This is the first I've put on this page, so if you have any questions for me, put them here!
|
Hi there. When
editing an article on Wikipedia there is a small field labeled "
Edit summary" under the main edit-box. It looks like this:
The text written here will appear on the Recent changes page, in the page revision history, on the diff page, and in the watchlists of users who are watching that article. See m:Help:Edit summary for full information on this feature.
Filling in the edit summary field greatly helps your fellow contributors in understanding what you changed, so please always fill in the edit summary field. If you are adding a section, please do not just keep the previous section's header in the Edit summary field – please fill in your new section's name instead. Thank you. — Spike Toronto 22:27, 25 October 2010 (UTC)
Welcome to Wikipedia. Please do not
attack other contributors, as you did with
this edit to
Talk:Donald Leifert. You may wish to read the
introduction to editing. Thank you.
KGasso (
talk)
22:00, 25 October 2010 (UTC)
Well he was violating my rights. He was being inconsiderate.
Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to
talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you must
sign your posts by typing four
tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. You may also click on the signature button
located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you. --
SineBot (
talk)
22:04, 25 October 2010 (UTC)
Hi Herman. The article, Donald Leifert needs some work especially as relates to verifiable references/ citations. Chances are the article may get returned to its stub status. You should try working on it in your own user namespace until such time as it is ready for the main (i.e., article) namespace. If you would like, I can put a copy of it in your own user namespace for you to work on. Would you like me to do that? Thanks! — Spike Toronto 22:17, 25 October 2010 (UTC)
The
recent edit you made to
Donald Leifert constitutes
vandalism, and has been reverted. Please do not continue to remove content. Thank you. —
Spike
Toronto
19:05, 26 October 2010 (UTC)
Please do not vandalize pages, as you did with
this edit to
Donald Leifert. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing.
Cmichael (
talk)
19:05, 26 October 2010 (UTC)
This is your last warning. You will be blocked from editing the next time you vandalize a page, as you did with
this edit to
Talk:Donald Leifert.
JamesBWatson (
talk)
19:06, 26 October 2010 (UTC)
{{
unblock|Your reason here}}
, but you should read the
guide to appealing blocks first.
UltraExactZZ
Said ~
Did
20:36, 26 October 2010 (UTC)I've also removed your AFD nomination from the article Donald Leifert. The nomination was not transcluded in the AFD log, and the debate page itself was malformed. If you believe that the article should be deleted in its entirety, and you wish to renominate, please have a look at WP:AFDHOW2 and follow the instructions there. You can also leave me a message or post {{ helpme}} on this page for additional assistance. May I suggest, though, that you take some time away from this article to calm down? It's clear that you feel very strongly about the subject; once your block expires, some time looking at other articles may offer a different perspective. Best, UltraExactZZ Said ~ Did 20:41, 26 October 2010 (UTC)
Some have alluded that I am connected with historyhermann and that my account is by the same person as historyhermann. I am not the same person as the person that created historyhermann's account. -- Hicukujoe ( talk) 01:13, 6 January 2011 (UTC)
I am a Wikipedian, who is studying the phenomenon on Wikipedia. I need your help to conduct my research on about understanding "Motivation of Wikipedia contributors." I would like to invite you to a short survey. Please give me your valuable time, which estimates only 5 minutes. cooldenny ( talk) 07:49, 15 April 2011 (UTC)
This is the first I've put on this page, so if you have any questions for me, put them here!
|
Hi there. When
editing an article on Wikipedia there is a small field labeled "
Edit summary" under the main edit-box. It looks like this:
The text written here will appear on the Recent changes page, in the page revision history, on the diff page, and in the watchlists of users who are watching that article. See m:Help:Edit summary for full information on this feature.
Filling in the edit summary field greatly helps your fellow contributors in understanding what you changed, so please always fill in the edit summary field. If you are adding a section, please do not just keep the previous section's header in the Edit summary field – please fill in your new section's name instead. Thank you. — Spike Toronto 22:27, 25 October 2010 (UTC)
Welcome to Wikipedia. Please do not
attack other contributors, as you did with
this edit to
Talk:Donald Leifert. You may wish to read the
introduction to editing. Thank you.
KGasso (
talk)
22:00, 25 October 2010 (UTC)
Well he was violating my rights. He was being inconsiderate.
Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to
talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you must
sign your posts by typing four
tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. You may also click on the signature button
located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you. --
SineBot (
talk)
22:04, 25 October 2010 (UTC)
Hi Herman. The article, Donald Leifert needs some work especially as relates to verifiable references/ citations. Chances are the article may get returned to its stub status. You should try working on it in your own user namespace until such time as it is ready for the main (i.e., article) namespace. If you would like, I can put a copy of it in your own user namespace for you to work on. Would you like me to do that? Thanks! — Spike Toronto 22:17, 25 October 2010 (UTC)
The
recent edit you made to
Donald Leifert constitutes
vandalism, and has been reverted. Please do not continue to remove content. Thank you. —
Spike
Toronto
19:05, 26 October 2010 (UTC)
Please do not vandalize pages, as you did with
this edit to
Donald Leifert. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing.
Cmichael (
talk)
19:05, 26 October 2010 (UTC)
This is your last warning. You will be blocked from editing the next time you vandalize a page, as you did with
this edit to
Talk:Donald Leifert.
JamesBWatson (
talk)
19:06, 26 October 2010 (UTC)
{{
unblock|Your reason here}}
, but you should read the
guide to appealing blocks first.
UltraExactZZ
Said ~
Did
20:36, 26 October 2010 (UTC)I've also removed your AFD nomination from the article Donald Leifert. The nomination was not transcluded in the AFD log, and the debate page itself was malformed. If you believe that the article should be deleted in its entirety, and you wish to renominate, please have a look at WP:AFDHOW2 and follow the instructions there. You can also leave me a message or post {{ helpme}} on this page for additional assistance. May I suggest, though, that you take some time away from this article to calm down? It's clear that you feel very strongly about the subject; once your block expires, some time looking at other articles may offer a different perspective. Best, UltraExactZZ Said ~ Did 20:41, 26 October 2010 (UTC)
Some have alluded that I am connected with historyhermann and that my account is by the same person as historyhermann. I am not the same person as the person that created historyhermann's account. -- Hicukujoe ( talk) 01:13, 6 January 2011 (UTC)
I am a Wikipedian, who is studying the phenomenon on Wikipedia. I need your help to conduct my research on about understanding "Motivation of Wikipedia contributors." I would like to invite you to a short survey. Please give me your valuable time, which estimates only 5 minutes. cooldenny ( talk) 07:49, 15 April 2011 (UTC)