I'm a Mac user, and OS X has a built-in calibration menu. If you use a PC, I don't know what you have. But this may help a bit: [1]. Greetings, -- Janke | Talk 06:00, 7 September 2006 (UTC) reply
circumstantial evidence != evidence. See WP:Reliable sources. HighInBC 17:46, 7 September 2006 (UTC)
Oh, != is a programing term for not equal. I was basically saying that circumstantial evidence is not equal to evidence HighInBC 18:41, 7 September 2006 (UTC) reply
Why are we fighting over year old vandalism/rubbish? Are you deliberately violating WP:POINT? Kim Bruning 13:28, 8 September 2006 (UTC) reply
I see, sorry about the collateral damage then.
Actually any useful content on that talk page was already part of a discussion Elsewhere, where it should stay. It's terribly annoying when people apply meatball:ExpandScope. Kim Bruning 13:42, 8 September 2006 (UTC) reply
Sigh... I'm sorry that this discussion has become so heated and that User:HighInBC has gotten his nose punched for offering the third-party opinion that I requested on WP:3O.
I see now that part of the confusion is my fault for not informing Kim and NeoFreak that I was making the request on WP:3O. My apologies, I'm a 3O newbie, it was my first such request.
I would have hoped that we could have had a calm and reasoned discussion about this topic as I think it is an important and yet unclear area of the Talk page guidelines. I am about to propose that we change those guidelines to recommend the deletion of inappropriate Talk Page comments. I think this is a difficult area. I've seen lots of Talk Page comments that are inappropriate but most of them should be left in place because there would be more damage caused by edit warring over what is and is not inappropriate. IMO, only the most egregious Talk Page comments should be deleted. I think Kim's deletion falls into this category. -- Richard 16:12, 8 September 2006 (UTC) reply
I'm a Mac user, and OS X has a built-in calibration menu. If you use a PC, I don't know what you have. But this may help a bit: [1]. Greetings, -- Janke | Talk 06:00, 7 September 2006 (UTC) reply
circumstantial evidence != evidence. See WP:Reliable sources. HighInBC 17:46, 7 September 2006 (UTC)
Oh, != is a programing term for not equal. I was basically saying that circumstantial evidence is not equal to evidence HighInBC 18:41, 7 September 2006 (UTC) reply
Why are we fighting over year old vandalism/rubbish? Are you deliberately violating WP:POINT? Kim Bruning 13:28, 8 September 2006 (UTC) reply
I see, sorry about the collateral damage then.
Actually any useful content on that talk page was already part of a discussion Elsewhere, where it should stay. It's terribly annoying when people apply meatball:ExpandScope. Kim Bruning 13:42, 8 September 2006 (UTC) reply
Sigh... I'm sorry that this discussion has become so heated and that User:HighInBC has gotten his nose punched for offering the third-party opinion that I requested on WP:3O.
I see now that part of the confusion is my fault for not informing Kim and NeoFreak that I was making the request on WP:3O. My apologies, I'm a 3O newbie, it was my first such request.
I would have hoped that we could have had a calm and reasoned discussion about this topic as I think it is an important and yet unclear area of the Talk page guidelines. I am about to propose that we change those guidelines to recommend the deletion of inappropriate Talk Page comments. I think this is a difficult area. I've seen lots of Talk Page comments that are inappropriate but most of them should be left in place because there would be more damage caused by edit warring over what is and is not inappropriate. IMO, only the most egregious Talk Page comments should be deleted. I think Kim's deletion falls into this category. -- Richard 16:12, 8 September 2006 (UTC) reply