Any chance you can send me an email to ryanpostlethwaite (at) hotmail (dot) com? There's a favour I'd like to ask you! Ryan Postlethwaite 17:24, 12 August 2007 (UTC) reply
User:Crystalflame has violated 3RR and has apparently been blocked for 24 hours as a sockpuppet along with the 3RR reverts. I'd send to WP:3RR but since it's a sockpuppet thought someone should deal with it quickly. - WarthogDemon 22:20, 12 August 2007 (UTC) reply
I had Jpgordon do a checkuser, and I reported the case at WP:ANI before I edit conflicted with you three (!) times at RFCN. I was suspicious from Bushpig's second edit, which was to RFCN. The username was similar-ish to TIW's previous socks (anti-bush/republican/US sentiment, three terms, all initially capitalised but run together). Also 25% of Bushpigs edits were to RFCN. The percentage was higher before the username block that lead to the RFCN case to begin with. Looking at Bushpigs' contributions once the name was at RFCN made my suspicions stronger. -- Flyguy649 talk contribs 14:13, 16 August 2007 (UTC) reply
for this. Cheers. ElinorD (talk) 16:32, 16 August 2007 (UTC) reply
I have undeleted Final Crisis and removed the cascading protection on it. The article as recreated addressed the problems of the AfD - new, verifiable information had come out, and it was possible to write an article on more than a single tease. Please be more careful when deleting content as a recreation - and particularly when using high-powered admin tools to cascadingly protect the page from recreation. Given that it was a subject that was, by everyone's account, certain to be worthy of an article at some point, this was a particularly damaging decision. Phil Sandifer 01:24, 18 August 2007 (UTC) reply
Hello,
An Arbitration case in which you commented has been opened: Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/BJAODN. Please add any evidence you may wish the Arbitrators to consider to the evidence sub-page, Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/BJAODN/Evidence. You may also contribute to the case on the workshop sub-page, Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/BJAODN/Workshop.
On behalf of the Arbitration Committee, Newyorkbrad 16:19, 18 August 2007 (UTC) reply
Our friend has mad Google skillz, apparently. ~ Riana ⁂ 17:22, 20 August 2007 (UTC) reply
Thanks for the message - I didn't take it personally, but I appreciate the gesture :-) --David Shankbone 13:44, 23 August 2007 (UTC) reply
Any chance you can send me an email to ryanpostlethwaite (at) hotmail (dot) com? There's a favour I'd like to ask you! Ryan Postlethwaite 17:24, 12 August 2007 (UTC) reply
User:Crystalflame has violated 3RR and has apparently been blocked for 24 hours as a sockpuppet along with the 3RR reverts. I'd send to WP:3RR but since it's a sockpuppet thought someone should deal with it quickly. - WarthogDemon 22:20, 12 August 2007 (UTC) reply
I had Jpgordon do a checkuser, and I reported the case at WP:ANI before I edit conflicted with you three (!) times at RFCN. I was suspicious from Bushpig's second edit, which was to RFCN. The username was similar-ish to TIW's previous socks (anti-bush/republican/US sentiment, three terms, all initially capitalised but run together). Also 25% of Bushpigs edits were to RFCN. The percentage was higher before the username block that lead to the RFCN case to begin with. Looking at Bushpigs' contributions once the name was at RFCN made my suspicions stronger. -- Flyguy649 talk contribs 14:13, 16 August 2007 (UTC) reply
for this. Cheers. ElinorD (talk) 16:32, 16 August 2007 (UTC) reply
I have undeleted Final Crisis and removed the cascading protection on it. The article as recreated addressed the problems of the AfD - new, verifiable information had come out, and it was possible to write an article on more than a single tease. Please be more careful when deleting content as a recreation - and particularly when using high-powered admin tools to cascadingly protect the page from recreation. Given that it was a subject that was, by everyone's account, certain to be worthy of an article at some point, this was a particularly damaging decision. Phil Sandifer 01:24, 18 August 2007 (UTC) reply
Hello,
An Arbitration case in which you commented has been opened: Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/BJAODN. Please add any evidence you may wish the Arbitrators to consider to the evidence sub-page, Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/BJAODN/Evidence. You may also contribute to the case on the workshop sub-page, Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/BJAODN/Workshop.
On behalf of the Arbitration Committee, Newyorkbrad 16:19, 18 August 2007 (UTC) reply
Our friend has mad Google skillz, apparently. ~ Riana ⁂ 17:22, 20 August 2007 (UTC) reply
Thanks for the message - I didn't take it personally, but I appreciate the gesture :-) --David Shankbone 13:44, 23 August 2007 (UTC) reply