The information on this page may be the results of boneheaded editing. This page may contain factually inaccurate information, incorrect spelling, unrelated images, or other easily preventable mistakes. It is currently in the process of being revised.
Template:Boneheaded editing has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for Deletion page. Thank you. — Cheeser1 ( talk) 02:57, 20 December 2007 (UTC)
Im not sure exactly where on that long ass page I'm supposed to comment, so I'll do it here. It's still in the testing stages, so sit tight. I may just drop the pictures, put it in a Wikibox, or try something new altogether. I just figured this template would make my so called controversial edits seem less uncivil. I AM JOHN SMITH ( talk) 03:03, 20 December 2007 (UTC)
It's getting a bit late in the TfD, but you might want to move this template to your own userspace. Either way, I would not advise using this template in article space, per WP:BITE and WP:CIVIL. / edg ☺ ☭ 06:31, 20 December 2007 (UTC)
I saw you added a deletion tag to List of groups referred to as cults. I don't think the page is going to be deleted on the grounds you provided; if you disagree, you may try an AFD, but I believe the article is notable enough to stay. Jmlk 1 7 03:04, 20 December 2007 (UTC)
Your edits were reverted because they go against the Wikipedia Manual of Style, which outlines the style of writing in the encyclopedia. I suggest you read through that fully before making anymore edits like that. The encyclopedia is not meant to be concise, it is meant to fully encompass the subject being written about. The wiki also is like a web, which is why there are so many linked terms in the first sentence. (referring to this edit) I am also going to ask you to try to be civil on here as being uncivil can get you blocked. -- Michael Greiner 00:22, 21 December 2007 (UTC)
I was just wondering. Cause it seems in order for one single edit to be accepted around here, it has to be freakin perfect! I AM JOHN SMITH ( talk) 18:40, 26 December 2007 (UTC)
and I see it didn't take you bitches ;) very long to revert my edits...AGAIN To which I respond "JEEEE-ZUS KEYYYY-REIST!" And in case you dont understand that cause all my edits seem to get removed anyways, I'll illustrate it for you:
I AM JOHN SMITH (
talk)
21:31, 26 December 2007 (UTC)
Instead of commenting to each individual, I figured only interested parties would visit here, that way I don't crash everyone's talk page and be interpreted as rude again. I AM JOHN SMITH ( talk) 21:45, 26 December 2007 (UTC)
I just read your sarcasm page, and being that the page title itself seems sarcastic, I'm not entirely sure what message it's trying to send. We need more of this confusion. I AM JOHN SMITH ( talk) 22:46, 26 December 2007 (UTC)
I just updated the link "reaction" to reflect a "chemical reaction" related to cold fusion. Happy now?,....beeeeyiches ;)" -- I AM JOHN SMITH ( talk) 23:05, 26 December 2007 (UTC)
A tag has been placed on Brought, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.
Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. If you plan to expand the article, you can request that
administrators wait a while for you to add contextual material. To do this, affix the template {{
hangon}}
to the article and state your intention on the article's
talk page. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this.
Victao lopes (
talk)
00:08, 27 December 2007 (UTC)
Oh,I just now noticed my brought page has been deleted. Awesome! I love you, all! >:o —Preceding unsigned comment added by I AM JOHN SMITH ( talk • contribs) 04:04, 27 December 2007
Dont worry about my dorm, they're all dicks anyways. I cant get along with any of them, so I didnt listen. I was just angry about another page disappearing. I just sometimes feel between this website, and the jags down the hall from me (not to mention the ones living in my room), I cant get anything done. I AM JOHN SMITH ( talk) 18:51, 27 December 2007 (UTC)
Sorry about the above rant. Dont get me wrong, I love Slipknot, But hearing it at full volume at 2 in the morning is enough to drive anyone mad. I AM JOHN SMITH ( talk) 01:46, 29 December 2007 (UTC)
The information on this page may be the results of boneheaded editing. This page may contain factually inaccurate information, incorrect spelling, unrelated images, or other easily preventable mistakes. It is currently in the process of being revised.
Template:Boneheaded editing has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for Deletion page. Thank you. — Cheeser1 ( talk) 02:57, 20 December 2007 (UTC)
Im not sure exactly where on that long ass page I'm supposed to comment, so I'll do it here. It's still in the testing stages, so sit tight. I may just drop the pictures, put it in a Wikibox, or try something new altogether. I just figured this template would make my so called controversial edits seem less uncivil. I AM JOHN SMITH ( talk) 03:03, 20 December 2007 (UTC)
It's getting a bit late in the TfD, but you might want to move this template to your own userspace. Either way, I would not advise using this template in article space, per WP:BITE and WP:CIVIL. / edg ☺ ☭ 06:31, 20 December 2007 (UTC)
I saw you added a deletion tag to List of groups referred to as cults. I don't think the page is going to be deleted on the grounds you provided; if you disagree, you may try an AFD, but I believe the article is notable enough to stay. Jmlk 1 7 03:04, 20 December 2007 (UTC)
Your edits were reverted because they go against the Wikipedia Manual of Style, which outlines the style of writing in the encyclopedia. I suggest you read through that fully before making anymore edits like that. The encyclopedia is not meant to be concise, it is meant to fully encompass the subject being written about. The wiki also is like a web, which is why there are so many linked terms in the first sentence. (referring to this edit) I am also going to ask you to try to be civil on here as being uncivil can get you blocked. -- Michael Greiner 00:22, 21 December 2007 (UTC)
I was just wondering. Cause it seems in order for one single edit to be accepted around here, it has to be freakin perfect! I AM JOHN SMITH ( talk) 18:40, 26 December 2007 (UTC)
and I see it didn't take you bitches ;) very long to revert my edits...AGAIN To which I respond "JEEEE-ZUS KEYYYY-REIST!" And in case you dont understand that cause all my edits seem to get removed anyways, I'll illustrate it for you:
I AM JOHN SMITH (
talk)
21:31, 26 December 2007 (UTC)
Instead of commenting to each individual, I figured only interested parties would visit here, that way I don't crash everyone's talk page and be interpreted as rude again. I AM JOHN SMITH ( talk) 21:45, 26 December 2007 (UTC)
I just read your sarcasm page, and being that the page title itself seems sarcastic, I'm not entirely sure what message it's trying to send. We need more of this confusion. I AM JOHN SMITH ( talk) 22:46, 26 December 2007 (UTC)
I just updated the link "reaction" to reflect a "chemical reaction" related to cold fusion. Happy now?,....beeeeyiches ;)" -- I AM JOHN SMITH ( talk) 23:05, 26 December 2007 (UTC)
A tag has been placed on Brought, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.
Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. If you plan to expand the article, you can request that
administrators wait a while for you to add contextual material. To do this, affix the template {{
hangon}}
to the article and state your intention on the article's
talk page. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this.
Victao lopes (
talk)
00:08, 27 December 2007 (UTC)
Oh,I just now noticed my brought page has been deleted. Awesome! I love you, all! >:o —Preceding unsigned comment added by I AM JOHN SMITH ( talk • contribs) 04:04, 27 December 2007
Dont worry about my dorm, they're all dicks anyways. I cant get along with any of them, so I didnt listen. I was just angry about another page disappearing. I just sometimes feel between this website, and the jags down the hall from me (not to mention the ones living in my room), I cant get anything done. I AM JOHN SMITH ( talk) 18:51, 27 December 2007 (UTC)
Sorry about the above rant. Dont get me wrong, I love Slipknot, But hearing it at full volume at 2 in the morning is enough to drive anyone mad. I AM JOHN SMITH ( talk) 01:46, 29 December 2007 (UTC)