![]() | This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 1 | Archive 2 | Archive 3 | Archive 4 | Archive 5 | Archive 6 | → | Archive 10 |
Hi, I put Citation needed on just those three because there are no articles on Wikipedia for them. That's why I put citation needed. And I don't know how to tag them. HannahMiley, Talk.
Stage 1: Please don't delete my construction, I make every one stage 15 racer issue, thank you. Kov 93
I think the T-shirt better then colour. 14:51
I was researching this a little while ago. The 2002 team was the last formation of the 1996-2002 team Cantina Tollo (search for cantina tollo here). The 2004 team was a new team [1]. I was meaning to do a page for Cantina Tollo, must have never got round to it. Severo T C 16:41, 10 May 2009 (UTC)
Hi Nosleep,
Thanks for your comments here, could I get you to include them in User:Mikaey/Request for Input/ListasBot 3? Thanks, Matt ( talk) 03:40, 12 May 2009 (UTC)
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there currently is a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. The discussion is about the topic Wikipedia:Ani#John_R._Talbott. Thank you.} Toddst1 ( talk) 07:03, 14 May 2009 (UTC)
Deletion of Bilateral relation pages despite ongoing merging effort Ed Fitzgerald t / c 08:29, 14 May 2009 (UTC)
Okay, I think I'm ready for your GA assessment (fingers crossed). KuyaBriBri Talk 13:46, 14 May 2009 (UTC)
Why did you withdraw your keep? Seinfeld episodes are composed with the same exact structure. -- Richard Arthur Norton (1958- ) ( talk) 04:44, 15 May 2009 (UTC)
I've started the GA review here. To be honest, it needs a fair bit of work, but I've listed my initial impressions on the review page. The neutral signs in the criteria list just mean I haven't got to them yet, not that they fail. Aptery gial 10:52, 18 May 2009 (UTC)
I've passed the article for GA. You did a lot of hard work to get the article to where it is now, good luck with future articles. Let me know if you need any help with anything. Aptery gial 09:28, 24 May 2009 (UTC)
Hi Alex, I will look into the new style guide when I have the time, but right now I'm in the middle of some exams and therefore quite busy. I just noticed you have started changing from American to European date formatting, that's great! =) Just remember that according to WP:DATE; you're supposed to write 18 May 2009, not 18 May, 2009. In words; no commas used in European date formats. Just letting you know before you edit this change on too many pages.. ;o) lil2mas ( talk) 12:41, 18 May 2009 (UTC)
I'm pretty sure the person who keeps adding the link to Vande Velde's fansite is going to do so definitely. How do things like this get handled? It really isn't a legitimate external link, is it? The intro contains the text "Christian Vande Velde is awesome!"..... Malo0178 ( talk) 17:58, 18 May 2009 (UTC)
for including WP:BEEF on {{ Essays on building Wikipedia}}. It was just a little idea I had rolling around in my head a few months ago, and I'm pleased to see people are noticing it (and if people agreed with it, that'd be even better! :P ). Hopefully even more people will now notice it. Thanks. Nosleep break my slumber 21:32, 24 May 2009 (UTC)
In case you have never seen it, I want to show you Wikipedia:WikiProject Cycling/Standard cyclist biography, together with Wikipedia:WikiProject Cycling/Standard cyclist biography example. It is something I started a long time ago, and it could save some time to start the styleguide with that "standard". But don't add it immediately, I think we need some more time on the short stage races and grand tours. If we look at too many things at the same time, we might forget important details.-- EdgeNavidad ( talk) 12:17, 31 May 2009 (UTC)
Hi, I have undertaken the initial review of the above and made recommendations and placed the article on hold. Please take time to check the comments and my minor copy-edits. PLease comment on the review page. Thanks. Jezhotwells ( talk) 20:27, 7 June 2009 (UTC)
No probs, I'm not in a hurry to fail it. I will wait anotehr week or so. 07:43, 17 June 2009 (UTC)
Hi! Considering
this: there is a way to comment under someone's comments without disturbing the numbering, using #:
. This is how you do it:
# '''Support'''. Too few admins currently. #: Indented comment! It doesn't break up the numbering. # '''Support'''. I'm still numbered #2, even though there's an indented comment above.
It looks like this:
Good luck with your RfA. Jafeluv ( talk) 07:39, 27 July 2009 (UTC)
Have a look at the Wikipedia capitalism article. Look at the history (earliest edits first). See the bunch of edits made by an IP editor? That's just one example of an article being improved by an IP editor. You may say that you don't see that kind of editing by IPs any where else. Do you think one reason for that might be the hostile attitude of some editors to IP editors? You might be interested in this IBM research that briefly mentions usefulness of IP edits -
http://www.research.ibm.com/visual/projects/history_flow/
Kind regards
82.33.48.96 (
talk)
10:52, 27 July 2009 (UTC)
I created two stubs today: Saaranpaskantamasaari and Termitomyces albuminosus. Since you've stated that you would like to set a minimum requirement on new articles of 2000 bytes, I'm curious what you would do with these articles. Both of them could be merged into parent articles, for sure, but this would have several clear disadvantages. Note that I read your userpage before I went to the RfA and that I support you in spite of your opinions, not because of them. -- Soap Talk/ Contributions 04:17, 28 July 2009 (UTC)
I'm sorry that your RfA currently looks to be unsuccessful, but I hope you will keep up your stellar work and apply again ASAP. You are the type of admin we need. ceran thor 20:55, 29 July 2009 (UTC)
![]() | This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 1 | Archive 2 | Archive 3 | Archive 4 | Archive 5 | Archive 6 | → | Archive 10 |
Hi, I put Citation needed on just those three because there are no articles on Wikipedia for them. That's why I put citation needed. And I don't know how to tag them. HannahMiley, Talk.
