You closed the AN I had today regarding RandomCanadian. But I think they were empowered to continue - this seems like a
WP:BADNAC#2 The outcome is a close call (especially where there are several valid outcomes) or likely to be controversial. Such closes are better left to an administrator.
.
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Neek the Exotic.
Lightburst (
talk)
03:16, 3 October 2021 (UTC)
reply
Sorry to hear about your frustrated feelings. This admin is not going to find fault in that close, perhaps another will. However it is really the purview of the community. If you really think it was closed contrary to policy take your arguments to WP:DRV, and the community can decide if the closure was contrary to policy. It is silly to go back and forth like this when there is a place you can go if you are confident you are correct. HighInBC Need help? Just ask. 11:49, 3 October 2021 (UTC) reply
Thank you for deleting my miscreated page "T:wpref". But I found a problem: "creator request to delete his/her pages" have a different token between Chinese Wikipedia ( G10) and English Wikipedia ( G7). Are there any common tokens?--Wiki Emoji | Emojiwiki Talk~~ 11:20, 4 October 2021 (UTC) reply
Hello, the page I created was not intended to be an attack page, I added it because it is mentioned in the text and I believe merits a redirect to the page. If I'm wrong, I understand, and I should have said this when doing the edit, but it was done with good intentions. Geminin667 ( talk) 07:16, 7 October 2021 (UTC) reply
Thank you for blocking Special:Contributions/2600:1702:2350:20F0:5DA9:E93B:DB52:1A8D. The person is evading their block by using other IPs in the same /64 range: Special:Contributions/2600:1702:2350:20F0:0:0:0:0/64. Personal attacks have been aimed at me. Binksternet ( talk) 01:33, 13 October 2021 (UTC) reply
Hi there, I just nominated a sock attack on myself ( Category:Suspected Wikipedia sockpuppets of kusma) as a G10 (should have probably just deleted it myself) and noticed that the bat signal (which I have enjoyed using for quite a while now) didn't fire. While I'm using @ Barkeep49's clone of your script, I think the issue is the same: attack categories do not trigger it. Perhaps they should? — Kusma ( talk) 08:33, 22 October 2021 (UTC) reply
No problem. I just realized that the .size attribute combines files, pages, and subcats. I have changed it to have the same functionality with simpler code: [2]. HighInBC Need help? Just ask. 05:41, 23 October 2021 (UTC) reply
How does this matter work with the "consensus required" restriction? Isn't the editor reverting the tag essentially reinstating the challenged edit without talk page consensus? Crossroads -talk- 21:37, 24 October 2021 (UTC) reply
Different question - being unfamiliar with consensus required restrictions, what is the proceess for reporting violations, etc.? The 3RRN does not seem to be the best tool for the task, but maybe it is? The edit I am thinking of is this one, which reinserts a formulation that was initially proposed here but then objected to (by me) here and by myself and another editor on Talk. But really I am raising the general question of "how to report consensus required vios" in general, since I'm confident there will be others regardless of the status of this one. Newimpartial ( talk) 15:49, 25 October 2021 (UTC) reply
(s)omething (I) have a memory of reading in a book but can't find or reference anymore, which seems hurtful TBH. Newimpartial ( talk) 04:02, 26 October 2021 (UTC) reply
There is little point in having a side debate here, let's keep this discussion to AE. HighInBC Need help? Just ask. 06:29, 26 October 2021 (UTC) reply
RFC was shut down, via successful non-confidence motion. Oh well, perhaps the 'next' one will straighten things out. GoodDay ( talk) 23:30, 9 November 2021 (UTC) reply
Special:Contributions/Sphnctr These posts are absolutely not acceptable - warning - NOT SAFE FOR WORK! Springee ( talk) 15:11, 26 October 2021 (UTC) reply
A good point. I have revision deleted them per WP:CFRD#2. HighInBC Need help? Just ask. 02:29, 27 October 2021 (UTC) reply
A living person who is not related to the Bitcointalk has been attacked in one of the edit summaries, the last one see: /info/en/?search=Special:Contributions/107.77.204.132
Request to blank it out. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 170.51.109.52 ( talk) 03:32, 28 October 2021 (UTC) reply
There was -- honestly -- a huge reason that has resulted into that "punishment" you assigned me.
