ভাইয়া আমি আপনার সাথে একটু কথা বলতে চাই । — Preceding unsigned comment added by Deep Ronjon Das ( talk • contribs) 12:29, 30 August 2022 (UTC)
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions; however, please remember the essential rule of respecting copyrights. Edits to Wikipedia, such as your edit to the page Stoic Bliss, may not contain material from copyrighted sources unless used with permission. It is almost never okay to copy extensive text out of a book or website and paste it into a Wikipedia article with little or no alteration, though you can clearly and briefly quote copyrighted text in the right circumstances. Content that does not comply with this legal rule must be removed. For more information on this, see:
If you still have questions, there is the teahouse, or you can and someone will be along to answer it shortly. As you get started, you may find the pages below to be helpful.
I hope you enjoy editing Wikipedia! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. Feel free to write a note on the bottom of my talk page if you want to get in touch with me. Again, welcome! — Diannaa ( talk) 18:10, 12 February 2021 (UTC)
Hello, I'm
Vinegarymass911. I noticed that you recently removed content from
PRAN-RFL Group without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate
edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use your
sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on
my talk page. Thanks.
Vinegarymass911 (
talk)
00:01, 20 March 2021 (UTC)
Please do not add
original research or
novel syntheses of published material to articles as you apparently did to
James (musician). Please cite a
reliable source for all of your contributions. Thank you.
Notfrompedro (
talk)
15:51, 15 June 2021 (UTC)
Hello, Imamul H. Ifaz,
welcome to Wikipedia and thank you for
your contributions. Your editing pattern indicates that you may be using multiple accounts or coordinating editing with people outside Wikipedia, such as
Imamul Ifaz (
talk ·
contribs). Our
policy on multiple accounts usually does not allow this, and users who misuse multiple accounts may be
blocked from editing. If you operate multiple accounts directly or with the help of another person, please
disclose these connections. Thank you. --
Worldbruce (
talk)
05:16, 8 March 2022 (UTC)
In this edit here, I reverted some information that appears to be a violation of our copyright policy.
I provided a brief summary of the problem in the edit summary, which should be visible just below my name. You can also click on the "view history" tab in the article to see the recent history of the article. This should be an edit with my name, and a parenthetical comment explaining why your edit was reverted. If that information is not sufficient to explain the situation, please ask.
I do occasionally make mistakes. We get hundreds of reports of potential copyright violations every week, and sometimes there are false positives, for a variety of reasons. (Perhaps the material was moved from another Wikipedia article, or the material was properly licensed but the license information was not obvious, or the material is in the public domain but I didn't realize it was public domain, and there can be other situations generating a report to our Copy Patrol tool that turn out not to be actual copyright violations.) If you think my edit was mistaken, please politely let me know and I will investigate. S Philbrick (Talk) 23:16, 23 June 2022 (UTC)
Hi Imamul H. Ifaz! I noticed that you have reverted to restore your preferred version of
Dhaka several times. The impulse to undo an edit you disagree with is understandable, but I wanted to make sure you're aware that the
edit warring policy disallows repeated reversions even if they are justifiable.
All editors are expected to discuss content disputes on article talk pages to try to reach consensus. If you are unable to agree at Talk:Dhaka, please use one of the dispute resolution options to seek input from others. Using this approach instead of reverting can help you avoid getting drawn into an edit war. Thank you. Worldbruce ( talk) 12:18, 7 October 2022 (UTC)
Your edits are not an improvement to Dhaka and Bangladesh. There is no source when you claim Bangladesh has the largest paramilitary in the world. Plus, your montage of Dhaka has problems. Discuss instead of waging an edit war. Solomon The Magnifico ( talk) 10:38, 11 October 2022 (UTC)
Okay, this edit warring needs to stop. We can work things out. Let's go for a consensus instead of reverting each other constantly. Solomon The Magnifico ( talk) 00:30, 15 October 2022 (UTC)
nor you do Imamul H. Ifaz ( talk) 21:47, 15 October 2022 (UTC)
editing montages doesn't need any researches, ur argument is pointless. so reverting again Imamul H. Ifaz ( talk) 12:00, 16 October 2022 (UTC)
Thank you for trying to keep Wikipedia free of vandalism. However, one or more edits you labeled as
vandalism, such as the edit at
Chittagong, are not considered vandalism under Wikipedia policy. Wikipedia has a stricter definition of the word "vandalism" than common usage, and mislabeling edits as vandalism can
discourage editors. Please see
what is not vandalism for more information on what is and is not considered vandalism.
