|
Did you really intend this revert? It is unnecessarily reinstating a version that has been challenged. At first glance, you would seem to be doing the edit warring IP's bidding. — Quondum 00:05, 16 March 2015 (UTC)
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. Thank you. -- mfb ( talk) 13:50, 16 March 2015 (UTC)
With this edit you again restore a paper by Omerbashich to Dimensionless physical constant that nobody else supports. This paper is published only in the Arxiv which usually doesn't count as a reliable source for Wikipedia. If you continue to restore this paper (before getting consensus) it is likely that I or another administrator will block your account. Thank you, EdJohnston ( talk) 14:26, 16 March 2015 (UTC)
{{
unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}
. However, you should read the
guide to appealing blocks first.During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection.
The full report is at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring#User:Inorout reported by User:Mfb (Result: Blocked). EdJohnston ( talk) 15:01, 16 March 2015 (UTC)
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. Thank you. -- mfb ( talk) 15:26, 23 March 2015 (UTC)
I don't understand your support for the material from this single unpublished paper. What is the point to us continually reverting each other's edits? I'm sure you understand this is edit warring and can get us blocked. How about discussing it on Talk:Gravitational constant/Archive 1#A formula for G? or Talk:Dimensionless physical constant#A formula for G?? I'd like to hear your case. Maybe we can find a compromise? -- Chetvorno TALK 16:59, 23 March 2015 (UTC)
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. You appear to be engaged in an edit war with one or more editors according to your reverts at Gravity. Although repeatedly reverting or undoing another editor's contributions may seem necessary to protect your preferred version of a page, on Wikipedia this is usually seen as obstructing the normal editing process, and often creates animosity between editors. Instead of edit warring, please discuss the situation with the editor(s) involved and try to reach a consensus on the talk page.
If editors continue to revert to their preferred version they are likely to be blocked from editing. This isn't done to punish an editor, but to prevent the disruption caused by edit warring. In particular, editors should be aware of the three-revert rule, which says that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. While edit warring on Wikipedia is not acceptable in any amount, breaking the three-revert rule is very likely to lead to a block. Thank you. Amaury ( talk) 20:17, 23 March 2015 (UTC)
{{
unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}
. However, you should read the
guide to appealing blocks first. Suspected sock puppet of User:Bosnipedian, who was also a promoter of the work of Mensur Omerbashich. See link to a page about Omerbashich. Bosnipedian was previously blocked per WP:Sockpuppet investigations/Bosnipedian/Archive. Search for Omerbashich in that SPI. The most recent AN3 report related to this case is WP:Administrators' noticeboard/3RRArchive275#User:Inorout reported by User:Mfb (Result: Blocked). Besides Inorout, a number of IPs have been restoring the work of Omerbashich. EdJohnston ( talk) 20:13, 23 March 2015 (UTC)
|
Did you really intend this revert? It is unnecessarily reinstating a version that has been challenged. At first glance, you would seem to be doing the edit warring IP's bidding. — Quondum 00:05, 16 March 2015 (UTC)
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. Thank you. -- mfb ( talk) 13:50, 16 March 2015 (UTC)
With this edit you again restore a paper by Omerbashich to Dimensionless physical constant that nobody else supports. This paper is published only in the Arxiv which usually doesn't count as a reliable source for Wikipedia. If you continue to restore this paper (before getting consensus) it is likely that I or another administrator will block your account. Thank you, EdJohnston ( talk) 14:26, 16 March 2015 (UTC)
{{
unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}
. However, you should read the
guide to appealing blocks first.During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection.
The full report is at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring#User:Inorout reported by User:Mfb (Result: Blocked). EdJohnston ( talk) 15:01, 16 March 2015 (UTC)
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. Thank you. -- mfb ( talk) 15:26, 23 March 2015 (UTC)
I don't understand your support for the material from this single unpublished paper. What is the point to us continually reverting each other's edits? I'm sure you understand this is edit warring and can get us blocked. How about discussing it on Talk:Gravitational constant/Archive 1#A formula for G? or Talk:Dimensionless physical constant#A formula for G?? I'd like to hear your case. Maybe we can find a compromise? -- Chetvorno TALK 16:59, 23 March 2015 (UTC)
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. You appear to be engaged in an edit war with one or more editors according to your reverts at Gravity. Although repeatedly reverting or undoing another editor's contributions may seem necessary to protect your preferred version of a page, on Wikipedia this is usually seen as obstructing the normal editing process, and often creates animosity between editors. Instead of edit warring, please discuss the situation with the editor(s) involved and try to reach a consensus on the talk page.
If editors continue to revert to their preferred version they are likely to be blocked from editing. This isn't done to punish an editor, but to prevent the disruption caused by edit warring. In particular, editors should be aware of the three-revert rule, which says that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. While edit warring on Wikipedia is not acceptable in any amount, breaking the three-revert rule is very likely to lead to a block. Thank you. Amaury ( talk) 20:17, 23 March 2015 (UTC)
{{
unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}
. However, you should read the
guide to appealing blocks first. Suspected sock puppet of User:Bosnipedian, who was also a promoter of the work of Mensur Omerbashich. See link to a page about Omerbashich. Bosnipedian was previously blocked per WP:Sockpuppet investigations/Bosnipedian/Archive. Search for Omerbashich in that SPI. The most recent AN3 report related to this case is WP:Administrators' noticeboard/3RRArchive275#User:Inorout reported by User:Mfb (Result: Blocked). Besides Inorout, a number of IPs have been restoring the work of Omerbashich. EdJohnston ( talk) 20:13, 23 March 2015 (UTC)