Hello, GreatGreen, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions, especially what you did for List of living supercentenarians. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:
Please remember to
sign your messages on
talk pages by typing four
tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out
Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on
my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{help me}}
before the question. Again, welcome! —
TheJJJunk (
say hello)
22:13, 9 December 2013 (UTC)
Do not blindly revert all edits under the guise of calling it vandalism. If you have a particular issue then discuss it. The pending and unverified claims are not reliable sources as have been repeatedly discussed and do not belong in any article. -- Ricky81682 ( talk) 00:43, 23 November 2015 (UTC)
Regarding this article. Do NOT restore the chronological list section because it cannot be sourced. Unsourced information has no business being on Wikipedia. CommanderLinx ( talk) 08:31, 19 December 2015 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current
Arbitration Committee election. The
Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia
arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose
site bans,
topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The
arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to
review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on
the voting page. For the Election committee,
MediaWiki message delivery (
talk)
17:02, 24 November 2015 (UTC)
Hello and
welcome to Wikipedia. When you add content to
talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion (but never when editing articles), please be sure to
sign your posts. There are two ways to do this. Either:
This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is necessary to allow other editors to easily see who wrote what and when.
Thank you. -- SineBot ( talk) 11:00, 19 December 2015 (UTC)
Please carefully read this information:
The Arbitration Committee has authorised discretionary sanctions to be used for pages regarding Longevity, a topic which you have edited. The Committee's decision is here.
Discretionary sanctions is a system of conduct regulation designed to minimize disruption to controversial topics. This means uninvolved administrators can impose sanctions for edits relating to the topic that do not adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, our standards of behavior, or relevant policies. Administrators may impose sanctions such as editing restrictions, bans, or blocks. This message is to notify you sanctions are authorised for the topic you are editing. Before continuing to edit this topic, please familiarise yourself with the discretionary sanctions system. Don't hesitate to contact me or another editor if you have any questions.GreatGreen, I noticed your signature here. I just want to say that's it's considered policy (because it's incredibly convenient) to include at least a single link to your user or talk page in your signature. With yours, to talk to you, I had to go through the history and click that which is not particularly convenient as you can imagine. -- Ricky81682 ( talk) 06:30, 13 January 2016 (UTC)
I've started a case requesting discretionary sanctions against you at Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Enforcement#GreatGreen. Please respond there. -- Ricky81682 ( talk) 21:56, 13 January 2016 (UTC)
TO give an answer to Jochman it is a such an manipulation of people participating on wiki to ban them although reasons and arguments that are given by me are logical and explained. A whole difference to the behaviour of Ricky and all the others ones. I just want to point out the following: on the one hand it is said verified cases are involved. Then explain why e.g. the list of living SCs has been crashed down to top 100 in past. It only involves now a minium of living cases what destroys the actual characterization that is needed and more interesting. I am convinced that people like Ricky are manipulating everyone and are the firsts to ban people giving arguments against the things they do. I will answer in the ban topic too. GreatGreen ( talk) 10:44, 16 January 2016 (UTC)
The following sanction now applies to you:
Topic ban from Longevity broadly construed
You have been sanctioned for the reasons provided in response to this arbitration enforcement request.
This sanction is imposed in my capacity as an uninvolved administrator under the authority of the Arbitration Committee's decision at age#Final decision and, if applicable, the procedure described at Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee/Discretionary sanctions. This sanction has been recorded in the log of sanctions. If the sanction includes a ban, please read the banning policy to ensure you understand what this means. If you do not comply with this sanction, you may be blocked for an extended period, by way of enforcement of this sanction—and you may also be made subject to further sanctions.
You may appeal this sanction using the process described here. I recommend that you use the arbitration enforcement appeals template if you wish to submit an appeal to the arbitration enforcement noticeboard. You may also appeal directly to me (on my talk page), before or instead of appealing to the noticeboard. Even if you appeal this sanction, you remain bound by it until you are notified by an uninvolved administrator that the appeal has been successful. You are also free to contact me on my talk page if anything of the above is unclear to you. Spartaz Humbug! 10:12, 17 January 2016 (UTC)
I reverted your recent edit to this page as you are topic banned from longevity articles. Not a good idea to break your topic ban in an area where discretionary sanctions are in place. CommanderLinx ( talk) 10:04, 14 April 2016 (UTC)
Second time now. What part of "you are topic banned from longevity articles" do you not understand? You are not allowed to edit in this topic area or you may be blocked from Wikipedia. CommanderLinx ( talk) 06:28, 30 October 2016 (UTC)
Hello, GreatGreen. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
I've had to remove your edit to the talk page of list of German supercentenarians as topic bans also apply to talk pages per WP:TBAN. You really are pushing for a block if you don't stay away from these articles. CommanderLinx ( talk) 03:36, 24 February 2017 (UTC)
Hello, GreatGreen. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)
Hello, GreatGreen, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions, especially what you did for List of living supercentenarians. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:
Please remember to
sign your messages on
talk pages by typing four
tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out
Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on
my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{help me}}
before the question. Again, welcome! —
TheJJJunk (
say hello)
22:13, 9 December 2013 (UTC)
Do not blindly revert all edits under the guise of calling it vandalism. If you have a particular issue then discuss it. The pending and unverified claims are not reliable sources as have been repeatedly discussed and do not belong in any article. -- Ricky81682 ( talk) 00:43, 23 November 2015 (UTC)
Regarding this article. Do NOT restore the chronological list section because it cannot be sourced. Unsourced information has no business being on Wikipedia. CommanderLinx ( talk) 08:31, 19 December 2015 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current
Arbitration Committee election. The
Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia
arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose
site bans,
topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The
arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to
review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on
the voting page. For the Election committee,
MediaWiki message delivery (
talk)
17:02, 24 November 2015 (UTC)
Hello and
welcome to Wikipedia. When you add content to
talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion (but never when editing articles), please be sure to
sign your posts. There are two ways to do this. Either:
This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is necessary to allow other editors to easily see who wrote what and when.
