I have listed Innatheism for deletion, as the article appears to be unverified and unverifiable, and to describe a non-notable religion. If you can overcome this claim, and somehow explain why this is worthy of description here despite the utter lack of google hits outside of Wikipedia and its mirrors, please do so at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Innatheism. Otherwise, please do not use Wikipedia to promote your ideas, movements, etc. This has nothing to do with whether your religion has merit as a philosophy. As an encyclopedia, Wikipedia is nothing more than a secondary source, summarizing what is already found at other reliable sources of information. Postdlf 00:43, 16 March 2006 (UTC)
I have listed Innatheism for deletion, as the article appears to be unverified and unverifiable, and to describe a non-notable religion. If you can overcome this claim, and somehow explain why this is worthy of description here despite the utter lack of google hits outside of Wikipedia and its mirrors, please do so at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Innatheism. Otherwise, please do not use Wikipedia to promote your ideas, movements, etc. This has nothing to do with whether your religion has merit as a philosophy. As an encyclopedia, Wikipedia is nothing more than a secondary source, summarizing what is already found at other reliable sources of information. Postdlf 00:43, 16 March 2006 (UTC)