Welcome!
Hello, Ishan87, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:
You may also want to complete the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit the Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.
Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or , and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome!-- Biografer ( talk) 02:57, 3 May 2019 (UTC)
This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.
You have shown interest in articles about living or recently deceased people, and edits relating to the subject (living or recently deceased) of such biographical articles. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.
For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.
AntiCompositeNumber ( talk) 02:58, 22 June 2021 (UTC)
The Islamic Barnstar | ||
Your knowledge of Islam is really appreciated, I am follow you for past many days, I can't wait to give you a barnstar for your knowledge of Islam, Thanks for you contribution in the field of Islam, Assalamualaikum! Xpërt100 ( talk) 16:38, 18 September 2021 (UTC) |
Thanks a lot. Ishan87 ( talk) 15:52, 5 December 2021 (UTC)
Sorry I was busy. I don't think I could've managed time for it anyway. Thanks though. Ishan87 ( talk) 15:54, 5 December 2021 (UTC)
An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.
( Opt-out instructions.) -- DPL bot ( talk) 05:55, 24 December 2021 (UTC)
Thanx for letting me know. I fixed them now. Ishan87 ( talk) 01:21, 25 December 2021 (UTC)
Thank you for
your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved text from
Egypt into
Islam in Egypt. While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere,
Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an
edit summary at the page into which you've copied content, disclosing the copying and
linking to the copied page, e.g., copied content from [[page name]]; see that page's history for attribution
. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted {{
copied}} template on the talk pages of the source and destination. Please provide attribution for this duplication if it has not already been supplied by another editor, and if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, you should provide attribution for that also. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at
Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. If you are the sole author of the prose that was copied, attribution is not required. —
Diannaa (
talk) 14:41, 25 December 2021 (UTC)
I didn't know how to attribute. So I apologize and thank you. Ishan87 ( talk) 14:50, 25 December 2021 (UTC)
Please see Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Biology#RfC_on_boldfacing_of_scientific_names_in_articles_about_organisms, the consensus has changed. Thank you. Hemiauchenia ( talk) 22:48, 20 September 2022 (UTC)
If that's the case then change every animal page, not just a few of them. That's all I was asking. Ishan87 ( talk) 17:54, 21 September 2022 (UTC)
BulbousCow as you can see. You're the one who flipped for no reason. Bolding is the new standards now Ishan87 ( talk) 22:04, 24 September 2022 (UTC)
Bold doesn't even exist in writing. It's only in typing. I think looks alright either way. You better watch your mouth buddy. Calling some admins as stupid ain't no smart choice! :D Ishan87 ( talk) 01:03, 25 September 2022 (UTC)
Do not remove bolded common names from the lede. Bolded synonyms in the first sentence are a feature of every type of article, not just species articles (see MOS:BOLDSYN). If anything they should be de-bolded in an etymology section if they are repeated there. -- Elmidae ( talk · contribs) 08:12, 10 October 2022 (UTC)
Elmidae which page?
I'm the one who added and bolded the "desert Lynx" name at the intro of Caracal page in the first place without prior knowledge that it was already in the Etymology section. That's why I removed it. Ishan87 ( talk) 08:25, 10 October 2022 (UTC)
Also the word "lynx" is considered a misonamer for caracals so I thought it'd be better not to require it at the intro. Ishan87 ( talk) 08:33, 10 October 2022 (UTC)
All animal the pages which has a etymology/taxonomy or common names section, they have all the alternate names bolded. I don't know what you issue is about this simple matter. Alternate names aren't essential for every animal. It's totally fine to remove some of them if there's a chance of confusion. Again I'm the one who corrected the names on the AWD article. Ishan87 ( talk) 12:40, 10 October 2022 (UTC)
Here I copy-paste from the MOS: (Death of Azaria Chamberlain, redirected from Azaria Chamberlain) Avoid redundancy Edit "WP:REDUNDANCY" redirects here. For redundant articles, see WP:REDUNDANT. Shortcut MOS:REDUNDANCY Keep redundancy to a minimum in the first sentence. Use the first sentence of the article to provide relevant information that is not already given by the title of the article.[15] The title of the article need not appear verbatim in the lead if the article title is descriptive.
The alternate name has to be significant and important enough to use for redirect. The alternate names of caracal are not only misonamer but also insignificant, that's why I removed it from the lead paragraph. I kept it for Jungle cat because the main name jungle cat itself is a misonamer. However u r right that I made a mistake for AWD page, but the other alternate names at the naming section should stay bold too if I remember correctly. What is the rule about naming/etymology section? Anyway, I don't mind either way. Ishan87 ( talk) 13:04, 10 October 2022 (UTC)
An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.
