![]() | This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 40 | ← | Archive 43 | Archive 44 | Archive 45 | Archive 46 | Archive 47 | → | Archive 50 |
Happy New Year! | ||
Hey there, Indubitably! Happy new
Gregorian year. All the best for the new year, both towards you and your family and friends too. I know that I am the only person lonely enough to be running this thing as the new year is ushered in, but meh, what are you going to do. I like to keep my templated messages in a satisfactorily melancholy tone. ;)
Congratulations to Coren, Wizardman, Vassyana, Carcharoth, Jayvdb, Casliber, Risker, Roger Davies, Cool Hand Luke and Rlevse, who were all appointed to the Arbitration Committee after the ArbCom elections. I am sure I am but a voice of many when I say I trust the aforementioned users to improve the committee, each in their own way, as listed within their respective election statements. Now, if you'll excuse me, I'm off to update the 2009 article, heh. Best wishes, neuro (talk) 00:51, 1 January 2009 (UTC) |
Dear Jennavecia,
Wishing you a happy new year, and very best wishes for 2009. Whether we were friends or not in the past year, I hope 2009 will be better for us both.
Kind regards,
Majorly talk 21:08, 1 January 2009 (UTC)
There is a brand spanking new thread regarding what I mentioned in my email earlier today. Here is the link. Willking1979 ( talk) 01:36, 2 January 2009 (UTC)
Hey remember the user I was telling you about a week or so ago, who showed up in the LawLord case with a sudden opinion to challenge mine and respond incivilly to me after we had, had prior dealings on the Talk:List of shipwrecks article. Well, the user is still at it. A few days later, he showed up out of nowhere yet again, involving himself in yet another debate I was having (an old debate which didn't involve him but another user) on the 2009 article talkpage, as shown here where I return and make a joking comment to the user involved [1] and then here where he incivily chimes in with this edit [2]. I originally had dealings with this user at the bottom of this article talk page Talk:List of shipwrecks regarding an incident in which he violated the 3RR as shown here [3] but an admin gave him a 2nd chance because I didn't give him a warning.
Anyways, now he's added uncivil comments on my user talk page as shown here [4] and when I removed them, he reverted my talkpage with the addition of more incivility, as shown here [5] . He also seems to be trying to cause trouble between myself and the user who adopted me as shown here [6] . Sorry to bother you again, but user CalendarWatcher has already avoided one block for the 3RR and now is continually reverting my own talkpage so he can keep incivility on it. He's broken several rules, so could you please step in. Cheers! Cheers_Dude ( talk) 14:34, 3 January 2009 (UTC)
Three issues have been published since the last deliver: November 24, December 1, and January 3.
![]() |
---|
| ||
Volume 4, Issue 45 | 24 November 2008 | About the Signpost |
|
| ||
Volume 4, Issue 46 | 1 December 2008 | About the Signpost |
|
ArbCom elections: Elections open | Wikipedia in the news |
WikiProject Report: WikiProject Solar System | Features and admins |
The Report on Lengthy Litigation |
| ||
Volume 5, Issue 1 | 3 January 2009 | About the Signpost |
|
| |
Home | Archives | Newsroom | Tip Line | Single-Page View | Shortcut : WP:POST |
|
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list.-- ragesoss ( talk) 21:42, 3 January 2009 (UTC)
I've been awarded barnstars for my anti-vandal work and my article on June Buchanan was featured on DYK yesterday, but this tops it all: [7]
All I have to say is this: Wow. Willking1979 ( talk) 22:27, 5 January 2009 (UTC)
Jenna could you please block the ip address that removed the Death of a Staff Member please and also if you look under the discussion page I added one new article that was posted on the University of Michigan newspaper. user;stokru720 jan 5 2009 Stokru720 ( talk) 22:49, 5 January 2009 (UTC)
*is still waiting* - Penwhale | Blast him / Follow his steps 18:30, 6 January 2009 (UTC)
