|
|
Whether you did it backwards or not depends on what you are trying to do. What are you trying to do?— Kww( talk) 22:01, 25 January 2010 (UTC)
Hello, I see that some users can create sub-pages from their user pages, so how can I do that? Thanks. DATABASE-owenhwlo ( talk) 13:42, 27 January 2010 (UTC)
Ikip 05:06, 28 January 2010 (UTC) (refactored) Ikip 02:34, 29 January 2010 (UTC)
Thanks a million for taking the time to comment at
the biography of living persons. I think
Wikipedia:Mistagged BLP cleanup is a good idea.
Ikip
21:01, 28 January 2010 (UTC)
Hi, Gigs. Because you participated in Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Septemberboy009/Blades (band), you may be interested in Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Septemberboy009/Ayush Goyal. Cunard ( talk) 23:37, 31 January 2010 (UTC)
I'm saddened that you misinterpreted my motives here, I was not intending to be disruptive and sincerely believe that this policy page no longer has any useful function. From my reading of the MfD guidance I thought that such nominations were sometimes acceptable. I've edited this guidance to make it clear that this is not the case diff. Tim Vickers ( talk) 23:00, 1 February 2010 (UTC)
I tried to follow what I believe was agreed on as a compromise on Talk:Butters' Bottom Bitch, but merely get reverted and get these [1] type of messages on my talkpage (which I find somewhat condescending). Could you have another look at the discussion?
Peter Isotalo 00:30, 3 February 2010 (UTC)
I've removed your note about his spelling from his talk page. There wasn't anything wrong with it, and it's something that's been brought to his attention before, but we just got finished with an AN/I thread where another user was hounding him about it, and he's understandably frustrated at the moment. CE is a minor who justifiably feels that he's been picked on and I'd like to give him a little bit of a break. I'm sure your note was well-intentioned, but, through no fault on your end, it happened to be poorly timed. I hope that's okay with you. Let me know if it isn't, and I'll self-revert. Thanks, Throwaway85 ( talk) 12:06, 4 February 2010 (UTC)
As someone who commented on the BLP workshop I created, please review this proposal to see if it is something that the community would support.
Harsh constructive criticism is very welcome!
Better to figure out the potential objections now. I am looking to remedy any potential objections by the community.
Thanks. Okip (formerly Ikip) 03:23, 8 February 2010 (UTC)
I strongly encourage you to consider Coffee's proposal.
RE: "I oppose tagging them all up front. It will cause a lot of problems. If your proposal was to actually tag 124 per day, that would be fine with me. I still support waiting until the natural reduction of the backlog levels off before prodding anything."
RE: "Mass prod tagging will lead to random passers-by untagging articles of clearly notable people without understanding what we are doing here. When people see that the leading person in their field is "proposed for deletion" they aren't going to understand the 100 pages of discussion that lead us to this seemingly irrational conclusion of proposing a clearly notable person for deletion. We should minimize the amount of time that any prod tags are on articles, so that the outside world doesn't freak out and unknowingly sabotage us."
I accidentally deleted a comment of yours on there a few minutes ago. It was reverted thankfully, but I wanted to let you know that it wasn't my intention. I was editing from my blackberry and I somehow didn't get any notice of an edit conflict. On an unrelated note, you may want to move your comment to the bottom of the discussion so that people can reply to it more easily. Gigs ( talk) 18:18, 10 February 2010 (UTC)
You are being notified because you participated in a previous Afd regarding this article, either at Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Argentina–Singapore_relations or at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Philippines–Romania relations, and you deserve a chance to weigh in on this article once again. -- Cdogsimmons ( talk) 00:14, 11 February 2010 (UTC)
![]() |
The Unreferenced living persons contest |
Please help us build this contest. Your suggestions are warmly welcome. >> Sign up now. << |
Okip BLP Contest 18:18, 14 February 2010 (UTC)
We may not agree on much, but we sure run in the same circles. Thanks for keeping this 'ol wikilawyer using his head for something more than a hatrack. Regards,
TRANSPORTERMAN (
TALK)
02:16, 17 February 2010 (UTC) has given you a
dove! Doves promote
WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day happier. Spread the WikiLove by giving someone else a dove, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past (this fits perfectly) or a good friend. Cheers!
Spread the peace of doves by adding {{ subst:Peace dove}} to someone's talk page with a friendly message!
whta are u doin —Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.200.80.113 ( talk) 21:45, 17 February 2010 (UTC)
You appear to not have understood the discussion, I have not accused anyone of anti semitic comments, I have said that the other users comments about anyone are worthless accusations of anti Semitic that do not even exist, have a good read before you comment as you don't appear to have understood what was going on, if yuou want to discuss it more I welcome that. thanks.
You have come and said this....Off2riorob's accusation of antisemitism is completely off the wall and unfounded as far as I can see. Off2riorob, remember to assume good faith.
Please show me where I have accused anybody of anti semitism? As I have not at all, have you really read the discussion? IMO you havn't understood it at all, please explain your comment. Off2riorob ( talk) 00:06, 20 February 2010 (UTC)
Verbal chat 14:34, 22 February 2010 (UTC)
Please remember to
assume good faith when dealing with other editors, which you did not do on
Talk:Dara Ó Briain. Thank you.
