![]() | Do not edit this page. This is the
archive of
User talk:Ham II for the year 2011. (Please direct any additional comments to the
current talk page.) See the annual archives for 2004, 2005, 2006, 2007, 2008, 2009, 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014, 2015, 2016, 2017, 2018, 2019, 2020, 2021, 2022, 2023, 2024. |
Hi, Ham, if would, please chime in over at Template talk:Infobox museum#Network. It looks like we could use a tweak to accommodate large and multiple networks such as ASTC and Smithsonian affiliates. Consider, for example USSRC which is both of those. My thought is that there could be a sub-template for a small network and perhaps another for a large network, and each of the individual networks could invoke the appropriate sub-template to get them to display properly in the infobox. Alas, my template skills aren't there yet, nor am I an admin who might edit Template:Infobox museum, so I ask your help. Thanks! -- ke4roh ( talk) 04:13, 21 April 2011 (UTC)
Archives of American Art Wikimedia Partnership - We need you! | |
---|---|
![]() |
Hi! I'm the Wikipedian In Residence at the Smithsonian Archives of American Art and I'm recruiting Wikipedians who are passionate about art to participate in furthering art coverage on Wikipedia. I am planning contests and projects that will allow you access, no matter where you live, to the world's largest collection of archives related to American art. Please sign up to participate here, and I look forward to working with you! SarahStierch ( talk) 00:14, 13 June 2011 (UTC) |
Thanks for uploading File:Art Fund Logo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
PLEASE NOTE:
{{bots|deny=DASHBot}}
to your talk page.
Thank you.
DASHBot (
talk)
17:57, 17 August 2011 (UTC)
Ham, I have carefully gone through the whole list and upgraded a number of them in the light of the current exhibition. The pictures that are in the "Disputed" category are all very closely associated with Leonardo. There is a very good case for the Dreyfus Madonna being entirely Leonardo. He almost certainly had a hand in the right-hand Madonna and child with the yarnwinder. That particular picture of the two Holy Children may well be his. The Bacchus is a painting with such extraordinary qualities that I cannot imagine how it has been discounted all these years. You must realise that whenever someone claims that a picture is or isn't by a famous painter, everyone jumps on the bandwaggon and says "I knew that too!" and by this means, bona fide artworks get discounted and some other works get the highly recommended certificate.
In the present exhibition, they have got La Belle Ferroniere from the Louvre, which for the last fifty years they have said what "definitely not!". My opinion, for what it's worth, is "definitely IS!"
The stuff in the "recent attributions" section are the works that definitely are not, and are completely consistent with the works of other painters. They do not show the hand of Leonardo, should never have been attributed to him, and ought not be muddled up with works that he possibly/probably had a hand in. Michael Kemp is much more cautious in his attributions than Carlo Pedretti, and so am I.
Please leave the list in the order it is now in. Amandajm ( talk) 00:51, 15 November 2011 (UTC)
I've had a fiddle with the order again. Obviously Kemp and Syson don't agree entirely. So, in the light of their disagreement, we use our eyes.
The changes that I have made don't completely ignore the wisdom of Syson and Kemp. They work within their parameters, and acknowledge their differences. Amandajm ( talk) 00:37, 6 December 2011 (UTC)
![]() | Do not edit this page. This is the
archive of
User talk:Ham II for the year 2011. (Please direct any additional comments to the
current talk page.) See the annual archives for 2004, 2005, 2006, 2007, 2008, 2009, 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014, 2015, 2016, 2017, 2018, 2019, 2020, 2021, 2022, 2023, 2024. |
Hi, Ham, if would, please chime in over at Template talk:Infobox museum#Network. It looks like we could use a tweak to accommodate large and multiple networks such as ASTC and Smithsonian affiliates. Consider, for example USSRC which is both of those. My thought is that there could be a sub-template for a small network and perhaps another for a large network, and each of the individual networks could invoke the appropriate sub-template to get them to display properly in the infobox. Alas, my template skills aren't there yet, nor am I an admin who might edit Template:Infobox museum, so I ask your help. Thanks! -- ke4roh ( talk) 04:13, 21 April 2011 (UTC)
Archives of American Art Wikimedia Partnership - We need you! | |
---|---|
![]() |
Hi! I'm the Wikipedian In Residence at the Smithsonian Archives of American Art and I'm recruiting Wikipedians who are passionate about art to participate in furthering art coverage on Wikipedia. I am planning contests and projects that will allow you access, no matter where you live, to the world's largest collection of archives related to American art. Please sign up to participate here, and I look forward to working with you! SarahStierch ( talk) 00:14, 13 June 2011 (UTC) |
Thanks for uploading File:Art Fund Logo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
PLEASE NOTE:
{{bots|deny=DASHBot}}
to your talk page.
Thank you.
DASHBot (
talk)
17:57, 17 August 2011 (UTC)
Ham, I have carefully gone through the whole list and upgraded a number of them in the light of the current exhibition. The pictures that are in the "Disputed" category are all very closely associated with Leonardo. There is a very good case for the Dreyfus Madonna being entirely Leonardo. He almost certainly had a hand in the right-hand Madonna and child with the yarnwinder. That particular picture of the two Holy Children may well be his. The Bacchus is a painting with such extraordinary qualities that I cannot imagine how it has been discounted all these years. You must realise that whenever someone claims that a picture is or isn't by a famous painter, everyone jumps on the bandwaggon and says "I knew that too!" and by this means, bona fide artworks get discounted and some other works get the highly recommended certificate.
In the present exhibition, they have got La Belle Ferroniere from the Louvre, which for the last fifty years they have said what "definitely not!". My opinion, for what it's worth, is "definitely IS!"
The stuff in the "recent attributions" section are the works that definitely are not, and are completely consistent with the works of other painters. They do not show the hand of Leonardo, should never have been attributed to him, and ought not be muddled up with works that he possibly/probably had a hand in. Michael Kemp is much more cautious in his attributions than Carlo Pedretti, and so am I.
Please leave the list in the order it is now in. Amandajm ( talk) 00:51, 15 November 2011 (UTC)
I've had a fiddle with the order again. Obviously Kemp and Syson don't agree entirely. So, in the light of their disagreement, we use our eyes.
The changes that I have made don't completely ignore the wisdom of Syson and Kemp. They work within their parameters, and acknowledge their differences. Amandajm ( talk) 00:37, 6 December 2011 (UTC)