Do you know the length that the song spent at the top of the Dutch Top 40? — Eternal Equinox | talk 23:06, 19 May 2006 (UTC)
I would like to add Beyonce Video Collection http://beyonceknowlesfan.com/indexvideo.html for Beyonce Knowles External Link. This is a good link as it gives viewer a better insight for Beyonce. Ben Sherman 16:23, 22 May 2006 (UTC)
Thanks for catching the vandalism on my user page. It's the first time my user page has been vandalized. I feel kind of special. Sue Anne 20:02, 22 May 2006 (UTC)
Posted by Pruneau 21:46, 23 May 2006 (UTC), on behalf of the AID Maintenance Team
![]() |
Thank you, Getcrunk/Archive 4! Thank you for voting for my recent RfA, which passed (to my extreme surprise and shock) with a total tally of 66/15/2. For that, I would like to thank you and offer a helping hand in any admin-related tasks that may be required -- it's as simple as leaving a message on my talkpage. Thanks again! -→ Buchanan-Hermit ™/ !? 22:32, 23 May 2006 (UTC) |
You included me in the category of liberal wikipedians
I am an economic liberal (libertarian), not a liberal. I corrected the mistake. Regards. User:Vincent shooter 21:34, 26 May 2006 (UTC)
Hello again, getcrunk. You wrote: "It is important to keep a cool head, especially when responding to comments against you or your edits. Personal attacks and disruptive comments only escalate a situation...", etc. I agree, and my head is quite cool. I believe I have not attacked you, as such was never my intention. It's just that I don't understand your motives to make you revert --twice-- such a small, albeit positive contribution on my part, as I see it. You responded by referring me to the NPOV (which I already knew) and Lead Section (which I didn't) official policy pages. Thanks, but that does not answer my questions. As I regard this as a matter of honour, I ask you to please be thorough (if you are willing to answer this) so as to to help me undertand your motives. When I added the TWO words "world-famous" in the (Kylie Minogue article) introduction, what exactly did you not find agreeable? Do you assert that such statement is false? If not, why in your opinion did I divert from a NPOV for stating such a fact?
The reason I ask is because I still cannot grasp the logic behind all those 'edit wars' raging out there in the Wikipedia. For instance, if someone wrote that Adolf Hitler was a madman and a murderous monster, there would be always someone else eager to delete such statement on the grounds of not complying with the NPOV policy, regardless of the absolute, undeniable truth of that statement. Why is that so? Why cannot facts be allowed, no matter how harsh or disgusting (or complimentary, as in the case of K. Minogue) they may be?
Thank you for your trouble, getcrunk. By the way, I'm getting to like your contributions.
P.D. I invite you to review the article on The Carpenters. Surely you'll find the high-praise comments ("the biggest selling artists of the 1970s"", "leading exponents of the soft rock or adult contemporary genre and ranking among the foremost recording artists of the decade") more guilty against NPOV policy than my humble "world-famous" remark about Kylie Minogue. However, seemingly no one has protested until now. AVM 02:16, 28 May 2006 (UTC)
Are you a now an admin?-- LooseTheHotButtonS 16:31, 28 May 2006 (UTC)
Please remove the Fair use images from your userpage. Thanks in advance! -- getcrunkjuice contribs 01:00, 29 May 2006 (UTC)
Good catch adding the {{ copyvio}} tag to Guadalajara key attractions. However, you left the copyvio material there! I removed it for you, just letting you know. Mango juice talk 20:34, 30 May 2006 (UTC)
On May 27 you {{prod}}ded the article kitten cannon. An IP only user removed the tag a short time later. I am replacing the tag because I think it is a non-notable game, and wanted to inform you about it so you could watch for the vote. In the case that the tag is removed again, I will seek admin help. PrometheusX303 15:16, 2 June 2006 (UTC)
The user in question is a sockpuppet of User:Bonaparte that has been banned. Please stop him. He wants to remove a one-day old discussion from the notice board because he's ashamed of the gays of Bucharest. -- Candide, or Optimism 16:30, 3 June 2006 (UTC)
Answer on my talk page. -- GDP 16:30, 3 June 2006 (UTC)
I belive you left a message in my talk box. I'm trying to imrpove the Serie A section of wikipeida. I'm currently adding each of the tables for Serie A going back for years. Adding into this, I've added links to an unrelated website which gives squads for Serie A for each individual year. I felt I was adding vital information. Could you please highlight exactly what I did that was wrong ? Niall123 19:09, 3 June 2006 (UTC)
Why do you repeatedly add songs' chart positions on personal charts to Wikipedia? Unless these charts claim notablity, I don't understand why they should be here. -- getcrunkjuice contribs 20:48, 3 June 2006 (UTC)
Hey Getcrunk! I have recieved a nomination for adminship which can be seen here. Please feel free to add to it. Thanks so much. -- Underneath-it-All 21:51, 7 June 2006 (UTC)
Hey Getcrunk, thanks for supporting my request for adminship! Unfortunately, it ended with a final tally of 5/17/3. Thanks again! Underneath-it-All 17:16, 8 June 2006 (UTC)
