Welcome to Wikipedia, Helloterran! I am Otolemur crassicaudatus and have been editing Wikipedia for quite some time. I just wanted to say hi and welcome you to Wikipedia! If you have any questions, feel free to leave me a message on my talk page or by typing {{ helpme}} at the bottom of this page. I love to help new users, so don't be afraid to leave a message! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Oh yeah, I almost forgot, when you post on talk pages you should sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); that should automatically produce your username and the date after your post. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{ helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Again, welcome! Otolemur crassicaudatus ( talk) 03:46, 14 May 2008 (UTC)
I'm afraid I disagree. Firstly please peruse Wikipedia:Notability (web) which gives guidelines on what websites are notable, which this does not appear to be. Secondly the Wikipedia article was a rant against various organisations accusing them of "lies" etc (just like you put on my talk page) which is an attack. Remember Wikipedia is Neutral. I'm afraid I speedy deleted the article as an attack quite properly, and I would doubt that the website would meet the above notability criteria where it to be re-created neutrally. However, you can re-create that article should you wish, but I can't gurantee it will pass a deletion discussion. Pedro : Chat 12:33, 8 April 2008 (UTC)
Hi - if you are going to make additions to this article please ensure that they
Thankyou. Black Kite 13:56, 8 April 2008 (UTC)
Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Anti-cnn that have open discussion, you should
sign your posts by typing four
tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. You may also click on the signature button
located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you.
Chris!
c
t
06:19, 10 April 2008 (UTC)
Hello, Helloterran. The section of torch relay needs to be improved. There are several sentences talking about the attack by protesters. I think that part needs to be smoothed. Thanks!-- Jingandteller ( talk) 13:55, 13 April 2008 (UTC)
May I remind you that Wikipedia is not censored? Only because you follow the official CCP line that Falun Gong is a religious sect, doesnt mean that this should make it into Wikipedia articles. This source is far more reliable than all the propaganda outlets from the PRC. Novidmarana ( talk) 05:02, 15 April 2008 (UTC)
Please refrain from undoing other people's edits repeatedly. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions in a content dispute within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. Rather than reverting, discuss disputed changes on the talk page. The revision you want is not going to be implemented by edit warring. Thank you. I'm not taking any sides here, I just want to make you aware of the policy on revert-warring. nneonneo talk 05:39, 15 April 2008 (UTC)
Hi, could you have a look at my proposal at Talk:Jin_Jing#Proposal_to_keep_the_article_as_is and weigh in with your opinion? Thanks, Novidmarana ( talk) 17:52, 5 May 2008 (UTC)
Can you please join this debate. Otolemur crassicaudatus ( talk) 04:14, 14 May 2008 (UTC)
You are free to think that I am just sinophobe, but sometimes it is wiser to keep thoughts for oneself. Slightly amused, yours truly, Novidmarana ( talk) 05:16, 28 August 2008 (UTC)
There appears to be some disagreement over what to say about the Rebiya Kadeer photo controversy, so please voice your opinion in the discussion at Talk:July 2009 Ürümqi riots#More POV-oriented edits. Changing the article directly when other editors have disagreed with those changes could be the beginnings of edit warring, and we are trying to avoid edit wars at this article. Thanks, rʨanaɢ talk/ contribs 20:24, 8 July 2009 (UTC)
You currently appear to be engaged in an
edit war according to the reverts you have made on
July 2009 Ürümqi riots. Note that the
three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the
three-revert rule. If you continue, you may be
blocked from editing. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content that gains a
consensus among editors. If necessary, pursue
dispute resolution.
76.117.1.254 (
talk)
04:55, 9 July 2009 (UTC)
(out) Just FYI, in this edit you restored a paragraph that had been removed after discussion at Talk:July_2009_Ürümqi_riots#Media_gaffes_2. The consensus currently is not to include it. Please read the arguments presented in the discussion and respond there. Thank you, rʨanaɢ talk/ contribs 03:44, 11 July 2009 (UTC)
Also, please do not insult others with remarks such as "who are you to make judgment/" thank you. Seb az86556 ( talk) 04:21, 11 July 2009 (UTC) rash
[1] [2] You're edit warring again. Starting a discussion at the talk page like you did was the right thing to do, and I'm glad you did it. But reverting a second time before giving anyone a chance to respond to that discussion was not the right thing to do. Please don't edit war. rʨanaɢ talk/ contribs 16:53, 12 July 2009 (UTC)
Many of your edits are having a side-effect of messing up the ref formatting, which causes references to break and display big red "citation errors" in the text; see, for example, this. I don't know if you're editing using an external program (like Microsoft Word) or what, but please be careful with your edits and check your edited text (preferably using the "show preview" button) before clicking save. Thank you, rʨanaɢ talk/ contribs 19:06, 12 July 2009 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current
Arbitration Committee election. The
Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia
arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose
site bans,
topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The
arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to
review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on
the voting page. For the Election committee,
MediaWiki message delivery (
talk)
13:50, 24 November 2015 (UTC)
Hello, Helloterran. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)
Hello, Helloterran. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
Welcome to Wikipedia, Helloterran! I am Otolemur crassicaudatus and have been editing Wikipedia for quite some time. I just wanted to say hi and welcome you to Wikipedia! If you have any questions, feel free to leave me a message on my talk page or by typing {{ helpme}} at the bottom of this page. I love to help new users, so don't be afraid to leave a message! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Oh yeah, I almost forgot, when you post on talk pages you should sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); that should automatically produce your username and the date after your post. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{ helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Again, welcome! Otolemur crassicaudatus ( talk) 03:46, 14 May 2008 (UTC)
I'm afraid I disagree. Firstly please peruse Wikipedia:Notability (web) which gives guidelines on what websites are notable, which this does not appear to be. Secondly the Wikipedia article was a rant against various organisations accusing them of "lies" etc (just like you put on my talk page) which is an attack. Remember Wikipedia is Neutral. I'm afraid I speedy deleted the article as an attack quite properly, and I would doubt that the website would meet the above notability criteria where it to be re-created neutrally. However, you can re-create that article should you wish, but I can't gurantee it will pass a deletion discussion. Pedro : Chat 12:33, 8 April 2008 (UTC)
Hi - if you are going to make additions to this article please ensure that they
Thankyou. Black Kite 13:56, 8 April 2008 (UTC)
Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Anti-cnn that have open discussion, you should
sign your posts by typing four
tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. You may also click on the signature button
located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you.
