|
So you really do think that 83.167.124.10 (that's my IP) has vandalised the article? I actually thought edits made by previous users are considered to be vandalism. The only thing I've done is the removal of line 'randle is so gay'. ReistRS ( talk) 17:59, 19 November 2007 (UTC)
I'm sorry, I hit the revert button too hastily, and I sincerely apologize for doing so, I hope you did not take offence at my momentary lack of concentration Hiddenfromview ( talk) 21:42, 19 November 2007 (UTC)
Thanks for reporting 168.216.120.207 to WP:AIV. I had attempted to do so, but one of the helperbots apparently deleted my report without action (per this diff). With duplicate final warnings, it only fits to have duplicate reports. Again, Thanks! ZZ Claims ~ Evidence 19:23, 9 November 2007 (UTC)
![]() ![]() |
Hello, Hiddenfromview! Thank you for your recent contributions to one of Wikipedia's Greater Manchester-related articles. Given the interest we're assuming you've expressed by your edits, have you considered joining
WikiProject Greater Manchester? It's a
user-group dedicated to improving the overall quality of all
Greater Manchester-related content. There is a discussion page for sharing ideas as well as developing and getting tips on improving articles. The project has in-house specialists to support and facilitate your ideas. If you would like to join, simply add your name to the
list of participants.
|
Rudget. talk 10:33, 25 November 2007 (UTC)
![]() ![]() |
Hello, Hiddenfromview, and
welcome to
Wikiproject Greater Manchester! Thank you for your generous offer to help contribute. I'm sure your input will be much appreciated. I hope you enjoy contributing here and being a Greater Manchester Project Wikipedian!
As a project we aim to have all our articles comply with the various editing policies and guidelines. If you are contributing to an article, it is good practice to ensure that it's properly referenced with reliable sources, otherwise any contentious content may be removed by another editor. A good starting point for articles about settlements in Greater Manchester is the WP:UKCITIES guideline. If you have any questions, feel free to discuss anything on the project talk page, or to leave a message on my own talk page. Please remember to sign all your comments, and be bold with your ideas. Again, welcome, and happy editing! |
└ and-rew┘┌ talk┐ 22:52, 25 November 2007 (UTC)
The Greater Manchester WikiProject Newsletter | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
If you don't wish to recieve this please put two asterisks (*) beside your name on the participant page. Rudget talk 18:16, 26 November 2007 (UTC)
I don't think it's vandalism? I think the bot made a mistake. Did you read the revision before you reverted it? Sting_au Talk 23:23, 6 December 2007 (UTC)
No problem about that- thanks for fixing it :) Hiddenfromview 17:46, 7 December 2007 (UTC)
Thank you for your interest in VandalProof, Hiddenfromview! You have now been added to the list of authorized users, so if you haven't already, simply download and install VandalProof from our main page. If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me or any other moderator, or you can post a message on the discussion page. βcommand 15:00, 7 December 2007 (UTC)
The Greater Manchester WikiProject Newsletter | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Hello! Based on your areas of interest, we believe that you may be interested in participating in the peer review of EasyJet. Comments from reviewers are needed over the next few weeks to assist editors in improving the article; we would be very grateful if you could spare some of your time to help out! If you would prefer not to receive such invitations in the future, please leave a message on this page, and we won't trouble you again. If you have any questions about the review process, you can ask them here. Thanks! - Trevor MacInnis ( Contribs) 03:30, 22 January 2008 (UTC)
EasyJet vs easyJet - can you please explain the reason why the capitals were changed? Thanks! 84.9.108.70 ( talk) 10:38, 30 January 2008 (UTC)
The Greater Manchester WikiProject Newsletter | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
|
Hi,
As a regularly contributing UK Wikipedian, we were wondering if you wanted to contribute to the Oxford bid to host the 2010 Wikimania conference. Please see here for details of how to get involved, we need all the help we can get if we are to put in a compelling bid.
We are also in the process of forming a new UK Wikimedia chapter to replace the soon to be folded old one. If you are interested in helping shape our plans, showing your support or becoming a future member or board member, please head over to the Wikimedia UK v2.0 page and let us know. We plan on holding an election in the next month to find the initial board, who will oversee the process of founding the company and accepting membership applications. They will then call an AGM to formally elect a new board who after obtaining charitable status will start the fund raising, promotion and active support for the UK Wikimedian community for which the chapter is being founded.
You may also wish to attend the next London meet-up at which both of these issues will be discussed. If you can't attend this meetup, you may want to watch Wikipedia:Meetup, for updates on future meets.
We look forward to hearing from you soon, and we send our apologies for this automated intrusion onto your talk page!
Addbot ( talk) 23:42, 30 August 2008 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current
Arbitration Committee election. The
Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia
arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose
site bans,
topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The
arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to
review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on
the voting page. For the Election committee,
MediaWiki message delivery (
talk)
17:31, 23 November 2015 (UTC)
Greetings Recent Changes Patrollers!
This is a one-time-only message to inform you about technical proposals related to Recent Changes Patrol in the 2016 Community Wishlist Survey that I think you may be interested in reviewing and perhaps even voting for:
Further, there are more than 20 proposals related to Watchlists in general that you may be interested in reviewing. (and over 260 proposals in all, across many aspects of wikis)
Thank you for your consideration. Please note that voting for proposals continues through December 12, 2016.
Note: You received this message because you have transcluded {{ User wikipedia/RC Patrol}} (user box) on your user page. Since this message is "one-time-only" there is no opt out for future mailings.
