I've added the "{{ prod}}" template to the article Christine Leadman, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but I don't believe it satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and I've explained why in the deletion notice (see also Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not and Wikipedia:Notability). Please either work to improve the article if the topic is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, or, if you disagree, discuss the issues raised at Talk:Christine Leadman. If you remove the {{ dated prod}} template, the article will not be deleted, but note that it may still be sent to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Irongargoyle 16:38, 5 October 2006 (UTC)
Aecis / Irongargoyle: I am new to contributing to Wikipedia and learning quickly. I appreciate the input received and would like to have a chance to work up a more encyclopedic article on a person from Ottawa. If I mistakenly created a second article, that was not my intention rather I wanted to edit what was there. Can I get this article restored so I may do the editing according to the guidelines? Grahame5
A belated reply to your message at my talk page. I haven't restored anything, and I still believe that Christine Leadman is not notable enough. But to be fair, I've nominated it for deletion now, so that other wikipedians can judge the article as well. You are welcome to explain your point of view there as well. The nomination and discussion are at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Christine Leadman. A ecis I'm too busy acting like I'm not naive. 14:14, 9 October 2006 (UTC)
Your upload of File:Christine Leadman 002.jpg or contribution to its description is noted, and thanks (even if belatedly) for your contribution. In order to help make better use of the media, an attempt has been made by an automated process to identify and add certain information to the media's description page.
This notification is placed on your talk page because a bot has identified you either as the uploader of the file, or as a contributor to its metadata. It would be appreciated if you could carefully review the information the bot added. To opt out of these notifications, please follow the instructions here. Thanks! Message delivered by Theo's Little Bot ( opt-out) 14:33, 28 April 2014 (UTC)
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Christine Leadman 002.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Kelly hi! 21:33, 21 May 2018 (UTC)
I've added the "{{ prod}}" template to the article Christine Leadman, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but I don't believe it satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and I've explained why in the deletion notice (see also Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not and Wikipedia:Notability). Please either work to improve the article if the topic is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, or, if you disagree, discuss the issues raised at Talk:Christine Leadman. If you remove the {{ dated prod}} template, the article will not be deleted, but note that it may still be sent to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Irongargoyle 16:38, 5 October 2006 (UTC)
Aecis / Irongargoyle: I am new to contributing to Wikipedia and learning quickly. I appreciate the input received and would like to have a chance to work up a more encyclopedic article on a person from Ottawa. If I mistakenly created a second article, that was not my intention rather I wanted to edit what was there. Can I get this article restored so I may do the editing according to the guidelines? Grahame5
A belated reply to your message at my talk page. I haven't restored anything, and I still believe that Christine Leadman is not notable enough. But to be fair, I've nominated it for deletion now, so that other wikipedians can judge the article as well. You are welcome to explain your point of view there as well. The nomination and discussion are at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Christine Leadman. A ecis I'm too busy acting like I'm not naive. 14:14, 9 October 2006 (UTC)
Your upload of File:Christine Leadman 002.jpg or contribution to its description is noted, and thanks (even if belatedly) for your contribution. In order to help make better use of the media, an attempt has been made by an automated process to identify and add certain information to the media's description page.
This notification is placed on your talk page because a bot has identified you either as the uploader of the file, or as a contributor to its metadata. It would be appreciated if you could carefully review the information the bot added. To opt out of these notifications, please follow the instructions here. Thanks! Message delivered by Theo's Little Bot ( opt-out) 14:33, 28 April 2014 (UTC)
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Christine Leadman 002.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Kelly hi! 21:33, 21 May 2018 (UTC)