Chris!
c
t
06:19, 10 April 2008 (UTC)
Hello, Helloterran. The section of torch relay needs to be improved. There are several sentences talking about the attack by protesters. I think that part needs to be smoothed. Thanks!-- Jingandteller ( talk) 13:55, 13 April 2008 (UTC)
May I remind you that Wikipedia is not censored? Only because you follow the official CCP line that Falun Gong is a religious sect, doesnt mean that this should make it into Wikipedia articles. This source is far more reliable than all the propaganda outlets from the PRC. Novidmarana ( talk) 05:02, 15 April 2008 (UTC)
Please refrain from undoing other people's edits repeatedly. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions in a content dispute within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. Rather than reverting, discuss disputed changes on the talk page. The revision you want is not going to be implemented by edit warring. Thank you. I'm not taking any sides here, I just want to make you aware of the policy on revert-warring. nneonneo talk 05:39, 15 April 2008 (UTC)
Hi, could you have a look at my proposal at Talk:Jin_Jing#Proposal_to_keep_the_article_as_is and weigh in with your opinion? Thanks, Novidmarana ( talk) 17:52, 5 May 2008 (UTC)
Can you please join this debate. Otolemur crassicaudatus ( talk) 04:14, 14 May 2008 (UTC)
You are free to think that I am just sinophobe, but sometimes it is wiser to keep thoughts for oneself. Slightly amused, yours truly, Novidmarana ( talk) 05:16, 28 August 2008 (UTC)
There appears to be some disagreement over what to say about the Rebiya Kadeer photo controversy, so please voice your opinion in the discussion at Talk:July 2009 Ürümqi riots#More POV-oriented edits. Changing the article directly when other editors have disagreed with those changes could be the beginnings of edit warring, and we are trying to avoid edit wars at this article. Thanks, rʨanaɢ talk/ contribs 20:24, 8 July 2009 (UTC)
You currently appear to be engaged in an
edit war according to the reverts you have made on
July 2009 Ürümqi riots. Note that the
three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the
three-revert rule. If you continue, you may be
blocked from editing. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content that gains a
consensus among editors. If necessary, pursue
dispute resolution.
76.117.1.254 (
talk)
04:55, 9 July 2009 (UTC)
(out) Just FYI, in this edit you restored a paragraph that had been removed after discussion at Talk:July_2009_Ürümqi_riots#Media_gaffes_2. The consensus currently is not to include it. Please read the arguments presented in the discussion and respond there. Thank you, rʨanaɢ talk/ contribs 03:44, 11 July 2009 (UTC)
Also, please do not insult others with remarks such as "who are you to make judgment/" thank you. Seb az86556 ( talk) 04:21, 11 July 2009 (UTC) rash
[1] [2] You're edit warring again. Starting a discussion at the talk page like you did was the right thing to do, and I'm glad you did it. But reverting a second time before giving anyone a chance to respond to that discussion was not the right thing to do. Please don't edit war. rʨanaɢ talk/ contribs 16:53, 12 July 2009 (UTC)
Many of your edits are having a side-effect of messing up the ref formatting, which causes references to break and display big red "citation errors" in the text; see, for example, this. I don't know if you're editing using an external program (like Microsoft Word) or what, but please be careful with your edits and check your edited text (preferably using the "show preview" button) before clicking save. Thank you, rʨanaɢ talk/ contribs 19:06, 12 July 2009 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current
Arbitration Committee election. The
Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia
arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose
site bans,
topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The
arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to
review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on
the voting page. For the Election committee,
MediaWiki message delivery (
talk)
13:50, 24 November 2015 (UTC)
Hello, Helloterran. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)
Hello, Helloterran. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)