|
Immoral moralist ( block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser ( log))
Request reason:
There is no policy against having multiple usernames as long as you don't use them for deceptive purposes. I never used the same username on the same article. WP:Sock puppetry says: "A second account used deceptively in violation of this policy is known as a sock puppet." So the fact that this account and "Can I touch it" account are both me, doesn't make them "sock puppets." The reason stated in the block is "Abusing multiple accounts." Yet, no abuse has been shown or even alleged. Furthermore, these other usernames that are being claimed as me, no evidence has been given that they are me. Just claims. No diffs. Nothing. Is this how your justice system works?
Decline reason:
Users with a history of blocks for abusive sockpuppetry should avoid trying to game the system. – Luna Santin ( talk) 00:27, 10 February 2010 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{ unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
Immoral moralist ( block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser ( log))
Request reason:
Last adminstrator declined to unblock sayin :"Users with a history of blocks for abusive sockpuppetry should avoid trying to game the system." Where is the history of blocks for abusive sockpuppetry? Does he understand the difference between an allegation and evidence?
Decline reason:
The difference between an allegation and evidence is Wikipedia:Sockpuppet_investigations/RJII. Toddst1 ( talk) 01:22, 10 February 2010 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{ unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
![]() |
You have been accused of sockpuppetry. Please refer to Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/RJII for evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with notes for the suspect before editing the evidence page. The Four Deuces ( talk) 21:35, 8 February 2010 (UTC)
Sockpuppetry? Sorry but you've got the wrong dude. Immoral moralist ( talk) 05:23, 9 February 2010 (UTC)
|
Immoral moralist ( block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser ( log))
Request reason:
There is no policy against having multiple usernames as long as you don't use them for deceptive purposes. I never used the same username on the same article. WP:Sock puppetry says: "A second account used deceptively in violation of this policy is known as a sock puppet." So the fact that this account and "Can I touch it" account are both me, doesn't make them "sock puppets." The reason stated in the block is "Abusing multiple accounts." Yet, no abuse has been shown or even alleged. Furthermore, these other usernames that are being claimed as me, no evidence has been given that they are me. Just claims. No diffs. Nothing. Is this how your justice system works?
Decline reason:
Users with a history of blocks for abusive sockpuppetry should avoid trying to game the system. – Luna Santin ( talk) 00:27, 10 February 2010 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{ unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
Immoral moralist ( block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser ( log))
Request reason:
Last adminstrator declined to unblock sayin :"Users with a history of blocks for abusive sockpuppetry should avoid trying to game the system." Where is the history of blocks for abusive sockpuppetry? Does he understand the difference between an allegation and evidence?
Decline reason:
The difference between an allegation and evidence is Wikipedia:Sockpuppet_investigations/RJII. Toddst1 ( talk) 01:22, 10 February 2010 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{ unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
![]() |
You have been accused of sockpuppetry. Please refer to Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/RJII for evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with notes for the suspect before editing the evidence page. The Four Deuces ( talk) 21:35, 8 February 2010 (UTC)
Sockpuppetry? Sorry but you've got the wrong dude. Immoral moralist ( talk) 05:23, 9 February 2010 (UTC)