Welcome!
Hello, Invisible Flying Mangoes, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a
Wikipedian! Please
sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out
Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}}
on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! Cheers, --
Infrogmation
21:44, 24 August 2006 (UTC)
Thanks very much for your translation assistance and support at SPATRA!! I completely agree with you that a name change/move is in order; I just translated the Spanish title literally before really reading the text. (Lesson learned on the wisdom of that! ;-)) I'd love to collaborate with you on the rest of the translation. - Fsotrain 09 13:54, 28 August 2006 (UTC)
Hey, first could you send me an email sometime and let me know whats going on? Also, FYI Aaron is going to be up at Har Charmon in about 3 months hopefully. Now as to the quote:
I'll attempt to go through this sentence by sentence.
In summary I am unimpressed if not outright dissapointed in the above. My general impression of process philosophy has been somewhat positive (although I find the notion of a divine tinkerer theologically abhorrent). I'm not very familiar with "naturalistic theism" (which sounds sort of like theistic evolution but not quite) but this reads pretty close to some of the more annoying sorts of ID and creationist arguments. In fact, variants of this argument are common enough that I wouldn't be surprised to have a listing in the |Index to Creationist Claims (hmm, I can't find an obvious entry that addresses this specific point, I'll look in more detail later and maybe drop a note to Mark that it might need an entry). I hope that clarifies matters. JoshuaZ 01:20, 29 August 2006 (UTC)
I just copied this from my talk page to here - my reply that I left a week ago, not sure if you read it. - Sam 06:13, 13 October 2006 (UTC)
Thank you for letting me know, and for the suggestion! I think you are absolutely right, and I breezed right by an important distinction. I dont really have the time today to fix the mistake, but please correct it yourself. Perhaps both you and I could go through the rest of the article and collaborate like this? - Sam 18:51, 5 October 2006 (UTC)
Thank you: [1]. Rintrah 10:44, 2 November 2006 (UTC)
At long last, the long-overdue nomination of medieval cuisine as an FAC is under way. You are invited to grab your fill of potage, quince pie, a subtlety worthy of a pope, and all the beer you can drink! Oh, and don't forget to make a few comments while you're digging in...
Peter Isotalo 21:22, 2 March 2007 (UTC)
Thanks for the comments (: response. —— Martinphi ☎ Ψ Φ—— 07:23, 30 March 2008 (UTC)
Welcome!
Hello, Invisible Flying Mangoes, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a
Wikipedian! Please
sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out
Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}}
on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! Cheers, --
Infrogmation
21:44, 24 August 2006 (UTC)
Thanks very much for your translation assistance and support at SPATRA!! I completely agree with you that a name change/move is in order; I just translated the Spanish title literally before really reading the text. (Lesson learned on the wisdom of that! ;-)) I'd love to collaborate with you on the rest of the translation. - Fsotrain 09 13:54, 28 August 2006 (UTC)
Hey, first could you send me an email sometime and let me know whats going on? Also, FYI Aaron is going to be up at Har Charmon in about 3 months hopefully. Now as to the quote:
I'll attempt to go through this sentence by sentence.
In summary I am unimpressed if not outright dissapointed in the above. My general impression of process philosophy has been somewhat positive (although I find the notion of a divine tinkerer theologically abhorrent). I'm not very familiar with "naturalistic theism" (which sounds sort of like theistic evolution but not quite) but this reads pretty close to some of the more annoying sorts of ID and creationist arguments. In fact, variants of this argument are common enough that I wouldn't be surprised to have a listing in the |Index to Creationist Claims (hmm, I can't find an obvious entry that addresses this specific point, I'll look in more detail later and maybe drop a note to Mark that it might need an entry). I hope that clarifies matters. JoshuaZ 01:20, 29 August 2006 (UTC)
I just copied this from my talk page to here - my reply that I left a week ago, not sure if you read it. - Sam 06:13, 13 October 2006 (UTC)
Thank you for letting me know, and for the suggestion! I think you are absolutely right, and I breezed right by an important distinction. I dont really have the time today to fix the mistake, but please correct it yourself. Perhaps both you and I could go through the rest of the article and collaborate like this? - Sam 18:51, 5 October 2006 (UTC)
Thank you: [1]. Rintrah 10:44, 2 November 2006 (UTC)
At long last, the long-overdue nomination of medieval cuisine as an FAC is under way. You are invited to grab your fill of potage, quince pie, a subtlety worthy of a pope, and all the beer you can drink! Oh, and don't forget to make a few comments while you're digging in...
Peter Isotalo 21:22, 2 March 2007 (UTC)
Thanks for the comments (: response. —— Martinphi ☎ Ψ Φ—— 07:23, 30 March 2008 (UTC)