( Opt-out instructions.) -- DPL bot ( talk) 06:09, 27 October 2022 (UTC)
Thank you. Both fixed now. Ishan87 ( talk) 08:27, 27 October 2022 (UTC)
Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review
the candidates and submit your choices on the
voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{
NoACEMM}}
to your user talk page.
MediaWiki message delivery (
talk) 01:41, 29 November 2022 (UTC)
Hello Ishan87! I've reverted a number of your edits carrying the edit summary "ibn = ابن bin = بن Whichever you write, be consistent with it". The fact is that medieval Arabic names are spelled بن, and ابن would simply be a misspelling. On the other hand, "ibn" is the most common way in which this word is transliterated in modern English-language reliable sources. The standard practice on Wikipedia is therefore using بن and "ibn". If you want to change this, I suggest discussing it at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Islam to get wp:consensus. ☿ Apaugasma ( talk ☉) 12:52, 1 January 2023 (UTC)
Your obsession over such small issue is simply ridiculous. Bin and ibn is the same thing. I just corrected the letters according to how it's written in English. Going as far to searching medieval texts is insane. As I said, these people are not from medieval but classical era. The fact that you felt the need to change my edits as well as other people's harakah in arabic, is absolutely pointless. I don't see a point of having a discussion to get consensus over such a no-issue, whereas there are far bigger mistakes and misinformations all over Wikipedia which editors like you don't even take a notice. Ishan87 ( talk) 12:32, 2 January 2023 (UTC)
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Tiger, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Diurnal, Growl and Python.
( Opt-out instructions.) -- DPL bot ( talk) 06:04, 26 January 2023 (UTC)
Hello, I'm GenoV84. I noticed that you removed topically-relevant content from Umm Salama. However, Wikipedia is not censored. Please do not remove or censor information that directly relates to the subject of the article. If the content in question involves images, you have the option to configure Wikipedia to hide images that you may find offensive. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. WP policies are correct; read WP:Neutral and WP:MOSISLAM. GenoV84 ( talk) 18:57, 11 February 2023 (UTC)
I have read those policies. I'm positive that the changes I made doesn't violate them. You also got the numbers (the order of marriages) wrong for the wives. There are many disputed claims. Ishan87 ( talk) 19:17, 11 February 2023 (UTC)
Mentioning first time as Islamic prophet is not honorific. It's also introducing the page for people to read islamic prophethood Ishan87 ( talk) 19:30, 11 February 2023 (UTC)
Also plz explain how any of your edits translate to neutrality? Bcz I can't see it. Ishan87 ( talk) 19:33, 11 February 2023 (UTC)
The order of marriages is not undisputed, so you listing them as 7th, 8th or 11th wife is inaccurate and also you made mistake while counting Ishan87 ( talk) 19:38, 11 February 2023 (UTC)
Plz check again Ishan87 ( talk) 19:39, 11 February 2023 (UTC)
That's exactly what I'm telling you to do, bcz you've made a mistake. Also the order of marriages of some wives are disputed. This list is only the most traditionally accepted stand Ishan87 ( talk) 19:43, 11 February 2023 (UTC)
As I said, it's not honorific. I'd like to read an admins opinion on this particular issue. However, I'll retain your changes for now but I'll restore the other edits I made which has nothing to do with your conflicts. Ishan87 ( talk) 19:55, 11 February 2023 (UTC)
I already explained to you that there's nothing honorific about using the term- islamic prophet as a general term in the lede. I'm not using it in everywhere the name- Muhammad is mentioned. I understood your point about maintaining neutrality. And as I said, I'm not doing that anymore, but you're making a big deal out of such a small issue, it's disappointing. Ishan87 ( talk) 20:15, 11 February 2023 (UTC)
That's why the term I chose was- Islamic prophet instead. There are also many figures in Wikipedia such as Zoroaster for example. He is mentioned as a prophet, but he is only a prophet of Zoroastrianism. Same goes for many greek and roman figures who are mentioned as prophets or prophetess. I don't see how it is honorific. It's just a mention of his/her occupation. Ishan87 ( talk) 20:29, 11 February 2023 (UTC)
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Maymunah bint al-Harith, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Sarif.
( Opt-out instructions.) -- DPL bot ( talk) 06:04, 12 February 2023 (UTC)
Removed the tag Ishan87 ( talk) 17:58, 12 February 2023 (UTC)
Hey. I saw you recently, and extensively, edited List of heaviest land mammals and List of largest carnivorans. Expanding the table the way you did partly broke them and is contrary to general consensus on the scope/length of such lists. In the future, I suggest you ask first if you want to extend, but be aware that such a proposal is unlikely to be accepted. Happy editing. SilverTiger12 ( talk) 01:28, 22 February 2023 (UTC)
{{
unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}}
. Note that anything you post in your unblock request will be public, so you may alternatively use the
Unblock Ticket Request System to submit an appeal if it contains information that must be private.Welcome!
Hello, Ishan87, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:
You may also want to complete the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit the Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.
Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or , and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome!-- Biografer ( talk) 02:57, 3 May 2019 (UTC)
This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.
You have shown interest in articles about living or recently deceased people, and edits relating to the subject (living or recently deceased) of such biographical articles. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.
For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.
AntiCompositeNumber ( talk) 02:58, 22 June 2021 (UTC)
The Islamic Barnstar | ||
Your knowledge of Islam is really appreciated, I am follow you for past many days, I can't wait to give you a barnstar for your knowledge of Islam, Thanks for you contribution in the field of Islam, Assalamualaikum! Xpërt100 ( talk) 16:38, 18 September 2021 (UTC) |
Thanks a lot. Ishan87 ( talk) 15:52, 5 December 2021 (UTC)
Sorry I was busy. I don't think I could've managed time for it anyway. Thanks though. Ishan87 ( talk) 15:54, 5 December 2021 (UTC)
An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.
( Opt-out instructions.) -- DPL bot ( talk) 05:55, 24 December 2021 (UTC)
Thanx for letting me know. I fixed them now. Ishan87 ( talk) 01:21, 25 December 2021 (UTC)
Thank you for
your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved text from
Egypt into
Islam in Egypt. While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere,
Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an
edit summary at the page into which you've copied content, disclosing the copying and
linking to the copied page, e.g., copied content from [[page name]]; see that page's history for attribution
. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted {{
copied}} template on the talk pages of the source and destination. Please provide attribution for this duplication if it has not already been supplied by another editor, and if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, you should provide attribution for that also. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at
Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. If you are the sole author of the prose that was copied, attribution is not required. —
Diannaa (
talk) 14:41, 25 December 2021 (UTC)
I didn't know how to attribute. So I apologize and thank you. Ishan87 ( talk) 14:50, 25 December 2021 (UTC)
Please see Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Biology#RfC_on_boldfacing_of_scientific_names_in_articles_about_organisms, the consensus has changed. Thank you. Hemiauchenia ( talk) 22:48, 20 September 2022 (UTC)
If that's the case then change every animal page, not just a few of them. That's all I was asking. Ishan87 ( talk) 17:54, 21 September 2022 (UTC)
BulbousCow as you can see. You're the one who flipped for no reason. Bolding is the new standards now Ishan87 ( talk) 22:04, 24 September 2022 (UTC)
Bold doesn't even exist in writing. It's only in typing. I think looks alright either way. You better watch your mouth buddy. Calling some admins as stupid ain't no smart choice! :D Ishan87 ( talk) 01:03, 25 September 2022 (UTC)
Do not remove bolded common names from the lede. Bolded synonyms in the first sentence are a feature of every type of article, not just species articles (see MOS:BOLDSYN). If anything they should be de-bolded in an etymology section if they are repeated there. -- Elmidae ( talk · contribs) 08:12, 10 October 2022 (UTC)
Elmidae which page?
I'm the one who added and bolded the "desert Lynx" name at the intro of Caracal page in the first place without prior knowledge that it was already in the Etymology section. That's why I removed it. Ishan87 ( talk) 08:25, 10 October 2022 (UTC)
Also the word "lynx" is considered a misonamer for caracals so I thought it'd be better not to require it at the intro. Ishan87 ( talk) 08:33, 10 October 2022 (UTC)
All animal the pages which has a etymology/taxonomy or common names section, they have all the alternate names bolded. I don't know what you issue is about this simple matter. Alternate names aren't essential for every animal. It's totally fine to remove some of them if there's a chance of confusion. Again I'm the one who corrected the names on the AWD article. Ishan87 ( talk) 12:40, 10 October 2022 (UTC)
Here I copy-paste from the MOS: (Death of Azaria Chamberlain, redirected from Azaria Chamberlain) Avoid redundancy Edit "WP:REDUNDANCY" redirects here. For redundant articles, see WP:REDUNDANT. Shortcut MOS:REDUNDANCY Keep redundancy to a minimum in the first sentence. Use the first sentence of the article to provide relevant information that is not already given by the title of the article.[15] The title of the article need not appear verbatim in the lead if the article title is descriptive.
The alternate name has to be significant and important enough to use for redirect. The alternate names of caracal are not only misonamer but also insignificant, that's why I removed it from the lead paragraph. I kept it for Jungle cat because the main name jungle cat itself is a misonamer. However u r right that I made a mistake for AWD page, but the other alternate names at the naming section should stay bold too if I remember correctly. What is the rule about naming/etymology section? Anyway, I don't mind either way. Ishan87 ( talk) 13:04, 10 October 2022 (UTC)
An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.
