![]() | Editing of this page by
new or
unregistered users is currently
disabled. See the protection policy and protection log for more details. If you cannot edit this page and you wish to make a change, you can request unprotection, log in, or create an account. |
Welcome!
Hello, Glitch Turner, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a
Wikipedian! Please
sign your messages on
discussion pages using four
tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out
Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{help me}}
before the question. Again, welcome!
—
Ched :
?
04:04, 10 May 2011 (UTC)
OK .. so .. do you want me to propose an unban at ANI? — Ched : ? 04:09, 10 May 2011 (UTC)
Glitch Turner ( block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser ( log))
Request reason:
Please unblock or contact the blocking administrator so that I can reply to the above and or to this. I would very much like to put my past behind me and feel the best way to bury the hatchet would be with open dialog between myself and Jayron32, Ched, and/or Bugs. If the event that this is denied, please paste this message (exclusive of the Unblock request) at ANI so that maybe the discussion can continue here. Thank you in advance for your consideration. Glitch Turner (talk) 10:44, 10 May 2011 (UTC)
Decline reason:
Unless there are exceptional circumstances, if you wish to be unblocked you need to request an unblock on your original account, not on one of your sockpuppet accounts. I see no indication of such exceptional circumstances in this case. JamesBWatson ( talk) 14:43, 10 May 2011 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{ unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
You may not be unblocked in order to participate at WP:ANI. You would type your response, sign it, and use {{ adminhelp}} asking an admin to copy/paste it over. If you are blocked due to WP:SOCK/ WP:EVADE then you MUST do this from your primary account. ( talk→ BWilkins ←track) 11:46, 10 May 2011 (UTC)
{{ adminhelp}}
{{ adminhelp}} Per JBW above, please ask him or another Admin post this for me:
Statement:
Please consider an unblock of this account. I have exerted much energy and wasted the time of others being disruptive in the past. It was wrong and I apologize for my immaturaty. I believe I can use my time and talents to be a productive member of the encyclopedia. I suggest the following:
If allowed, I am going to give 100% effort to turning over a new leaf and devote my energy to improvements here. If someone would be willing to help or mentor me, I think it would be even better. Thank you in advance for the consideration. Glitch Turner ( talk) 21:12, 10 May 2011 (UTC)
{{ adminhelp}} Admin, Please insert the below here as an indented bullet below DWeller's Support !vote:
Thank you in advance for considering this assistance. Glitch Turner ( talk) 12:28, 11 May 2011 (UTC)
Well, I did think that opinion at ANI was pretty evenly balanced lifting the ban and keeping it, and I put some thought into how to shift opinion more in your favour. Today I went back to the discussion to make another try, and found to my surprise that there had been a massive shift of opinion against you. I wondered why, but on looking further I found that at least part of the reason was this edit. You really know how to shoot yourself in the foot, don't you? There is no question whatever of my continuing to support the lifting of a ban on a person whose attitude is "if you don't do what I want then I will deliberately be uncooperative". How can anyone with such an obstructive attitude ever be trusted? I was one of your strongest supporters, but not any more, and I wonder how many others have also been turned against you by this attitude: some have actually said that they have. JamesBWatson ( talk) 09:43, 12 May 2011 (UTC)
You really don't know when you are onto a good thing, do you? There was a serious chance that you might be unbanned, but by more childish sockpuppetry you have blown that. This talk page has been protected to stop more of the same.
JamesBWatson (
talk)
14:50, 12 May 2011 (UTC)
Two things to say:
![]() | Editing of this page by
new or
unregistered users is currently
disabled. See the protection policy and protection log for more details. If you cannot edit this page and you wish to make a change, you can request unprotection, log in, or create an account. |
Welcome!
Hello, Glitch Turner, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a
Wikipedian! Please
sign your messages on
discussion pages using four
tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out
Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{help me}}
before the question. Again, welcome!
—
Ched :
?
04:04, 10 May 2011 (UTC)
OK .. so .. do you want me to propose an unban at ANI? — Ched : ? 04:09, 10 May 2011 (UTC)
Glitch Turner ( block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser ( log))
Request reason:
Please unblock or contact the blocking administrator so that I can reply to the above and or to this. I would very much like to put my past behind me and feel the best way to bury the hatchet would be with open dialog between myself and Jayron32, Ched, and/or Bugs. If the event that this is denied, please paste this message (exclusive of the Unblock request) at ANI so that maybe the discussion can continue here. Thank you in advance for your consideration. Glitch Turner (talk) 10:44, 10 May 2011 (UTC)
Decline reason:
Unless there are exceptional circumstances, if you wish to be unblocked you need to request an unblock on your original account, not on one of your sockpuppet accounts. I see no indication of such exceptional circumstances in this case. JamesBWatson ( talk) 14:43, 10 May 2011 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{ unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
You may not be unblocked in order to participate at WP:ANI. You would type your response, sign it, and use {{ adminhelp}} asking an admin to copy/paste it over. If you are blocked due to WP:SOCK/ WP:EVADE then you MUST do this from your primary account. ( talk→ BWilkins ←track) 11:46, 10 May 2011 (UTC)
{{ adminhelp}}
{{ adminhelp}} Per JBW above, please ask him or another Admin post this for me:
Statement:
Please consider an unblock of this account. I have exerted much energy and wasted the time of others being disruptive in the past. It was wrong and I apologize for my immaturaty. I believe I can use my time and talents to be a productive member of the encyclopedia. I suggest the following:
If allowed, I am going to give 100% effort to turning over a new leaf and devote my energy to improvements here. If someone would be willing to help or mentor me, I think it would be even better. Thank you in advance for the consideration. Glitch Turner ( talk) 21:12, 10 May 2011 (UTC)
{{ adminhelp}} Admin, Please insert the below here as an indented bullet below DWeller's Support !vote:
Thank you in advance for considering this assistance. Glitch Turner ( talk) 12:28, 11 May 2011 (UTC)
Well, I did think that opinion at ANI was pretty evenly balanced lifting the ban and keeping it, and I put some thought into how to shift opinion more in your favour. Today I went back to the discussion to make another try, and found to my surprise that there had been a massive shift of opinion against you. I wondered why, but on looking further I found that at least part of the reason was this edit. You really know how to shoot yourself in the foot, don't you? There is no question whatever of my continuing to support the lifting of a ban on a person whose attitude is "if you don't do what I want then I will deliberately be uncooperative". How can anyone with such an obstructive attitude ever be trusted? I was one of your strongest supporters, but not any more, and I wonder how many others have also been turned against you by this attitude: some have actually said that they have. JamesBWatson ( talk) 09:43, 12 May 2011 (UTC)
You really don't know when you are onto a good thing, do you? There was a serious chance that you might be unbanned, but by more childish sockpuppetry you have blown that. This talk page has been protected to stop more of the same.
JamesBWatson (
talk)
14:50, 12 May 2011 (UTC)
Two things to say: