Hi! The reference desk is for real questions that you want factual answers to. I'm concerned that your recent questions may present the appearance of 'trolling'- asking a question just to get an entertaining emotional reaction. I hope I'm wrong about that; if your future edits are useful, then I'll know that I made a mistake. However, it is possible to be blocked from using Wikipedia for disruptive editing, and I wanted to let you know that. - FisherQueen ( talk · contribs) 20:53, 24 October 2008 (UTC)
A
proposed deletion template has been added to the article
Winter Dawn, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's
criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "
What Wikipedia is not" and
Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{
dated prod}}
notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on
its talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. 98.217.8.46 ( talk) 02:08, 25 October 2008 (UTC)
Do you have a source supporting your change in a statistic from 5000 to 9000? - FisherQueen ( talk · contribs) 12:32, 25 October 2008 (UTC)
Perhaps you should leave the Reference Desks alone for a while. Your edits there seem to be intended to be suggestive, off-colour humourous, and/or designed to provoke arguments.
I'm going to give you the benefit of the doubt and not immediately block this account from editing, but you need to find other outlets for your urges. TenOfAllTrades( talk) 18:45, 25 October 2008 (UTC)
Hi! The reference desk is for real questions that you want factual answers to. I'm concerned that your recent questions may present the appearance of 'trolling'- asking a question just to get an entertaining emotional reaction. I hope I'm wrong about that; if your future edits are useful, then I'll know that I made a mistake. However, it is possible to be blocked from using Wikipedia for disruptive editing, and I wanted to let you know that. - FisherQueen ( talk · contribs) 20:53, 24 October 2008 (UTC)
A
proposed deletion template has been added to the article
Winter Dawn, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's
criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "
What Wikipedia is not" and
Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{
dated prod}}
notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on
its talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. 98.217.8.46 ( talk) 02:08, 25 October 2008 (UTC)
Do you have a source supporting your change in a statistic from 5000 to 9000? - FisherQueen ( talk · contribs) 12:32, 25 October 2008 (UTC)
Perhaps you should leave the Reference Desks alone for a while. Your edits there seem to be intended to be suggestive, off-colour humourous, and/or designed to provoke arguments.
I'm going to give you the benefit of the doubt and not immediately block this account from editing, but you need to find other outlets for your urges. TenOfAllTrades( talk) 18:45, 25 October 2008 (UTC)