Hi Isaacsirup! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. |
Vigyani talk ਯੋਗਦਾਨ 03:30, 14 June 2013 (UTC)
also see Talk:Krishma Kapoor also Vigyani talk ਯੋਗਦਾਨ 03:43, 14 June 2013 (UTC)
--Vigyani talk ਯੋਗਦਾਨ 04:02, 14 June 2013 (UTC)
You don't get it. Box Office Mojo hasn't been updating it's total foreign box office total on Olympus Has Fallen, which most countries are updating their numbers, but they haven't been updating the exact total box office gross numbers. this link here will tell you about it. BattleshipMan ( talk) 03:06, 17 June 2013 (UTC)
- Vivvt ( Talk) 23:11, 18 June 2013 (UTC)
As you were repeatedly reverting your statement based on just one source on her international films, I think I can defend with another popular source proving only 2 films were disasters at BO. The source that you have ( http://www.indianexpress.com/news/did-hollywood-flops-cause-ashs-manager-to-quit/769243) doesn't say the Box office verdict.
FYI - It doesn't make any sense to anyone that a film is called success only if it collected gross of $50 million at BO. In the case of Bride and prejudice, With a worldwide gross of $24 million against a production budget of $7 million, the film proved a commercial success. So as provoked & Pink panther based on the budget and its gross revenue it is called a moderate success. In business, Moderate meaning the film didn't failed at the BO.
From Hindustan Times:
Ash has done successful international projects like Bride & Prejudice (2004) and Provoked (2007). While Mistress Of Spices (2005) and The Last Legion (2007) flopped, The Pink Panther 2 (2009) did moderate business. Source : http://www.hindustantimes.com/Entertainment/Bollywood/OVER-THE-YEARS-Ash-good-as-it-can-get/Article1-930831.aspx
Cheers, Ssg2442 ( talk) 04:14, 19 June 2013 (UTC)
Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Aishwarya Rai Bachchan may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry, just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.
Thanks, BracketBot ( talk) 14:18, 19 June 2013 (UTC)
smarojit (buzz me) 18:58, 19 June 2013 (UTC)
Are you sure you really want to support the edit of a banned editor with nearly 200 known sockpuppets? It's your call but that seems awful risky unless you've very carefully examined every single part of that edit to (a) confirm that the sources support it and (b) it's NPOV (which has been one of the major problems with his or her edits). Please confirm that you've done so and are willing to take responsibility for those edits. Thanks! ElKevbo ( talk) 01:31, 21 June 2013 (UTC)
As you have already seen in the discussion on ANI, the "yellow" in your signature make is impossible to read. As per the signature guidelines (more specifically WP:SIGAPP), you're requested to change the colour to something that allows your username to be read by all users on a plain white background. Thanks ( ✉→ BWilkins ←✎) 09:11, 21 June 2013 (UTC)
Isaacsirup ( block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser ( log))
Request reason:
No clue about why I got blocked-- Isaacsirup ChatMe! ReadMe!! 22:48, 21 June 2013 (UTC)
Decline reason:
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{ unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
This was a check user block, which is almost never reversed ("All such blocks are subject to direct review by the Arbitration Committee, and administrators should not undo or alter any block that is specifically called a "CheckUser" block without first consulting a CheckUser."). I'm not going to decline your request again. I'll leave that to another admin. If you have any further comments, I suggest you not make unblock requests but simply comment. If an admin decides you are wasting our time, your talk page access will probably be revoked.-- Bbb23 ( talk) 00:44, 22 June 2013 (UTC)
If this guy really is Mangoeater, then why will a severe damager to the project be so cooperative and do such a thing? I don't believe that this guy is Mangoeater. But one strange thing is, how can a CU get it wrong? I'm just commenting, you can choose to ignore it when processing unblock request. Arctic Kangaroo ( ✉ • ✎) 01:19, 22 June 2013 (UTC)
Another thing, which vandal has ever decorated his signature? Never came across a single one so far in my few months' experience in fighting vandalism. Arctic Kangaroo ( ✉ • ✎) 02:57, 22 June 2013 (UTC)
They should be spending their time on Wikipedia more "worthwhile" by damaging it, the more the better. Arctic Kangaroo ( ✉ • ✎) 03:01, 22 June 2013 (UTC)
Chance of being a sock after reviewing: 30-70. Arctic Kangaroo ( ✉ • ✎) 03:29, 22 June 2013 (UTC)
please see history — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ashhhfann ( talk • contribs) 07:54, 28 June 2013 (UTC)
Hi Isaacsirup! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. |
Vigyani talk ਯੋਗਦਾਨ 03:30, 14 June 2013 (UTC)
also see Talk:Krishma Kapoor also Vigyani talk ਯੋਗਦਾਨ 03:43, 14 June 2013 (UTC)
--Vigyani talk ਯੋਗਦਾਨ 04:02, 14 June 2013 (UTC)
You don't get it. Box Office Mojo hasn't been updating it's total foreign box office total on Olympus Has Fallen, which most countries are updating their numbers, but they haven't been updating the exact total box office gross numbers. this link here will tell you about it. BattleshipMan ( talk) 03:06, 17 June 2013 (UTC)
- Vivvt ( Talk) 23:11, 18 June 2013 (UTC)
As you were repeatedly reverting your statement based on just one source on her international films, I think I can defend with another popular source proving only 2 films were disasters at BO. The source that you have ( http://www.indianexpress.com/news/did-hollywood-flops-cause-ashs-manager-to-quit/769243) doesn't say the Box office verdict.
