|
Talk Page Archive as of May 23rd
Hey HubHikari, do you know any admins? Coz with this wikipedia bot called ClueBot, I think its malfunctioning as it has been accusing some users about vandalism when they didn't do anything. Just some complaints I have recieved that I thought I should address about. -- Narutofanz ( talk) 00:24, 24 May 2008 (UTC)
Hey, do u happen to know any1 who can ban others. Just in case I catch someone who vandalises other pages. Narutofanz
Hey know any good admins around here? Some assholes have been continuously vandalising the Naruto Shippuden Episode List Page.-- Narutofanz 08:18, 19 October 2007 (UTC)
Hi, I know it was all the way back in May, but thanks for reverting the vandalism in my user page. But actually, I made all those edits to my page without signing in! Thank you anyway.. good looking out! :) Guanaco152003 18:37, 17 July 2006 (UTC)
Once again, my regged account seems to have been dominated by Lightdarkness' block. Can someone please advise, and perhaps offer assistace? -- HubHikari 13:29, 24 May 2006 (UTC)
Thank you for reverting vandalism to my user page. Best, Kukini 16:15, 25 May 2006 (UTC)
Why are you so awesome at this Wiki-thingy? (for comment to make more sense please add proverbal drunk voice) Cheers! Yanksox 16:22, 25 May 2006 (UTC)
That's what makes Vandal proof so awesome. Besides, I'm going to be social this saturday so I figure I'll do as much as I can till then. Yanksox 23:21, 26 May 2006 (UTC)
Thank you for your interest in VandalProof, HubHikari! You have now been added to the list of authorized users, so if you haven't already, simply download and install VandalProof from our main page. If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me or any other moderator, or you can post a message on the discussion page. AmiDaniel ( talk) 04:34, 27 May 2006 (UTC)
Good for you! Now, you'll have some fun. Yanksox 04:56, 27 May 2006 (UTC)
You havn't been signing your vandal's user talk pages ;) -- Consumed Crustacean | Talk | 02:38, 30 May 2006 (UTC)
Crazy! :P Yanksox 20:36, 5 June 2006 (UTC)
Looks like you could use this:
Hey, man, what's happening? I haven't seen you around alot, I hope everything is fine with you. Feel free to contact me. You always can. :) Yank sox 23:41, 21 July 2006 (UTC)
Heyy.! its me, Ace Fighter sory bout the fault in Hoot, my bad man, im bad with grammar. So how bout we talk sometime?? u gotta show me how though. I have no idea!! Heyy, its mne again, Ace Fighter, Hows it goin?? look at my talk page. Thanks for that fix. Plus, I avoid sharing personal info, i am a fairly young editer.
Hey, whats up? hows it goin? its me again. Ace Fighter 22:24, 5 November 2006 (UTC)
Don't you think you were being a little hypacritical when you corrected me on my "miss editing?" it says you've vandalized 5 times! Ace Fighter 23:59, 14 November 2006 (UTC)
Oh, aha, thanks for the correcttion i thought it said, "this user has vandalized 5 times, ohh. Funny turns out it ACTUALLY said this user has been vandalized 5 times! My mistake, how do you become a patroller or something on wiki? I edit freely.
Too right it's not! Thanx for finale standin up for us for once.
What the hell made you decide to put speedy deletion tags on those American Dragon: Jake Long episode descriptions made by TSLcrazier? If I wrote them myself, I would've put the "hangon" tag there before they disappeared. DanTD 16:13, 17 January 2007 (UTC)
Thanks. That's been recreated about 10 times in the last half hour. I'm glad you agree that it's nonsense. Academic Challenger 03:29, 26 January 2007 (UTC)
I dunno exactly why, but it's kind of fun. The Colbert crapflood seems to be slowing down at least. Cheers! Antandrus (talk) 05:42, 30 January 2007 (UTC)
Thanks a lot! I was in the middle od editing on that page and you put that crap back in. Now you just caused me an hours work for nothing. I was planning on putting the links back in when I was done but now I have to start back from Wave Five and build myself back up to Wave Twelve. Supergeeky1 06:24, 30 January 2007 (UTC)
No, I'm sorry for the message I gave you. YOU please except MY apologies, I'm just kinda tired! You wouldn't have known any way. SORRY!!! Supergeeky1 06:36, 30 January 2007 (UTC)
Oop, sorry, I didn't log in last night. :-O Yeah, I think this guy may be a serial vandal and/or "SPAM artist." RfC might not work out too well because I'm not sure he'd be responsive to that; maybe we could try to open an RfC and if he doesn't follow up there, it can be discussed on WP:ANI?
