![]() | This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 75 | ← | Archive 77 | Archive 78 | Archive 79 | Archive 80 | Archive 81 | → | Archive 85 |
ARCHIVE PAGE 79: July 2014
Hello, I'm
BracketBot. I have automatically detected that
your edit to
Ethminolia hemprichii may have broken the
syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just
edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on
my operator's talk page.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot ( talk) 15:48, 5 July 2014 (UTC)
Hello, I'm
BracketBot. I have automatically detected that
your edit to
Intolerable Cruelty may have broken the
syntax by modifying 2 "()"s and 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just
edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on
my operator's talk page.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot ( talk) 21:16, 5 July 2014 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 10:27, 11 July 2014 (UTC)
Invertzoo: I have made some... revisions... for you to see and comment on. I am not ready to offer it up for featured picture consideration, but I have been meticulous in improving it and have been reviewing all of the available literature before bringing it to its current state. I am braced. See what you think of it now. KDS444 ( talk) 06:06, 15 July 2014 (UTC)
Susan, the article on The Festivus is wonderful however it is inaccurate to state that the journal "was" peer reviewed when in fact it still "is" peer reviewed. I just added two more professionals to our peer review board. Give me a call when you have a chance. I hope all is well with you and Ed. Shellnut ( talk) 02:43, 16 July 2014 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Rip tide, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Flood tide and Ebb. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 08:55, 18 July 2014 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 08:53, 25 July 2014 (UTC)
The controversial study on tunicates that was under discussion in May is back causing trouble in the article again. Somebody has now labelled it pseudoscience and the present state of the paragraph is no longer "neutral" in my opinion. Would you like to take a look? Cwmhiraeth ( talk) 05:18, 31 July 2014 (UTC)
Dear Invertzoo, I will try to get the pictures you requested when I go to my village. It looks like NERITIDAE. Thanks, Jai Prakash Singh — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jaiprakashsingh ( talk • contribs) 12:42, 31 July 2014 (UTC)
![]() | This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 75 | ← | Archive 77 | Archive 78 | Archive 79 | Archive 80 | Archive 81 | → | Archive 85 |
ARCHIVE PAGE 79: July 2014
Hello, I'm
BracketBot. I have automatically detected that
your edit to
Ethminolia hemprichii may have broken the
syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just
edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on
my operator's talk page.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot ( talk) 15:48, 5 July 2014 (UTC)
Hello, I'm
BracketBot. I have automatically detected that
your edit to
Intolerable Cruelty may have broken the
syntax by modifying 2 "()"s and 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just
edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on
my operator's talk page.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot ( talk) 21:16, 5 July 2014 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 10:27, 11 July 2014 (UTC)
Invertzoo: I have made some... revisions... for you to see and comment on. I am not ready to offer it up for featured picture consideration, but I have been meticulous in improving it and have been reviewing all of the available literature before bringing it to its current state. I am braced. See what you think of it now. KDS444 ( talk) 06:06, 15 July 2014 (UTC)
Susan, the article on The Festivus is wonderful however it is inaccurate to state that the journal "was" peer reviewed when in fact it still "is" peer reviewed. I just added two more professionals to our peer review board. Give me a call when you have a chance. I hope all is well with you and Ed. Shellnut ( talk) 02:43, 16 July 2014 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Rip tide, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Flood tide and Ebb. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 08:55, 18 July 2014 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 08:53, 25 July 2014 (UTC)
The controversial study on tunicates that was under discussion in May is back causing trouble in the article again. Somebody has now labelled it pseudoscience and the present state of the paragraph is no longer "neutral" in my opinion. Would you like to take a look? Cwmhiraeth ( talk) 05:18, 31 July 2014 (UTC)
Dear Invertzoo, I will try to get the pictures you requested when I go to my village. It looks like NERITIDAE. Thanks, Jai Prakash Singh — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jaiprakashsingh ( talk • contribs) 12:42, 31 July 2014 (UTC)