Best regards, Stevietheman — Delivered: 01:10, 8 December 2016 (UTC)
|
So you really do think that 83.167.124.10 (that's my IP) has vandalised the article? I actually thought edits made by previous users are considered to be vandalism. The only thing I've done is the removal of line 'randle is so gay'. ReistRS ( talk) 17:59, 19 November 2007 (UTC)
I'm sorry, I hit the revert button too hastily, and I sincerely apologize for doing so, I hope you did not take offence at my momentary lack of concentration Hiddenfromview ( talk) 21:42, 19 November 2007 (UTC)
Thanks for reporting 168.216.120.207 to WP:AIV. I had attempted to do so, but one of the helperbots apparently deleted my report without action (per this diff). With duplicate final warnings, it only fits to have duplicate reports. Again, Thanks! ZZ Claims ~ Evidence 19:23, 9 November 2007 (UTC)
![]() ![]() |
Hello, Hiddenfromview! Thank you for your recent contributions to one of Wikipedia's Greater Manchester-related articles. Given the interest we're assuming you've expressed by your edits, have you considered joining
WikiProject Greater Manchester? It's a
user-group dedicated to improving the overall quality of all
Greater Manchester-related content. There is a discussion page for sharing ideas as well as developing and getting tips on improving articles. The project has in-house specialists to support and facilitate your ideas. If you would like to join, simply add your name to the
list of participants.
|
Rudget. talk 10:33, 25 November 2007 (UTC)
![]() ![]() |
Hello, Hiddenfromview, and
welcome to
Wikiproject Greater Manchester! Thank you for your generous offer to help contribute. I'm sure your input will be much appreciated. I hope you enjoy contributing here and being a Greater Manchester Project Wikipedian!
As a project we aim to have all our articles comply with the various editing policies and guidelines. If you are contributing to an article, it is good practice to ensure that it's properly referenced with reliable sources, otherwise any contentious content may be removed by another editor. A good starting point for articles about settlements in Greater Manchester is the WP:UKCITIES guideline. If you have any questions, feel free to discuss anything on the project talk page, or to leave a message on my own talk page. Please remember to sign all your comments, and be bold with your ideas. Again, welcome, and happy editing! |
└ and-rew┘┌ talk┐ 22:52, 25 November 2007 (UTC)
The Greater Manchester WikiProject Newsletter | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
If you don't wish to recieve this please put two asterisks (*) beside your name on the participant page. Rudget talk 18:16, 26 November 2007 (UTC)
I don't think it's vandalism? I think the bot made a mistake. Did you read the revision before you reverted it? Sting_au Talk 23:23, 6 December 2007 (UTC)
No problem about that- thanks for fixing it :) Hiddenfromview 17:46, 7 December 2007 (UTC)
Thank you for your interest in VandalProof, Hiddenfromview! You have now been added to the list of authorized users, so if you haven't already, simply download and install VandalProof from our main page. If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me or any other moderator, or you can post a message on the discussion page. βcommand 15:00, 7 December 2007 (UTC)
The Greater Manchester WikiProject Newsletter | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Hello! Based on your areas of interest, we believe that you may be interested in participating in the peer review of EasyJet. Comments from reviewers are needed over the next few weeks to assist editors in improving the article; we would be very grateful if you could spare some of your time to help out! If you would prefer not to receive such invitations in the future, please leave a message on this page, and we won't trouble you again. If you have any questions about the review process, you can ask them here. Thanks! - Trevor MacInnis ( Contribs) 03:30, 22 January 2008 (UTC)
EasyJet vs easyJet - can you please explain the reason why the capitals were changed? Thanks! 84.9.108.70 ( talk) 10:38, 30 January 2008 (UTC)
The Greater Manchester WikiProject Newsletter | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
|
Hi,
As a regularly contributing UK Wikipedian, we were wondering if you wanted to contribute to the Oxford bid to host the 2010 Wikimania conference. Please see here for details of how to get involved, we need all the help we can get if we are to put in a compelling bid.
We are also in the process of forming a new UK Wikimedia chapter to replace the soon to be folded old one. If you are interested in helping shape our plans, showing your support or becoming a future member or board member, please head over to the Wikimedia UK v2.0 page and let us know. We plan on holding an election in the next month to find the initial board, who will oversee the process of founding the company and accepting membership applications. They will then call an AGM to formally elect a new board who after obtaining charitable status will start the fund raising, promotion and active support for the UK Wikimedian community for which the chapter is being founded.
You may also wish to attend the next London meet-up at which both of these issues will be discussed. If you can't attend this meetup, you may want to watch Wikipedia:Meetup, for updates on future meets.
We look forward to hearing from you soon, and we send our apologies for this automated intrusion onto your talk page!
Addbot ( talk) 23:42, 30 August 2008 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current
Arbitration Committee election. The
Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia
arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose
site bans,
topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The
arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to
review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on
the voting page. For the Election committee,
MediaWiki message delivery (
talk)
17:31, 23 November 2015 (UTC)
Greetings Recent Changes Patrollers!
This is a one-time-only message to inform you about technical proposals related to Recent Changes Patrol in the 2016 Community Wishlist Survey that I think you may be interested in reviewing and perhaps even voting for:
Further, there are more than 20 proposals related to Watchlists in general that you may be interested in reviewing. (and over 260 proposals in all, across many aspects of wikis)
Thank you for your consideration. Please note that voting for proposals continues through December 12, 2016.
Note: You received this message because you have transcluded {{ User wikipedia/RC Patrol}} (user box) on your user page. Since this message is "one-time-only" there is no opt out for future mailings.
Best regards, Stevietheman — Delivered: 01:10, 8 December 2016 (UTC)