I do not transclude my signature. Garden. 20:33, 6 January 2009 (UTC)
Any suggestions on what to do with this article? I did a tiny little bit of cleanup on it, but I'm not even sure it deserves an article. Enigma msg 03:31, 8 January 2009 (UTC)
Sorry to see another anti-admin go... while we didn't always agree, I think we were on the same side more than not... I do want to give a special thank you for not turning on me when I made my major faux pas back in May. Your voice actually helped me reflect on my own thoughts/feelings, and I might have left WP then if not for you. Thank you, hope that you return when you're ready.--- Balloonman PoppaBalloon CSD Survey Results 15:13, 8 January 2009 (UTC)
I'm sorry to see this too. Hope your batteries recharge and you come back when you feel ready. -- Malleus Fatuorum 15:15, 8 January 2009 (UTC)
As Bob Hope would say, thanks for the memories. I thank you for all the advice you've given me and for all you do here on Wikipedia. Hope to see you down the road. Willking1979 ( talk) 15:24, 8 January 2009 (UTC)
I am very sorry to see this. Given the mounting collection at WP:FORMER losing another active admin to indef. semi-retirement is yet another blow. Good luck, and hope to still see you pop in from time to time! Pedro : Chat 16:29, 8 January 2009 (UTC)
Lara lara lara, what can I say. You were patient with me always, forgave me for my (many) mistakes, and are a perfect example of a great adopter. I will really miss you, but I'm still happy that I got to know what a great person you are. :) Sam Blab 21:26, 8 January 2009 (UTC)
Thanks, guys (and dick ;)). I'll be poking my head in, commenting where I feel so inclined (as I just did an edit or three ago) and making sure my baby is taken care of (this is not a claim of ownership!*). As can be seen in my edits, I'm just not interested anymore. It's a repetitive cycle and I'm tired of watching the same movie, if you know what I mean. Fear not, though. I'll still be wandering around aimlessly, like an Alzheimer's patient, when looking for info... and who can resist the pink (yours is probably orange) banner? لenna vecia 05:13, 9 January 2009 (UTC) *Anyone touches my article and I keeeel you! :D
Grrr… can't she be shanghaied into staying? No fair!-- Goodmorningworld ( talk) 00:49, 10 January 2009 (UTC)
==I will miss your support== You have been viligent in doing your job I truly appreciate it and I hope your replacement is as sensitive as I know you are stokru720 Stokru720 ( talk) 06:55, 11 January 2009 (UTC)
I miss you already. I can understand especially after the last couple of days as I have seen how much you went into bat for E-man's RFA, fighting the good fight against the seemingly constant negativity coming from editors who use wikipedia to express their political frustration. Please come talk to me anytime via email - your words will be between us alone. Enjoy the extra time with those in your real life, that you love and love you unconditionally. Best regards Steve. -- VS talk 21:59, 8 January 2009 (UTC)
I feel like I've been fed to a shark You can't do this Any way I'll miss you (I'm rubbish at persuading)
Reallikeunreal ( talk) 17:22, 10 January 2009 (UTC) Thanks 4 everything
Lara could you please post on my talk page the discussion you removed so i could send it to mr greene in an email
Thank you
Bob samuels-- Bobsamuels ( talk) 21:33, 10 January 2009 (UTC)
You have been a real trooper in my efforts to make sure proper information is posted. I hope everything in your life provides pleasure and gradification David Greene -- user:stokru720 06:59, 11 January 2009 (UTC) Stokru720 ( talk)
Hi,
I believe that you just falsely warned someone because that was actually a sandbox that I was experementing on OK? And like I said to a different person on here ( I don't remember who) but I have seen editors blank the sandbox page alot of times amnd they were off the hook for it so I don't really think that was Warnable Ok? Thank you.-- Chase25 ( talk) 20:45, 12 January 2009 (UTC)
