A final decision has been made in the above Arbitration case and the case has been closed.
For the Arbitration committee. -- Tony Sidaway 18:03, 20 March 2006 (UTC)
If you ever come back to Wikipedia. you could help me find a text you have added to the Mass Rapid Transit (Singapore) article: Sock, Y.P. and Walder, Jay H. (1999) Singapore’s Public Transport. Thank you for your help! -- Ghormax 13:07, 4 June 2006 (UTC)
Is there nothing that can make you come back? You are an asset to us. Please return! We'd love to see you work on articles!-- Tdxi an g 09:25, 4 July 2006 (UTC)
Huaiwei, I need your help for the 1997 elections and I don't know much about elections before 2001. If you like to help, help me to expand the article. Thanks. -- Ter e nce Ong ( Chat | Contribs) 07:29, 9 July 2006 (UTC)
Welcome back/L/ wangi 16:47, 12 July 2006 (UTC)
welcome back...having been aroudn for quite some time i have always been for changi's page been tend by singaporeans. that filipino thinks he knows best....what the.
huaiwei i was refering to eletrikblue that pinoy guy.....
Re [1] [2] [3] [4] - From materials I have cited and have on hand, it's pretty apparent that the Municipal Council, later the City Council, did not cover the entirety of the then crown colony. There was a Rural Board responsible for the rest of the crown colony. The Municipal Council was in fact established in the mid-19th century, long before Singapore became a crown colony of its own in 1946. The City Council definitely was not responsible for the Cocos or Keeling Islands and the Christmas Island, which were transferred to Australia in 1955 and 1957. In the 1948 Legislative Council election, there were four constituencies, two for Rural and two for Municipal. As it is a fact as shown by evidence, it's hardly my assertion. I've yet to see any evidence justifying your claim ( [5]) that the pre-1963 City is the same as the modern state of Singapore.
Edits related to the pre-1963 City and City Council were not related to the page ban in the sense that the page ban was a result of disagreements over the city status of modern Singapore from the administration and legal point of view. There's nothing related to the fact that the pre-1963 City did not cover the entirety of the modern state of Singapore. — Insta ntnood 22:54, 10 July 2006 (UTC)
Please kindly restore what you've overdone in your recent revert to culture of the People's Republic of China [7]. Thanks in advance. — Insta ntnood 18:34, 15 July 2006 (UTC)
Re [10] [11] - Please explain why you overdid, especially for the latter one, in which you undid your own edit [12]. — Insta ntnood 18:03, 22 July 2006 (UTC)
[20] - Do you actually know what exactly you've reverted? — Insta ntnood 21:33, 31 July 2006 (UTC)
Re [21] [22] [23] [24] [25] [26] - Please note that the word country in the English language, as used on Wikipedia, is not normally restricted to refer to sovereign states, c.f. list of countries (which is a featured list), entries under category:lists of countries, categories under category:categories by country, etc. — Insta ntnood 20:35, 15 July 2006 (UTC)
Re [27] [28] - Please kindly stop confusing SARs with SARS. It's no joke. It cost several thousand lives. You've been reminded [29], yet you continue to do so. — Insta ntnood 18:19, 16 July 2006 (UTC)
Re [35] - Please stop. SARs ≠ SARS. — Insta ntnood 21:44, 25 August 2006 (UTC)
Re [36] - Please stop now. — Insta ntnood 21:41, 28 August 2006 (UTC)
[37] - Please stop now. — Insta ntnood 19:25, 6 September 2006 (UTC)
[38] Please stop, or else you are insulting yourself. — Insta ntnood 17:22, 9 September 2006 (UTC)
[39] Please stop. — Insta ntnood 17:46, 9 September 2006 (UTC)
[40] Please stop. — Insta ntnood 19:05, 9 September 2006 (UTC)
Huaiwei, thanks for signing up for the Esperanza User Page Contest. The judges have received the fifteen entries, and are ready to start judging. The judges will take a week to complete the judging process, and they will contact all the participants when the judging is done.
Please drop by the
contest page for contest updates and questions. Take care, and good luck! May the Force be with you!
