2007 | <<
|
<<
|
<<
|
•
|
•
|
•
|
•
|
•
|
•
|
•
|
•
|
|||||||||||||
2008 | •
|
•
|
•
|
•
|
•
|
•
|
•
|
•
|
•
|
•
|
•
|
|||||||||||||
2009 | •
|
•
|
•
|
•
|
•
|
•
|
•
|
•
|
•
|
•
|
•
|
|||||||||||||
2010 | •
|
•
|
•
|
•
|
>>
|
>>
|
>>
|
>>
|
>>
|
>>
|
>>
|
>>
|
Apologies about the Phillies logo. Another user apparently deleted the fair use rationales which did exist before. I've restored them. KV5 • Squawk box • Fight on! 22:20, 2 March 2009 (UTC)
I don't understand your removal of the Phillies logo (nor do I understand not using my talk page to respond instead of an edit summary). The NFCC says "Non-free content is used only where no free equivalent is available, or could be created, that would serve the same encyclopedic purpose." There is no free content version of the Phillies' logo, and there is no other way to represent the team's logo in an encyclopedic manner. KV5 • Squawk box • Fight on! 18:07, 6 March 2009 (UTC)
I fail to see how the exclusion of the team's logo isn't detrimental to the article... KV5 • Squawk box • Fight on! 17:11, 7 March 2009 (UTC)
That, I actually have. I can make that happen. Cheers. KV5 • Squawk box • Fight on! 18:15, 7 March 2009 (UTC)
Please see Wikipedia:Deletion review/Log/2009 March 4! --Avant-garde a clue- hexa Chord 2 06:53, 5 March 2009 (UTC)
Hi, It is very important that this article stays on Wiki. If it needs cleaning up it can be done. It was not original research. May reports and work exist and I need to add them and clean up. Media bias is a big menace in India and it will be great to have an article on that here. ~rAGU ( talk)
Can you restore File:Hrvati1.JPG so I can give it a correct FUR for the Croats article? Please give it a new date on the tag so it gets 7 more days of time and doesn't get deleted before I can update it. Thanks. -- Enric Naval ( talk) 09:12, 17 March 2009 (UTC)
Please check that the FUR I put is correct. -- Enric Naval ( talk) 04:37, 19 March 2009 (UTC)
Thanks for removing those. I updated the sources a bit more; sorry that I can't pinpoint the sources better, but all the images left appear to be on the public domain for one or other reason. -- Enric Naval ( talk) 10:52, 20 March 2009 (UTC)
Ok. -- Enric Naval ( talk) 15:58, 20 March 2009 (UTC)
Hi Hmwith! I see you are back from your spring break vacation (hope you had a good time) and I was wondering if you had a chance to think about the email I sent you. If you are not interested, please say so now otherwise we are still holding a spot for you should you wish to accept. Either way, I await your reply. Cheers, Tiptoety talk 23:48, 30 March 2009 (UTC)
2007 | <<
|
<<
|
<<
|
•
|
•
|
•
|
•
|
•
|
•
|
•
|
•
|
|||||||||||||
2008 | •
|
•
|
•
|
•
|
•
|
•
|
•
|
•
|
•
|
•
|
•
|
|||||||||||||
2009 | •
|
•
|
•
|
•
|
•
|
•
|
•
|
•
|
•
|
•
|
•
|
|||||||||||||
2010 | •
|
•
|
•
|
•
|
>>
|
>>
|
>>
|
>>
|
>>
|
>>
|
>>
|
>>
|
Apologies about the Phillies logo. Another user apparently deleted the fair use rationales which did exist before. I've restored them. KV5 • Squawk box • Fight on! 22:20, 2 March 2009 (UTC)
I don't understand your removal of the Phillies logo (nor do I understand not using my talk page to respond instead of an edit summary). The NFCC says "Non-free content is used only where no free equivalent is available, or could be created, that would serve the same encyclopedic purpose." There is no free content version of the Phillies' logo, and there is no other way to represent the team's logo in an encyclopedic manner. KV5 • Squawk box • Fight on! 18:07, 6 March 2009 (UTC)
I fail to see how the exclusion of the team's logo isn't detrimental to the article... KV5 • Squawk box • Fight on! 17:11, 7 March 2009 (UTC)
That, I actually have. I can make that happen. Cheers. KV5 • Squawk box • Fight on! 18:15, 7 March 2009 (UTC)
Please see Wikipedia:Deletion review/Log/2009 March 4! --Avant-garde a clue- hexa Chord 2 06:53, 5 March 2009 (UTC)
Hi, It is very important that this article stays on Wiki. If it needs cleaning up it can be done. It was not original research. May reports and work exist and I need to add them and clean up. Media bias is a big menace in India and it will be great to have an article on that here. ~rAGU ( talk)
Can you restore File:Hrvati1.JPG so I can give it a correct FUR for the Croats article? Please give it a new date on the tag so it gets 7 more days of time and doesn't get deleted before I can update it. Thanks. -- Enric Naval ( talk) 09:12, 17 March 2009 (UTC)
Please check that the FUR I put is correct. -- Enric Naval ( talk) 04:37, 19 March 2009 (UTC)
Thanks for removing those. I updated the sources a bit more; sorry that I can't pinpoint the sources better, but all the images left appear to be on the public domain for one or other reason. -- Enric Naval ( talk) 10:52, 20 March 2009 (UTC)
Ok. -- Enric Naval ( talk) 15:58, 20 March 2009 (UTC)
Hi Hmwith! I see you are back from your spring break vacation (hope you had a good time) and I was wondering if you had a chance to think about the email I sent you. If you are not interested, please say so now otherwise we are still holding a spot for you should you wish to accept. Either way, I await your reply. Cheers, Tiptoety talk 23:48, 30 March 2009 (UTC)