. And ignored a very polite and simple question, as well. So much for due process on this site. Italia2006 ( talk) 05:06, 27 January 2016 (UTC)
You might have noticed that a user insists on adding an image of the Lazio squad to the season article. I've removed it a few times and told the user that images are not usually used in season articles. He's said that that's a fallacy and would still help the article... Even though it is for consistency purposes. Do you think we should keep the image, or revert it and take higher action if the user persists? Thanks. Regards, Vaselineeeeeeee ( talk) 17:04, 7 February 2016 (UTC)
Hey Italia2006, can I ask that you reduce the amount of commenting that you are posting on the RfC? It can lead to "bludgeoning" of the RfC. I don't say this to "whack you over the head" or anything, only to let you be aware of it. It also helps to have "outside" commentary confirming the results rather than "involved" commentary. Anyway, just try to slow down on the comments and let the RfC run 'naturally'. Cheers, Doctor Crazy in Room 102 of The Mental Asylum 23:46, 7 February 2016 (UTC)
Hi, I am wondering if you could have a look at Fallschirm-Panzer Division 1 Hermann Göring. Two IP editors restored dubious and POV information uncited from 2013. Please see diffs: IP editor 1 and IP editor 2.
I also left an note on the Talk page: Problematic content. K.e.coffman ( talk) 00:01, 12 March 2016 (UTC)
A tiny punctuation correction you made at Belgium national football team, but that is the way to keep getting forward! Assuming you support Italy tomorrow I wish both your side and the Belgian team a spectacular and fair game, without injuries or red cards. Arrivederci, Kareldorado ( talk) 21:18, 12 June 2016 (UTC)
@ Kareldorado: Grazie mille per il tuo complemento! Best of luck to Belgium tomorrow and in the rest of the tournament! Italia2006 ( talk) 00:23, 13 June 2016 (UTC)
Hello, due to your edits to Roman army, i would like to request that you join a small group ( i am the only active member) known as Wikipedia:WikiProject Military history/Incubator/Roman military history, If you are willing to join, please do so. Iazyges ( talk) 17:12, 11 July 2016 (UTC)
Just so you know, I'm kinda on your side in that I don't think you did anything wrong by changing the links per se. However, I would suggest that in the future, if you must change the links, do it as part of a wider edit on the article. Per WP:NOTBROKEN, links to redirects aren't wrong since they get the reader to the correct page albeit by the wrong link, and therefore "fixing" the link is an unnecessary edit; however, if you want to do it as part of an edit to update the article's content, that would make sense. I've noticed that most of the time you correct a lot of links at once, which is also probably fine, but don't just change one link (or set of identical links) per edit. – Pee Jay 11:59, 19 July 2016 (UTC)
I have gone through all the steps to graduate us from the incubator, and added a userbox for us, if you would like to add it to your user page, please do so.
This user is a member of the Roman and Byzantine military history task force. |
Iazyges ( talk) 21:54, 24 August 2016 (UTC)
Hey, hope you're doing well. What do you make of a user removing the goalscoring and assist tables from all 2016-17 Italian football club season articles? I don't really see a dire need for them as he does have a point that you can see the goals from the team table above, and that assists are usually not tracked in general, but then again neither are clean sheets really, but he still kept that table there. Regards, Vaselineeeeeeee ★★★ 11:11, 9 September 2016 (UTC)
@ Vaselineeeeeeee: Re-add all the goalscorer tables because they're a ranking, not just a random list. I'll accept the assists loss. Italia2006 ( talk) 16:04, 9 September 2016 (UTC)
Hey man, what do you think of the bot request? Have you seen it? I don't know if anything will be done though. Real pain in the ass to remove all that code by hand... Vaselineeeeeeee ★★★ 18:01, 24 September 2016 (UTC)
I am not vandalizing the appearances table. Those are youth team players who are not members of the first team squad. They do not belong in that table and very likely will receive no first team callups. I have maintained that appearance table and squad tables for several years now and I do not appreciate you making inaccurate changes nor you threatening me. If you want to edit it fine, just make sure your information is correct and stop adding inappropriate players. If they do make official appearances then they will be included but until that happens they do not belong in that table.