Lets try this again shall we? I have been on Wikipedia for a little while now and I have seen people blank that page and got away with it and you I think are giving a false warning about it. In fact I went through this just last week or the week before with another person on here and they stated that was not actually warnable so yes you gave me a false warning and i'm sorry but I strongly dissagree with that.-- Chase25 ( talk) 20:51, 12 January 2009 (UTC)
do me a favor go watch Dr. Phil and adjust your attitude.-- Chase25 ( talk) 21:04, 12 January 2009 (UTC)
i'm glad to hear that why don't you go on there and tell him you like to falsely accuse people on Wikipedia and get some help with your attitude issue.-- Chase25 ( talk) 21:08, 12 January 2009 (UTC)
Pardon me Missy but you did falsely warn me and I really think you're making a big deal on the sandbox issue because the soxbot always fixes it. Now go tell your mom you can't play on Wikipedia anymore until you adjust your attitude.-- Chase25 ( talk) 21:15, 12 January 2009 (UTC)
I'm sorry slakr but I strongly Dissagree with this Adminstrator's actions-- Chase25 ( talk) 21:20, 12 January 2009 (UTC)
Good grief! -- Malleus Fatuorum 21:27, 12 January 2009 (UTC)
Turns out he's right, sort of. I dropped the wrong warning, I think. It should have been {{ Uw-sandbox}}. لenna vecia 21:39, 12 January 2009 (UTC)
First of all. I apologize for getting so mad at you. But how were you able to figure out I was right?-- Chase25 ( talk) 21:51, 12 January 2009 (UTC)
Jenna, Jenna, Jenna,
Why don't you have a meeting with the other admins and consider changing the policy on that-- Chase25 ( talk) 19:22, 13 January 2009 (UTC)
jenna Jenna jenna let's practice your listening skills Hmm?
I don't vandalize sandboxes i just use them to test things and as I said yesterday for the 1,0000,00th timee I do not see that as a warnable offense because its a sanfbox for god's sakes and people remove that line all the time and not get warnings about it. Now sweetie I'd love to say the same thing over and over if you'll excuse i have to go update some articles for the Radio Stations in my town because they have either switched formats or got sold.-- Chase25 ( talk) 19:31, 13 January 2009 (UTC)
Don't block I'm done arguing about this-- Chase25 ( talk) 19:40, 13 January 2009 (UTC)
I'm Sorry (Again) Jenna or Lara for all the trouble today.
so now the question is what do you prefer that I call you Jenna or Lara?-- Chase25 ( talk) 19:52, 13 January 2009 (UTC)
SORRY, Can you tell me whether you live in Amerrica or the UK. Thanks Reallikeunreal ( talk) 20:49, 13 January 2009 (UTC)
![]() |
---|
| ||
Volume 5, Issue 2 | 10 January 2009 | About the Signpost |
|
| |
Home | Archives | Newsroom | Tip Line | Single-Page View | Shortcut : WP:POST |
|
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list.-- ragesoss ( talk) 20:00, 11 January 2009 (UTC) §hepBot ( Disable) 19:46, 13 January 2009 (UTC)
Hi Lara / Jenna,
Hope I catch you in, (noticed the semi-retired). I saw on the Sangler post that you said (or rather it's more accurate to say that I read to understand) that the particular RFC wasn't proper. I was wondering why it was an improper RfC? I'd rather learn from someone else's mistakes than my own (I don't appear quite as stupid that way ... LOL). Anyway, was just curious. hmmmm ... personalized smile huh ...I'm thinkin here ... "8D" ....ok, so I'll work on it. all my best
Ched (
talk)
17:12, 15 January 2009 (UTC)
I hereby command you to at least semi-protect the page Cliff Bleszinski, which has been filled with defaming content, vandalism, and just plain stupid statements for more than a month! Tanisha Escobar ( talk) 22:55, 15 January 2009 (UTC)
The recall draft is posted: it's been edited a few times since with comments from Risker, MZM, and DanielB. Hersfold ( t/ a/ c) 07:37, 16 January 2009 (UTC)
![]() |
---|
| ||
Volume 5, Issue 3 | 17 January 2009 | About the Signpost |
|
| |
Home | Archives | Newsroom | Tip Line | Single-Page View | Shortcut : WP:POST |
|
![]() |
Jennavecia has been identified as an
Awesome Wikipedian, Best Wishes, |