You should have seen what happened to the
COVID-19 dashboard on October 25 and 26.
That technical difficulty occurrence was, absolutely, out of my expectation. I am glad that it has been fixed on Wednesday -- shorter than what I have expected (That technical difficulty could have been lasted for, pretty much, an entire week).
Anyway, I am beyond sorry for being a
Kevin/Karen (I am not going to disclose my gender as an IP editor) on the edit summary. I absolutely should not have done it.
70.66.59.163 (
talk)
01:35, 31 October 2021 (UTC)
reply
P.S. I failed you as an IP editor.
Hi HighInBC. It's not a big deal, but the reason I blanked KingdomHearts25 rather than deleting it is that it has a substantive history before the spamming started and is therefore not eligible for WP:CSD#U5. – Joe ( talk) 10:21, 9 November 2021 (UTC) reply
Hi, really sorry to disturb you once again, but may I please know when my page will be undeleted? As promised, I shall blank the page immediately and never engage in such activity again. Regards KingdomHearts25 ( talk) 11:32, 10 November 2021 (UTC) reply
Regarding, your unblock decline on User talk:Idiot Driver, bear in mind there is an active SPI going on. I just thought I'd let you know. Scorpions13256 ( talk) 19:40, 9 November 2021 (UTC) reply
No worries, it was an interesting read. Good to know my instincts for this person were good. HighInBC Need help? Just ask. 07:22, 10 November 2021 (UTC) reply
Just wondered why you deleted this as A7 (it was tagged as PROD). An organisation started by Jared Kushner and citing a US government website doesn't meet the criteria for A7. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 12:27, 10 November 2021 (UTC) reply
You closed the AN I had today regarding RandomCanadian. But I think they were empowered to continue - this seems like a
WP:BADNAC#2 The outcome is a close call (especially where there are several valid outcomes) or likely to be controversial. Such closes are better left to an administrator.
.
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Neek the Exotic.
Lightburst (
talk)
03:16, 3 October 2021 (UTC)
reply
Sorry to hear about your frustrated feelings. This admin is not going to find fault in that close, perhaps another will. However it is really the purview of the community. If you really think it was closed contrary to policy take your arguments to WP:DRV, and the community can decide if the closure was contrary to policy. It is silly to go back and forth like this when there is a place you can go if you are confident you are correct. HighInBC Need help? Just ask. 11:49, 3 October 2021 (UTC) reply
Thank you for deleting my miscreated page "T:wpref". But I found a problem: "creator request to delete his/her pages" have a different token between Chinese Wikipedia ( G10) and English Wikipedia ( G7). Are there any common tokens?--Wiki Emoji | Emojiwiki Talk~~ 11:20, 4 October 2021 (UTC) reply
Hello, the page I created was not intended to be an attack page, I added it because it is mentioned in the text and I believe merits a redirect to the page. If I'm wrong, I understand, and I should have said this when doing the edit, but it was done with good intentions. Geminin667 ( talk) 07:16, 7 October 2021 (UTC) reply
Thank you for blocking Special:Contributions/2600:1702:2350:20F0:5DA9:E93B:DB52:1A8D. The person is evading their block by using other IPs in the same /64 range: Special:Contributions/2600:1702:2350:20F0:0:0:0:0/64. Personal attacks have been aimed at me. Binksternet ( talk) 01:33, 13 October 2021 (UTC) reply
Hi there, I just nominated a sock attack on myself ( Category:Suspected Wikipedia sockpuppets of kusma) as a G10 (should have probably just deleted it myself) and noticed that the bat signal (which I have enjoyed using for quite a while now) didn't fire. While I'm using @ Barkeep49's clone of your script, I think the issue is the same: attack categories do not trigger it. Perhaps they should? — Kusma ( talk) 08:33, 22 October 2021 (UTC) reply