Thank you. -- SineBot ( talk) 11:00, 19 December 2015 (UTC)
Please carefully read this information:
The Arbitration Committee has authorised discretionary sanctions to be used for pages regarding Longevity, a topic which you have edited. The Committee's decision is here.
Discretionary sanctions is a system of conduct regulation designed to minimize disruption to controversial topics. This means uninvolved administrators can impose sanctions for edits relating to the topic that do not adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, our standards of behavior, or relevant policies. Administrators may impose sanctions such as editing restrictions, bans, or blocks. This message is to notify you sanctions are authorised for the topic you are editing. Before continuing to edit this topic, please familiarise yourself with the discretionary sanctions system. Don't hesitate to contact me or another editor if you have any questions.GreatGreen, I noticed your signature here. I just want to say that's it's considered policy (because it's incredibly convenient) to include at least a single link to your user or talk page in your signature. With yours, to talk to you, I had to go through the history and click that which is not particularly convenient as you can imagine. -- Ricky81682 ( talk) 06:30, 13 January 2016 (UTC)
I've started a case requesting discretionary sanctions against you at Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Enforcement#GreatGreen. Please respond there. -- Ricky81682 ( talk) 21:56, 13 January 2016 (UTC)
TO give an answer to Jochman it is a such an manipulation of people participating on wiki to ban them although reasons and arguments that are given by me are logical and explained. A whole difference to the behaviour of Ricky and all the others ones. I just want to point out the following: on the one hand it is said verified cases are involved. Then explain why e.g. the list of living SCs has been crashed down to top 100 in past. It only involves now a minium of living cases what destroys the actual characterization that is needed and more interesting. I am convinced that people like Ricky are manipulating everyone and are the firsts to ban people giving arguments against the things they do. I will answer in the ban topic too. GreatGreen ( talk) 10:44, 16 January 2016 (UTC)
The following sanction now applies to you:
Topic ban from Longevity broadly construed
You have been sanctioned for the reasons provided in response to this arbitration enforcement request.
This sanction is imposed in my capacity as an uninvolved administrator under the authority of the Arbitration Committee's decision at age#Final decision and, if applicable, the procedure described at Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee/Discretionary sanctions. This sanction has been recorded in the log of sanctions. If the sanction includes a ban, please read the banning policy to ensure you understand what this means. If you do not comply with this sanction, you may be blocked for an extended period, by way of enforcement of this sanction—and you may also be made subject to further sanctions.
You may appeal this sanction using the process described here. I recommend that you use the arbitration enforcement appeals template if you wish to submit an appeal to the arbitration enforcement noticeboard. You may also appeal directly to me (on my talk page), before or instead of appealing to the noticeboard. Even if you appeal this sanction, you remain bound by it until you are notified by an uninvolved administrator that the appeal has been successful. You are also free to contact me on my talk page if anything of the above is unclear to you. Spartaz Humbug! 10:12, 17 January 2016 (UTC)
I reverted your recent edit to this page as you are topic banned from longevity articles. Not a good idea to break your topic ban in an area where discretionary sanctions are in place. CommanderLinx ( talk) 10:04, 14 April 2016 (UTC)
Second time now. What part of "you are topic banned from longevity articles" do you not understand? You are not allowed to edit in this topic area or you may be blocked from Wikipedia. CommanderLinx ( talk) 06:28, 30 October 2016 (UTC)
Hello, GreatGreen. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
I've had to remove your edit to the talk page of list of German supercentenarians as topic bans also apply to talk pages per WP:TBAN. You really are pushing for a block if you don't stay away from these articles. CommanderLinx ( talk) 03:36, 24 February 2017 (UTC)
Hello, GreatGreen. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)