No there are actually many awesome people around (though sadly awesomeness and tendency to leave this project seem to be correlated) Alas, not me, though what I lack in awesomeness, I make up in ... er... I'll get back to you on that one :| -- Gurch ( talk) 23:13, 20 January 2009 (UTC)
hello Jennavecia. Can you tell me why you deleted the page as I posted the content of the article on the discussion page to be helped building the article with a NPOV ? Thanks GregoryCouratier ( talk) 14:29, 23 January 2009 (UTC)
![]() |
---|
| ||
Volume 5, Issue 4 | 24 January 2009 | About the Signpost |
|
| |
Home | Archives | Newsroom | Tip Line | Single-Page View | Shortcut : WP:POST |
|
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list.-- ragesoss ( talk) 03:08, 25 January 2009 (UTC)
Delivered at 04:26, 25 January 2009 (UTC) by §hepBot ( Disable)
that you were a horrid admin and really mean person. You lacked focus, commitment and neutrality. I'm jolly glad you're semi-retired and I'll dance the day you're de-sysopped. But, in a spirit of fairness, it'll be a dance of your choice. X MarX the Spot ( talk) 15:37, 25 January 2009 (UTC)
I dropped a question at Ioeth's talk page. I saw the semi-retired heading, and the links on your user page as being wiki-gnome and wiki-fairy. That's why I asked at his page. Anyway - I see that you're still active, and I didn't want you to think I was avoiding talking to you personally or anything. Hope life is treating you well .. Ched ( talk) 03:02, 26 January 2009 (UTC)
Never had a chance to leave a message on your talk page (I think) since I've been here, so thought I'll use my final opportunity to do so. <3 Thank you for all your wonderful and valuable contributions. <3 For the limited period of time that I'm still stuck here, will miss ya. Take care, Ncmvocalist ( talk) 06:09, 26 January 2009 (UTC) (P. S. Jennaveciawayyy! :P lol.)
![]() | This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 40 | ← | Archive 43 | Archive 44 | Archive 45 | Archive 46 | Archive 47 | → | Archive 50 |
Happy New Year! | ||
Hey there, Indubitably! Happy new
Gregorian year. All the best for the new year, both towards you and your family and friends too. I know that I am the only person lonely enough to be running this thing as the new year is ushered in, but meh, what are you going to do. I like to keep my templated messages in a satisfactorily melancholy tone. ;)
Congratulations to Coren, Wizardman, Vassyana, Carcharoth, Jayvdb, Casliber, Risker, Roger Davies, Cool Hand Luke and Rlevse, who were all appointed to the Arbitration Committee after the ArbCom elections. I am sure I am but a voice of many when I say I trust the aforementioned users to improve the committee, each in their own way, as listed within their respective election statements. Now, if you'll excuse me, I'm off to update the 2009 article, heh. Best wishes, neuro (talk) 00:51, 1 January 2009 (UTC) |
Dear Jennavecia,
Wishing you a happy new year, and very best wishes for 2009. Whether we were friends or not in the past year, I hope 2009 will be better for us both.
Kind regards,
Majorly talk 21:08, 1 January 2009 (UTC)
There is a brand spanking new thread regarding what I mentioned in my email earlier today. Here is the link. Willking1979 ( talk) 01:36, 2 January 2009 (UTC)
Hey remember the user I was telling you about a week or so ago, who showed up in the LawLord case with a sudden opinion to challenge mine and respond incivilly to me after we had, had prior dealings on the Talk:List of shipwrecks article. Well, the user is still at it. A few days later, he showed up out of nowhere yet again, involving himself in yet another debate I was having (an old debate which didn't involve him but another user) on the 2009 article talkpage, as shown here where I return and make a joking comment to the user involved [1] and then here where he incivily chimes in with this edit [2]. I originally had dealings with this user at the bottom of this article talk page Talk:List of shipwrecks regarding an incident in which he violated the 3RR as shown here [3] but an admin gave him a 2nd chance because I didn't give him a warning.
