Hello, I'm
AntiDionysius. Wikipedia is written by people who have a wide diversity of opinions, but we try hard to make sure articles have a
neutral point of view. Your recent edit to
Pets of Vladimir Putin seemed less than neutral and has been removed. If you think this was a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on
my talk page. Thank you.
AntiDionysius (
talk)
15:39, 21 June 2024 (UTC)
Please do not add commentary, your own point of view, or your own personal analysis to Wikipedia articles, as you did to
Cranford (TV series). Doing so violates Wikipedia's
neutral point of view policy and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia. Thank you.
Smallangryplanet (
talk)
17:13, 21 June 2024 (UTC)
Please do not add or change content, as you did at
George Lavelle, without citing a
reliable source. Please review the guidelines at
Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you.
AntiDionysius (
talk)
18:10, 23 June 2024 (UTC)
Please stop your
disruptive editing. If you continue to
vandalize Wikipedia, as you did with
this edit to
Human penis, you may be
blocked from editing.
Ae245 (
talk)
15:31, 25 June 2024 (UTC)
Please stop. If you continue to violate Wikipedia's
neutral point of view policy by adding commentary and your personal analysis into articles, as you did at
Julian Assange, you may be
blocked from editing.
Joyous!
Noise!
17:12, 26 June 2024 (UTC)
your recent edit was reverted, as it was redundant in light of the following sentence. Augmented Seventh ( talk) 15:33, 25 June 2024 (UTC)
{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}
.
ScottishFinnishRadish (
talk)
17:13, 26 June 2024 (UTC)HelloSven ( block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser ( log))
Request reason:
I understand why I was blocked, and completely respect the decision of the Administrators. I was misusing Wikipedia, a wonderful source of knowledge for a diverse range of people around the worlds. I have seen the error of my ways, and beg for my ban on editing to be lifted, and my mistakes forgiven. I swear to use my privilege of editing more wisely next time, if ScottishFinnishRadish is kind enough to forgive me. HelloSven ( talk) 18:45, 26 June 2024 (UTC)
Decline reason:
This unblock request has been declined due to your history of vandalism and/or disruption to this encyclopedia. However, we are willing to give you another chance provided that you can earn back the trust of the Wikipedia community. To be unblocked you need to demonstrate and confirm that you are willing and able to contribute positively to Wikipedia. You can do this by:
Once you have decided on the article you will propose improvements to:
{{infobox name|...}}
),[[File:Name.jpg|thumb|caption]]
),[[Category:Name]]
),{{Foo stub}}
);== [[Article title]] ==
) the copied content but do not save yet;Copied content from [[exact Name of Article]]; see that article's history for attribution.
"{{reflist-talk}}
. Once you have added the template, click .If you need help while working with your proposed edits, you may add "{{
Help me|your question here ~~~~}}
" to your talk page. Thank you.
Jake Wartenberg (
talk)
03:48, 29 June 2024 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{ unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
Hello, I'm
AntiDionysius. Wikipedia is written by people who have a wide diversity of opinions, but we try hard to make sure articles have a
neutral point of view. Your recent edit to
Pets of Vladimir Putin seemed less than neutral and has been removed. If you think this was a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on
my talk page. Thank you.
AntiDionysius (
talk)
15:39, 21 June 2024 (UTC)
Please do not add commentary, your own point of view, or your own personal analysis to Wikipedia articles, as you did to
Cranford (TV series). Doing so violates Wikipedia's
neutral point of view policy and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia. Thank you.
Smallangryplanet (
talk)
17:13, 21 June 2024 (UTC)
Please do not add or change content, as you did at
George Lavelle, without citing a
reliable source. Please review the guidelines at
Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you.
AntiDionysius (
talk)
18:10, 23 June 2024 (UTC)
Please stop your
disruptive editing. If you continue to
vandalize Wikipedia, as you did with
this edit to
Human penis, you may be
blocked from editing.
Ae245 (
talk)
15:31, 25 June 2024 (UTC)
Please stop. If you continue to violate Wikipedia's
neutral point of view policy by adding commentary and your personal analysis into articles, as you did at
Julian Assange, you may be
blocked from editing.
Joyous!
Noise!
17:12, 26 June 2024 (UTC)
your recent edit was reverted, as it was redundant in light of the following sentence. Augmented Seventh ( talk) 15:33, 25 June 2024 (UTC)
{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}
.
ScottishFinnishRadish (
talk)
17:13, 26 June 2024 (UTC)HelloSven ( block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser ( log))
Request reason:
I understand why I was blocked, and completely respect the decision of the Administrators. I was misusing Wikipedia, a wonderful source of knowledge for a diverse range of people around the worlds. I have seen the error of my ways, and beg for my ban on editing to be lifted, and my mistakes forgiven. I swear to use my privilege of editing more wisely next time, if ScottishFinnishRadish is kind enough to forgive me. HelloSven ( talk) 18:45, 26 June 2024 (UTC)
Decline reason:
This unblock request has been declined due to your history of vandalism and/or disruption to this encyclopedia. However, we are willing to give you another chance provided that you can earn back the trust of the Wikipedia community. To be unblocked you need to demonstrate and confirm that you are willing and able to contribute positively to Wikipedia. You can do this by:
Once you have decided on the article you will propose improvements to:
{{infobox name|...}}
),[[File:Name.jpg|thumb|caption]]
),[[Category:Name]]
),{{Foo stub}}
);== [[Article title]] ==
) the copied content but do not save yet;Copied content from [[exact Name of Article]]; see that article's history for attribution.
"{{reflist-talk}}
. Once you have added the template, click .If you need help while working with your proposed edits, you may add "{{
Help me|your question here ~~~~}}
" to your talk page. Thank you.
Jake Wartenberg (
talk)
03:48, 29 June 2024 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{ unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.