A tag has been placed on Talent6, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article seems to be blatant advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read the guidelines on spam as well as the Wikipedia:Business' FAQ for more information.
If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{
hangon}}
to the top of
the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on
the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact
one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you.
KJS77
Join the Revolution
22:37, 15 September 2008 (UTC)
I saw the {{
hangon}} template on this page, and I wanted to help. You seem to have misunderstood the use of the {{
hangon}} template. To contest a proposed
speedy deletion you add {{
hangon}} to the page in question (the page that an editor has tagged for speedy deletion), just below the speedy delete tag (which usually has a name that starts with db (for "delete because")). You do not add it to your user talk page below the message informing you that a page has been tagged for speedy deletion, because then people looking at the page tagged for speedy deletion won't see it.
If a page has been deleted before you see the message, or in spite of your use of hangon, you can send a message to the deleting admin on his or her user talk page. If you click on a link to a deleted page you will see the relevant deletion log entries, which will show you the user ID of the admin who did the deletion. Pegasus «C¦ T» 17:14, 17 September 2008 (UTC)
In order to survive speedy deletion, the article must assert why it is notable. In this instance, asserting the award was won would probably be enough to prevent speedy deletion. However, the external link to the website that you provided doesn't seem to say anything. If you can provide me with evidence that the award was won, I'll restore the article. However, merely asserting notability is not enough to prevent deletion at AfD. In order for an article survive an AfD, it must have its notability verified by reliable sources; at this time, you would need to do more work on the article for it to survive an AfD. Should I restore the article, I would probably give a few days before reviewing the article and possibly sending it to AfD if it doesn't seem to be notable (unless somebody else does first, of course). Another idea would be for you to work on the article in a subpage of your userspace, where it does not need to meet the aforementioned guidelines until moved to main article space. Let me know what you want to do and I'll assist you further. seresin ( ¡? ) 00:04, 24 September 2008 (UTC)
A tag has been placed on Talent6, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article seems to be blatant advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read the guidelines on spam as well as the Wikipedia:Business' FAQ for more information.
If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{
hangon}}
to the top of
the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on
the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact
one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you.
KJS77
Join the Revolution
22:37, 15 September 2008 (UTC)
I saw the {{
hangon}} template on this page, and I wanted to help. You seem to have misunderstood the use of the {{
hangon}} template. To contest a proposed
speedy deletion you add {{
hangon}} to the page in question (the page that an editor has tagged for speedy deletion), just below the speedy delete tag (which usually has a name that starts with db (for "delete because")). You do not add it to your user talk page below the message informing you that a page has been tagged for speedy deletion, because then people looking at the page tagged for speedy deletion won't see it.
If a page has been deleted before you see the message, or in spite of your use of hangon, you can send a message to the deleting admin on his or her user talk page. If you click on a link to a deleted page you will see the relevant deletion log entries, which will show you the user ID of the admin who did the deletion. Pegasus «C¦ T» 17:14, 17 September 2008 (UTC)
In order to survive speedy deletion, the article must assert why it is notable. In this instance, asserting the award was won would probably be enough to prevent speedy deletion. However, the external link to the website that you provided doesn't seem to say anything. If you can provide me with evidence that the award was won, I'll restore the article. However, merely asserting notability is not enough to prevent deletion at AfD. In order for an article survive an AfD, it must have its notability verified by reliable sources; at this time, you would need to do more work on the article for it to survive an AfD. Should I restore the article, I would probably give a few days before reviewing the article and possibly sending it to AfD if it doesn't seem to be notable (unless somebody else does first, of course). Another idea would be for you to work on the article in a subpage of your userspace, where it does not need to meet the aforementioned guidelines until moved to main article space. Let me know what you want to do and I'll assist you further. seresin ( ¡? ) 00:04, 24 September 2008 (UTC)