Anyways, now he's added uncivil comments on my user talk page as shown here [4] and when I removed them, he reverted my talkpage with the addition of more incivility, as shown here [5] . He also seems to be trying to cause trouble between myself and the user who adopted me as shown here [6] . Sorry to bother you again, but user CalendarWatcher has already avoided one block for the 3RR and now is continually reverting my own talkpage so he can keep incivility on it. He's broken several rules, so could you please step in. Cheers! Cheers_Dude ( talk) 14:34, 3 January 2009 (UTC)
Three issues have been published since the last deliver: November 24, December 1, and January 3.
![]() |
---|
| ||
Volume 4, Issue 45 | 24 November 2008 | About the Signpost |
|
| ||
Volume 4, Issue 46 | 1 December 2008 | About the Signpost |
|
ArbCom elections: Elections open | Wikipedia in the news |
WikiProject Report: WikiProject Solar System | Features and admins |
The Report on Lengthy Litigation |
| ||
Volume 5, Issue 1 | 3 January 2009 | About the Signpost |
|
| |
Home | Archives | Newsroom | Tip Line | Single-Page View | Shortcut : WP:POST |
|
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list.-- ragesoss ( talk) 21:42, 3 January 2009 (UTC)
I've been awarded barnstars for my anti-vandal work and my article on June Buchanan was featured on DYK yesterday, but this tops it all: [7]
All I have to say is this: Wow. Willking1979 ( talk) 22:27, 5 January 2009 (UTC)
Jenna could you please block the ip address that removed the Death of a Staff Member please and also if you look under the discussion page I added one new article that was posted on the University of Michigan newspaper. user;stokru720 jan 5 2009 Stokru720 ( talk) 22:49, 5 January 2009 (UTC)
*is still waiting* - Penwhale | Blast him / Follow his steps 18:30, 6 January 2009 (UTC)
I do not transclude my signature. Garden. 20:33, 6 January 2009 (UTC)
Any suggestions on what to do with this article? I did a tiny little bit of cleanup on it, but I'm not even sure it deserves an article. Enigma msg 03:31, 8 January 2009 (UTC)
Sorry to see another anti-admin go... while we didn't always agree, I think we were on the same side more than not... I do want to give a special thank you for not turning on me when I made my major faux pas back in May. Your voice actually helped me reflect on my own thoughts/feelings, and I might have left WP then if not for you. Thank you, hope that you return when you're ready.--- Balloonman PoppaBalloon CSD Survey Results 15:13, 8 January 2009 (UTC)
I'm sorry to see this too. Hope your batteries recharge and you come back when you feel ready. -- Malleus Fatuorum 15:15, 8 January 2009 (UTC)
As Bob Hope would say, thanks for the memories. I thank you for all the advice you've given me and for all you do here on Wikipedia. Hope to see you down the road. Willking1979 ( talk) 15:24, 8 January 2009 (UTC)
I am very sorry to see this. Given the mounting collection at WP:FORMER losing another active admin to indef. semi-retirement is yet another blow. Good luck, and hope to still see you pop in from time to time! Pedro : Chat 16:29, 8 January 2009 (UTC)
Lara lara lara, what can I say. You were patient with me always, forgave me for my (many) mistakes, and are a perfect example of a great adopter. I will really miss you, but I'm still happy that I got to know what a great person you are. :) Sam Blab 21:26, 8 January 2009 (UTC)
Thanks, guys (and dick ;)). I'll be poking my head in, commenting where I feel so inclined (as I just did an edit or three ago) and making sure my baby is taken care of (this is not a claim of ownership!*). As can be seen in my edits, I'm just not interested anymore. It's a repetitive cycle and I'm tired of watching the same movie, if you know what I mean. Fear not, though. I'll still be wandering around aimlessly, like an Alzheimer's patient, when looking for info... and who can resist the pink (yours is probably orange) banner? لenna vecia 05:13, 9 January 2009 (UTC) *Anyone touches my article and I keeeel you! :D
