Hope you enjoy contributing to Wikipedia. Be bold in editing pages. Here are some links that you might find useful:
I hope you stick around and keep contributing to Wikipedia. Drop a note at Wikipedia:New user log.
-- Utcursch | Talk to me
I want to explain why I reverted your edits to Objections to evolution. First (as my edit summary indicates), both instances of apologist/apologetics were accurate. Plantigna describes himself as an apologist (see his spiritual autobiography at [1]). Answers in Genesis also describes itself as an "apologetics ministry" (see [2]). Second, even though the term sounds a bit insulting, doesn't mean they actually think they have something to apologize for. Just the opposite -- it means a defender. Third, it's relevant, because if someone's mission is to defend (their conception of) Christianity, their views on evolution are likely to be influenced by this. Novalis 22:11, 22 April 2007 (UTC)
I updated my talk page to reply to your reply to this. Novalis 18:39, 23 April 2007 (UTC)
The article Sambomba has been proposed for deletion. The proposed-deletion notice added to the article should explain why.
While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}}
notice, but please explain why in your
edit summary or on
the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}}
will stop the
proposed deletion process, but other
deletion processes exist. In particular, the
speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and
articles for deletion allows discussion to reach
consensus for deletion.
DGaw (
talk)
03:31, 6 December 2011 (UTC)
Hope you enjoy contributing to Wikipedia. Be bold in editing pages. Here are some links that you might find useful:
I hope you stick around and keep contributing to Wikipedia. Drop a note at Wikipedia:New user log.
-- Utcursch | Talk to me
I want to explain why I reverted your edits to Objections to evolution. First (as my edit summary indicates), both instances of apologist/apologetics were accurate. Plantigna describes himself as an apologist (see his spiritual autobiography at [1]). Answers in Genesis also describes itself as an "apologetics ministry" (see [2]). Second, even though the term sounds a bit insulting, doesn't mean they actually think they have something to apologize for. Just the opposite -- it means a defender. Third, it's relevant, because if someone's mission is to defend (their conception of) Christianity, their views on evolution are likely to be influenced by this. Novalis 22:11, 22 April 2007 (UTC)
I updated my talk page to reply to your reply to this. Novalis 18:39, 23 April 2007 (UTC)
The article Sambomba has been proposed for deletion. The proposed-deletion notice added to the article should explain why.
While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}}
notice, but please explain why in your
edit summary or on
the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}}
will stop the
proposed deletion process, but other
deletion processes exist. In particular, the
speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and
articles for deletion allows discussion to reach
consensus for deletion.
DGaw (
talk)
03:31, 6 December 2011 (UTC)