Be careful to remain
civil in your edit summaries and discussions, however wronged you feel. Editors are expected to
assume other editors have good intentions. Wikipedia is built on collaboration, so it's one of our core principles to interact with one another in a polite and respectful manner. Accusing another editor of being unprofessional or of vandalism does not help achieve consensus.
If you are unable to reach consensus through discussion based on
image use policy and
image guidelines, various
dispute resolution mechanisms are available. Stepping away from an article can be an effective way of de-escalating. But if you're likely to cross paths with an editor again because of shared interests, it may be worth taking the time to reach an agreement you both can live with instead of letting the disagreement fester.
Worldbruce (
talk)
12:28, 15 October 2022 (UTC)
Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but you recently removed
maintenance templates from
Tahsan Rahman Khan. When removing maintenance templates, please be sure to either resolve the problem that the template refers to, or give a valid reason for the removal in the
edit summary. Please see
Help:Maintenance template removal for further information on when maintenance templates should or should not be removed. If this was a mistake, don't worry, as your removal of this template has been
reverted. Take a look at the
welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use your
sandbox. Thank you.
Worldbruce (
talk)
12:52, 18 October 2022 (UTC)
Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review
the candidates and submit your choices on the
voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{
NoACEMM}}
to your user talk page.
MediaWiki message delivery (
talk)
01:42, 29 November 2022 (UTC)
{{
unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}}
. Note that anything you post in your unblock request will be public, so you may alternatively use the
Unblock Ticket Request System to submit an appeal if it contains information that must be private.ভাইয়া আমি আপনার সাথে একটু কথা বলতে চাই । — Preceding unsigned comment added by Deep Ronjon Das ( talk • contribs) 12:29, 30 August 2022 (UTC)
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions; however, please remember the essential rule of respecting copyrights. Edits to Wikipedia, such as your edit to the page Stoic Bliss, may not contain material from copyrighted sources unless used with permission. It is almost never okay to copy extensive text out of a book or website and paste it into a Wikipedia article with little or no alteration, though you can clearly and briefly quote copyrighted text in the right circumstances. Content that does not comply with this legal rule must be removed. For more information on this, see:
If you still have questions, there is the teahouse, or you can and someone will be along to answer it shortly. As you get started, you may find the pages below to be helpful.
I hope you enjoy editing Wikipedia! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. Feel free to write a note on the bottom of my talk page if you want to get in touch with me. Again, welcome! — Diannaa ( talk) 18:10, 12 February 2021 (UTC)
Hello, I'm
Vinegarymass911. I noticed that you recently removed content from
PRAN-RFL Group without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate
edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use your
sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on
my talk page. Thanks.
Vinegarymass911 (
talk)
00:01, 20 March 2021 (UTC)
Please do not add
original research or
novel syntheses of published material to articles as you apparently did to
James (musician). Please cite a
reliable source for all of your contributions. Thank you.
Notfrompedro (
talk)
15:51, 15 June 2021 (UTC)
Hello, Imamul H. Ifaz,
welcome to Wikipedia and thank you for
your contributions. Your editing pattern indicates that you may be using multiple accounts or coordinating editing with people outside Wikipedia, such as
Imamul Ifaz (
talk ·
contribs). Our
policy on multiple accounts usually does not allow this, and users who misuse multiple accounts may be
blocked from editing. If you operate multiple accounts directly or with the help of another person, please
disclose these connections. Thank you. --
Worldbruce (
talk)
05:16, 8 March 2022 (UTC)
In this edit here, I reverted some information that appears to be a violation of our copyright policy.