Grrr… can't she be shanghaied into staying? No fair!-- Goodmorningworld ( talk) 00:49, 10 January 2009 (UTC)
==I will miss your support== You have been viligent in doing your job I truly appreciate it and I hope your replacement is as sensitive as I know you are stokru720 Stokru720 ( talk) 06:55, 11 January 2009 (UTC)
I miss you already. I can understand especially after the last couple of days as I have seen how much you went into bat for E-man's RFA, fighting the good fight against the seemingly constant negativity coming from editors who use wikipedia to express their political frustration. Please come talk to me anytime via email - your words will be between us alone. Enjoy the extra time with those in your real life, that you love and love you unconditionally. Best regards Steve. -- VS talk 21:59, 8 January 2009 (UTC)
I feel like I've been fed to a shark You can't do this Any way I'll miss you (I'm rubbish at persuading)
Reallikeunreal ( talk) 17:22, 10 January 2009 (UTC) Thanks 4 everything
Lara could you please post on my talk page the discussion you removed so i could send it to mr greene in an email
Thank you
Bob samuels-- Bobsamuels ( talk) 21:33, 10 January 2009 (UTC)
You have been a real trooper in my efforts to make sure proper information is posted. I hope everything in your life provides pleasure and gradification David Greene -- user:stokru720 06:59, 11 January 2009 (UTC) Stokru720 ( talk)
Hi,
I believe that you just falsely warned someone because that was actually a sandbox that I was experementing on OK? And like I said to a different person on here ( I don't remember who) but I have seen editors blank the sandbox page alot of times amnd they were off the hook for it so I don't really think that was Warnable Ok? Thank you.-- Chase25 ( talk) 20:45, 12 January 2009 (UTC)
Lets try this again shall we? I have been on Wikipedia for a little while now and I have seen people blank that page and got away with it and you I think are giving a false warning about it. In fact I went through this just last week or the week before with another person on here and they stated that was not actually warnable so yes you gave me a false warning and i'm sorry but I strongly dissagree with that.-- Chase25 ( talk) 20:51, 12 January 2009 (UTC)
do me a favor go watch Dr. Phil and adjust your attitude.-- Chase25 ( talk) 21:04, 12 January 2009 (UTC)
i'm glad to hear that why don't you go on there and tell him you like to falsely accuse people on Wikipedia and get some help with your attitude issue.-- Chase25 ( talk) 21:08, 12 January 2009 (UTC)
Pardon me Missy but you did falsely warn me and I really think you're making a big deal on the sandbox issue because the soxbot always fixes it. Now go tell your mom you can't play on Wikipedia anymore until you adjust your attitude.-- Chase25 ( talk) 21:15, 12 January 2009 (UTC)
I'm sorry slakr but I strongly Dissagree with this Adminstrator's actions-- Chase25 ( talk) 21:20, 12 January 2009 (UTC)
Good grief! -- Malleus Fatuorum 21:27, 12 January 2009 (UTC)
Turns out he's right, sort of. I dropped the wrong warning, I think. It should have been {{ Uw-sandbox}}. لenna vecia 21:39, 12 January 2009 (UTC)
First of all. I apologize for getting so mad at you. But how were you able to figure out I was right?-- Chase25 ( talk) 21:51, 12 January 2009 (UTC)
Jenna, Jenna, Jenna,
Why don't you have a meeting with the other admins and consider changing the policy on that-- Chase25 ( talk) 19:22, 13 January 2009 (UTC)
jenna Jenna jenna let's practice your listening skills Hmm?
