This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 75 | ← | Archive 80 | Archive 81 | Archive 82 | Archive 83 | Archive 84 | Archive 85 |
ARCHIVE PAGE 82: October 2014
Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Okenia mexicorum may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot ( talk) 12:58, 24 October 2014 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 10:59, 27 October 2014 (UTC)
Greetings... how's thing? We haven't connected for some time! There's a new project for organising articles on animal anatomy (shortcut WP:ANAN). You may have noticed that I've linked some mollusc articles to it. Please feel free to change any assessments you don't agree with. It would be great to have you as a member on the project if it interests you. All the best. -- Epipelagic ( talk) 06:02, 28 October 2014 (UTC)
Hi Invertzoo,
In browsing I came across Mucuna bracteata with tags at the top for cleanup and peacock. Is it Ok for me to delete these? The article had been edited to address the issues. BernardP ( talk) 17:32, 30 October 2014 (UTC)
This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 75 | ← | Archive 80 | Archive 81 | Archive 82 | Archive 83 | Archive 84 | Archive 85 |
ARCHIVE PAGE 82: October 2014
Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Okenia mexicorum may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot ( talk) 12:58, 24 October 2014 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 10:59, 27 October 2014 (UTC)
Greetings... how's thing? We haven't connected for some time! There's a new project for organising articles on animal anatomy (shortcut WP:ANAN). You may have noticed that I've linked some mollusc articles to it. Please feel free to change any assessments you don't agree with. It would be great to have you as a member on the project if it interests you. All the best. -- Epipelagic ( talk) 06:02, 28 October 2014 (UTC)
Hi Invertzoo,
In browsing I came across Mucuna bracteata with tags at the top for cleanup and peacock. Is it Ok for me to delete these? The article had been edited to address the issues. BernardP ( talk) 17:32, 30 October 2014 (UTC)