Glad to see you're back! :) Srose (talk) 13:53, 30 January 2007 (UTC)
I noticed that you deleted the stub article I wrote for Alex Atkind, the Cornell dog torturer, as a personal attack. It was not one. Here's an article about him and his reckless, horrible animal abuse. [1]
I'm sorry, but unfortunately I do not have time to write more than a stub on this person. Zeepwner 02:01, 21 March 2007 (UTC)
Even if it's not an attack page, the article as written fell under WP:CSD#A1 and WP:CSD#A7. It would need to be rewritten from scratch with notability asserted, sources cited per WP:BLP, and more context given to avoid A1. · j e r s y k o talk · 02:19, 21 March 2007 (UTC)
Alright, let's take this guy up through channels. What's the first move to get this guy blocked? -- HubHikari 12:31, 21 March 2007 (UTC)
I hope it's okay to ask you this, but you look like a pretty friendly guy and I am new to Wiki. You placed a speedy deletion tag on the page Adrian Johann Gracias-Flor and someone replaced your tag with the "hangon" tag. Should your tag have been replaced or should both tags be on the page? Thanks! Literacola 00:51, 30 March 2007 (UTC)
I noticed you have frequently been removing one user from the list of Elder Scrolls participants, the reason you provided being bad grammar. Fair enough, his comments are not the most grammatically correct, but do you really need to remove his name as well? I would like an explanation of your actions, if that wouldn't trouble you too much. Smomo 20:58, 1 April 2007 (UTC)
When the only editor of an article blanks it, that's a request for deletion, so don't revert it. Just let an admin delete it. (referring to Megz) — User:ACupOfCoffee @ 08:12, 5 April 2007 (UTC)
Question regarding potential block needed on a user, and the Wikipedia:No legal threats policy, at Wikipedia talk:No legal threats - subsection, Veiled legal threats ???. Please comment if you have a chance. Thank you for your time. Yours, Smee 01:36, 13 April 2007 (UTC).
"Subject-verb agreement; 'Franz Ferdinand' is a singular subject"
Collective ('group') nouns can take a verb in the singular or plural depending on whether the group is considered as a single unified entity or as a collection of individuals. "Abba is a Swedish pop group." "Abba are breaking up." Often a verb is used in the plural even when the singular might be more logical. "Abba are on tour in Australia." Your rule, followed strictly, would lead to unidiomatic writing and loss of precision. Your edit was nonetheless correct. Please do not reply to this message. Life is too short. Jagdfeld 17:37, 27 October 2007 (UTC)
Will you please stop putting "IS" for British bands? We are not all American users! How dare you presume that the British version of grammar is incorrect! —Preceding unsigned comment added by 80.35.148.220 ( talk) 20:12, 1 November 2007 (UTC)
Hey HubHikari,
Now that I know what your wikipedia username is, I expect you to make me wise in the ways of wiki. In return I can... not beat you up? ;) (Not that I could, Mr. "Accidentally Broke FirstRainbow's wrist that one time"
FirstRainbow ( talk) 04:43, 4 March 2008 (UTC)
Please note that I have removed the speedy delete tag you placed on this article as "Reasons derived from Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not" are non-criteria for speedy deletion. Regards, Guest9999 ( talk) 16:43, 29 September 2008 (UTC)
{{
helpme}}
In order to seal off a privacy leak that I am in the middle of, I need to request that an administrator destroy the Special subpage of my user page. -- HubHikari ( talk) 06:48, 18 April 2009 (UTC)
Are you getting Paid for this? I bet you DOOOooo. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Franklinbe ( talk • contribs) 05:55, 12 November 2009 (UTC)
New page patrol – Survey Invitation Hello HubHikari! The WMF is currently developing new tools to make new page patrolling much easier. Whether you have patrolled many pages or only a few, we now need to know about your experience. The survey takes only 6 minutes, and the information you provide will not be shared with third parties other than to assist us in analyzing the results of the survey; the WMF will not use the information to identify you.
Please click
HERE to take part. You are receiving this invitation because you have patrolled new pages. For more information, please see NPP Survey |
Hi HubHikari,
In order to better control the quality of new pages, keep out the spam, and welcome the genuine newbies, the current system we introduced in 2011 is being updated and improved. The documentation and tutorials have also been revised and given a facelift. Most importantly a new user group New Page Reviewer has been created.
Under the new rule, you may find that you are temporarily unable to mark new pages as reviewed. However, this is nothing to worry about - most current experienced patrollers are being accorded the the new right without the need to apply, and if you have significant previous experience of patrolling new pages, we strongly encourage you to apply for the new right as soon as possible - we need all the help we can get, and we are now providing a dynamic, supportive environment for your work.