Shr
e
shth91
($ |-| ŗ 3 $ |-| ţ |-|) 10:11, 20 July 2006 (UTC)
Now I cant believe how my humble little page can get nominated, but thanks anyhow and have fun! :D-- Huaiwei 11:42, 20 July 2006 (UTC)
In your 8 March 2005 edit to List of schools in Singapore, Singapore Japanese School was called "シンガポール日本人学校へようこそ". Actually, "へようこそ" just means "Welcome to...", and I've since removed "へようこそ", albiet only sixteen months later. It would help if you check with a speaker of a foreign language before adding text in that foreign language into articles. Thank you! — Goh wz 14:25, 21 July 2006 (UTC)
Because you're a member of the Association of Inclusionist Wikipedians, I'm notifying you that the inclusionist proposa Wikipedia:Non-notabilityl is in progress to define the role of notability in articles. Please help us make this successful! Also note the proposal Wikipedia:Importance is a deletionist proposla that seeks to officially introduce notabiltiy for the first time. -- Ephilei 04:45, 4 July 2006 (UTC)
Yes, Huaiwei, welcome back. I hope to work with you soon...so good luck! See you on MSN, too.-- Tdxi an g 10:16, 24 July 2006 (UTC)
Well, true enough, it was rather sian without you...:(-- Tdxi an g 10:17, 24 July 2006 (UTC)
Thanks for moving back Current events in Hong Kong. --- Hong Qi Gong 16:09, 26 July 2006 (UTC)
Greetings, Huaiwei. The judges would like to announce that the winner for the Esperanza User Page Contest has been chosen. Congratulations to Kylu for winning the contest. The winning entry can be found here.
If you'd like to participate in the contest again, check by the
contest page in a few days and sign up. See you around. May the Force be with you!
Shr
e
shth91
($ |-| ŗ 3 $ |-| ţ |-|)
Hi Huaiwei! There appears to be a fair but real dispute on this article. I have opened an article RFC on the above talkpage (There were two talkpages to choose from, I selected which one by tossing a coin). Please comment if there are things you wish to add. Sjakkalle (Check!) 08:11, 3 August 2006 (UTC)
Hi there Huaiwei, just noticed your edit to SIN. I agree that source says nothing at all about the service, however this service (and onto MEL) is due to terminate at the end of March 2007. Some news articles on it:
and I think there was an article in the New Straits Times today, but without a subscription... Thanks/ wangi 12:48, 14 August 2006 (UTC)
Going off on a tangent here... I know we've had our moments on the article table/list at SIN in the past and it's now the much reduced "standard" format... But I can't help thinking that even these lists are largely a non-encyclopedic collection of indescriminate information. In an encyclopedia article surely the list of current destinations isn't important - it's the reason behind and for important routes being dropped and started that's important. Consider it from the view of WP:0.5, WP:1.0 and print versions - the content will be stale...
Oh, I don't know... This is really just a brain-dump — don't worry, i'm not going to get the hatchet out :) I'd I wager not many people, if any, think the same anyway! Thanks/ wangi 15:29, 14 August 2006 (UTC)
Thanks for adding the information. " You know the answer, but since you are too lazy... " [42] - No I don't. I am no expert in aviation stuffs. The original sentence was a general description, but the 2006 clause did not mention which award(s). It looked like all awards went to Changi in 2006. — Insta ntnood 19:04, 19 August 2006 (UTC)
Take your discussion of Country to the article's talk page. You are close to violating 3RR. Joelito ( talk) 20:21, 19 August 2006 (UTC)
You were properly warned. You have been blocked for 48 hrs for edit warring on both Country and List of largest buildings in the world. Joelito ( talk) 21:20, 19 August 2006 (UTC)
If I may respond to User_talk:Instantnood#Blocked in my talkpage:
The 3RR is there for a purpose, and that is to prevent revert warring. Having more than one revert in consecutively is disruptive, and it does not get any less so just because there are less than three rounds of reverts. I would think a lifting of the ban based on his reasoning would contribute nothing to the arbcom's efforts other than enforcing his believe that the 3RR ruling can be circumvented by sneaking other intermitent edits together with the disputed edits, and by timing his reverts to avoid breaching the 3RR. The 3RR specifically speaks against the gaming of the system for a reason, which is quite evident here in my books. Hope this view may be considered when evaluating his request. Thanks!-- Huaiwei 21:44, 19 August 2006 (UTC)
A final decision has been made in the above Arbitration case and the case has been closed.