I don't vandalize sandboxes i just use them to test things and as I said yesterday for the 1,0000,00th timee I do not see that as a warnable offense because its a sanfbox for god's sakes and people remove that line all the time and not get warnings about it. Now sweetie I'd love to say the same thing over and over if you'll excuse i have to go update some articles for the Radio Stations in my town because they have either switched formats or got sold.-- Chase25 ( talk) 19:31, 13 January 2009 (UTC)
Don't block I'm done arguing about this-- Chase25 ( talk) 19:40, 13 January 2009 (UTC)
I'm Sorry (Again) Jenna or Lara for all the trouble today.
so now the question is what do you prefer that I call you Jenna or Lara?-- Chase25 ( talk) 19:52, 13 January 2009 (UTC)
SORRY, Can you tell me whether you live in Amerrica or the UK. Thanks Reallikeunreal ( talk) 20:49, 13 January 2009 (UTC)
![]() |
---|
| ||
Volume 5, Issue 2 | 10 January 2009 | About the Signpost |
|
| |
Home | Archives | Newsroom | Tip Line | Single-Page View | Shortcut : WP:POST |
|
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list.-- ragesoss ( talk) 20:00, 11 January 2009 (UTC) §hepBot ( Disable) 19:46, 13 January 2009 (UTC)
Hi Lara / Jenna,
Hope I catch you in, (noticed the semi-retired). I saw on the Sangler post that you said (or rather it's more accurate to say that I read to understand) that the particular RFC wasn't proper. I was wondering why it was an improper RfC? I'd rather learn from someone else's mistakes than my own (I don't appear quite as stupid that way ... LOL). Anyway, was just curious. hmmmm ... personalized smile huh ...I'm thinkin here ... "8D" ....ok, so I'll work on it. all my best
Ched (
talk)
17:12, 15 January 2009 (UTC)
I hereby command you to at least semi-protect the page Cliff Bleszinski, which has been filled with defaming content, vandalism, and just plain stupid statements for more than a month! Tanisha Escobar ( talk) 22:55, 15 January 2009 (UTC)
The recall draft is posted: it's been edited a few times since with comments from Risker, MZM, and DanielB. Hersfold ( t/ a/ c) 07:37, 16 January 2009 (UTC)
![]() |
---|
| ||
Volume 5, Issue 3 | 17 January 2009 | About the Signpost |
|
| |
Home | Archives | Newsroom | Tip Line | Single-Page View | Shortcut : WP:POST |
|
![]() |
Jennavecia has been identified as an
Awesome Wikipedian, Best Wishes, |
No there are actually many awesome people around (though sadly awesomeness and tendency to leave this project seem to be correlated) Alas, not me, though what I lack in awesomeness, I make up in ... er... I'll get back to you on that one :| -- Gurch ( talk) 23:13, 20 January 2009 (UTC)
hello Jennavecia. Can you tell me why you deleted the page as I posted the content of the article on the discussion page to be helped building the article with a NPOV ? Thanks GregoryCouratier ( talk) 14:29, 23 January 2009 (UTC)
![]() |
---|
| ||
Volume 5, Issue 4 | 24 January 2009 | About the Signpost |
|
| |
Home | Archives | Newsroom | Tip Line | Single-Page View | Shortcut : WP:POST |
|
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list.-- ragesoss ( talk) 03:08, 25 January 2009 (UTC)
Delivered at 04:26, 25 January 2009 (UTC) by §hepBot ( Disable)
that you were a horrid admin and really mean person. You lacked focus, commitment and neutrality. I'm jolly glad you're semi-retired and I'll dance the day you're de-sysopped. But, in a spirit of fairness, it'll be a dance of your choice. X MarX the Spot ( talk) 15:37, 25 January 2009 (UTC)
I dropped a question at Ioeth's talk page. I saw the semi-retired heading, and the links on your user page as being wiki-gnome and wiki-fairy. That's why I asked at his page. Anyway - I see that you're still active, and I didn't want you to think I was avoiding talking to you personally or anything. Hope life is treating you well .. Ched ( talk) 03:02, 26 January 2009 (UTC)
Never had a chance to leave a message on your talk page (I think) since I've been here, so thought I'll use my final opportunity to do so. <3 Thank you for all your wonderful and valuable contributions. <3 For the limited period of time that I'm still stuck here, will miss ya. Take care, Ncmvocalist ( talk) 06:09, 26 January 2009 (UTC) (P. S. Jennaveciawayyy! :P lol.)