Gtommy17 ( block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser ( log))
Request reason:
I'm not exactly sure what's happened here. Apparently, someone thinks I'm G.M. Cupertino because of the quality of the edits I've made as a new user? I'm not sure who that is. Frankly, after reviewing a couple of existing pages, I found the Wikipedia edit process relatively simple to follow as I could copy comparable formats from other pages. The fact that I made numerous edits within the same general topic areas stems from the fact that I'm a semi-professional genealogist who has extensively studied the Houses of Julich, Cleves and Berg. After recently watching a TV show on Henry VIII, I was checking some facts on Wikipedia and noticed gaps in the information on these noble families and realized that anyone could sign up to add to Wikipedia's content. I did so last Wednesday and have spent the last week adding to Wikipedia's content on these families and editing existing content. My name is Thomas G. Myers (i.e. Gtommy). I have published 11 genealogical books relating to Bucks County, PA (I'm listed on Amazon.com). I'm happy to provide further evidence as to my identity.Gtommy17 (talk) 23:57, 10 February 2011 (UTC)
Decline reason:
Removing notice until a Checkuser investigates. m.o.p 05:36, 11 February 2011 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{ unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
Gtommy17 ( block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser ( log))
Request reason:
P.S., If I'm looking at the correct info, I apparently edited 4 common pages out of nearly 6000 pages edited by G.M. Cupertino. I don't see how this comes close to suggesting that we're the same person.Gtommy17 (talk) 00:12, 11 February 2011 (UTC)
Decline reason:
See above. m.o.p 05:36, 11 February 2011 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{ unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
It's the obvious relationship to Konakonian ( talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) and LoveActresses ( talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) that did you in.— Kww( talk) 00:23, 11 February 2011 (UTC)
- I'm not sure that I see the relationship with these other user names. These other users appear to be focused on British nobility. The pages I created and the edits I did were largely limited to the Houses of Julich, Cleves and Berg, and pages that were connected to those houses. What can I do to demonstrate that I'm not the same person as this other person?
Gtommy17 (
talk)
00:45, 11 February 2011 (UTC)
- Someone with the ability to examine details of your access to the site (physical locations, computers, browsers, illegal proxies (if any), and similar details) will review the account. Usually takes a day or so. I'm certainly not going to unblock you, and no other admin should until that's been done.— Kww( talk) 00:55, 11 February 2011 (UTC)
OK, thanks. I'll let the process work through. Gtommy17 ( talk) 01:04, 11 February 2011 (UTC)
Gtommy17 ( block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser ( log))
Request reason:
per discussion
Accept reason:
Cleared by technical examination (checkuser). You will note that most of your edits have been removed, and articles you created have been deleted. I will take care of restoring them over the next few days. Sorry for the confusion. — Kww( talk) 19:49, 11 February 2011 (UTC)
I have restored all of your edits. If something looks funny, let me know, but I'm confident that everything is back the way it was.— Kww( talk) 20:39, 11 February 2011 (UTC)
Thank you Gtommy17 ( talk) 22:38, 11 February 2011 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current
Arbitration Committee election. The
Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia
arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose
site bans,
topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The
arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to
review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on
the voting page. For the Election committee,
MediaWiki message delivery (
talk)
14:30, 24 November 2015 (UTC)
Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review
the candidates and submit your choices on the
voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{
NoACEMM}} to your user talk page.
MediaWiki message delivery (
talk)
00:39, 28 November 2023 (UTC)
Gtommy17 ( block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser ( log))
Request reason:
I'm not exactly sure what's happened here. Apparently, someone thinks I'm G.M. Cupertino because of the quality of the edits I've made as a new user? I'm not sure who that is. Frankly, after reviewing a couple of existing pages, I found the Wikipedia edit process relatively simple to follow as I could copy comparable formats from other pages. The fact that I made numerous edits within the same general topic areas stems from the fact that I'm a semi-professional genealogist who has extensively studied the Houses of Julich, Cleves and Berg. After recently watching a TV show on Henry VIII, I was checking some facts on Wikipedia and noticed gaps in the information on these noble families and realized that anyone could sign up to add to Wikipedia's content. I did so last Wednesday and have spent the last week adding to Wikipedia's content on these families and editing existing content. My name is Thomas G. Myers (i.e. Gtommy). I have published 11 genealogical books relating to Bucks County, PA (I'm listed on Amazon.com). I'm happy to provide further evidence as to my identity.Gtommy17 (talk) 23:57, 10 February 2011 (UTC)
Decline reason:
Removing notice until a Checkuser investigates. m.o.p 05:36, 11 February 2011 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{ unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
Gtommy17 ( block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser ( log))
Request reason:
P.S., If I'm looking at the correct info, I apparently edited 4 common pages out of nearly 6000 pages edited by G.M. Cupertino. I don't see how this comes close to suggesting that we're the same person.Gtommy17 (talk) 00:12, 11 February 2011 (UTC)
Decline reason:
See above. m.o.p 05:36, 11 February 2011 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{ unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
It's the obvious relationship to Konakonian ( talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) and LoveActresses ( talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) that did you in.— Kww( talk) 00:23, 11 February 2011 (UTC)
- I'm not sure that I see the relationship with these other user names. These other users appear to be focused on British nobility. The pages I created and the edits I did were largely limited to the Houses of Julich, Cleves and Berg, and pages that were connected to those houses. What can I do to demonstrate that I'm not the same person as this other person?
Gtommy17 (
talk)
00:45, 11 February 2011 (UTC)
- Someone with the ability to examine details of your access to the site (physical locations, computers, browsers, illegal proxies (if any), and similar details) will review the account. Usually takes a day or so. I'm certainly not going to unblock you, and no other admin should until that's been done.— Kww( talk) 00:55, 11 February 2011 (UTC)
OK, thanks. I'll let the process work through. Gtommy17 ( talk) 01:04, 11 February 2011 (UTC)
Gtommy17 ( block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser ( log))
Request reason:
per discussion
Accept reason:
Cleared by technical examination (checkuser). You will note that most of your edits have been removed, and articles you created have been deleted. I will take care of restoring them over the next few days. Sorry for the confusion. — Kww( talk) 19:49, 11 February 2011 (UTC)
I have restored all of your edits. If something looks funny, let me know, but I'm confident that everything is back the way it was.— Kww( talk) 20:39, 11 February 2011 (UTC)
Thank you Gtommy17 ( talk) 22:38, 11 February 2011 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current
Arbitration Committee election. The
Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia
arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose
site bans,
topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The
arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to
review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on
the voting page. For the Election committee,
MediaWiki message delivery (
talk)
14:30, 24 November 2015 (UTC)
Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review
the candidates and submit your choices on the
voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{
NoACEMM}} to your user talk page.
MediaWiki message delivery (
talk)
00:39, 28 November 2023 (UTC)