For the Arbitration committee. -- Tony Sidaway 18:03, 20 March 2006 (UTC)
If you ever come back to Wikipedia. you could help me find a text you have added to the Mass Rapid Transit (Singapore) article: Sock, Y.P. and Walder, Jay H. (1999) Singapore’s Public Transport. Thank you for your help! -- Ghormax 13:07, 4 June 2006 (UTC)
Is there nothing that can make you come back? You are an asset to us. Please return! We'd love to see you work on articles!-- Tdxi an g 09:25, 4 July 2006 (UTC)
Huaiwei, I need your help for the 1997 elections and I don't know much about elections before 2001. If you like to help, help me to expand the article. Thanks. -- Ter e nce Ong ( Chat | Contribs) 07:29, 9 July 2006 (UTC)
Welcome back/L/ wangi 16:47, 12 July 2006 (UTC)
welcome back...having been aroudn for quite some time i have always been for changi's page been tend by singaporeans. that filipino thinks he knows best....what the.
huaiwei i was refering to eletrikblue that pinoy guy.....
Re [1] [2] [3] [4] - From materials I have cited and have on hand, it's pretty apparent that the Municipal Council, later the City Council, did not cover the entirety of the then crown colony. There was a Rural Board responsible for the rest of the crown colony. The Municipal Council was in fact established in the mid-19th century, long before Singapore became a crown colony of its own in 1946. The City Council definitely was not responsible for the Cocos or Keeling Islands and the Christmas Island, which were transferred to Australia in 1955 and 1957. In the 1948 Legislative Council election, there were four constituencies, two for Rural and two for Municipal. As it is a fact as shown by evidence, it's hardly my assertion. I've yet to see any evidence justifying your claim ( [5]) that the pre-1963 City is the same as the modern state of Singapore.
Edits related to the pre-1963 City and City Council were not related to the page ban in the sense that the page ban was a result of disagreements over the city status of modern Singapore from the administration and legal point of view. There's nothing related to the fact that the pre-1963 City did not cover the entirety of the modern state of Singapore. — Insta ntnood 22:54, 10 July 2006 (UTC)
Please kindly restore what you've overdone in your recent revert to culture of the People's Republic of China [7]. Thanks in advance. — Insta ntnood 18:34, 15 July 2006 (UTC)
Re [10] [11] - Please explain why you overdid, especially for the latter one, in which you undid your own edit [12]. — Insta ntnood 18:03, 22 July 2006 (UTC)
[20] - Do you actually know what exactly you've reverted? — Insta ntnood 21:33, 31 July 2006 (UTC)
Re [21] [22] [23] [24] [25] [26] - Please note that the word country in the English language, as used on Wikipedia, is not normally restricted to refer to sovereign states, c.f. list of countries (which is a featured list), entries under category:lists of countries, categories under category:categories by country, etc. — Insta ntnood 20:35, 15 July 2006 (UTC)
Re [27] [28] - Please kindly stop confusing SARs with SARS. It's no joke. It cost several thousand lives. You've been reminded [29], yet you continue to do so. — Insta ntnood 18:19, 16 July 2006 (UTC)
Re [35] - Please stop. SARs ≠ SARS. — Insta ntnood 21:44, 25 August 2006 (UTC)
Re [36] - Please stop now. — Insta ntnood 21:41, 28 August 2006 (UTC)
[37] - Please stop now. — Insta ntnood 19:25, 6 September 2006 (UTC)
[38] Please stop, or else you are insulting yourself. — Insta ntnood 17:22, 9 September 2006 (UTC)
[39] Please stop. — Insta ntnood 17:46, 9 September 2006 (UTC)
[40] Please stop. — Insta ntnood 19:05, 9 September 2006 (UTC)
Huaiwei, thanks for signing up for the Esperanza User Page Contest. The judges have received the fifteen entries, and are ready to start judging. The judges will take a week to complete the judging process, and they will contact all the participants when the judging is done.
Please drop by the
contest page for contest updates and questions. Take care, and good luck! May the Force be with you!
