This is IanDBeacon's talk page, where you can send him messages and comments. |
|
Archives:
1Auto-archiving period: 30 days
![]() |
A level 4 warning for this editor seems a bit severe for seemingly good faith edits. Yes, they are edit warring, but it is not vandalism and it's a bit bitey. Would you please consider revising this to be a level 2 or 3 warning on edit warring including some extra encouragement to discuss each of their proposed changes on the talk page and to also register an account? Daniel Quinlan ( talk) 03:42, 28 June 2023 (UTC)
Just an FYI - Here is another article https://www.primeminister.am/en/press-release/item/2023/07/07/Nikol-Pashinyan-meeting/ (from today) proving my edit (revisions) were correct. I do not understand how someone (IanDBeacon) edits something wrong (over and over), I correct(over and over), and then I get told that I am the one that is vandalizing, and get banned. Sevkhatch ( talk) 22:14, 7 July 2023 (UTC)
Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review
the candidates and submit your choices on the
voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{
NoACEMM}}
to your user talk page.
MediaWiki message delivery (
talk) 00:49, 28 November 2023 (UTC)
Hi. I'm not very familiar with the custom of topic-based page protections. The policy states "all pages broadly related to a topic, as well as parts of other pages that are related to the topic". The page was already partially protected in regards to any information regarding the incident in Gaza, and there has been no vandalism.
Is this the norm of topic-based protections? E.g. it is not banned to edit the article Legality of conversion therapy because of the "gender-related contentious topics; or the biography of Wang Zhi'an merely because it contains information about him criticising Falun Gong. I was about to add some information regarding past World Central Kitchen responses to natural disasters. Y. Dongchen ( talk) 01:49, 5 April 2024 (UTC)
This is IanDBeacon's talk page, where you can send him messages and comments. |
|
Archives:
1Auto-archiving period: 30 days
![]() |
A level 4 warning for this editor seems a bit severe for seemingly good faith edits. Yes, they are edit warring, but it is not vandalism and it's a bit bitey. Would you please consider revising this to be a level 2 or 3 warning on edit warring including some extra encouragement to discuss each of their proposed changes on the talk page and to also register an account? Daniel Quinlan ( talk) 03:42, 28 June 2023 (UTC)
Just an FYI - Here is another article https://www.primeminister.am/en/press-release/item/2023/07/07/Nikol-Pashinyan-meeting/ (from today) proving my edit (revisions) were correct. I do not understand how someone (IanDBeacon) edits something wrong (over and over), I correct(over and over), and then I get told that I am the one that is vandalizing, and get banned. Sevkhatch ( talk) 22:14, 7 July 2023 (UTC)
Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review
the candidates and submit your choices on the
voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{
NoACEMM}}
to your user talk page.
MediaWiki message delivery (
talk) 00:49, 28 November 2023 (UTC)
Hi. I'm not very familiar with the custom of topic-based page protections. The policy states "all pages broadly related to a topic, as well as parts of other pages that are related to the topic". The page was already partially protected in regards to any information regarding the incident in Gaza, and there has been no vandalism.
Is this the norm of topic-based protections? E.g. it is not banned to edit the article Legality of conversion therapy because of the "gender-related contentious topics; or the biography of Wang Zhi'an merely because it contains information about him criticising Falun Gong. I was about to add some information regarding past World Central Kitchen responses to natural disasters. Y. Dongchen ( talk) 01:49, 5 April 2024 (UTC)