![]() | This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 1 | Archive 2 | Archive 3 | Archive 4 |
Hi there! I noticed your comments (again) for Hiro Fujiwara so I just want to ask where are the uncited sentences and paragraphs. I really appreciate it if you would tell me so I can improve the article. :)
Amaya Sakura ( talk) 10:22, 17 May 2009 (UTC)
Goodraise, I didn't get a copy of the Malay Theory work so far. Is there a way to get a copy so I can add the info to the other locations you mention? Reds0xfan ( talk) 16:00, 17 May 2009 (UTC)
Thanks--I'll check with John. I'm not sure who actually deleted it. Reds0xfan ( talk) 17:20, 17 May 2009 (UTC)
Thank you for assessing the requested article. I see it has only failed one of the criteria. Would you mind pointing out which sections need improvement in order for it to be suitably referenced?-- Stepusual ( talk) 20:21, 18 May 2009 (UTC)
Out of curiosity, User:CarpetCrawler started the GA review at Free Collars Kingdom, so I'm curious as to how/why you ended up taking it over? Certainly don't mind the feedback, just wondering what happened. -- Collectonian ( talk · contribs) 02:26, 22 May 2009 (UTC)
Haha, no, I wouldn't say that. Feel free to do whatever you'd like with both articles, I really don't mind! ;) I'll finish up Earl Cain and you can do Free Collars Kingdom. CarpetCrawler message me 10:03, 22 May 2009 (UTC)
Yo,
I dug more about the website and spend +1.5 hours in it :( That why i asked the WP:RS/N at first to save myself the search :p
While they have no about page some of their editors/columnists are presents around the web
What i found
Phil Hall: His article is self-explanatory.
Craig Johnson (formerly Craig Lemon): worked as senior editor in
Comics Bulletin
[1]
[2]
Glenn Carter: also worked for Comics Bulletin
Comics International
[3]
[4]
[5]
Mark Bittmann: also worked for Comics Bulletin
[6]
Katherine Farmar: wrote for the
The Irish Times
[7],
Forbidden Planet (bookstore) blog
[8]
They seems experts in Comics field and Comics Village is probably a prominent resource for UK.
For the rest, i leave it to your judgment as i'm too inside the stuff to make a npov final evaluation. Thanks--
KrebMarkt
07:33, 23 May 2009 (UTC)
I saw that you are using a new way to ref manga volumes and anime episodes in List of One Piece characters. It looks pretty cool, but does it help to reduce the weight? It would sure help the FMA character list which is 100 kylobites long. Additionally, why do you use both English and Japanese volumes to source? Since there are already 20 volumes more or less in English, the Japanese ones with the same number could be removed. By the way, good work with the One Piece articles. Regards. Tintor2 ( talk) 01:21, 24 May 2009 (UTC)
I promised you that I would copy-edit the episode summaries about four months back, except that I got caught up with other things and forgot to return here. Well, here I am now, saying that I can finally resume doing so. Dabomb87 ( talk) 01:19, 6 June 2009 (UTC)
importScript('User:Plastikspork/monobook.js/script.js');
into your
monobook.js.
Dabomb87 (
talk)
02:59, 7 June 2009 (UTC)
Ah crap... I can't believe I missed that. Apparently, the division between seasons nine and ten was determined by common sense. That means the list won't be nominated again for another three month or so (until the first season 10 DVD is announced). Anyways, thanks for the copy-edit (whether you decide to complete it or not). Good raise 16:56, 10 June 2009 (UTC)
{{ List of One Piece episodes (season 9)}} includes a group="n"parameter for references. Those also get transcluded to List of One Piece episodes. I added a tag there to show them.