Find out more about this exiting new user right now at New Page Reviewers and be sure to read the new tutorial before applying. MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 04:29, 13 November 2016 (UTC)
Hello, HubHikari. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
|
Talk Page Archive as of May 23rd
Hey HubHikari, do you know any admins? Coz with this wikipedia bot called ClueBot, I think its malfunctioning as it has been accusing some users about vandalism when they didn't do anything. Just some complaints I have recieved that I thought I should address about. -- Narutofanz ( talk) 00:24, 24 May 2008 (UTC)
Hey, do u happen to know any1 who can ban others. Just in case I catch someone who vandalises other pages. Narutofanz
Hey know any good admins around here? Some assholes have been continuously vandalising the Naruto Shippuden Episode List Page.-- Narutofanz 08:18, 19 October 2007 (UTC)
Hi, I know it was all the way back in May, but thanks for reverting the vandalism in my user page. But actually, I made all those edits to my page without signing in! Thank you anyway.. good looking out! :) Guanaco152003 18:37, 17 July 2006 (UTC)
Once again, my regged account seems to have been dominated by Lightdarkness' block. Can someone please advise, and perhaps offer assistace? -- HubHikari 13:29, 24 May 2006 (UTC)
Thank you for reverting vandalism to my user page. Best, Kukini 16:15, 25 May 2006 (UTC)
Why are you so awesome at this Wiki-thingy? (for comment to make more sense please add proverbal drunk voice) Cheers! Yanksox 16:22, 25 May 2006 (UTC)
That's what makes Vandal proof so awesome. Besides, I'm going to be social this saturday so I figure I'll do as much as I can till then. Yanksox 23:21, 26 May 2006 (UTC)
Thank you for your interest in VandalProof, HubHikari! You have now been added to the list of authorized users, so if you haven't already, simply download and install VandalProof from our main page. If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me or any other moderator, or you can post a message on the discussion page. AmiDaniel ( talk) 04:34, 27 May 2006 (UTC)
Good for you! Now, you'll have some fun. Yanksox 04:56, 27 May 2006 (UTC)
You havn't been signing your vandal's user talk pages ;) -- Consumed Crustacean | Talk | 02:38, 30 May 2006 (UTC)
Crazy! :P Yanksox 20:36, 5 June 2006 (UTC)
Looks like you could use this:
Hey, man, what's happening? I haven't seen you around alot, I hope everything is fine with you. Feel free to contact me. You always can. :) Yank sox 23:41, 21 July 2006 (UTC)
Heyy.! its me, Ace Fighter sory bout the fault in Hoot, my bad man, im bad with grammar. So how bout we talk sometime?? u gotta show me how though. I have no idea!! Heyy, its mne again, Ace Fighter, Hows it goin?? look at my talk page. Thanks for that fix. Plus, I avoid sharing personal info, i am a fairly young editer.
Hey, whats up? hows it goin? its me again. Ace Fighter 22:24, 5 November 2006 (UTC)
Don't you think you were being a little hypacritical when you corrected me on my "miss editing?" it says you've vandalized 5 times! Ace Fighter 23:59, 14 November 2006 (UTC)
Oh, aha, thanks for the correcttion i thought it said, "this user has vandalized 5 times, ohh. Funny turns out it ACTUALLY said this user has been vandalized 5 times! My mistake, how do you become a patroller or something on wiki? I edit freely.
Too right it's not! Thanx for finale standin up for us for once.
What the hell made you decide to put speedy deletion tags on those American Dragon: Jake Long episode descriptions made by TSLcrazier? If I wrote them myself, I would've put the "hangon" tag there before they disappeared. DanTD 16:13, 17 January 2007 (UTC)
Thanks. That's been recreated about 10 times in the last half hour. I'm glad you agree that it's nonsense. Academic Challenger 03:29, 26 January 2007 (UTC)
I dunno exactly why, but it's kind of fun. The Colbert crapflood seems to be slowing down at least. Cheers! Antandrus (talk) 05:42, 30 January 2007 (UTC)
Thanks a lot! I was in the middle od editing on that page and you put that crap back in. Now you just caused me an hours work for nothing. I was planning on putting the links back in when I was done but now I have to start back from Wave Five and build myself back up to Wave Twelve. Supergeeky1 06:24, 30 January 2007 (UTC)
No, I'm sorry for the message I gave you. YOU please except MY apologies, I'm just kinda tired! You wouldn't have known any way. SORRY!!! Supergeeky1 06:36, 30 January 2007 (UTC)
Oop, sorry, I didn't log in last night. :-O Yeah, I think this guy may be a serial vandal and/or "SPAM artist." RfC might not work out too well because I'm not sure he'd be responsive to that; maybe we could try to open an RfC and if he doesn't follow up there, it can be discussed on WP:ANI?