-- 173.17.249.224 ( talk) 05:22, 28 September 2016 (UTC)
You are completely wrong. They are not first team players and DO NOT BELONG in that table. None of them will even make an appearance for the club this season. You are simply ruining that table with unnecessary information. This is the official squad list Offical First Team Squad. Stop being an arrogant jackass and get rid of that incorrect information. And yes, I have been monitoring and correcting that squad appearances table for years now, correcting inaccurate information that people like you post. I also created that squad table list under the Squad Information section. -- 173.17.249.224 ( talk) 00:45, 30 September 2016 (UTC)
Are you out of your mind? I literally provided you a direct link to the correct squad information. You are the one posting incorrect information. You are simply in denial. It's funny when people cannot admit they are wrong. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 173.17.249.224 ( talk) 03:37, 30 September 2016 (UTC)
You know what, now that I looked at it closer, the IP may have a point, despite his utter rudeness. From the official Roma page he provided, those players are not listed in the first team squad, so probably should not be included in the list on the season page. I also noticed on the Juve season page Rolando Mandragora, which is not listed on the Juve website, so I've removed him. If we look at 2016–17 Manchester City F.C. season as an example, they only include first team squad. I also noticed something on the Roma season page and the previous season page as well spanning a couple years back a "Kit" section with several kits listed. I remember reading a discussion recently on FOOTY that sections on kits in season articles like that are generally not accepted. I would also propose to delete those. Regards, Vaselineeeeeeee ★★★ 03:38, 30 September 2016 (UTC)
Thank you.-- 173.17.249.224 ( talk) 04:35, 30 September 2016 (UTC)
Actually, @ 173.17.249.224:, I've decided in your favor, upon further review. And also in the interests of avoiding a continual edit war going forward. Italia2006 ( talk) 04:51, 30 September 2016 (UTC)
That is completely speculative on your part. You cannot assume that the official club website does not have accurate information. In fact the club itself should absolutely be the de facto source on the members of its first team squad. These players that you are including are not first team players and should not be included in the appearances and goals section as they have not made any appearances nor have scored any goals. If they actually do they can be added. But as of now there is no use in congesting that table with a lot of unnecessary and inaccurate information with players that are not full members of the squad--
173.17.249.224 (
talk) 04:54, 30 September 2016 (UTC)
Ok, fair enough. -- 173.17.249.224 ( talk) 04:54, 30 September 2016 (UTC)
Thank you.-- 173.17.249.224 ( talk) 04:57, 30 September 2016 (UTC)
Hi. You may be interested in participating in the African Destubathon which starts on October 15. Africa currently has over 37,000 stubs and badly needs a quality improvement editathon/contest to flesh out basic stubs. There are proposed substantial prizes to give to editors who do the most articles, and planned smaller prizes for doing to most destubs for each of the 53 African countries, so should be enjoyable! So it would be a good chance to win something for improving stubs on African sportspeople, including footballers, athletes, Olympians and Paralympians etc, particularly female ones, but also male. Even if contests aren't your thing we would be grateful if you could consider destubbing a few African articles during the drive to help the cause and help reduce the massive 37,000 + stub count, of which many are rated high importance (think Regions of countries etc). If you're interested in competing or just loosely contributing a few expanded articles on African Paralympians, Olympians and committees etc, please add your name to the Contestants/participants section. Diversity of work from a lot of people will make this that bit more special. Thanks. -- MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 21:13, 6 October 2016 (UTC)
| |
---|---|
An opportunity for you and your country to contribute to the |
-- Ipigott ( talk) 10:45, 14 October 2016 (UTC)
(To subscribe, Women in Red/Invite list. Unsubscribe, Women in Red/Opt-out list)
Hello, Italia2006. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
What a shame to go out like that on penalties...and I understand Giovinco didn't play that good of a game, but to take him out in extra time with penalties looming, and him being a spot kick taker may have been the wrong call...Morrow's penalty reminded me of Trezeguet's from 2006! Bradley played amazing, but that penalty was God awful. We could've wrapped it up several times in open play, but didn't; Frei made a pretty good save in extra time...Seattle didn't even have a shot on...The better all-round team lost, but in the end, penalties are a raffle! Enjoy the rest of your weekend! Vaselineeeeeeee ★★★ 17:48, 11 December 2016 (UTC)
Hey, I wanted to ask you if you're willing to be one of the reviewers for my A-class nomination of the Iazyges article, which I recently improved and got past GA. Thanks, Iazyges Consermonor Opus meum 06:29, 11 December 2016 (UTC)
Hello! You are receiving this message because you have added yourself as a member of the Roman and Byzantine Milhist Project. This is the first such message, however we hope that this can be used to coordinate editing and development of articles later down the road. If you wish to opt out of further messages, please remove yourself from here. 05:07, 23 January 2017 (UTC)
Hey man, would you please weigh in on Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/1988–89 Juventus F.C. season? A user seems to think WP:NSEASONS translates to the deletion of a top flight season article just because it is not well sourced. What a joke, may as well delete all early year season articles! Thanks. Vaselineeeeeeee ★★★ 00:22, 12 February 2017 (UTC)
Hey, I've created 2017–18 Genoa C.F.C. season. If you could comment at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/A.C. Cesena in European football :) Thanks. Vaselineeeeeeee ★★★ 01:19, 30 June 2017 (UTC)
Come va? I was hoping you could take a look at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Atalanta B.C. in European football and comment, this guy is relentless. Saluti, Vaselineeeeeeee ★★★ 11:44, 21 August 2017 (UTC)
Hey man what's up? You heard about the 2017 International Champions Cup being in the States? You planning on going to any games? Juve and Roma both play in NJ. I really wanna take the trek out to Mass to see Juve-Roma, July 30, just still seeing if I can pull something together! Vaselineeeeeeee ★★★ 15:02, 10 July 2017 (UTC)
How's it going? Thanks for imputing the fixtures. I've noticed User:Sean Ago adding "season" sections to a lot of Inter Milan season articles recently, many of which contain really bad grammar. I know he's doing it with good intentions obviously, but some of the wording is just so bad. It's just annoying since I really don't want to sit there and read through and correct all his additions, and I don't want to just delete them because I don't think that would be right either. But if a native speaker of English read his additions, they'd think Wikipedia is a joke... Vaselineeeeeeee ★★★ 13:40, 28 July 2017 (UTC)
Hey hope all is well. I forget exactly what we do when matches are postponed like Lazio-Udinese. I know Roma-Samp were also postponed earlier, but Roma's wiki season still lists it in grey and postponed and P in results by round? Don't they know the day yet? Lazio's is rescheduled for January 24 2018. Don't we just end up removing the grey match and move it to the right point in time in the match list, then I think every subsequent matchday after the postponed match is considered the matchday 1 behind until the match is made up. I know that sounds confusing...but so if it was postponed match day 12, matchday 13 would count for 12, then 14 for 13, until the match is rescheduled as matchday 22, then it would be normal again. Is that it? Vaselineeeeeeee ★★★ 23:09, 7 November 2017 (UTC)
Dude............. How can we even begin to describe a World Cup without Italy??? Ventura seems as he was only destined for failure, and bringing our beloved team and reputation down with him. It's very sad to see, especially since his tactics were all over the place and could not get the team to gel properly. The formations he played most of the time were crazy, and leaving star quality on the bench and at home. He will likely resign or get fired, but it's too little too late and should've happened much sooner. Look at what Croatia did with their coaching situation, and they made it. It's painful to see the only goal coming from a horrid deflection off De Rossi in the first leg, especially when we had quite a few really good chances with Belotti and Darmian, and in the second leg as well, however, also many wasted opportunities. Bonucci since joining Milan has looked in worse form, making several blind passes up the middle which led to dangerous counter attacks. It was agonizing to watch the minutes wind down without a goal to show for it, that goal we so desperately needed just to take to extra time. We were fortunate not to get two penalties called on us, but at the same time, we could've had a penalty first. 60 years since this last happened and it comes at a time where Italy have been lackluster at the past two World Cups as well. So, so, so sad that Buffon, Chiellini, Barzagli, and De Rossi's careers end in such a fashion. Especially for Gigi...he always wanted to retire after the 2018 World Cup, play at 40 like Zoff, but never even came to fruition. It frustrates me that we were even in this situation, having to be in Spain's group, then coming second to play arguably the hardest second seed playoff team the Swedes. It also frustrates me how teams like Serbia and Denmark/Ireland are in the World Cup, but not Italy. It's just unbelievable. This summer will not be the same with all the football going on around us and not being able to take part. Toronto's Italian population is gonna be really quiet this summer, which is something I always loved about the World Cup, everyone coming together, which is something I'm sure you guys have in NYC as well! It's so very hard to swallow. Anyway, hopefully this will allow the national team to rebuild and give youngsters experience before Euro 2020 qualification. Regards, Vaselineeeeeeee ★★★ 02:38, 14 November 2017 (UTC)
Buongiorno da Coreca, ti scrivo per salutarti e sapere come stai. Io sto abbastanza bene per ora. Ti scrivo per chiederti un aiuto per ampliare e migliorare l'articolo sulla Ferilli che giace ta tempo nel limbo. Io ho provato a fare qualcosa con scarso successo, ho chiesto aiuto a tanti amici utenti ma niente di niente....spero di ricevere aiuto da te che ho visto che te la cavi bene, Naturalmente se posso fare qualcosa per te in qualche lingua del mondo, ho tanti amici e conoscenti in svedese, danese, indonesiano e cinese per citarne qualche lingua. Io avrei intenzione di ampliare altre due bio sempre se tu mi aiuterai. Nell'attesa di una tua certa risposta e aiuto ti ringrazio in anticipo di vero cuore e sappi che potrai contare su di me per qualsiasi problema.-- Luigi Salvatore Vadacchino ( talk) 11:37, 20 November 2017 (UTC)
Hi,
I apologize for my attitude, I'm at fault here, no point reporting, it won't happen again. I'm a regular contributor. RafaelS1979 ( talk) 01:37, 24 November 2017 (UTC)
@ RafaelS1979: fair enough, we're a community here and we try to work together. You haven't been reported yet anyway so we're all good. Italia2006 ( talk) 01:40, 24 November 2017 (UTC)
Hi. We're into the last five days of the Women in Red World Contest. There's a new bonus prize of $200 worth of books of your choice to win for creating the most new women biographies between 0:00 on the 26th and 23:59 on 30th November. If you've been contributing to the contest, thank you for your support, we've produced over 2000 articles. If you haven't contributed yet, we would appreciate you taking the time to add entries to our articles achievements list by the end of the month. Thank you, and if participating, good luck with the finale!
Hello, Italia2006. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)
Hi Italia2006, thanks for your contribution to the List of La Liga hat-tricks. But, why have you added the innecesary C.F?. -- Zigurat ( talk) 17:36, 11 January 2018 (UTC)
( talk page stalker) Because it is a direct link; how it should be. Vaselineeeeeeee ★★★ 18:08, 11 January 2018 (UTC)
Hey hope all is well. Wow that was an absolute insane match against Real Madrid. It was larceny. Anyway, before the ridiculous red card to Buffon, he was keeping a clean sheet. Szczęsny came in and was scored on by the resulting penalty. Does Buffon get a clean sheet? I know we've discussed this in the past with regards to keepers being substituted when they've been keeping a clean sheet, and opted to use an asterisk to indicate a "shared clean sheet". You think this may be something to add as a note like that as well for this instance? Best of luck to Roma as they came out on the better side. You a Roma fan no? or Milan? Regards, Vaselineeeeeeee ★★★ 18:51, 15 April 2018 (UTC)
Hi. There's a requested move at Inter Milan, and I thought you might like to know if you're not watching it knowing you deal heavily in Italian football. I am appropriately notifying you, and have had no past indication of which title you prefer. Vaselineeeeeeee ★★★ 21:28, 28 June 2018 (UTC)
Wait so what's going on? They're likely going to delete those position templates etc and replace them with a new one? Vaselineeeeeeee ★★★ 16:42, 6 September 2018 (UTC)
Why are you changing "Hat-tricks(+)" into "Hat-tricks"? -- Sb008 ( talk) 20:40, 4 November 2018 (UTC)
Well, if you're not wrong, you better contact all dictionaries and tell them they're wrong, since not both of you can be right. -- Sb008 ( talk) 23:34, 5 November 2018 (UTC)
Hi mate, I guess his argument is that the article is located at Inter Milan, so there's no need to pipe to any other title. I understand that argument, although you and I both know the article should be located at F.C. Internazionale Milano. – Pee Jay 22:53, 7 November 2018 (UTC)
Hello, Italia2006. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
An article you recently created,
2019–20 U.S. Lecce season, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from
reliable,
independent sources. (
?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (
verifiability is of
central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to
draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:
" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's
general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page.
CASSIOPEIA(
talk) 05:33, 11 July 2019 (UTC)
An article you recently created,
2019–20 Udinese Calcio season, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from
reliable,
independent sources. (
?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (
verifiability is of
central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to
draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:
" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's
general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page.
CASSIOPEIA(
talk) 06:25, 2 August 2019 (UTC)
Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:2019–20 U.S. Lecce season, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.
If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.
You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.
If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.
Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot ( talk) 01:26, 13 January 2020 (UTC)
Medhi Benatia transferred during the last season, and he is still present for the 2018–19 article in the table. Perin, Mandžukić and Han must be in the table too.-- 79.34.216.248 ( talk) 19:31, 17 January 2020 (UTC)
Hey man, hope you and your family have been well during this time. A user has been creating some 2020-21 season articles for Serie A clubs. He has included the "overview" section again in these articles. I removed it at the Juve page but was reverted. I thought I remembered a discussion at footy where it was decided not to implement this section. I tried searching for it but couldn't find it - do you remember something along those lines? Vaselineeeeeeee ★★★ 00:30, 8 July 2020 (UTC)
Hey man, yeah you’re totally in the right. I haven’t edited in a while but that’ll change soon so I’ll take a look. Italia2006 ( talk) 02:22, 8 July 2020 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Upper Satrapies, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Carmania. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 06:14, 18 February 2021 (UTC)
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited 2000–01 Celtic F.C. season, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page John Underhill.
( Opt-out instructions.) -- DPL bot ( talk) 06:04, 8 August 2021 (UTC)
Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review
the candidates and submit your choices on the
voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{
NoACEMM}}
to your user talk page.
MediaWiki message delivery (
talk) 01:09, 29 November 2022 (UTC)
Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review
the candidates and submit your choices on the
voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{
NoACEMM}}
to your user talk page.
MediaWiki message delivery (
talk) 00:34, 28 November 2023 (UTC)