No problem. I just realized that the .size attribute combines files, pages, and subcats. I have changed it to have the same functionality with simpler code: [2]. HighInBC Need help? Just ask. 05:41, 23 October 2021 (UTC) reply
How does this matter work with the "consensus required" restriction? Isn't the editor reverting the tag essentially reinstating the challenged edit without talk page consensus? Crossroads -talk- 21:37, 24 October 2021 (UTC) reply
Different question - being unfamiliar with consensus required restrictions, what is the proceess for reporting violations, etc.? The 3RRN does not seem to be the best tool for the task, but maybe it is? The edit I am thinking of is this one, which reinserts a formulation that was initially proposed here but then objected to (by me) here and by myself and another editor on Talk. But really I am raising the general question of "how to report consensus required vios" in general, since I'm confident there will be others regardless of the status of this one. Newimpartial ( talk) 15:49, 25 October 2021 (UTC) reply
(s)omething (I) have a memory of reading in a book but can't find or reference anymore, which seems hurtful TBH. Newimpartial ( talk) 04:02, 26 October 2021 (UTC) reply
There is little point in having a side debate here, let's keep this discussion to AE. HighInBC Need help? Just ask. 06:29, 26 October 2021 (UTC) reply
RFC was shut down, via successful non-confidence motion. Oh well, perhaps the 'next' one will straighten things out. GoodDay ( talk) 23:30, 9 November 2021 (UTC) reply
Special:Contributions/Sphnctr These posts are absolutely not acceptable - warning - NOT SAFE FOR WORK! Springee ( talk) 15:11, 26 October 2021 (UTC) reply
A good point. I have revision deleted them per WP:CFRD#2. HighInBC Need help? Just ask. 02:29, 27 October 2021 (UTC) reply
A living person who is not related to the Bitcointalk has been attacked in one of the edit summaries, the last one see: /info/en/?search=Special:Contributions/107.77.204.132
Request to blank it out. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 170.51.109.52 ( talk) 03:32, 28 October 2021 (UTC) reply
There was -- honestly -- a huge reason that has resulted into that "punishment" you assigned me.
You should have seen what happened to the
COVID-19 dashboard on October 25 and 26.
That technical difficulty occurrence was, absolutely, out of my expectation. I am glad that it has been fixed on Wednesday -- shorter than what I have expected (That technical difficulty could have been lasted for, pretty much, an entire week).
Anyway, I am beyond sorry for being a
Kevin/Karen (I am not going to disclose my gender as an IP editor) on the edit summary. I absolutely should not have done it.
70.66.59.163 (
talk)
01:35, 31 October 2021 (UTC)
reply
P.S. I failed you as an IP editor.
Hi HighInBC. It's not a big deal, but the reason I blanked KingdomHearts25 rather than deleting it is that it has a substantive history before the spamming started and is therefore not eligible for WP:CSD#U5. – Joe ( talk) 10:21, 9 November 2021 (UTC) reply
Hi, really sorry to disturb you once again, but may I please know when my page will be undeleted? As promised, I shall blank the page immediately and never engage in such activity again. Regards KingdomHearts25 ( talk) 11:32, 10 November 2021 (UTC) reply
Regarding, your unblock decline on User talk:Idiot Driver, bear in mind there is an active SPI going on. I just thought I'd let you know. Scorpions13256 ( talk) 19:40, 9 November 2021 (UTC) reply
No worries, it was an interesting read. Good to know my instincts for this person were good. HighInBC Need help? Just ask. 07:22, 10 November 2021 (UTC) reply
Just wondered why you deleted this as A7 (it was tagged as PROD). An organisation started by Jared Kushner and citing a US government website doesn't meet the criteria for A7. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 12:27, 10 November 2021 (UTC) reply