InNeed95 ( block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser ( log))
Request reason:
I have been unblocked indef by User:El_C. The reason was "Edit-Warring". Hilarious. I didnt. Though it is understandable, why a person might think of it. I indeed did the same edit as prior to my recent block. Though I did it with caution. I requested that the user who reverted the Edit to join the TP. I only did that once. I did not look forward for additional edits. 1 Actually, I assumed that the reverter would revert the edit again. I wanted to use that non-cooperation behaviour (the edit) in a "protection request", "requesting for dispute solution" or starting a "noticeboard discussion".. etc.. Though now, this I am unable to do so. -- InNeed95 ( talk) 13:48, 19 November 2021 (UTC)
Decline reason:
You were absolutely edit warring; there is no other way to describe your actions here. Since you fail to acknowledge this, I am declining this request. -- Blablubbs ( talk) 14:21, 19 November 2021 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{ unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
I am not looking forward to find "excuses" or something similar like El_C would love claim it... I am pro finding solutions and neutral POV. Looking at my edit history it is clear that 90% of them are in favour of the points mentioned. I would request people to join the started Discussions on the TP. 1 A actual Edit-Warrior wouldnt even think of doing this. Even the prior to the recent block, I looked forward to find a solution thru discussions. El_C did fail to have a overview over the dispute and failed to find a fair solution. If the reviewing admin takes some time with this problem, he/she will surely understand. -- InNeed95 ( talk) 13:55, 19 November 2021 (UTC)
@ Blablubbs: You re confused. I literally explained that I know it might look like edit warring. I acknowledge that I indirectly did it. I meant that I directly do it. Like on porpuse. I explained why I did revert the edit (diff given above by me). As such, I dont know what u re talking about. -- InNeed95 ( talk) 15:20, 19 November 2021 (UTC)
Hilariousbecause
[you] didnt, yet also
acknowledge that [you] indirectly did itand
directly [did] it? In any case: Edit warring is the act of repeatedly overriding someone else's edit in order to reinstate your preferred version of a page. That is unambiguously what you are doing on Serbia, in spite of multiple blocks for it. It does not matter whether you have reason to believe that your version is the "correct" one (all edit warriors do) or whether you also participate in a talk page discussion; it is still disruptive, and it is still edit warring. I believe El C's block is necessary to prevent further disruption, and as such I stand behind my decline. You are welcome to make another unblock request (I strongly recommend reading WP:EW and WP:GAB first), which will be reviewed by someone else. -- Blablubbs ( talk) 16:43, 19 November 2021 (UTC)
As it says, Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.. --jpgordon 𝄢𝄆𝄐𝄇 19:59, 19 November 2021 (UTC)
InNeed95 ( block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser ( log))
Request reason:
I took a distance from wikipedia and senseless unblock requests as a gesture of goodwill. It has been +2 Months by now. I would ask the reviewing Admin to read the last conversation on the TP, because I dont think that any adjustment is needed to it and what I wrote does show my regrets quiet well in my opinion. Maybe I might add that I will be relativly inactive and probably will change only a few things if needed. If something is unclear, feel free to ask on my TP. Best Regards, -- InNeed95 ( talk) 14:53, 25 January 2022 (UTC)
Decline reason:
I am declining this, mostly so it doesn't stay open while you review WP:DR which I think will help you. 331dot ( talk) 00:57, 5 March 2022 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{ unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
You say you will refrain from editing the Serbia article, what edits will you make if unblocked? 331dot ( talk) 08:33, 26 January 2022 (UTC)
InNeed95 ( block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser ( log))
Request reason:
As per my discussion with 331dot and his help to understand the problem better, I come to the conclusion to rewind WP:DR and follow it's steps to enable a clean process of solving disputes.-- InNeed95 ( talk) 13:24, 5 March 2022 (UTC)
Decline reason:
Procedural decline only. This unblock request has been open for more than two weeks but has not proven sufficient for any reviewing administrator to take action. You are welcome to request a new block review if you substantially reword your request. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that
Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. Yamla ( talk) 11:09, 3 April 2022 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{ unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
@ Amanuensis Balkanicus: what's this business of WP:outing a user? -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 16:08, 25 March 2022 (UTC)
Inclined to unblock, but not on my own. -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 21:16, 5 March 2022 (UTC)
InNeed95 ( block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser ( log))
Request reason:
Its been a long time since the Block. As per comments I made in the discussion from back then, I request a unblock. If the reviewing Admin has a question about the matter, he/she should feel free to comment/ask. Best regards -- InNeed95 ( talk) 16:44, 24 June 2023 (UTC)(UTC)
Decline reason:
Time since the block is not a sufficient ground for lifting the block. You need to address the concerns that lead to the block. Yamla ( talk) 17:26, 30 June 2023 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{ unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
You could ve asked me in advance instead of declining the unblock-request.
But ok, I'll try to hold it short an make a rewind on the matter. I was blocked for "Edit-Warring". Which is fine. I kinda did it. I acknowledge that. And in the future I'll try to minimalize "rulebreaking". I'm barely online anyways. The only things I'd edit would be small mistakes (for example grammatical ones) that I may be seeing while reading a article.