You removed a link on the social networking link saying 'rv spam'. I do not understand your reasoning. The section refers to many social networks by name 'Blended networking is an approach to social networking that combines both offline elements (face-to-face events) and online elements. MySpace, for example, builds on independent music and party scenes, and Facebook mirrors a college community. The newest social networks on the Internet are becoming more focused on niches such as art, tennis, football (soccer), golf, cars, dog owners, and even cosmetic surgery. ' I was providing a link to illustrate the point of the 'newest' social networks. GolfBuzz is a legitimate player in the niche social netowrk space and was trying to illustrate the point. Please respond so I can modify. I am still learning what is acceptable and want to conribute positively Prcoulson 23:27, 8 June 2006 (UTC)
Crunk, you were very helpful before and was hoping you could help me get a listing back. I added GolfBuzz to the ' List_of_social_networking_websites' and it was removed for the reason 'non-notable and not social networking'. The site has over 16,000 members and it is one of the few professional 'niche' social networking sites. It is defintely a social network. It allows its members to create profiles and connect with one another. In addition to allowing individuals to create neighborhoods it also allows courses to create profiles and companies to create "Neighborhoods". Golfers can also connect and join these course communities and neighborhoods. GolfBuzz is one of the few professionally built 'niche' social networking sites. It is truly an open social network which allows more than just individuals to create profiles. In addition GolfBuzz has been in the press considerably in the past few months. Placements include Information week The Business Chronicle (Atlanta Edition), Information Week [1], PR Week, etc. I am new to contributing and would love improve my posts. Prcoulson 13:53, 9 June 2006 (UTC)
Crunk, you just removed a link (rm spam) although not even two comments above you told me to add it (See Question). In addition you added GolfBuzz to the list of social networking sites but it has been removed by an IP user, again. I do not understand. I follow the recommendations from the editors and the editors themselves seem to be canceling each other out. GolfBuzz is a social network. It has over 16,000 members it is truly and ‘open’ community. It even contributes its golf content to wikipedia. Users can invite people into their networks, plan rounds, review courses, etc. I do not mind being edited but I definitely do mind wasting my time, being told to do one thing and then have it changed on me. Can you please help me out here. I am having fun contributing to the success of the site but I am getting frustrated on all the removals. Especially when it seems the management is not agreeing. Can you add the link back to the niche site it is good to have examples and can you also add it back to the list of social networking sites. Prcoulson 19:41, 10 June 2006 (UTC)
No idea what your talking about when it comes to putting in vandalism. I've been updating that article for over 5 months. Please just leave me be you seem to be the only one who has ever had a problem with me. AcePuppy 00:28, 12 June 2006 (UTC)
Getcrunk, do you have any idea about how to make a navigational toolbar at the bottom of Janet's page to link directly to her albums and singles. You can look at the bottom of Christina Aguilera's page to see what I mean. Janet has one presently for her siblings. Maddyfan 07:11, 12 June 2006 (UTC)
thanks for not getting my joke :( I wanted someone to add "the previous unsigned comment, blah blah" cause that was all the rage on that thread. -- kizzle 01:16, 13 June 2006 (UTC)
Hi - you removed a fair use image from the Arctic Monkeys article, specifically the band's logo. We have discussed this elsewhere - mainly on WikiProject Albums and the like - and it is accepted that band's logos form an integral part of the branding of the band. Logos such as those of Oasis, Foo Fighters or Nirvana become representative of the band, and therefore need to be included in an article about the band. Given that an infobox provides the opportunity to use it, it seems senseless to have to use it elsewhere on the page. Accordingly, I have re-instated the logo. Obviously if you disagree, feel free to bring it up at Talk:Arctic Monkeys or my talk page. Cheers, DJR ( Talk) 22:15, 14 June 2006 (UTC)
![]() |
Dear Getcrunk/Archive 4, thanks so much for your support during my recent successful request for adminship. I really appreciate it. Let me know if you need any administrative support; just leave me a message on my talk page or send me an e-mail if it's urgent. Take care man, hope studying is well, and hope the exams will be done soon! -- Samir धर्म 06:06, 15 June 2006 (UTC) |
Thanks for helping revert 65.138.68.52 ( talk • contribs • page moves • block user • block log)'s vandalism. :-) Netscott 22:26, 15 June 2006 (UTC)
I found this information, and I'm not sure what to do with it. It's for Janet's new single, "Call On Me".
