|
||
This page has archives. Sections older than 15 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III when more than 4 sections are present. |
A gentle word of advice: go easy on the Twinkle reverting. Since the tool makes this process much easier, it's co-commitantly easier to make mistakes, and it's also very easy to get on the community's bad side through over-enthusiastic Twinkle use. You need to take as much time over reverting with Twinkle as you would if you were doing it manually - for example, issuing a top-level warning for an edit which actually tidied up the article is excessive - that edit probably shouldn't have been reverted in the first place. The notices above also seem to indicate that you aren't being as thorough as you might need to be with Twinkle. I mention this because I've seen more than one new editor dive headfirst into anti-vandalism, make mistakes, and end up blocked for disruption - you aren't at that point yet, and you can avoid it becoming a problem if you take care with your edits. Yunshui 雲 水 07:49, 17 August 2015 (UTC)
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at
Food Network Star (season 10). Your edits appear to be
disruptive and have been
reverted or removed.
Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive, until the dispute is resolved through consensus. Continuing to edit disruptively could result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you.. Your use of Twinkle to revert a valid edit not once but twice is disruptive, and bordering on edit warring. You clearly didn't do some basic research on the reverts you make; you obviously hadn't read the edit summary that accompanied my removal of the link to a TV show that will never happen or you'd never have reverted. You need to turn off Twinkle and get back to manual content editing, or find somewhere else to play. -- Drmargi ( talk) 18:28, 17 August 2015 (UTC)
Thank You Unframboise and Drmargi for both taking the high road and letting go for the sake of peace. I really appreciate it from both of you as that was the mature thing to do. Thank You both. GlacialFrost (Talk) 18:56, 17 August 2015 (UTC)
Drmargi GET OFF my page. I thought this was over but tou are trying to instigate a fight. Your comments are offensive. For example, you said all this- "Glacialfrost, you need to stop playing Mommy" "He's not competent" "twerp". You are trying to make things worse. I thought that you had done the right thing by calming down but clearly you havent. You are causing problems so please stop. GlacialFrost (Talk) 20:48, 17 August 2015 (UTC)
Hostile comment by Drmargi above Explained- Yunshui, you've got to get him under control or block him. He left his tablet running Twinkle to have breakfast (Twinkle is always running.) according to his message on my talk page, making how many (??)(Two, Drmargi literally says how many in the next sentence) unsupervised reverts, including reverting a valid edit I made TWICE in the course of a couple minutes. He's leaving a trail of aggressive and inappropriate warnings(All the warnings I post are template messages so how are they agressive, especially when they are posted properly and in response to vandalism.), ANV and SPI filings(ONE SPI filing not plural SPI filings) in his wake. Now, he's approaching 50% edits in talk space (Yes, 50% reverts of vandalism, 50% warnings to the vandals, there is nothing sinister about that.), mostly with aggressive and multiple warnings(Again, they cant be agressive if theyre template warnings. And Yes there are multiple warnings for multiple acts of previous vandalism that go unnoticed that I dig up from their contributions.), and generally playing hall monitor with ONE WEEK's experience on the site. He's not competent to be doing anything fighting vandalism(Clearly an unwarranted insult), when he clearly has no grasp of the basics of editing (The fact that I am typing in superscript right now proves that wrong)and, having made a gesture at content production, has abandoned it in favor of running Twinkle full time(Fighting vandalism is more satisfying for me and it feels more productive. Also I havent abandoned content production, I still come back to it now and then. And there is no problem in wanting to fight vandalism over making content, both help out.. He's not here to build an encyclopedia(The article I created on Daniel Burnett says otherwise), and the sooner we come to grips with the growing disruption he's becoming, the better. GlacialFrost (Talk) 20:52, 17 August 2015 (UTC)
Im sorry that I offended you. I am not going to participate in any arguments so lets continue to stay away from each other as before as contact between us is not productive.So, I advise you to follow your own words and not prolong this argument. Let it go.
Im not exactly sure what happened Floquenbeam but I assume that the rollback button was pushed then drmargi reverted and then it was pushed again. But Im not too sure what exactly happened. I claim responsibility for the edits that were made but I am not exactly sure how they were made. GlacialFrost (Talk) 22:32, 17 August 2015 (UTC)
All of you have done a great job of scaring me off. This is all too stressful for me and is becoming unenjoyable for me. I may return one day but for now, Ive had enough.
And there, my friends, is the final evidence that this is, indeed, User:The Editor of All Things Wikipedia, who made the same sort of diva quit after the same sort of interactions with other editors. -- Drmargi ( talk) 23:52, 17 August 2015 (UTC)
Just in case GlacialFrost returns, I want to explain what I mean by "technically impossible". Unless he was intentionally faking edit summaries (in which case, block for intentional harassment, lying, and demonstrating a level of knowledge incompatible with being a newbie), he reverted using the Twinkle rollback button that appears either on a contributions page, or a diff of a page. When you use Twinkle to rollback, it goes to an edit summary page that you have to click on. So GlacialFrost would have had to:
So, GlacialFrost, when I block you indef in a minute, it is not because of "two reverts accidental or not", it's because you are harassing someone, and (thinking that you're smarter than you actually are, or we're dumber than we actually are) making up a story about it, demonstrating an attitude incompatible with editing here. -- Floquenbeam ( talk) 02:57, 18 August 2015 (UTC)
|
||
This page has archives. Sections older than 15 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III when more than 4 sections are present. |
A gentle word of advice: go easy on the Twinkle reverting. Since the tool makes this process much easier, it's co-commitantly easier to make mistakes, and it's also very easy to get on the community's bad side through over-enthusiastic Twinkle use. You need to take as much time over reverting with Twinkle as you would if you were doing it manually - for example, issuing a top-level warning for an edit which actually tidied up the article is excessive - that edit probably shouldn't have been reverted in the first place. The notices above also seem to indicate that you aren't being as thorough as you might need to be with Twinkle. I mention this because I've seen more than one new editor dive headfirst into anti-vandalism, make mistakes, and end up blocked for disruption - you aren't at that point yet, and you can avoid it becoming a problem if you take care with your edits. Yunshui 雲 水 07:49, 17 August 2015 (UTC)
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at
Food Network Star (season 10). Your edits appear to be
disruptive and have been
reverted or removed.
Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive, until the dispute is resolved through consensus. Continuing to edit disruptively could result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you.. Your use of Twinkle to revert a valid edit not once but twice is disruptive, and bordering on edit warring. You clearly didn't do some basic research on the reverts you make; you obviously hadn't read the edit summary that accompanied my removal of the link to a TV show that will never happen or you'd never have reverted. You need to turn off Twinkle and get back to manual content editing, or find somewhere else to play. -- Drmargi ( talk) 18:28, 17 August 2015 (UTC)
Thank You Unframboise and Drmargi for both taking the high road and letting go for the sake of peace. I really appreciate it from both of you as that was the mature thing to do. Thank You both. GlacialFrost (Talk) 18:56, 17 August 2015 (UTC)
Drmargi GET OFF my page. I thought this was over but tou are trying to instigate a fight. Your comments are offensive. For example, you said all this- "Glacialfrost, you need to stop playing Mommy" "He's not competent" "twerp". You are trying to make things worse. I thought that you had done the right thing by calming down but clearly you havent. You are causing problems so please stop. GlacialFrost (Talk) 20:48, 17 August 2015 (UTC)
Hostile comment by Drmargi above Explained- Yunshui, you've got to get him under control or block him. He left his tablet running Twinkle to have breakfast (Twinkle is always running.) according to his message on my talk page, making how many (??)(Two, Drmargi literally says how many in the next sentence) unsupervised reverts, including reverting a valid edit I made TWICE in the course of a couple minutes. He's leaving a trail of aggressive and inappropriate warnings(All the warnings I post are template messages so how are they agressive, especially when they are posted properly and in response to vandalism.), ANV and SPI filings(ONE SPI filing not plural SPI filings) in his wake. Now, he's approaching 50% edits in talk space (Yes, 50% reverts of vandalism, 50% warnings to the vandals, there is nothing sinister about that.), mostly with aggressive and multiple warnings(Again, they cant be agressive if theyre template warnings. And Yes there are multiple warnings for multiple acts of previous vandalism that go unnoticed that I dig up from their contributions.), and generally playing hall monitor with ONE WEEK's experience on the site. He's not competent to be doing anything fighting vandalism(Clearly an unwarranted insult), when he clearly has no grasp of the basics of editing (The fact that I am typing in superscript right now proves that wrong)and, having made a gesture at content production, has abandoned it in favor of running Twinkle full time(Fighting vandalism is more satisfying for me and it feels more productive. Also I havent abandoned content production, I still come back to it now and then. And there is no problem in wanting to fight vandalism over making content, both help out.. He's not here to build an encyclopedia(The article I created on Daniel Burnett says otherwise), and the sooner we come to grips with the growing disruption he's becoming, the better. GlacialFrost (Talk) 20:52, 17 August 2015 (UTC)
Im sorry that I offended you. I am not going to participate in any arguments so lets continue to stay away from each other as before as contact between us is not productive.So, I advise you to follow your own words and not prolong this argument. Let it go.
Im not exactly sure what happened Floquenbeam but I assume that the rollback button was pushed then drmargi reverted and then it was pushed again. But Im not too sure what exactly happened. I claim responsibility for the edits that were made but I am not exactly sure how they were made. GlacialFrost (Talk) 22:32, 17 August 2015 (UTC)
All of you have done a great job of scaring me off. This is all too stressful for me and is becoming unenjoyable for me. I may return one day but for now, Ive had enough.
And there, my friends, is the final evidence that this is, indeed, User:The Editor of All Things Wikipedia, who made the same sort of diva quit after the same sort of interactions with other editors. -- Drmargi ( talk) 23:52, 17 August 2015 (UTC)
Just in case GlacialFrost returns, I want to explain what I mean by "technically impossible". Unless he was intentionally faking edit summaries (in which case, block for intentional harassment, lying, and demonstrating a level of knowledge incompatible with being a newbie), he reverted using the Twinkle rollback button that appears either on a contributions page, or a diff of a page. When you use Twinkle to rollback, it goes to an edit summary page that you have to click on. So GlacialFrost would have had to:
So, GlacialFrost, when I block you indef in a minute, it is not because of "two reverts accidental or not", it's because you are harassing someone, and (thinking that you're smarter than you actually are, or we're dumber than we actually are) making up a story about it, demonstrating an attitude incompatible with editing here. -- Floquenbeam ( talk) 02:57, 18 August 2015 (UTC)