Hello, Hakikatco, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, your edit to Said Nursî does not conform to Wikipedia's Neutral Point of View policy (NPOV). Wikipedia articles should refer only to facts and interpretations that have been stated in print or on reputable websites or other forms of media.
There's a page about the NPOV policy that has tips on how to effectively write about disparate points of view without compromising the NPOV status of the article as a whole. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the Questions page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, to ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Below are a few other good links for newcomers:
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! Paradise Chronicle ( talk) 03:22, 26 June 2023 (UTC)
Hi there why did you remove these templates? Instead, you may add sources if you don't want to see them in the page? Otherwise your edits would be reverted. Egeymi ( talk) 05:45, 26 June 2023 (UTC)
Dear Hakikatco, I see you have some interest on the Said Nursi article on wikipedia. But your additions are stray, unsuffienctly sourced and the Said Nursi article disrupting quotes. I don't know much about Said Nursi but I am sure there is more info on him and not only about what he said, but his biography. If there is a well known quote of Said Nursi you can create its own article for it, but then with context on why it is important, to his followers, in his biography. See I am a Berliner from Kennedy, or Civis Romanus sum, Peace at Home, Peace in the World or Biji Serok Apo for examples. Paradise Chronicle ( talk) 07:48, 27 June 2023 (UTC)
Your recent editing history at Gülen movement shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war; read about how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.
Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. — Diannaa ( talk) 12:49, 27 June 2023 (UTC)
Also on Said Nursî. — Diannaa ( talk) 12:50, 27 June 2023 (UTC)
Please stop your disruptive editing.
If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Said Nursi, you may be blocked from editing. Semsûrî ( talk) 23:57, 30 June 2023 (UTC)
Hello Hakikatco! Your additions to Said Nursî have been removed in whole or in part, as they appear to have added copyrighted content without evidence that the source material is in the public domain or has been released by its owner or legal agent under a suitably-free and compatible copyright license. (To request such a release, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission.) While we appreciate your contributions to Wikipedia, there are certain things you must keep in mind about using information from sources to avoid copyright and plagiarism issues.
It's very important that contributors understand and follow these practices, as policy requires that people who persistently do not must be blocked from editing. If you have any questions about this, please ask them here on this page, or leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. — Diannaa ( talk) 11:25, 23 July 2023 (UTC)
I have reverted your edit to the article on Aisha. The edit you made was much the same as the one you made at 05:11 on 20 January 2024 and it got reverted because the source you cited was not considered reliable.
If you think that the edit should go in the article, please could you discuss it at Talk:Aisha. It would help if you read through some of the previous discussions about this issue in the talk page archives - it is likely that your questions have already been answered.
Have you also considered adding how oppressed Aisha was because she did not have a smartphone and an Instagram account? These things are normal in 2024, but apparently what was normal in 620 A.D. in Arabia and what is normal today are different. That probably explains why she got married at a normal age in 620 A.D. even though it is not a normal age today.-- Toddy1 (talk) 07:01, 5 April 2024 (UTC)
There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. — Kaalakaa (talk) 01:40, 26 April 2024 (UTC)
You said at
Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents that according to Muslim community Islamicity is high quality website and active for 29 years
. If that is true, there must be reliable third-party published sources on it. See if you can write an article at
Draft:IslamiCity that other people think is worth moving to mainspace. I did a
search on Google News to see if it might be possible to write such an article. The search produced 22 potentially usable sources. I had to exclude www.islamicity.org and www.prnewswire.com as sources - we want to know what other people write about Islamicity - we do not care what they say about themselves. If you click on the "books" tab, it produces some more potentially useful sources.--
Toddy1
(talk)
06:52, 28 April 2024 (UTC)
{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}
. Hakikatco ( block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser ( log))
Request reason:
I didnt do disruptive editing, the other editors deleted my content with no valid reasons and I restored 1 of these disruptive edits after the incident was created on the incident dashboard, none of my content violated any of the Wikipedia policies, and the other editors were not able to prove that they did Hakikatco ( talk) 14:38, 4 May 2024 (UTC)
Decline reason:
This approach won't work. Yamla ( talk) 15:27, 4 May 2024 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{ unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
Hello, Hakikatco, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, your edit to Said Nursî does not conform to Wikipedia's Neutral Point of View policy (NPOV). Wikipedia articles should refer only to facts and interpretations that have been stated in print or on reputable websites or other forms of media.