Shr
e
shth91
($ |-| ŗ 3 $ |-| ţ |-|) 10:11, 20 July 2006 (UTC)
Now I cant believe how my humble little page can get nominated, but thanks anyhow and have fun! :D-- Huaiwei 11:42, 20 July 2006 (UTC)
In your 8 March 2005 edit to List of schools in Singapore, Singapore Japanese School was called "シンガポール日本人学校へようこそ". Actually, "へようこそ" just means "Welcome to...", and I've since removed "へようこそ", albiet only sixteen months later. It would help if you check with a speaker of a foreign language before adding text in that foreign language into articles. Thank you! — Goh wz 14:25, 21 July 2006 (UTC)
Because you're a member of the Association of Inclusionist Wikipedians, I'm notifying you that the inclusionist proposa Wikipedia:Non-notabilityl is in progress to define the role of notability in articles. Please help us make this successful! Also note the proposal Wikipedia:Importance is a deletionist proposla that seeks to officially introduce notabiltiy for the first time. -- Ephilei 04:45, 4 July 2006 (UTC)
Yes, Huaiwei, welcome back. I hope to work with you soon...so good luck! See you on MSN, too.-- Tdxi an g 10:16, 24 July 2006 (UTC)
Well, true enough, it was rather sian without you...:(-- Tdxi an g 10:17, 24 July 2006 (UTC)
Thanks for moving back Current events in Hong Kong. --- Hong Qi Gong 16:09, 26 July 2006 (UTC)
Greetings, Huaiwei. The judges would like to announce that the winner for the Esperanza User Page Contest has been chosen. Congratulations to Kylu for winning the contest. The winning entry can be found here.
If you'd like to participate in the contest again, check by the
contest page in a few days and sign up. See you around. May the Force be with you!
Shr
e
shth91
($ |-| ŗ 3 $ |-| ţ |-|)
Hi Huaiwei! There appears to be a fair but real dispute on this article. I have opened an article RFC on the above talkpage (There were two talkpages to choose from, I selected which one by tossing a coin). Please comment if there are things you wish to add. Sjakkalle (Check!) 08:11, 3 August 2006 (UTC)
Hi there Huaiwei, just noticed your edit to SIN. I agree that source says nothing at all about the service, however this service (and onto MEL) is due to terminate at the end of March 2007. Some news articles on it:
and I think there was an article in the New Straits Times today, but without a subscription... Thanks/ wangi 12:48, 14 August 2006 (UTC)
Going off on a tangent here... I know we've had our moments on the article table/list at SIN in the past and it's now the much reduced "standard" format... But I can't help thinking that even these lists are largely a non-encyclopedic collection of indescriminate information. In an encyclopedia article surely the list of current destinations isn't important - it's the reason behind and for important routes being dropped and started that's important. Consider it from the view of WP:0.5, WP:1.0 and print versions - the content will be stale...
Oh, I don't know... This is really just a brain-dump — don't worry, i'm not going to get the hatchet out :) I'd I wager not many people, if any, think the same anyway! Thanks/ wangi 15:29, 14 August 2006 (UTC)
Thanks for adding the information. " You know the answer, but since you are too lazy... " [42] - No I don't. I am no expert in aviation stuffs. The original sentence was a general description, but the 2006 clause did not mention which award(s). It looked like all awards went to Changi in 2006. — Insta ntnood 19:04, 19 August 2006 (UTC)
Take your discussion of Country to the article's talk page. You are close to violating 3RR. Joelito ( talk) 20:21, 19 August 2006 (UTC)
You were properly warned. You have been blocked for 48 hrs for edit warring on both Country and List of largest buildings in the world. Joelito ( talk) 21:20, 19 August 2006 (UTC)
If I may respond to User_talk:Instantnood#Blocked in my talkpage:
The 3RR is there for a purpose, and that is to prevent revert warring. Having more than one revert in consecutively is disruptive, and it does not get any less so just because there are less than three rounds of reverts. I would think a lifting of the ban based on his reasoning would contribute nothing to the arbcom's efforts other than enforcing his believe that the 3RR ruling can be circumvented by sneaking other intermitent edits together with the disputed edits, and by timing his reverts to avoid breaching the 3RR. The 3RR specifically speaks against the gaming of the system for a reason, which is quite evident here in my books. Hope this view may be considered when evaluating his request. Thanks!-- Huaiwei 21:44, 19 August 2006 (UTC)