I have just reviewed your additions to rheumatoid arthritis. Could I please point out to you that we should not be citing primary research articles, but rather use secondary sources - refer to WP:MEDRS for details. The section you have added is really disproportionately long, but I thought that I should simply request that you shorten it rather than remove the whole lot. JFW | T@lk 11:07, 26 February 2010 (UTC)
I arrived at Booth's article because it didn't have a living parameter in the biography banner...
While the speedy delete has been removed, it is still a candidate for deletion in the future because it may not meet the general nobility guidelines. May I offer some suggestions.
Give me a yell if you need help or have questions. Bgwhite ( talk) 06:49, 24 February 2011 (UTC)
The article David A. Booth has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}}
notice, but please explain why in your
edit summary or on
the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}}
will stop the
proposed deletion process, but other
deletion processes exist. The
speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and
articles for deletion allows discussion to reach
consensus for deletion. --
Alan Liefting (
talk) -
00:01, 23 March 2011 (UTC)
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article David A. Booth is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/David A. Booth until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. -- Alan Liefting ( talk) - 04:29, 24 March 2011 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading File:Scopus logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Randykitty ( talk) 14:56, 9 September 2013 (UTC)
I have just reviewed your additions to rheumatoid arthritis. Could I please point out to you that we should not be citing primary research articles, but rather use secondary sources - refer to WP:MEDRS for details. The section you have added is really disproportionately long, but I thought that I should simply request that you shorten it rather than remove the whole lot. JFW | T@lk 11:07, 26 February 2010 (UTC)
I arrived at Booth's article because it didn't have a living parameter in the biography banner...
While the speedy delete has been removed, it is still a candidate for deletion in the future because it may not meet the general nobility guidelines. May I offer some suggestions.
Give me a yell if you need help or have questions. Bgwhite ( talk) 06:49, 24 February 2011 (UTC)
The article David A. Booth has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}}
notice, but please explain why in your
edit summary or on
the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}}
will stop the
proposed deletion process, but other
deletion processes exist. The
speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and
articles for deletion allows discussion to reach
consensus for deletion. --
Alan Liefting (
talk) -
00:01, 23 March 2011 (UTC)
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article David A. Booth is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/David A. Booth until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. -- Alan Liefting ( talk) - 04:29, 24 March 2011 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading File:Scopus logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Randykitty ( talk) 14:56, 9 September 2013 (UTC)