( Opt-out instructions.) -- DPL bot ( talk) 06:09, 27 October 2022 (UTC)
Thank you. Both fixed now. Ishan87 ( talk) 08:27, 27 October 2022 (UTC)
Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review
the candidates and submit your choices on the
voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{
NoACEMM}}
to your user talk page.
MediaWiki message delivery (
talk) 01:41, 29 November 2022 (UTC)
Hello Ishan87! I've reverted a number of your edits carrying the edit summary "ibn = ابن bin = بن Whichever you write, be consistent with it". The fact is that medieval Arabic names are spelled بن, and ابن would simply be a misspelling. On the other hand, "ibn" is the most common way in which this word is transliterated in modern English-language reliable sources. The standard practice on Wikipedia is therefore using بن and "ibn". If you want to change this, I suggest discussing it at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Islam to get wp:consensus. ☿ Apaugasma ( talk ☉) 12:52, 1 January 2023 (UTC)
Your obsession over such small issue is simply ridiculous. Bin and ibn is the same thing. I just corrected the letters according to how it's written in English. Going as far to searching medieval texts is insane. As I said, these people are not from medieval but classical era. The fact that you felt the need to change my edits as well as other people's harakah in arabic, is absolutely pointless. I don't see a point of having a discussion to get consensus over such a no-issue, whereas there are far bigger mistakes and misinformations all over Wikipedia which editors like you don't even take a notice. Ishan87 ( talk) 12:32, 2 January 2023 (UTC)
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Tiger, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Diurnal, Growl and Python.
( Opt-out instructions.) -- DPL bot ( talk) 06:04, 26 January 2023 (UTC)
Hello, I'm GenoV84. I noticed that you removed topically-relevant content from Umm Salama. However, Wikipedia is not censored. Please do not remove or censor information that directly relates to the subject of the article. If the content in question involves images, you have the option to configure Wikipedia to hide images that you may find offensive. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. WP policies are correct; read WP:Neutral and WP:MOSISLAM. GenoV84 ( talk) 18:57, 11 February 2023 (UTC)
I have read those policies. I'm positive that the changes I made doesn't violate them. You also got the numbers (the order of marriages) wrong for the wives. There are many disputed claims. Ishan87 ( talk) 19:17, 11 February 2023 (UTC)
Mentioning first time as Islamic prophet is not honorific. It's also introducing the page for people to read islamic prophethood Ishan87 ( talk) 19:30, 11 February 2023 (UTC)
Also plz explain how any of your edits translate to neutrality? Bcz I can't see it. Ishan87 ( talk) 19:33, 11 February 2023 (UTC)
The order of marriages is not undisputed, so you listing them as 7th, 8th or 11th wife is inaccurate and also you made mistake while counting Ishan87 ( talk) 19:38, 11 February 2023 (UTC)
Plz check again Ishan87 ( talk) 19:39, 11 February 2023 (UTC)
That's exactly what I'm telling you to do, bcz you've made a mistake. Also the order of marriages of some wives are disputed. This list is only the most traditionally accepted stand Ishan87 ( talk) 19:43, 11 February 2023 (UTC)
As I said, it's not honorific. I'd like to read an admins opinion on this particular issue. However, I'll retain your changes for now but I'll restore the other edits I made which has nothing to do with your conflicts. Ishan87 ( talk) 19:55, 11 February 2023 (UTC)
I already explained to you that there's nothing honorific about using the term- islamic prophet as a general term in the lede. I'm not using it in everywhere the name- Muhammad is mentioned. I understood your point about maintaining neutrality. And as I said, I'm not doing that anymore, but you're making a big deal out of such a small issue, it's disappointing. Ishan87 ( talk) 20:15, 11 February 2023 (UTC)
That's why the term I chose was- Islamic prophet instead. There are also many figures in Wikipedia such as Zoroaster for example. He is mentioned as a prophet, but he is only a prophet of Zoroastrianism. Same goes for many greek and roman figures who are mentioned as prophets or prophetess. I don't see how it is honorific. It's just a mention of his/her occupation. Ishan87 ( talk) 20:29, 11 February 2023 (UTC)
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Maymunah bint al-Harith, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Sarif.
( Opt-out instructions.) -- DPL bot ( talk) 06:04, 12 February 2023 (UTC)
Removed the tag Ishan87 ( talk) 17:58, 12 February 2023 (UTC)
Hey. I saw you recently, and extensively, edited List of heaviest land mammals and List of largest carnivorans. Expanding the table the way you did partly broke them and is contrary to general consensus on the scope/length of such lists. In the future, I suggest you ask first if you want to extend, but be aware that such a proposal is unlikely to be accepted. Happy editing. SilverTiger12 ( talk) 01:28, 22 February 2023 (UTC)
{{
unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}}
. Note that anything you post in your unblock request will be public, so you may alternatively use the
Unblock Ticket Request System to submit an appeal if it contains information that must be private.