I very much disliked the idea of turning references into text inorder to circumvent a certain limit. Consider other possibilities, please. Debresser ( talk) 02:25, 11 June 2009 (UTC)
There is a proposed merge that I think would interest you at Talk:Limited geography model#Several merge proposals - my take. I am posting this notice because I saw that you were a recent editor at one of the pages listed below:
-- Descartes1979 ( talk) 17:58, 14 June 2009 (UTC)
Just to let you know, there is no longer a need to set |listas=
in {{
WikiProject Anime and manga}} if the WPBiography banner already has one set. --
Farix (
Talk)
01:02, 19 June 2009 (UTC)
note sierra blanca school malaga? might it be a good idea to do something about it? it looks awful. ... aa: talk 21:55, 20 June 2009 (UTC)
For some reason I still like the way the One Piece characters list is sourced. I think its for how differentiates third-party sources to primary sources. I think listing the vols is okay, but I dont know if listing the episodes is good. Do you mean to add the other episodes to references? Considering that there are over 400 episodes, and most of them retell the manga's chapters it would be unnecesary weight. Regards. Tintor2 ( talk) 15:42, 21 June 2009 (UTC)
I finally finished the copy-edit. Sorry for taking so long; I kept committing myself to complete it, but various things kept getting in the way. I plan to do a final proofread, and then you can send the list to FLC. Dabomb87 ( talk) 23:59, 24 June 2009 (UTC)
Thanks for doing this. Even especially for doing this without knowing baseball -- your confusions over jargon are useful in untangling it for a general audience. — Quasirandom ( talk) 03:41, 30 June 2009 (UTC)
Viz to Publish One Piece #24-53 in January-June 2010 (Updated). I'm sure it would help. Tintor2 ( talk) 00:49, 4 July 2009 (UTC)
Nice work with the One Piece character list. By the way, while I was searching for reception for Luffy, I found that Zoro and Nami were featured in various reviews and other stuff (In an SPJA, Nami was nominated to Best Female Character but lost, Zoro's English voice actor was nominated to a category per his work with Zoro. I'll later make a reception section for them in a sandbox, and I guess it would help to the weight from the list. Regards. Tintor2 ( talk) 00:15, 5 July 2009 (UTC)
For having the somewhat bad role as it's necessary to keep some critical sense. Smile more often thought. -- KrebMarkt 17:22, 16 July 2009 (UTC)
Hi, I noticed that you are using my script, and I thought I would let you know that I have split the script into two, namely User:Plastikspork/monobook.js/script.js and User:Plastikspork/date.js. If you would like to use both, you can just add
importScript('User:Plastikspork/monobook.js/script.js');
and
importScript('User:Plastikspork/date.js');
to your monobook.js. Alternatively, if you are only using the date formatting buttons, you can just add the date.js script. Let me know if you have any questions, comments, bug reports, suggestions, requests, or really anything. Thanks! Plastikspork ( talk) 20:09, 22 July 2009 (UTC)
It would have caused an edit because DBZfan29 believes the articles should stand on their own. He would likely revert every attempt to merge them, hence the required discussion. – túrian patois 23:14, 9 August 2009 (UTC)
Shouldn't the most countries from the manga section be removed? They are already shown in the infobox and it would imply that the anime should also have every country in which it is broadcast mentioned. Tintor2 ( talk) 13:20, 3 September 2009 (UTC)
It seems you are a bit busy right now but there is discussion at Wikipedia talk:Manual of Style (anime- and manga-related articles)#Problem with character articles regarding characters articles and more opinions are needed. Regards. Tintor2 ( talk) 17:38, 6 September 2009 (UTC)
I thought I would let you know that I now have an account. I may still edit from time to time without logging in. (aka 97.115.129.240) allen四 names 12:50, 20 September 2009 (UTC)
For Bamboo Blade cover.