I provided a brief summary of the problem in the edit summary, which should be visible just below my name. You can also click on the "view history" tab in the article to see the recent history of the article. This should be an edit with my name, and a parenthetical comment explaining why your edit was reverted. If that information is not sufficient to explain the situation, please ask.
I do occasionally make mistakes. We get hundreds of reports of potential copyright violations every week, and sometimes there are false positives, for a variety of reasons. (Perhaps the material was moved from another Wikipedia article, or the material was properly licensed but the license information was not obvious, or the material is in the public domain but I didn't realize it was public domain, and there can be other situations generating a report to our Copy Patrol tool that turn out not to be actual copyright violations.) If you think my edit was mistaken, please politely let me know and I will investigate. S Philbrick (Talk) 23:16, 23 June 2022 (UTC)
Hi Imamul H. Ifaz! I noticed that you have reverted to restore your preferred version of
Dhaka several times. The impulse to undo an edit you disagree with is understandable, but I wanted to make sure you're aware that the
edit warring policy disallows repeated reversions even if they are justifiable.
All editors are expected to discuss content disputes on article talk pages to try to reach consensus. If you are unable to agree at Talk:Dhaka, please use one of the dispute resolution options to seek input from others. Using this approach instead of reverting can help you avoid getting drawn into an edit war. Thank you. Worldbruce ( talk) 12:18, 7 October 2022 (UTC)
Your edits are not an improvement to Dhaka and Bangladesh. There is no source when you claim Bangladesh has the largest paramilitary in the world. Plus, your montage of Dhaka has problems. Discuss instead of waging an edit war. Solomon The Magnifico ( talk) 10:38, 11 October 2022 (UTC)
Okay, this edit warring needs to stop. We can work things out. Let's go for a consensus instead of reverting each other constantly. Solomon The Magnifico ( talk) 00:30, 15 October 2022 (UTC)
nor you do Imamul H. Ifaz ( talk) 21:47, 15 October 2022 (UTC)
editing montages doesn't need any researches, ur argument is pointless. so reverting again Imamul H. Ifaz ( talk) 12:00, 16 October 2022 (UTC)
Thank you for trying to keep Wikipedia free of vandalism. However, one or more edits you labeled as
vandalism, such as the edit at
Chittagong, are not considered vandalism under Wikipedia policy. Wikipedia has a stricter definition of the word "vandalism" than common usage, and mislabeling edits as vandalism can
discourage editors. Please see
what is not vandalism for more information on what is and is not considered vandalism.
Be careful to remain
civil in your edit summaries and discussions, however wronged you feel. Editors are expected to
assume other editors have good intentions. Wikipedia is built on collaboration, so it's one of our core principles to interact with one another in a polite and respectful manner. Accusing another editor of being unprofessional or of vandalism does not help achieve consensus.
If you are unable to reach consensus through discussion based on
image use policy and
image guidelines, various
dispute resolution mechanisms are available. Stepping away from an article can be an effective way of de-escalating. But if you're likely to cross paths with an editor again because of shared interests, it may be worth taking the time to reach an agreement you both can live with instead of letting the disagreement fester.
Worldbruce (
talk)
12:28, 15 October 2022 (UTC)
Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but you recently removed
maintenance templates from
Tahsan Rahman Khan. When removing maintenance templates, please be sure to either resolve the problem that the template refers to, or give a valid reason for the removal in the
edit summary. Please see
Help:Maintenance template removal for further information on when maintenance templates should or should not be removed. If this was a mistake, don't worry, as your removal of this template has been
reverted. Take a look at the
welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use your
sandbox. Thank you.
Worldbruce (
talk)
12:52, 18 October 2022 (UTC)
Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review
the candidates and submit your choices on the
voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{
NoACEMM}}
to your user talk page.
MediaWiki message delivery (
talk)
01:42, 29 November 2022 (UTC)
{{
unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}}
. Note that anything you post in your unblock request will be public, so you may alternatively use the
Unblock Ticket Request System to submit an appeal if it contains information that must be private.