Verbal
chat
15:44, 22 February 2010 (UTC)
|
|
Whether you did it backwards or not depends on what you are trying to do. What are you trying to do?— Kww( talk) 22:01, 25 January 2010 (UTC)
Hello, I see that some users can create sub-pages from their user pages, so how can I do that? Thanks. DATABASE-owenhwlo ( talk) 13:42, 27 January 2010 (UTC)
Ikip 05:06, 28 January 2010 (UTC) (refactored) Ikip 02:34, 29 January 2010 (UTC)
Thanks a million for taking the time to comment at
the biography of living persons. I think
Wikipedia:Mistagged BLP cleanup is a good idea.
Ikip
21:01, 28 January 2010 (UTC)
Hi, Gigs. Because you participated in Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Septemberboy009/Blades (band), you may be interested in Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Septemberboy009/Ayush Goyal. Cunard ( talk) 23:37, 31 January 2010 (UTC)
I'm saddened that you misinterpreted my motives here, I was not intending to be disruptive and sincerely believe that this policy page no longer has any useful function. From my reading of the MfD guidance I thought that such nominations were sometimes acceptable. I've edited this guidance to make it clear that this is not the case diff. Tim Vickers ( talk) 23:00, 1 February 2010 (UTC)
I tried to follow what I believe was agreed on as a compromise on Talk:Butters' Bottom Bitch, but merely get reverted and get these [1] type of messages on my talkpage (which I find somewhat condescending). Could you have another look at the discussion?
Peter Isotalo 00:30, 3 February 2010 (UTC)
I've removed your note about his spelling from his talk page. There wasn't anything wrong with it, and it's something that's been brought to his attention before, but we just got finished with an AN/I thread where another user was hounding him about it, and he's understandably frustrated at the moment. CE is a minor who justifiably feels that he's been picked on and I'd like to give him a little bit of a break. I'm sure your note was well-intentioned, but, through no fault on your end, it happened to be poorly timed. I hope that's okay with you. Let me know if it isn't, and I'll self-revert. Thanks, Throwaway85 ( talk) 12:06, 4 February 2010 (UTC)
As someone who commented on the BLP workshop I created, please review this proposal to see if it is something that the community would support.
Harsh constructive criticism is very welcome!
Better to figure out the potential objections now. I am looking to remedy any potential objections by the community.
Thanks. Okip (formerly Ikip) 03:23, 8 February 2010 (UTC)
I strongly encourage you to consider Coffee's proposal.
RE: "I oppose tagging them all up front. It will cause a lot of problems. If your proposal was to actually tag 124 per day, that would be fine with me. I still support waiting until the natural reduction of the backlog levels off before prodding anything."
RE: "Mass prod tagging will lead to random passers-by untagging articles of clearly notable people without understanding what we are doing here. When people see that the leading person in their field is "proposed for deletion" they aren't going to understand the 100 pages of discussion that lead us to this seemingly irrational conclusion of proposing a clearly notable person for deletion. We should minimize the amount of time that any prod tags are on articles, so that the outside world doesn't freak out and unknowingly sabotage us."
I accidentally deleted a comment of yours on there a few minutes ago. It was reverted thankfully, but I wanted to let you know that it wasn't my intention. I was editing from my blackberry and I somehow didn't get any notice of an edit conflict. On an unrelated note, you may want to move your comment to the bottom of the discussion so that people can reply to it more easily. Gigs ( talk) 18:18, 10 February 2010 (UTC)
You are being notified because you participated in a previous Afd regarding this article, either at Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Argentina–Singapore_relations or at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Philippines–Romania relations, and you deserve a chance to weigh in on this article once again. -- Cdogsimmons ( talk) 00:14, 11 February 2010 (UTC)
![]() |
The Unreferenced living persons contest |
Please help us build this contest. Your suggestions are warmly welcome. >> Sign up now. << |
Okip BLP Contest 18:18, 14 February 2010 (UTC)
We may not agree on much, but we sure run in the same circles. Thanks for keeping this 'ol wikilawyer using his head for something more than a hatrack. Regards,
TRANSPORTERMAN (
TALK)
02:16, 17 February 2010 (UTC) has given you a
dove! Doves promote
WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day happier. Spread the WikiLove by giving someone else a dove, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past (this fits perfectly) or a good friend. Cheers!
Spread the peace of doves by adding {{ subst:Peace dove}} to someone's talk page with a friendly message!
whta are u doin —Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.200.80.113 ( talk) 21:45, 17 February 2010 (UTC)
You appear to not have understood the discussion, I have not accused anyone of anti semitic comments, I have said that the other users comments about anyone are worthless accusations of anti Semitic that do not even exist, have a good read before you comment as you don't appear to have understood what was going on, if yuou want to discuss it more I welcome that. thanks.
You have come and said this....Off2riorob's accusation of antisemitism is completely off the wall and unfounded as far as I can see. Off2riorob, remember to assume good faith.
Please show me where I have accused anybody of anti semitism? As I have not at all, have you really read the discussion? IMO you havn't understood it at all, please explain your comment. Off2riorob ( talk) 00:06, 20 February 2010 (UTC)
Verbal chat 14:34, 22 February 2010 (UTC)
Please remember to
assume good faith when dealing with other editors, which you did not do on
Talk:Dara Ó Briain. Thank you.
Verbal
chat
15:44, 22 February 2010 (UTC)