Glad to see you're back! :) Srose (talk) 13:53, 30 January 2007 (UTC)
I noticed that you deleted the stub article I wrote for Alex Atkind, the Cornell dog torturer, as a personal attack. It was not one. Here's an article about him and his reckless, horrible animal abuse. [1]
I'm sorry, but unfortunately I do not have time to write more than a stub on this person. Zeepwner 02:01, 21 March 2007 (UTC)
Even if it's not an attack page, the article as written fell under WP:CSD#A1 and WP:CSD#A7. It would need to be rewritten from scratch with notability asserted, sources cited per WP:BLP, and more context given to avoid A1. · j e r s y k o talk · 02:19, 21 March 2007 (UTC)
Alright, let's take this guy up through channels. What's the first move to get this guy blocked? -- HubHikari 12:31, 21 March 2007 (UTC)
I hope it's okay to ask you this, but you look like a pretty friendly guy and I am new to Wiki. You placed a speedy deletion tag on the page Adrian Johann Gracias-Flor and someone replaced your tag with the "hangon" tag. Should your tag have been replaced or should both tags be on the page? Thanks! Literacola 00:51, 30 March 2007 (UTC)
I noticed you have frequently been removing one user from the list of Elder Scrolls participants, the reason you provided being bad grammar. Fair enough, his comments are not the most grammatically correct, but do you really need to remove his name as well? I would like an explanation of your actions, if that wouldn't trouble you too much. Smomo 20:58, 1 April 2007 (UTC)
When the only editor of an article blanks it, that's a request for deletion, so don't revert it. Just let an admin delete it. (referring to Megz) — User:ACupOfCoffee @ 08:12, 5 April 2007 (UTC)
Question regarding potential block needed on a user, and the Wikipedia:No legal threats policy, at Wikipedia talk:No legal threats - subsection, Veiled legal threats ???. Please comment if you have a chance. Thank you for your time. Yours, Smee 01:36, 13 April 2007 (UTC).
"Subject-verb agreement; 'Franz Ferdinand' is a singular subject"
Collective ('group') nouns can take a verb in the singular or plural depending on whether the group is considered as a single unified entity or as a collection of individuals. "Abba is a Swedish pop group." "Abba are breaking up." Often a verb is used in the plural even when the singular might be more logical. "Abba are on tour in Australia." Your rule, followed strictly, would lead to unidiomatic writing and loss of precision. Your edit was nonetheless correct. Please do not reply to this message. Life is too short. Jagdfeld 17:37, 27 October 2007 (UTC)
Will you please stop putting "IS" for British bands? We are not all American users! How dare you presume that the British version of grammar is incorrect! —Preceding unsigned comment added by 80.35.148.220 ( talk) 20:12, 1 November 2007 (UTC)
Hey HubHikari,
Now that I know what your wikipedia username is, I expect you to make me wise in the ways of wiki. In return I can... not beat you up? ;) (Not that I could, Mr. "Accidentally Broke FirstRainbow's wrist that one time"
FirstRainbow ( talk) 04:43, 4 March 2008 (UTC)
Please note that I have removed the speedy delete tag you placed on this article as "Reasons derived from Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not" are non-criteria for speedy deletion. Regards, Guest9999 ( talk) 16:43, 29 September 2008 (UTC)
{{
helpme}}
In order to seal off a privacy leak that I am in the middle of, I need to request that an administrator destroy the Special subpage of my user page. -- HubHikari ( talk) 06:48, 18 April 2009 (UTC)
Are you getting Paid for this? I bet you DOOOooo. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Franklinbe ( talk • contribs) 05:55, 12 November 2009 (UTC)
New page patrol – Survey Invitation Hello HubHikari! The WMF is currently developing new tools to make new page patrolling much easier. Whether you have patrolled many pages or only a few, we now need to know about your experience. The survey takes only 6 minutes, and the information you provide will not be shared with third parties other than to assist us in analyzing the results of the survey; the WMF will not use the information to identify you.
Please click
HERE to take part. You are receiving this invitation because you have patrolled new pages. For more information, please see NPP Survey |
Hi HubHikari,
In order to better control the quality of new pages, keep out the spam, and welcome the genuine newbies, the current system we introduced in 2011 is being updated and improved. The documentation and tutorials have also been revised and given a facelift. Most importantly a new user group New Page Reviewer has been created.
Under the new rule, you may find that you are temporarily unable to mark new pages as reviewed. However, this is nothing to worry about - most current experienced patrollers are being accorded the the new right without the need to apply, and if you have significant previous experience of patrolling new pages, we strongly encourage you to apply for the new right as soon as possible - we need all the help we can get, and we are now providing a dynamic, supportive environment for your work.
Find out more about this exiting new user right now at New Page Reviewers and be sure to read the new tutorial before applying. MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 04:29, 13 November 2016 (UTC)
Hello, HubHikari. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)