Hga,
Thanks for the compliments on my Jeff Cooper edits, I really appreciate them.
Duane
HGA,
hello, I appreciate the work you have done on the Cooper page. I am interested in how to remove the remaining concerns posted on his front page. Would you be willing to let me know what concerns remain as it appears that you have addressed many of them. Maegdlyn — Preceding unsigned comment added by Maegdlyn ( talk • contribs) 20:21, 28 May 2013 (UTC)
Thanks for the virtual high five, i appreciate it. :-) Bonewah ( talk) 13:58, 5 February 2010 (UTC)
I personally don't think "THEM" is purely plural in common usage anymore, but "THAT PERSON" ought to satisfy everybody while maintaining a neutral perspective.-- 72.130.130.78 ( talk) 21:08, 7 January 2011 (UTC)
Hey man, saw your discussion on some Nuclear warfare related talk pages and was thinking we should collaborate together on some Civil defense and Duck and Cover (film) related articles. Boundarylayer ( talk) 18:42, 19 January 2013 (UTC)
Your reinstating unreliable sources in a biography of a recently deceased person have been removed. Private web sites/blogs are considered unreliable see WP:SOURCE and are not to be used. You have worked on the article for years and you have had plenty of time to find better sources. It also appears as link spam WP:SPAM as you have included a link to that web page in several articles. You must find a reliable source if you wish to include it or I will bring this to at least 2 noticeboards. Your reason for reverting was not convincing as it violated good editing practices. If you have an axe to grind or a position to push concerning this person you should altogether avoid editing it as you have a WP:COI. Thanks 172.56.9.232 ( talk) 04:46, 5 March 2015 (UTC)
Hga,
Thanks for the compliments on my Jeff Cooper edits, I really appreciate them.
Duane
HGA,
hello, I appreciate the work you have done on the Cooper page. I am interested in how to remove the remaining concerns posted on his front page. Would you be willing to let me know what concerns remain as it appears that you have addressed many of them. Maegdlyn — Preceding unsigned comment added by Maegdlyn ( talk • contribs) 20:21, 28 May 2013 (UTC)
Thanks for the virtual high five, i appreciate it. :-) Bonewah ( talk) 13:58, 5 February 2010 (UTC)
I personally don't think "THEM" is purely plural in common usage anymore, but "THAT PERSON" ought to satisfy everybody while maintaining a neutral perspective.-- 72.130.130.78 ( talk) 21:08, 7 January 2011 (UTC)
Hey man, saw your discussion on some Nuclear warfare related talk pages and was thinking we should collaborate together on some Civil defense and Duck and Cover (film) related articles. Boundarylayer ( talk) 18:42, 19 January 2013 (UTC)
Your reinstating unreliable sources in a biography of a recently deceased person have been removed. Private web sites/blogs are considered unreliable see WP:SOURCE and are not to be used. You have worked on the article for years and you have had plenty of time to find better sources. It also appears as link spam WP:SPAM as you have included a link to that web page in several articles. You must find a reliable source if you wish to include it or I will bring this to at least 2 noticeboards. Your reason for reverting was not convincing as it violated good editing practices. If you have an axe to grind or a position to push concerning this person you should altogether avoid editing it as you have a WP:COI. Thanks 172.56.9.232 ( talk) 04:46, 5 March 2015 (UTC)