Please do not add inappropriate
external links to Wikipedia.
Wikipedia is not a collection of links, nor should it be used for advertising or promotion. Inappropriate links include, but are not limited to, links to personal websites, links to websites with which you are affiliated (whether as a link in article text, or a citation in an article), and links that attract visitors to a website or promote a product. See
the external links guideline and
spam guideline for further explanations. Because Wikipedia uses the
nofollow attribute value, its external links are disregarded by most search engines. If you feel the link should be added to the page, please discuss it on the associated talk page rather than re-adding it.
[1]
MrOllie (
talk)
12:37, 13 November 2020 (UTC)
Please stop your
disruptive editing. If you continue to add inappropriate
external links to Wikipedia, as you did at
Atrangi Re, you may be
blocked from editing. It is considered
spamming and
Wikipedia is not a vehicle for advertising or promotion. Because Wikipedia uses
nofollow tags, additions of links to Wikipedia will not alter search engine rankings.
MrOllie (
talk)
12:10, 14 November 2020 (UTC)
Hardik, logging out to continue to spam Wikipedia with the garbage reference bollytrendz.com as you've done here and here, is a violation of our sockpuppetry policy, and nobody's fooled by this. If you continue to spam this poor site at Wikipedia, your account will be blocked and the site will be added to our spam blacklist. I would advise you to find other ways to contribute here at Wikipedia. Thank you, Cyphoidbomb ( talk) 20:13, 14 November 2020 (UTC)
{{
unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.
Drmies (
talk)
21:46, 16 November 2020 (UTC)If any account continues to add links to [2], the next option is request the site be put on the spam black list which WILL stop anyone from promoting the site. Just stop. Wikipedia is not the place to promote your site. Ravensfire ( talk) 14:48, 18 November 2020 (UTC)
Please do not add inappropriate
external links to Wikipedia.
Wikipedia is not a collection of links, nor should it be used for advertising or promotion. Inappropriate links include, but are not limited to, links to personal websites, links to websites with which you are affiliated (whether as a link in article text, or a citation in an article), and links that attract visitors to a website or promote a product. See
the external links guideline and
spam guideline for further explanations. Because Wikipedia uses the
nofollow attribute value, its external links are disregarded by most search engines. If you feel the link should be added to the page, please discuss it on the associated talk page rather than re-adding it.
[1]
MrOllie (
talk)
12:37, 13 November 2020 (UTC)
Please stop your
disruptive editing. If you continue to add inappropriate
external links to Wikipedia, as you did at
Atrangi Re, you may be
blocked from editing. It is considered
spamming and
Wikipedia is not a vehicle for advertising or promotion. Because Wikipedia uses
nofollow tags, additions of links to Wikipedia will not alter search engine rankings.
MrOllie (
talk)
12:10, 14 November 2020 (UTC)
Hardik, logging out to continue to spam Wikipedia with the garbage reference bollytrendz.com as you've done here and here, is a violation of our sockpuppetry policy, and nobody's fooled by this. If you continue to spam this poor site at Wikipedia, your account will be blocked and the site will be added to our spam blacklist. I would advise you to find other ways to contribute here at Wikipedia. Thank you, Cyphoidbomb ( talk) 20:13, 14 November 2020 (UTC)
{{
unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.
Drmies (
talk)
21:46, 16 November 2020 (UTC)If any account continues to add links to [2], the next option is request the site be put on the spam black list which WILL stop anyone from promoting the site. Just stop. Wikipedia is not the place to promote your site. Ravensfire ( talk) 14:48, 18 November 2020 (UTC)