JanetJackson.cn:
Janet's latest single, "Call On Me", featuring Nelly has already proven popular with 184 spins in just one day, according to Media Base. Spins are as follows:
Pop radio: 44 spins Urban radio: 54 spins Urban Adult Contemporary: 5 spins R'n'b radio: 81 spins
Collectively, the 184 spins generated audience impressions to make a total of 4.358 million audience impressions. Make sure you request Janet on your local radio station!
http://www.mmr247.com/ (MediaBase) Buzzed1 20:37, 18 June 2006 (UTC)
You participated in the Finola Hackett AfD. Please also join the discussion here: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Saryn Hooks (second nomination). Thank you. - CrazyRussian talk/ email 17:28, 19 June 2006 (UTC)
Yes, I'm not an administrator, but thanks for the compliment! I've returned for now, but I'm not sure if I'm ready to become an admin. However, if somebody were to nominate me, I wouldn't decline. Extraordinary Machine 18:23, 19 June 2006 (UTC)
![]() |
Thanks for voting! Hello Getcrunk/Archive 4, and thank you so much for voting in my recent RfA. I am pleased to inform you that it passed with a final tally of (119/1/3), into the WP:100, so I have now been cleared for adminship and will soon be soaring above the clouds. I was overjoyed, shocked, and humbled by the tally, and, most importantly, all the support. Thank you. If there is ever anything you need, you know where you can find me. Take care. |
-- Pilot| guy 22:43, 19 June 2006 (UTC)
/me runs for the hills. Bishonen | talk 18:44, 20 June 2006 (UTC).
Even though you were reverting vandalism, I don't want anyone dumb enough to support Quebec sovereignty to touch my user page in any way. Biff Loman 22:05, 20 June 2006 (UTC)
Thanks for keeping an eye out for trolls on my talk page. No harm done with the TOC thing. I was even in the process of making a report when you left the message! I'll keep an eye on that page. That user seems to have problem with being civil towards editors, as I discovered by looking through his contributions. -- getcrunk ? 02:17, 21 June 2006 (UTC)
Wow, thanks! This was a little unexpected. Well, I've accepted, though I'm a little unsure about this...:) Thanks again. Extraordinary Machine 22:25, 22 June 2006 (UTC)
You replied to my question about images in the Wikipedia_talk:Userboxes page. I was wondering if you could help me figure out how I'm going wrong with this code. I used the template and then entered the image using the correct syntax. Here's my code with nowiki and pre tags.