Square-Enix made dubious chance by putting sandy brown font on red background resulting a lot of noise in the scan. -- KrebMarkt 06:32, 22 September 2009 (UTC)
See here. Cheeers, Dabomb87 ( talk) 01:54, 25 September 2009 (UTC)
At WP:EL we are continuing to discuss the usage of official websites on web.archive.org here: Wikipedia_talk:External_links#ELs_of_official_websites_archived_on_web.archive.org WhisperToMe ( talk) 20:50, 4 October 2009 (UTC)
Thanks for the reassessing, but I wish to know how I can work on the first criteria to push it to B status, I've read the pages on citations and reliable sources, but to be frank, it all just went over my head. So I was hoping you could help push me in the right direction, would you please help me and tell me what was wrong? -- Lightlowemon ( talk) 08:06, 7 October 2009 (UTC)
I tried to add to the reply on the help desk using my mobile phone but it went wrong for some reason! And now i find i don't have a way to press enter, hence why this is all on one line -- PhantomSteve ( Contact Me, My Contribs) 10:13, 23 October 2009 (UTC)
Thank you so much for that lengthy review! I'd been getting worried with the nomination getting stale. I've fixed most of your issues, but there are a couple things I could use further comments on. Stop by when you get a chance. Thanks! Staxringold talk contribs 16:04, 22 October 2009 (UTC)
![]() |
The Reviewers Award | |
For a detailed and quick-replying review of 30 Rock (season 3). Staxringold talk contribs 21:05, 24 October 2009 (UTC) |
Hello! I'm just wondering that me adding a chart to One Piece Movie: The Desert Princess and the Pirates: Adventures in Alabasta meets you approval (I'm a little worried!)-- Geoffman13 ( talk) 02:21, 29 October 2009 (UTC)
Hi Goodraise. Thanks for all of your recent FLC reviews. Several FLCs are close to being eligible for closure. Could you please revisit the following FLCs so that the consensus for that FLC is more apparent:
Thanks again, Dabomb87 ( talk) 15:40, 14 November 2009 (UTC)
This might have been explained a while back, but I was wondering why there isn't an antagonist section in the character list, just protagonist and other characters. I wanted to ask here because I know how much drama that article can have, I don't want to stir it up. -- Kraftlos ( Talk | Contrib) 07:41, 21 November 2009 (UTC)
I have a problem in List of Gin Tama episodes (season 4); For the episode 185, which is going to be one containing two titles, is not shown in the list. Could you take a look? Regards. Tintor2 ( talk) 23:24, 22 November 2009 (UTC)
On the family Guy season 5 where your concerns addressed.-- Pedro J. the rookie 03:15, 30 November 2009 (UTC)
Hi,
I wanted to thanks you for fixing so many chapters lists while i'm simply overburdened by fixing unsourced BLP, i felt bad watching you fixing those lists and not helping. -- KrebMarkt 07:47, 6 February 2010 (UTC)
Hi,
If someday you decide to write your essay on reliable sources and weight allow me to join in. -- KrebMarkt 22:27, 12 January 2010 (UTC)
Hi Goodraise,
Can you please check that I added the correct information when I uploaded the above file to Commons? (Specifically, is the image a derivative work, and the license details?)
If so, I can then delete the local copy.
G.A.S talk 09:32, 1 March 2010 (UTC)
Hey Goodraise, hope you're well. I did the easy review of Taylor Swift tonight, and your quick and incisive comment blew my comments out pretty much as you don't see Chartstats as meeting WP:RS. Fair enough. This appears to be a reasonably common theme and I was wondering if you could knock up some boilerplate advice (since this crops up quite a bit) so that when you oppose, you could mitigate for all the fallout the oppose generally produces? It'd be awesome if you'd be prepared to just point folks to alternatives or whatever, nothing spectacular, I know it's not your job to do it, but when you just oppose a list based on a single reference source, I imagine for our newcomers it's pretty daunting. Hopefully you see where I'm coming from, if not, no worries, just ignore this and we'll keep on keeping on. All the best, thanks for your efforts here, in particular at FLC. The Rambling Man ( talk) 23:04, 13 March 2010 (UTC)
You were working on User:Goodraise/Notability (fiction) a year ago. Is there a plan to make this an active proposal, or can it be removed from that cstegory? Fences& Windows 15:59, 25 May 2010 (UTC)
Hello. Your account has been granted the "reviewer" userright, allowing you to to review other users' edits on certain flagged pages. Pending changes, also known as flagged protection, will be commencing a a two-month trial at approximately 23:00, 2010 June 15 (UTC).
Reviewers can review edits made by users who are not autoconfirmed to articles placed under flagged protection. Flagged protection is applied to only a small number of articles, similarly to how semi-protection is applied but in a more controlled way for the trial.
When reviewing, edits should be accepted if they are not obvious vandalism or BLP violations, and not clearly problematic in light of the reason given for protection (see Wikipedia:Reviewing process). More detailed documentation and guidelines can be found here.
If you do not want this userright, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time. The Rambling Man ( talk) 16:05, 15 June 2010 (UTC)
On the MOS:JP talk page, a discussion has been started about including or not including romanizations for words of English origin, such as Fainaru Fantajī in Final Fantasy (ファイナルファンタジー, Fainaru Fantajī) (for the sake of simplicity, I called this case "words of English origin", more information on semantics here).
Over the course of a month, it has become apparent that both the parties proposing to include or not include those romanizations cannot be convinced by the arguments or guidelines brought up by the other side. Therefore, a compromise is trying to be found that will satisfy both parties. One suggestion on a compromise has been given already, but it has not found unanimous agreement, so additional compromises are encouraged to be suggested.
One universally accepted point was to bring more users from the affected projects in to help achieve consensus, and you were one of those selected in the process.
What this invitation is:
What this invitation is not:
It would be highly appreciated if you came over to the MOS:JP talk page and helped find a solution. Thank you in advance. Prime Blue ( talk) 11:28, 8 August 2010 (UTC)
Hi Goodraise,
The Signpost's "Features and admins" page now includes a "Choice of the week" for featured articles, featured lists and featured pictures. Each week, The Signpost invites a different delegate, reviewer or nominator from each process to select what they think is the best, or their favourite, item, and to give their reasons. These reasons can be technical (e.g., related to the Criteria) or subjective, or both.
Would you be willing to do this with featured lists for next week's edition? If you agree, promotions from Saturday 21 August to Friday 27 August will be eligible. They will be listed here by Saturday UTC, and we would need your text by Sunday UTC. Examples from previous weeks are accessible by clicking on "← PREVIOUS Features and admins" at the bottom. Cheers, Dabomb87 ( talk) 23:49, 25 August 2010 (UTC)
![]() | This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 1 | Archive 2 | Archive 3 | Archive 4 |
Hi there! I noticed your comments (again) for Hiro Fujiwara so I just want to ask where are the uncited sentences and paragraphs. I really appreciate it if you would tell me so I can improve the article. :)
Amaya Sakura ( talk) 10:22, 17 May 2009 (UTC)
Goodraise, I didn't get a copy of the Malay Theory work so far. Is there a way to get a copy so I can add the info to the other locations you mention? Reds0xfan ( talk) 16:00, 17 May 2009 (UTC)
Thanks--I'll check with John. I'm not sure who actually deleted it. Reds0xfan ( talk) 17:20, 17 May 2009 (UTC)
Thank you for assessing the requested article. I see it has only failed one of the criteria. Would you mind pointing out which sections need improvement in order for it to be suitably referenced?-- Stepusual ( talk) 20:21, 18 May 2009 (UTC)
Out of curiosity, User:CarpetCrawler started the GA review at Free Collars Kingdom, so I'm curious as to how/why you ended up taking it over? Certainly don't mind the feedback, just wondering what happened. -- Collectonian ( talk · contribs) 02:26, 22 May 2009 (UTC)
Haha, no, I wouldn't say that. Feel free to do whatever you'd like with both articles, I really don't mind! ;) I'll finish up Earl Cain and you can do Free Collars Kingdom. CarpetCrawler message me 10:03, 22 May 2009 (UTC)
Yo,
I dug more about the website and spend +1.5 hours in it :( That why i asked the WP:RS/N at first to save myself the search :p
While they have no about page some of their editors/columnists are presents around the web
What i found
Phil Hall: His article is self-explanatory.
Craig Johnson (formerly Craig Lemon): worked as senior editor in
Comics Bulletin
[1]
[2]
Glenn Carter: also worked for Comics Bulletin
Comics International
[3]
[4]
[5]
Mark Bittmann: also worked for Comics Bulletin
[6]
Katherine Farmar: wrote for the
The Irish Times
[7],
Forbidden Planet (bookstore) blog
[8]
They seems experts in Comics field and Comics Village is probably a prominent resource for UK.