Stage 1: Please don't delete my construction, I make every one stage 15 racer issue, thank you. Kov 93
I think the T-shirt better then colour. 14:51
I was researching this a little while ago. The 2002 team was the last formation of the 1996-2002 team Cantina Tollo (search for cantina tollo here). The 2004 team was a new team [1]. I was meaning to do a page for Cantina Tollo, must have never got round to it. Severo T C 16:41, 10 May 2009 (UTC)
Hi Nosleep,
Thanks for your comments here, could I get you to include them in User:Mikaey/Request for Input/ListasBot 3? Thanks, Matt ( talk) 03:40, 12 May 2009 (UTC)
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there currently is a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. The discussion is about the topic Wikipedia:Ani#John_R._Talbott. Thank you.} Toddst1 ( talk) 07:03, 14 May 2009 (UTC)
Deletion of Bilateral relation pages despite ongoing merging effort Ed Fitzgerald t / c 08:29, 14 May 2009 (UTC)
Okay, I think I'm ready for your GA assessment (fingers crossed). KuyaBriBri Talk 13:46, 14 May 2009 (UTC)
Why did you withdraw your keep? Seinfeld episodes are composed with the same exact structure. -- Richard Arthur Norton (1958- ) ( talk) 04:44, 15 May 2009 (UTC)
I've started the GA review here. To be honest, it needs a fair bit of work, but I've listed my initial impressions on the review page. The neutral signs in the criteria list just mean I haven't got to them yet, not that they fail. Aptery gial 10:52, 18 May 2009 (UTC)
I've passed the article for GA. You did a lot of hard work to get the article to where it is now, good luck with future articles. Let me know if you need any help with anything. Aptery gial 09:28, 24 May 2009 (UTC)
Hi Alex, I will look into the new style guide when I have the time, but right now I'm in the middle of some exams and therefore quite busy. I just noticed you have started changing from American to European date formatting, that's great! =) Just remember that according to WP:DATE; you're supposed to write 18 May 2009, not 18 May, 2009. In words; no commas used in European date formats. Just letting you know before you edit this change on too many pages.. ;o) lil2mas ( talk) 12:41, 18 May 2009 (UTC)
I'm pretty sure the person who keeps adding the link to Vande Velde's fansite is going to do so definitely. How do things like this get handled? It really isn't a legitimate external link, is it? The intro contains the text "Christian Vande Velde is awesome!"..... Malo0178 ( talk) 17:58, 18 May 2009 (UTC)
for including WP:BEEF on {{ Essays on building Wikipedia}}. It was just a little idea I had rolling around in my head a few months ago, and I'm pleased to see people are noticing it (and if people agreed with it, that'd be even better! :P ). Hopefully even more people will now notice it. Thanks. Nosleep break my slumber 21:32, 24 May 2009 (UTC)
In case you have never seen it, I want to show you Wikipedia:WikiProject Cycling/Standard cyclist biography, together with Wikipedia:WikiProject Cycling/Standard cyclist biography example. It is something I started a long time ago, and it could save some time to start the styleguide with that "standard". But don't add it immediately, I think we need some more time on the short stage races and grand tours. If we look at too many things at the same time, we might forget important details.-- EdgeNavidad ( talk) 12:17, 31 May 2009 (UTC)
Hi, I have undertaken the initial review of the above and made recommendations and placed the article on hold. Please take time to check the comments and my minor copy-edits. PLease comment on the review page. Thanks. Jezhotwells ( talk) 20:27, 7 June 2009 (UTC)
No probs, I'm not in a hurry to fail it. I will wait anotehr week or so. 07:43, 17 June 2009 (UTC)
Hi! Considering
this: there is a way to comment under someone's comments without disturbing the numbering, using #:
. This is how you do it:
# '''Support'''. Too few admins currently. #: Indented comment! It doesn't break up the numbering. # '''Support'''. I'm still numbered #2, even though there's an indented comment above.
It looks like this:
Good luck with your RfA. Jafeluv ( talk) 07:39, 27 July 2009 (UTC)
Have a look at the Wikipedia capitalism article. Look at the history (earliest edits first). See the bunch of edits made by an IP editor? That's just one example of an article being improved by an IP editor. You may say that you don't see that kind of editing by IPs any where else. Do you think one reason for that might be the hostile attitude of some editors to IP editors? You might be interested in this IBM research that briefly mentions usefulness of IP edits -
http://www.research.ibm.com/visual/projects/history_flow/
Kind regards
82.33.48.96 (
talk)
10:52, 27 July 2009 (UTC)
I created two stubs today: Saaranpaskantamasaari and Termitomyces albuminosus. Since you've stated that you would like to set a minimum requirement on new articles of 2000 bytes, I'm curious what you would do with these articles. Both of them could be merged into parent articles, for sure, but this would have several clear disadvantages. Note that I read your userpage before I went to the RfA and that I support you in spite of your opinions, not because of them. -- Soap Talk/ Contributions 04:17, 28 July 2009 (UTC)
I'm sorry that your RfA currently looks to be unsuccessful, but I hope you will keep up your stellar work and apply again ASAP. You are the type of admin we need. ceran thor 20:55, 29 July 2009 (UTC)