<pre> {{subst:Bol |border-c = #00ff00 |border-s = 5 |id-c = #ffffff |id-s = 12 |id-fc = #ffffff |info-c = #ffff00 |info-s = 8 |info-fc = #008000 |id = [[Image:Boltshirtcloseup.JPG|thumb|45px]] |info = This user is an avid listener of the Buzz Out Loud Podcast. He or she is very greatful for the work that [[Tom|Tom Merritt]], [[Molly|Molly Wood]], and [[Veronica|Veronica Belmont]] do to enrich his or her life. }} </pre>
Thanks! Alexbrewer 22:35, 22 June 2006 (UTC)
My final edits will be made on Wikipedia on June 26. After this date, the only edits I will make will be occasional pop-culture updates. Thanks for your kindness and your time. Take care! — Eternal Equinox | talk 22:58, 22 June 2006 (UTC)
Thank you for your interest in VandalProof, Getcrunk! You have now been added to the list of authorized users, so if you haven't already, simply download and install VandalProof from our main page. If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me or any other moderator, or you can post a message on the discussion page. — Xyra e l / 07:02, 23 June 2006 (UTC) 07:02, 23 June 2006 (UTC)
I left questions at your RFA. I was blocked from editing the page because I use AOL, so they are on the talk page, please move them. Hort Graz 21:02, 25 June 2006 (UTC)
I have filed an RFAR against User:Eternal_Equinox listing you as an involved party at [ [2]]. -- HeyNow10029 23:25, 25 June 2006 (UTC)
You deleted a site I added to Social Networking at the same time you deleted another. I would like it to be added back. As far as I can tell, there is no mention of the sites having to have a certain number of members. I would like clarification on how and why you feel justified in doing so. I don't mean to be rude, but, its a list of Social Networking sites. Maybe a new category should be made for the largest sites, huh? A list is a list and I think all Social Networking sites should be able to be listed as long as they are a social networking site. nilly1a 01:47, 26 June 2006 (UTC)Nilly1A nilly1a 01:47, 26 June 2006 (UTC)
I noticed the comments about ten minute vandalism reports at your RfA (which I may yet vote in). I'd suggest adding User:Voice of All/RC/monobook.js. It gives you some handy javascript tools, including a one-click report button (all you have to do is type your reason). I've been using it for a few weeks and find it great. I thought it might be worth a whirl for you. Cheers and happy vandal-fighting!-- Kchase02 T 08:41, 26 June 2006 (UTC)
Thanks for your welcome message. Wow, that was a very polite wayof saying that I did something stupid. I really didn't mean to. In your message you said "your changes were deleted/removed". But actually all changes I made are still online, as far as I can see. Could you please be more specific on what I did wrong. It would also help to me to improve my skills. Wisser 19:35, 26 June 2006 (UTC)
Is there a tag for "already been moved to commons?" The IfD tag was probably the wrong one to use for this case (at least, if it works like AfD does). Rklawton 01:37, 27 June 2006 (UTC)
Screw them don't change your username just because they want you to. ILovePlankton 04:33, 28 June 2006 (UTC)
Having supported you last time, I am supporting you this time as well (although your tastes in music are rather disquieting; I'll let that slide for the moment). I was going to ask a follow-up question to that posed by User:BigDT apropos of your username, but I'm certain it would have done more harm than good. In any case, I'll leave it here in order that you might answer it if you like, although, as you will see, it's rather a rhetorical (or at best leading) question.
Can we start marking the charts for the song? From Billboard:
Just when you thought the smoke cleared from Beyonce's chart-burning debut at No. 20 on last week's Billboard Radio Monitor R&B/Hip-Hop Airplay chart, "Call One Me" by Janet Jackson with Nelly shines one spot higher to become the best debut on the list in seven years ... The No. 19 entry is the highest at the format since TLC's "No Scrubs" landed at No. 13 in February 1999. Meanwhile, "Call's" No. 28 debut on the Rhythmic Top 40 chart gives Jackson her first appearance as a lead artist at the format since "Son Of A Gun" entered the chart in November 2001. (Why such a long time? None of the singles from Jackson's last album, 2004's "Damita Jo," charted on the Rhythmic Top 40 list.) ... "Call" also opens at No. 36 at Adult R&B and No. 38 at Mainstream Top 40 ... "Call On Me" is the first single from Jackson's ninth studio album, "20 Years Old," due out later this year.
Thank you for the help! Buzzed1 11:43, 29 June 2006 (UTC)
Hello, I would be interested in finding out how I cite references from other websites onto an article on WP. I am new to this resource and would appreciate information on this issue. Thanks for your welcome. Starsweep 14:30, 29 June 2006 (UTC)
I like what you did in rearranging Notes, Filmography, etc. Good work.