For the rest, i leave it to your judgment as i'm too inside the stuff to make a npov final evaluation. Thanks--
KrebMarkt
07:33, 23 May 2009 (UTC)
I saw that you are using a new way to ref manga volumes and anime episodes in List of One Piece characters. It looks pretty cool, but does it help to reduce the weight? It would sure help the FMA character list which is 100 kylobites long. Additionally, why do you use both English and Japanese volumes to source? Since there are already 20 volumes more or less in English, the Japanese ones with the same number could be removed. By the way, good work with the One Piece articles. Regards. Tintor2 ( talk) 01:21, 24 May 2009 (UTC)
I promised you that I would copy-edit the episode summaries about four months back, except that I got caught up with other things and forgot to return here. Well, here I am now, saying that I can finally resume doing so. Dabomb87 ( talk) 01:19, 6 June 2009 (UTC)
importScript('User:Plastikspork/monobook.js/script.js');
into your
monobook.js.
Dabomb87 (
talk)
02:59, 7 June 2009 (UTC)
Ah crap... I can't believe I missed that. Apparently, the division between seasons nine and ten was determined by common sense. That means the list won't be nominated again for another three month or so (until the first season 10 DVD is announced). Anyways, thanks for the copy-edit (whether you decide to complete it or not). Good raise 16:56, 10 June 2009 (UTC)
{{ List of One Piece episodes (season 9)}} includes a group="n"parameter for references. Those also get transcluded to List of One Piece episodes. I added a tag there to show them.
I very much disliked the idea of turning references into text inorder to circumvent a certain limit. Consider other possibilities, please. Debresser ( talk) 02:25, 11 June 2009 (UTC)
There is a proposed merge that I think would interest you at Talk:Limited geography model#Several merge proposals - my take. I am posting this notice because I saw that you were a recent editor at one of the pages listed below:
-- Descartes1979 ( talk) 17:58, 14 June 2009 (UTC)
Just to let you know, there is no longer a need to set |listas=
in {{
WikiProject Anime and manga}} if the WPBiography banner already has one set. --
Farix (
Talk)
01:02, 19 June 2009 (UTC)
note sierra blanca school malaga? might it be a good idea to do something about it? it looks awful. ... aa: talk 21:55, 20 June 2009 (UTC)
For some reason I still like the way the One Piece characters list is sourced. I think its for how differentiates third-party sources to primary sources. I think listing the vols is okay, but I dont know if listing the episodes is good. Do you mean to add the other episodes to references? Considering that there are over 400 episodes, and most of them retell the manga's chapters it would be unnecesary weight. Regards. Tintor2 ( talk) 15:42, 21 June 2009 (UTC)
I finally finished the copy-edit. Sorry for taking so long; I kept committing myself to complete it, but various things kept getting in the way. I plan to do a final proofread, and then you can send the list to FLC. Dabomb87 ( talk) 23:59, 24 June 2009 (UTC)
Thanks for doing this. Even especially for doing this without knowing baseball -- your confusions over jargon are useful in untangling it for a general audience. — Quasirandom ( talk) 03:41, 30 June 2009 (UTC)
Viz to Publish One Piece #24-53 in January-June 2010 (Updated). I'm sure it would help. Tintor2 ( talk) 00:49, 4 July 2009 (UTC)
Nice work with the One Piece character list. By the way, while I was searching for reception for Luffy, I found that Zoro and Nami were featured in various reviews and other stuff (In an SPJA, Nami was nominated to Best Female Character but lost, Zoro's English voice actor was nominated to a category per his work with Zoro. I'll later make a reception section for them in a sandbox, and I guess it would help to the weight from the list. Regards. Tintor2 ( talk) 00:15, 5 July 2009 (UTC)
For having the somewhat bad role as it's necessary to keep some critical sense. Smile more often thought. -- KrebMarkt 17:22, 16 July 2009 (UTC)
Hi, I noticed that you are using my script, and I thought I would let you know that I have split the script into two, namely User:Plastikspork/monobook.js/script.js and User:Plastikspork/date.js. If you would like to use both, you can just add
importScript('User:Plastikspork/monobook.js/script.js');
and
importScript('User:Plastikspork/date.js');
