Hello, Gnip, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ~~~~, which will automatically produce your name and the date.
If you need help, check out
Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}}
on your talk page and ask your question there. Again, welcome!
I should have kept the fact that he was killed afterwards, didn't I? I can't remember if I did or not. The actual certain event of his death is somewhat hazy in historical records, if I recall reading a while back. Conflicting accounts of how he actually died after he fled Beijing.-- Pericles of Athens Talk 00:33, 29 November 2007 (UTC)
With your edits to Huolongjing, we will need more than just the title of the book in that citation you gave about Juan de Mendoca; I'll need actual page numbers for those if you still have the book Late Imperial Chinese Armies on hand. Thanks.-- Pericles of Athens Talk 01:21, 14 January 2008 (UTC)
Fancy seeing you again! Thanks for providing this quote on my talk page. It should be very useful indeed. I'll find a way to include it in the article. However, it is late, and I am off to bed for now. Cheers.-- Pericles of Athens Talk 06:33, 16 July 2009 (UTC)
I have edited and changed the article somewhat. I am relatively inactive on wikipedia now, so if you have sources please expand the article with them. As to the Manchus' view on gunpowder weapons, see:
It stands to reason that
limiting the use of firearms to a single centralized body of people specially trained and easily controlled, and keeping the production of weapons under direct state control, could be measures meant as much to rationalize the deployment of artillery in military campaigns as to prevent the proliferation of a type of
weaponry that might give potential Chinese rebels an edge against the Qing forces.
which is from your source. The Ming armies relied on gunpowder weapons to a great deal and developed them, while Manchus viewed gunpowder weapons (and new inventions/economic development in general) as a threat to their rule. This was a major reason for China's decline starting from the 17th century onwards. Teeninvestor ( talk) 20:19, 13 January 2010 (UTC)
Actually, that picture is not from the Huolongjing, so it is perhaps misleading to place it in the article, let alone the lead. I'll see if I can find a worthy replacement image.-- Pericles of Athens Talk 16:04, 19 July 2010 (UTC)
Hi Gnip. Are you certain about this? Prof. Gary Lee Todd did not provide any sort of wall plaque describing the artwork, but he did place the image in a page specifically labeled as showing Chinese artwork from its inception up to the end of the Han Dynasty. Could you provide some sort of comparison artworks from the Sui/Tang Dynasties? I've also seen many Han stone reliefs; some reliefs provided on that page by Professor Todd are unquestionably from Han period tomb walls. However, the lack of wear-and-tear and lanky artistic style on the image in question does raise an eyebrow or two, I will admit. I'll need more evidence, though, before I am totally convinced that the images should be removed. Cheers!-- Pericles of Athens Talk 05:08, 30 September 2010 (UTC)
do you have any sources about this?- Battle_of_Mohi#Usage_of_Gunpowder_and_Firearms. I've read before that Mongols used a type of catapult and/or rockets during their invasion of europe, but I'm not sure what they were called, all it said was that they were of Chinese design. DÜNGÁNÈ ( talk) 03:26, 31 July 2011 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current
Arbitration Committee election. The
Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia
arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose
site bans,
topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The
arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to
review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on
the voting page. For the Election committee,
MediaWiki message delivery (
talk)
13:41, 24 November 2015 (UTC)
Hello, Gnip, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ~~~~, which will automatically produce your name and the date.
If you need help, check out
Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}}
on your talk page and ask your question there. Again, welcome!
I should have kept the fact that he was killed afterwards, didn't I? I can't remember if I did or not. The actual certain event of his death is somewhat hazy in historical records, if I recall reading a while back. Conflicting accounts of how he actually died after he fled Beijing.-- Pericles of Athens Talk 00:33, 29 November 2007 (UTC)
With your edits to Huolongjing, we will need more than just the title of the book in that citation you gave about Juan de Mendoca; I'll need actual page numbers for those if you still have the book Late Imperial Chinese Armies on hand. Thanks.-- Pericles of Athens Talk 01:21, 14 January 2008 (UTC)
Fancy seeing you again! Thanks for providing this quote on my talk page. It should be very useful indeed. I'll find a way to include it in the article. However, it is late, and I am off to bed for now. Cheers.-- Pericles of Athens Talk 06:33, 16 July 2009 (UTC)
I have edited and changed the article somewhat. I am relatively inactive on wikipedia now, so if you have sources please expand the article with them. As to the Manchus' view on gunpowder weapons, see:
It stands to reason that
limiting the use of firearms to a single centralized body of people specially trained and easily controlled, and keeping the production of weapons under direct state control, could be measures meant as much to rationalize the deployment of artillery in military campaigns as to prevent the proliferation of a type of
weaponry that might give potential Chinese rebels an edge against the Qing forces.
which is from your source. The Ming armies relied on gunpowder weapons to a great deal and developed them, while Manchus viewed gunpowder weapons (and new inventions/economic development in general) as a threat to their rule. This was a major reason for China's decline starting from the 17th century onwards. Teeninvestor ( talk) 20:19, 13 January 2010 (UTC)
Actually, that picture is not from the Huolongjing, so it is perhaps misleading to place it in the article, let alone the lead. I'll see if I can find a worthy replacement image.-- Pericles of Athens Talk 16:04, 19 July 2010 (UTC)
Hi Gnip. Are you certain about this? Prof. Gary Lee Todd did not provide any sort of wall plaque describing the artwork, but he did place the image in a page specifically labeled as showing Chinese artwork from its inception up to the end of the Han Dynasty. Could you provide some sort of comparison artworks from the Sui/Tang Dynasties? I've also seen many Han stone reliefs; some reliefs provided on that page by Professor Todd are unquestionably from Han period tomb walls. However, the lack of wear-and-tear and lanky artistic style on the image in question does raise an eyebrow or two, I will admit. I'll need more evidence, though, before I am totally convinced that the images should be removed. Cheers!-- Pericles of Athens Talk 05:08, 30 September 2010 (UTC)
do you have any sources about this?- Battle_of_Mohi#Usage_of_Gunpowder_and_Firearms. I've read before that Mongols used a type of catapult and/or rockets during their invasion of europe, but I'm not sure what they were called, all it said was that they were of Chinese design. DÜNGÁNÈ ( talk) 03:26, 31 July 2011 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current
Arbitration Committee election. The
Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia
arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose
site bans,
topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The
arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to
review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on
the voting page. For the Election committee,
MediaWiki message delivery (
talk)
13:41, 24 November 2015 (UTC)