There's a "Quotations" section that seems out of place in the middle of all those fine-print-like references. I'm thinking that it belongs right above the Bibliography. Since you're the Master of Rearrangement in this area, I'll leave it to you to decide and act. Lou Sander 15:15, 29 June 2006 (UTC)
Also, Notes 1-8 are badly in need of cleanup. (Too much http://, NYT link requires membership, etc.) I'd fix it myself, but I don't know how. Lou Sander 15:32, 29 June 2006 (UTC)
Thanks for the reversion. CambridgeBayWeather (Talk) 16:57, 29 June 2006 (UTC)
Hi. I saw your post there, and it seems like you haven't received a reply. It sounds like you are looking for Wikipedia:Editor review. — getcrunk what?! 17:31, 29 June 2006 (UTC)
Thanks :). Like I said in other places, I just hope I don't break something... Extraordinary Machine 23:58, 29 June 2006 (UTC)
Hello,
An Arbitration case involving you has been opened: Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Eternal Equinox. Please add evidence to the evidence sub-page, Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Eternal Equinox/Evidence. You may also contribute to the case on the workshop sub-page, Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Eternal Equinox/Workshop.
On behalf of the Arbitration Committee, -- Tony Sidaway 11:22, 1 July 2006 (UTC)
Ah, good, someone else putting in some evidence. I noticed your two May 28, 2006 RfA diffs are the same diff. — Bunchofgrapes ( talk) 19:00, 2 July 2006 (UTC)
I am sorry to inform you that your Request for Adminship (RfA) has failed to reach sufficient consensus for promotion, and has now been delisted and archived. Please do not look upon this outcome as a discouragement, but rather as an opportunity to improve. Try to address the concerns raised during your RfA and, in a few months' time, resubmit your request. Thank you for offering to serve Wikipedia in this capacity! Redux 19:27, 2 July 2006 (UTC)
Do you know the length that the song spent at the top of the Dutch Top 40? — Eternal Equinox | talk 23:06, 19 May 2006 (UTC)
I would like to add Beyonce Video Collection http://beyonceknowlesfan.com/indexvideo.html for Beyonce Knowles External Link. This is a good link as it gives viewer a better insight for Beyonce. Ben Sherman 16:23, 22 May 2006 (UTC)
Thanks for catching the vandalism on my user page. It's the first time my user page has been vandalized. I feel kind of special. Sue Anne 20:02, 22 May 2006 (UTC)
Posted by Pruneau 21:46, 23 May 2006 (UTC), on behalf of the AID Maintenance Team
![]() |
Thank you, Getcrunk/Archive 4! Thank you for voting for my recent RfA, which passed (to my extreme surprise and shock) with a total tally of 66/15/2. For that, I would like to thank you and offer a helping hand in any admin-related tasks that may be required -- it's as simple as leaving a message on my talkpage. Thanks again! -→ Buchanan-Hermit ™/ !? 22:32, 23 May 2006 (UTC) |
You included me in the category of liberal wikipedians
I am an economic liberal (libertarian), not a liberal. I corrected the mistake. Regards. User:Vincent shooter 21:34, 26 May 2006 (UTC)
Hello again, getcrunk. You wrote: "It is important to keep a cool head, especially when responding to comments against you or your edits. Personal attacks and disruptive comments only escalate a situation...", etc. I agree, and my head is quite cool. I believe I have not attacked you, as such was never my intention. It's just that I don't understand your motives to make you revert --twice-- such a small, albeit positive contribution on my part, as I see it. You responded by referring me to the NPOV (which I already knew) and Lead Section (which I didn't) official policy pages. Thanks, but that does not answer my questions. As I regard this as a matter of honour, I ask you to please be thorough (if you are willing to answer this) so as to to help me undertand your motives. When I added the TWO words "world-famous" in the (Kylie Minogue article) introduction, what exactly did you not find agreeable? Do you assert that such statement is false? If not, why in your opinion did I divert from a NPOV for stating such a fact?
The reason I ask is because I still cannot grasp the logic behind all those 'edit wars' raging out there in the Wikipedia. For instance, if someone wrote that Adolf Hitler was a madman and a murderous monster, there would be always someone else eager to delete such statement on the grounds of not complying with the NPOV policy, regardless of the absolute, undeniable truth of that statement. Why is that so? Why cannot facts be allowed, no matter how harsh or disgusting (or complimentary, as in the case of K. Minogue) they may be?