I hope thats enough. I'll certainly answer any further questions of yours. -- InNeed95 ( talk) 14:48, 23 July 2023 (UTC)
InNeed95 ( block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser ( log))
Request reason:
As per Comments/Discussion above. Any questions? Feel free to comment (before declining like one Admin did once) Best regards -- InNeed95 ( talk)
Decline reason:
I'm going to read your entire talk page just to find your real unblock request. Summarize your thoughts concisely and put them in an unblock request. NinjaRobotPirate ( talk) 14:02, 9 May 2024 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{ unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
InNeed95 ( block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser ( log))
Request reason:
I have been unblocked indef by User:El_C. The reason was "Edit-Warring". Hilarious. I didnt. Though it is understandable, why a person might think of it. I indeed did the same edit as prior to my recent block. Though I did it with caution. I requested that the user who reverted the Edit to join the TP. I only did that once. I did not look forward for additional edits. 1 Actually, I assumed that the reverter would revert the edit again. I wanted to use that non-cooperation behaviour (the edit) in a "protection request", "requesting for dispute solution" or starting a "noticeboard discussion".. etc.. Though now, this I am unable to do so. -- InNeed95 ( talk) 13:48, 19 November 2021 (UTC)
Decline reason:
You were absolutely edit warring; there is no other way to describe your actions here. Since you fail to acknowledge this, I am declining this request. -- Blablubbs ( talk) 14:21, 19 November 2021 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{ unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
I am not looking forward to find "excuses" or something similar like El_C would love claim it... I am pro finding solutions and neutral POV. Looking at my edit history it is clear that 90% of them are in favour of the points mentioned. I would request people to join the started Discussions on the TP. 1 A actual Edit-Warrior wouldnt even think of doing this. Even the prior to the recent block, I looked forward to find a solution thru discussions. El_C did fail to have a overview over the dispute and failed to find a fair solution. If the reviewing admin takes some time with this problem, he/she will surely understand. -- InNeed95 ( talk) 13:55, 19 November 2021 (UTC)
@ Blablubbs: You re confused. I literally explained that I know it might look like edit warring. I acknowledge that I indirectly did it. I meant that I directly do it. Like on porpuse. I explained why I did revert the edit (diff given above by me). As such, I dont know what u re talking about. -- InNeed95 ( talk) 15:20, 19 November 2021 (UTC)
Hilariousbecause
[you] didnt, yet also
acknowledge that [you] indirectly did itand
directly [did] it? In any case: Edit warring is the act of repeatedly overriding someone else's edit in order to reinstate your preferred version of a page. That is unambiguously what you are doing on Serbia, in spite of multiple blocks for it. It does not matter whether you have reason to believe that your version is the "correct" one (all edit warriors do) or whether you also participate in a talk page discussion; it is still disruptive, and it is still edit warring. I believe El C's block is necessary to prevent further disruption, and as such I stand behind my decline. You are welcome to make another unblock request (I strongly recommend reading WP:EW and WP:GAB first), which will be reviewed by someone else. -- Blablubbs ( talk) 16:43, 19 November 2021 (UTC)
As it says, Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.. --jpgordon 𝄢𝄆𝄐𝄇 19:59, 19 November 2021 (UTC)
InNeed95 ( block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser ( log))
Request reason:
I took a distance from wikipedia and senseless unblock requests as a gesture of goodwill. It has been +2 Months by now. I would ask the reviewing Admin to read the last conversation on the TP, because I dont think that any adjustment is needed to it and what I wrote does show my regrets quiet well in my opinion. Maybe I might add that I will be relativly inactive and probably will change only a few things if needed. If something is unclear, feel free to ask on my TP. Best Regards, -- InNeed95 ( talk) 14:53, 25 January 2022 (UTC)
Decline reason:
I am declining this, mostly so it doesn't stay open while you review WP:DR which I think will help you. 331dot ( talk) 00:57, 5 March 2022 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{ unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
You say you will refrain from editing the Serbia article, what edits will you make if unblocked? 331dot ( talk) 08:33, 26 January 2022 (UTC)
InNeed95 ( block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser ( log))
Request reason:
As per my discussion with 331dot and his help to understand the problem better, I come to the conclusion to rewind WP:DR and follow it's steps to enable a clean process of solving disputes.-- InNeed95 ( talk) 13:24, 5 March 2022 (UTC)
Decline reason:
Procedural decline only. This unblock request has been open for more than two weeks but has not proven sufficient for any reviewing administrator to take action. You are welcome to request a new block review if you substantially reword your request. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that
Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. Yamla ( talk) 11:09, 3 April 2022 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{ unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
@ Amanuensis Balkanicus: what's this business of WP:outing a user? -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 16:08, 25 March 2022 (UTC)
Inclined to unblock, but not on my own. -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 21:16, 5 March 2022 (UTC)
InNeed95 ( block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser ( log))
Request reason:
Its been a long time since the Block. As per comments I made in the discussion from back then, I request a unblock. If the reviewing Admin has a question about the matter, he/she should feel free to comment/ask. Best regards -- InNeed95 ( talk) 16:44, 24 June 2023 (UTC)(UTC)
Decline reason:
Time since the block is not a sufficient ground for lifting the block. You need to address the concerns that lead to the block. Yamla ( talk) 17:26, 30 June 2023 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{ unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
You could ve asked me in advance instead of declining the unblock-request.
But ok, I'll try to hold it short an make a rewind on the matter. I was blocked for "Edit-Warring". Which is fine. I kinda did it. I acknowledge that. And in the future I'll try to minimalize "rulebreaking". I'm barely online anyways. The only things I'd edit would be small mistakes (for example grammatical ones) that I may be seeing while reading a article.
I hope thats enough. I'll certainly answer any further questions of yours. -- InNeed95 ( talk) 14:48, 23 July 2023 (UTC)
InNeed95 ( block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser ( log))
Request reason:
As per Comments/Discussion above. Any questions? Feel free to comment (before declining like one Admin did once) Best regards -- InNeed95 ( talk)
Decline reason:
I'm going to read your entire talk page just to find your real unblock request. Summarize your thoughts concisely and put them in an unblock request. NinjaRobotPirate ( talk) 14:02, 9 May 2024 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{ unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.