Hi. If you've come to complain about something I've done, please form an orderly queue
Generally I just creep about the place, quiet as a church mouse, changing a small spelling mistake here, or correcting a small grammatical error there. I rarely have the time, or the inclination, to do anythng more substantial, and yet I still manage to rile a few people up
Admittedly on occasion (usually after one teeny little glass of after-dinner sherry too many) I get a little raucous on discussion pages. I'm particularly antipathetic towards articles on religion and other forms of mumbo jumbo, that are written as if what's being discussed is in some way real
Get with the programme dudes. There is no god, there is no devil, there is no magic, there is no extrasensory perception, there is no afterlife, there is no reincarnation
How can I be sure? The Lizard Men told me. Duh-uh...
HieronymousCrowley (
talk) 06:07, 1 December 2010 (UTC)
Hi, thanks for trying to improve Lord George Sanger, but please don't randomly change facts just because they seem unlikely to you, without checking the sources used to write the article. Thanks, -- Beloved Freak 08:34, 27 June 2010 (UTC)
my apologies. it certainly wasn't "randomly". it simply wasn't, um... rightly
(i can see now that Elliott was the name of his father's wife. i'd misread the sentence, and assumed it was referring to his own wife - "Ellen (Nellie) Chapman, the lady lion tamer from Wombwell's circus") HieronymousCrowley ( talk) 11:10, 27 June 2010 (UTC)
Welcome to Wikipedia, and thank you for
your contributions. One of the core policies of Wikipedia is that articles should always be written from a
neutral point of view. A contribution you made to
Talk:Ethics in religion appears to carry a non-neutral point of view, and your edit may have been changed or reverted to correct the problem. Please remember to observe this important
core policy. Thank you.
Charles (
talk) 07:50, 4 October 2010 (UTC)
If you have an issue with the use of the word, then change it. It is not constructive to make a comment like that in the edit summary. It can even be construed a rude, although I will assume good faith. Thanks. -- Brian Halvorsen ( talk) 22:46, 25 November 2010 (UTC)
Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review
the candidates and submit your choices on the
voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{
NoACEMM}}
to your user talk page.
MediaWiki message delivery (
talk) 00:44, 29 November 2022 (UTC)
Hi. If you've come to complain about something I've done, please form an orderly queue
Generally I just creep about the place, quiet as a church mouse, changing a small spelling mistake here, or correcting a small grammatical error there. I rarely have the time, or the inclination, to do anythng more substantial, and yet I still manage to rile a few people up
Admittedly on occasion (usually after one teeny little glass of after-dinner sherry too many) I get a little raucous on discussion pages. I'm particularly antipathetic towards articles on religion and other forms of mumbo jumbo, that are written as if what's being discussed is in some way real
Get with the programme dudes. There is no god, there is no devil, there is no magic, there is no extrasensory perception, there is no afterlife, there is no reincarnation
How can I be sure? The Lizard Men told me. Duh-uh...
HieronymousCrowley (
talk) 06:07, 1 December 2010 (UTC)
Hi, thanks for trying to improve Lord George Sanger, but please don't randomly change facts just because they seem unlikely to you, without checking the sources used to write the article. Thanks, -- Beloved Freak 08:34, 27 June 2010 (UTC)
my apologies. it certainly wasn't "randomly". it simply wasn't, um... rightly
(i can see now that Elliott was the name of his father's wife. i'd misread the sentence, and assumed it was referring to his own wife - "Ellen (Nellie) Chapman, the lady lion tamer from Wombwell's circus") HieronymousCrowley ( talk) 11:10, 27 June 2010 (UTC)
Welcome to Wikipedia, and thank you for
your contributions. One of the core policies of Wikipedia is that articles should always be written from a
neutral point of view. A contribution you made to
Talk:Ethics in religion appears to carry a non-neutral point of view, and your edit may have been changed or reverted to correct the problem. Please remember to observe this important
core policy. Thank you.
Charles (
talk) 07:50, 4 October 2010 (UTC)
If you have an issue with the use of the word, then change it. It is not constructive to make a comment like that in the edit summary. It can even be construed a rude, although I will assume good faith. Thanks. -- Brian Halvorsen ( talk) 22:46, 25 November 2010 (UTC)
Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review
the candidates and submit your choices on the
voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{
NoACEMM}}
to your user talk page.
MediaWiki message delivery (
talk) 00:44, 29 November 2022 (UTC)