to your monobook.js. Alternatively, if you are only using the date formatting buttons, you can just add the date.js script. Let me know if you have any questions, comments, bug reports, suggestions, requests, or really anything. Thanks! Plastikspork ( talk) 20:09, 22 July 2009 (UTC)
It would have caused an edit because DBZfan29 believes the articles should stand on their own. He would likely revert every attempt to merge them, hence the required discussion. – túrian patois 23:14, 9 August 2009 (UTC)
Shouldn't the most countries from the manga section be removed? They are already shown in the infobox and it would imply that the anime should also have every country in which it is broadcast mentioned. Tintor2 ( talk) 13:20, 3 September 2009 (UTC)
It seems you are a bit busy right now but there is discussion at Wikipedia talk:Manual of Style (anime- and manga-related articles)#Problem with character articles regarding characters articles and more opinions are needed. Regards. Tintor2 ( talk) 17:38, 6 September 2009 (UTC)
I thought I would let you know that I now have an account. I may still edit from time to time without logging in. (aka 97.115.129.240) allen四 names 12:50, 20 September 2009 (UTC)
For Bamboo Blade cover.
Square-Enix made dubious chance by putting sandy brown font on red background resulting a lot of noise in the scan. -- KrebMarkt 06:32, 22 September 2009 (UTC)
See here. Cheeers, Dabomb87 ( talk) 01:54, 25 September 2009 (UTC)
At WP:EL we are continuing to discuss the usage of official websites on web.archive.org here: Wikipedia_talk:External_links#ELs_of_official_websites_archived_on_web.archive.org WhisperToMe ( talk) 20:50, 4 October 2009 (UTC)
Thanks for the reassessing, but I wish to know how I can work on the first criteria to push it to B status, I've read the pages on citations and reliable sources, but to be frank, it all just went over my head. So I was hoping you could help push me in the right direction, would you please help me and tell me what was wrong? -- Lightlowemon ( talk) 08:06, 7 October 2009 (UTC)
I tried to add to the reply on the help desk using my mobile phone but it went wrong for some reason! And now i find i don't have a way to press enter, hence why this is all on one line -- PhantomSteve ( Contact Me, My Contribs) 10:13, 23 October 2009 (UTC)
Thank you so much for that lengthy review! I'd been getting worried with the nomination getting stale. I've fixed most of your issues, but there are a couple things I could use further comments on. Stop by when you get a chance. Thanks! Staxringold talk contribs 16:04, 22 October 2009 (UTC)
![]() |
The Reviewers Award | |
For a detailed and quick-replying review of 30 Rock (season 3). Staxringold talk contribs 21:05, 24 October 2009 (UTC) |
Hello! I'm just wondering that me adding a chart to One Piece Movie: The Desert Princess and the Pirates: Adventures in Alabasta meets you approval (I'm a little worried!)-- Geoffman13 ( talk) 02:21, 29 October 2009 (UTC)
Hi Goodraise. Thanks for all of your recent FLC reviews. Several FLCs are close to being eligible for closure. Could you please revisit the following FLCs so that the consensus for that FLC is more apparent:
Thanks again, Dabomb87 ( talk) 15:40, 14 November 2009 (UTC)
This might have been explained a while back, but I was wondering why there isn't an antagonist section in the character list, just protagonist and other characters. I wanted to ask here because I know how much drama that article can have, I don't want to stir it up. -- Kraftlos ( Talk | Contrib) 07:41, 21 November 2009 (UTC)
I have a problem in List of Gin Tama episodes (season 4); For the episode 185, which is going to be one containing two titles, is not shown in the list. Could you take a look? Regards. Tintor2 ( talk) 23:24, 22 November 2009 (UTC)
On the family Guy season 5 where your concerns addressed.-- Pedro J. the rookie 03:15, 30 November 2009 (UTC)
Hi,
I wanted to thanks you for fixing so many chapters lists while i'm simply overburdened by fixing unsourced BLP, i felt bad watching you fixing those lists and not helping. -- KrebMarkt 07:47, 6 February 2010 (UTC)
Hi,
If someday you decide to write your essay on reliable sources and weight allow me to join in. -- KrebMarkt 22:27, 12 January 2010 (UTC)
Hi Goodraise,
Can you please check that I added the correct information when I uploaded the above file to Commons? (Specifically, is the image a derivative work, and the license details?)
If so, I can then delete the local copy.
G.A.S talk 09:32, 1 March 2010 (UTC)
Hey Goodraise, hope you're well. I did the easy review of Taylor Swift tonight, and your quick and incisive comment blew my comments out pretty much as you don't see Chartstats as meeting WP:RS. Fair enough. This appears to be a reasonably common theme and I was wondering if you could knock up some boilerplate advice (since this crops up quite a bit) so that when you oppose, you could mitigate for all the fallout the oppose generally produces? It'd be awesome if you'd be prepared to just point folks to alternatives or whatever, nothing spectacular, I know it's not your job to do it, but when you just oppose a list based on a single reference source, I imagine for our newcomers it's pretty daunting. Hopefully you see where I'm coming from, if not, no worries, just ignore this and we'll keep on keeping on. All the best, thanks for your efforts here, in particular at FLC. The Rambling Man ( talk) 23:04, 13 March 2010 (UTC)
You were working on User:Goodraise/Notability (fiction) a year ago. Is there a plan to make this an active proposal, or can it be removed from that cstegory? Fences& Windows 15:59, 25 May 2010 (UTC)
Hello. Your account has been granted the "reviewer" userright, allowing you to to review other users' edits on certain flagged pages. Pending changes, also known as flagged protection, will be commencing a a two-month trial at approximately 23:00, 2010 June 15 (UTC).
Reviewers can review edits made by users who are not autoconfirmed to articles placed under flagged protection. Flagged protection is applied to only a small number of articles, similarly to how semi-protection is applied but in a more controlled way for the trial.
When reviewing, edits should be accepted if they are not obvious vandalism or BLP violations, and not clearly problematic in light of the reason given for protection (see Wikipedia:Reviewing process). More detailed documentation and guidelines can be found here.
If you do not want this userright, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time. The Rambling Man ( talk) 16:05, 15 June 2010 (UTC)
On the MOS:JP talk page, a discussion has been started about including or not including romanizations for words of English origin, such as Fainaru Fantajī in Final Fantasy (ファイナルファンタジー, Fainaru Fantajī) (for the sake of simplicity, I called this case "words of English origin", more information on semantics here).
Over the course of a month, it has become apparent that both the parties proposing to include or not include those romanizations cannot be convinced by the arguments or guidelines brought up by the other side. Therefore, a compromise is trying to be found that will satisfy both parties. One suggestion on a compromise has been given already, but it has not found unanimous agreement, so additional compromises are encouraged to be suggested.
One universally accepted point was to bring more users from the affected projects in to help achieve consensus, and you were one of those selected in the process.
What this invitation is:
What this invitation is not:
It would be highly appreciated if you came over to the MOS:JP talk page and helped find a solution. Thank you in advance. Prime Blue ( talk) 11:28, 8 August 2010 (UTC)
Hi Goodraise,
The Signpost's "Features and admins" page now includes a "Choice of the week" for featured articles, featured lists and featured pictures. Each week, The Signpost invites a different delegate, reviewer or nominator from each process to select what they think is the best, or their favourite, item, and to give their reasons. These reasons can be technical (e.g., related to the Criteria) or subjective, or both.
Would you be willing to do this with featured lists for next week's edition? If you agree, promotions from Saturday 21 August to Friday 27 August will be eligible. They will be listed here by Saturday UTC, and we would need your text by Sunday UTC. Examples from previous weeks are accessible by clicking on "← PREVIOUS Features and admins" at the bottom. Cheers, Dabomb87 ( talk) 23:49, 25 August 2010 (UTC)