FYI - It doesn't make any sense to anyone that a film is called success only if it collected gross of $50 million at BO. In the case of Bride and prejudice, With a worldwide gross of $24 million against a production budget of $7 million, the film proved a commercial success. So as provoked & Pink panther based on the budget and its gross revenue it is called a moderate success. In business, Moderate meaning the film didn't failed at the BO.
From Hindustan Times:
Ash has done successful international projects like Bride & Prejudice (2004) and Provoked (2007). While Mistress Of Spices (2005) and The Last Legion (2007) flopped, The Pink Panther 2 (2009) did moderate business. Source : http://www.hindustantimes.com/Entertainment/Bollywood/OVER-THE-YEARS-Ash-good-as-it-can-get/Article1-930831.aspx
Cheers, Ssg2442 ( talk) 04:14, 19 June 2013 (UTC)
Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Aishwarya Rai Bachchan may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry, just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.
Thanks, BracketBot ( talk) 14:18, 19 June 2013 (UTC)
smarojit (buzz me) 18:58, 19 June 2013 (UTC)
Are you sure you really want to support the edit of a banned editor with nearly 200 known sockpuppets? It's your call but that seems awful risky unless you've very carefully examined every single part of that edit to (a) confirm that the sources support it and (b) it's NPOV (which has been one of the major problems with his or her edits). Please confirm that you've done so and are willing to take responsibility for those edits. Thanks! ElKevbo ( talk) 01:31, 21 June 2013 (UTC)
As you have already seen in the discussion on ANI, the "yellow" in your signature make is impossible to read. As per the signature guidelines (more specifically WP:SIGAPP), you're requested to change the colour to something that allows your username to be read by all users on a plain white background. Thanks ( ✉→ BWilkins ←✎) 09:11, 21 June 2013 (UTC)
Isaacsirup ( block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser ( log))
Request reason:
No clue about why I got blocked-- Isaacsirup ChatMe! ReadMe!! 22:48, 21 June 2013 (UTC)
Decline reason:
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{ unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
This was a check user block, which is almost never reversed ("All such blocks are subject to direct review by the Arbitration Committee, and administrators should not undo or alter any block that is specifically called a "CheckUser" block without first consulting a CheckUser."). I'm not going to decline your request again. I'll leave that to another admin. If you have any further comments, I suggest you not make unblock requests but simply comment. If an admin decides you are wasting our time, your talk page access will probably be revoked.-- Bbb23 ( talk) 00:44, 22 June 2013 (UTC)
If this guy really is Mangoeater, then why will a severe damager to the project be so cooperative and do such a thing? I don't believe that this guy is Mangoeater. But one strange thing is, how can a CU get it wrong? I'm just commenting, you can choose to ignore it when processing unblock request. Arctic Kangaroo ( ✉ • ✎) 01:19, 22 June 2013 (UTC)
Another thing, which vandal has ever decorated his signature? Never came across a single one so far in my few months' experience in fighting vandalism. Arctic Kangaroo ( ✉ • ✎) 02:57, 22 June 2013 (UTC)
They should be spending their time on Wikipedia more "worthwhile" by damaging it, the more the better. Arctic Kangaroo ( ✉ • ✎) 03:01, 22 June 2013 (UTC)
Chance of being a sock after reviewing: 30-70. Arctic Kangaroo ( ✉ • ✎) 03:29, 22 June 2013 (UTC)
please see history — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ashhhfann ( talk • contribs) 07:54, 28 June 2013 (UTC)