There's a page about the NPOV policy that has tips on how to effectively write about disparate points of view without compromising the NPOV status of the article as a whole. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the Questions page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, to ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Below are a few other good links for newcomers:
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! Paradise Chronicle ( talk) 03:22, 26 June 2023 (UTC)
Hi there why did you remove these templates? Instead, you may add sources if you don't want to see them in the page? Otherwise your edits would be reverted. Egeymi ( talk) 05:45, 26 June 2023 (UTC)
Dear Hakikatco, I see you have some interest on the Said Nursi article on wikipedia. But your additions are stray, unsuffienctly sourced and the Said Nursi article disrupting quotes. I don't know much about Said Nursi but I am sure there is more info on him and not only about what he said, but his biography. If there is a well known quote of Said Nursi you can create its own article for it, but then with context on why it is important, to his followers, in his biography. See I am a Berliner from Kennedy, or Civis Romanus sum, Peace at Home, Peace in the World or Biji Serok Apo for examples. Paradise Chronicle ( talk) 07:48, 27 June 2023 (UTC)
Your recent editing history at Gülen movement shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war; read about how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.
Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. — Diannaa ( talk) 12:49, 27 June 2023 (UTC)
Also on Said Nursî. — Diannaa ( talk) 12:50, 27 June 2023 (UTC)
Please stop your disruptive editing.
If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Said Nursi, you may be blocked from editing. Semsûrî ( talk) 23:57, 30 June 2023 (UTC)
Hello Hakikatco! Your additions to Said Nursî have been removed in whole or in part, as they appear to have added copyrighted content without evidence that the source material is in the public domain or has been released by its owner or legal agent under a suitably-free and compatible copyright license. (To request such a release, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission.) While we appreciate your contributions to Wikipedia, there are certain things you must keep in mind about using information from sources to avoid copyright and plagiarism issues.
It's very important that contributors understand and follow these practices, as policy requires that people who persistently do not must be blocked from editing. If you have any questions about this, please ask them here on this page, or leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. — Diannaa ( talk) 11:25, 23 July 2023 (UTC)
I have reverted your edit to the article on Aisha. The edit you made was much the same as the one you made at 05:11 on 20 January 2024 and it got reverted because the source you cited was not considered reliable.
If you think that the edit should go in the article, please could you discuss it at Talk:Aisha. It would help if you read through some of the previous discussions about this issue in the talk page archives - it is likely that your questions have already been answered.
Have you also considered adding how oppressed Aisha was because she did not have a smartphone and an Instagram account? These things are normal in 2024, but apparently what was normal in 620 A.D. in Arabia and what is normal today are different. That probably explains why she got married at a normal age in 620 A.D. even though it is not a normal age today.-- Toddy1 (talk) 07:01, 5 April 2024 (UTC)
There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. — Kaalakaa (talk) 01:40, 26 April 2024 (UTC)
You said at
Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents that according to Muslim community Islamicity is high quality website and active for 29 years
. If that is true, there must be reliable third-party published sources on it. See if you can write an article at
Draft:IslamiCity that other people think is worth moving to mainspace. I did a
search on Google News to see if it might be possible to write such an article. The search produced 22 potentially usable sources. I had to exclude www.islamicity.org and www.prnewswire.com as sources - we want to know what other people write about Islamicity - we do not care what they say about themselves. If you click on the "books" tab, it produces some more potentially useful sources.--
Toddy1
(talk)
06:52, 28 April 2024 (UTC)
{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}
. Hakikatco ( block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser ( log))
Request reason:
I didnt do disruptive editing, the other editors deleted my content with no valid reasons and I restored 1 of these disruptive edits after the incident was created on the incident dashboard, none of my content violated any of the Wikipedia policies, and the other editors were not able to prove that they did Hakikatco ( talk) 14:38, 4 May 2024 (UTC)
Decline reason:
This approach won't work. Yamla ( talk) 15:27, 4 May 2024 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{ unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.