Thank you for your trouble, getcrunk. By the way, I'm getting to like your contributions.
P.D. I invite you to review the article on The Carpenters. Surely you'll find the high-praise comments ("the biggest selling artists of the 1970s"", "leading exponents of the soft rock or adult contemporary genre and ranking among the foremost recording artists of the decade") more guilty against NPOV policy than my humble "world-famous" remark about Kylie Minogue. However, seemingly no one has protested until now. AVM 02:16, 28 May 2006 (UTC)
Are you a now an admin?-- LooseTheHotButtonS 16:31, 28 May 2006 (UTC)
Please remove the Fair use images from your userpage. Thanks in advance! -- getcrunkjuice contribs 01:00, 29 May 2006 (UTC)
Good catch adding the {{ copyvio}} tag to Guadalajara key attractions. However, you left the copyvio material there! I removed it for you, just letting you know. Mango juice talk 20:34, 30 May 2006 (UTC)
On May 27 you {{prod}}ded the article kitten cannon. An IP only user removed the tag a short time later. I am replacing the tag because I think it is a non-notable game, and wanted to inform you about it so you could watch for the vote. In the case that the tag is removed again, I will seek admin help. PrometheusX303 15:16, 2 June 2006 (UTC)
The user in question is a sockpuppet of User:Bonaparte that has been banned. Please stop him. He wants to remove a one-day old discussion from the notice board because he's ashamed of the gays of Bucharest. -- Candide, or Optimism 16:30, 3 June 2006 (UTC)
Answer on my talk page. -- GDP 16:30, 3 June 2006 (UTC)
I belive you left a message in my talk box. I'm trying to imrpove the Serie A section of wikipeida. I'm currently adding each of the tables for Serie A going back for years. Adding into this, I've added links to an unrelated website which gives squads for Serie A for each individual year. I felt I was adding vital information. Could you please highlight exactly what I did that was wrong ? Niall123 19:09, 3 June 2006 (UTC)
Why do you repeatedly add songs' chart positions on personal charts to Wikipedia? Unless these charts claim notablity, I don't understand why they should be here. -- getcrunkjuice contribs 20:48, 3 June 2006 (UTC)
Hey Getcrunk! I have recieved a nomination for adminship which can be seen here. Please feel free to add to it. Thanks so much. -- Underneath-it-All 21:51, 7 June 2006 (UTC)
Hey Getcrunk, thanks for supporting my request for adminship! Unfortunately, it ended with a final tally of 5/17/3. Thanks again! Underneath-it-All 17:16, 8 June 2006 (UTC)
You removed a link on the social networking link saying 'rv spam'. I do not understand your reasoning. The section refers to many social networks by name 'Blended networking is an approach to social networking that combines both offline elements (face-to-face events) and online elements. MySpace, for example, builds on independent music and party scenes, and Facebook mirrors a college community. The newest social networks on the Internet are becoming more focused on niches such as art, tennis, football (soccer), golf, cars, dog owners, and even cosmetic surgery. ' I was providing a link to illustrate the point of the 'newest' social networks. GolfBuzz is a legitimate player in the niche social netowrk space and was trying to illustrate the point. Please respond so I can modify. I am still learning what is acceptable and want to conribute positively Prcoulson 23:27, 8 June 2006 (UTC)
Crunk, you were very helpful before and was hoping you could help me get a listing back. I added GolfBuzz to the ' List_of_social_networking_websites' and it was removed for the reason 'non-notable and not social networking'. The site has over 16,000 members and it is one of the few professional 'niche' social networking sites. It is defintely a social network. It allows its members to create profiles and connect with one another. In addition to allowing individuals to create neighborhoods it also allows courses to create profiles and companies to create "Neighborhoods". Golfers can also connect and join these course communities and neighborhoods. GolfBuzz is one of the few professionally built 'niche' social networking sites. It is truly an open social network which allows more than just individuals to create profiles. In addition GolfBuzz has been in the press considerably in the past few months. Placements include Information week The Business Chronicle (Atlanta Edition), Information Week [1], PR Week, etc. I am new to contributing and would love improve my posts. Prcoulson 13:53, 9 June 2006 (UTC)
Crunk, you just removed a link (rm spam) although not even two comments above you told me to add it (See Question). In addition you added GolfBuzz to the list of social networking sites but it has been removed by an IP user, again. I do not understand. I follow the recommendations from the editors and the editors themselves seem to be canceling each other out. GolfBuzz is a social network. It has over 16,000 members it is truly and ‘open’ community. It even contributes its golf content to wikipedia. Users can invite people into their networks, plan rounds, review courses, etc. I do not mind being edited but I definitely do mind wasting my time, being told to do one thing and then have it changed on me. Can you please help me out here. I am having fun contributing to the success of the site but I am getting frustrated on all the removals. Especially when it seems the management is not agreeing. Can you add the link back to the niche site it is good to have examples and can you also add it back to the list of social networking sites. Prcoulson 19:41, 10 June 2006 (UTC)
No idea what your talking about when it comes to putting in vandalism. I've been updating that article for over 5 months. Please just leave me be you seem to be the only one who has ever had a problem with me. AcePuppy 00:28, 12 June 2006 (UTC)
Getcrunk, do you have any idea about how to make a navigational toolbar at the bottom of Janet's page to link directly to her albums and singles. You can look at the bottom of Christina Aguilera's page to see what I mean. Janet has one presently for her siblings. Maddyfan 07:11, 12 June 2006 (UTC)
thanks for not getting my joke :( I wanted someone to add "the previous unsigned comment, blah blah" cause that was all the rage on that thread. -- kizzle 01:16, 13 June 2006 (UTC)
Hi - you removed a fair use image from the Arctic Monkeys article, specifically the band's logo. We have discussed this elsewhere - mainly on WikiProject Albums and the like - and it is accepted that band's logos form an integral part of the branding of the band. Logos such as those of Oasis, Foo Fighters or Nirvana become representative of the band, and therefore need to be included in an article about the band. Given that an infobox provides the opportunity to use it, it seems senseless to have to use it elsewhere on the page. Accordingly, I have re-instated the logo. Obviously if you disagree, feel free to bring it up at Talk:Arctic Monkeys or my talk page. Cheers, DJR ( Talk) 22:15, 14 June 2006 (UTC)
![]() |
Dear Getcrunk/Archive 4, thanks so much for your support during my recent successful request for adminship. I really appreciate it. Let me know if you need any administrative support; just leave me a message on my talk page or send me an e-mail if it's urgent. Take care man, hope studying is well, and hope the exams will be done soon! -- Samir धर्म 06:06, 15 June 2006 (UTC) |
Thanks for helping revert 65.138.68.52 ( talk • contribs • page moves • block user • block log)'s vandalism. :-) Netscott 22:26, 15 June 2006 (UTC)
I found this information, and I'm not sure what to do with it. It's for Janet's new single, "Call On Me".
JanetJackson.cn:
Janet's latest single, "Call On Me", featuring Nelly has already proven popular with 184 spins in just one day, according to Media Base. Spins are as follows:
Pop radio: 44 spins Urban radio: 54 spins Urban Adult Contemporary: 5 spins R'n'b radio: 81 spins
Collectively, the 184 spins generated audience impressions to make a total of 4.358 million audience impressions. Make sure you request Janet on your local radio station!
http://www.mmr247.com/ (MediaBase) Buzzed1 20:37, 18 June 2006 (UTC)
You participated in the Finola Hackett AfD. Please also join the discussion here: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Saryn Hooks (second nomination). Thank you. - CrazyRussian talk/ email 17:28, 19 June 2006 (UTC)
Yes, I'm not an administrator, but thanks for the compliment! I've returned for now, but I'm not sure if I'm ready to become an admin. However, if somebody were to nominate me, I wouldn't decline. Extraordinary Machine 18:23, 19 June 2006 (UTC)
![]() |
Thanks for voting! Hello Getcrunk/Archive 4, and thank you so much for voting in my recent RfA. I am pleased to inform you that it passed with a final tally of (119/1/3), into the WP:100, so I have now been cleared for adminship and will soon be soaring above the clouds. I was overjoyed, shocked, and humbled by the tally, and, most importantly, all the support. Thank you. If there is ever anything you need, you know where you can find me. Take care. |
-- Pilot| guy 22:43, 19 June 2006 (UTC)
/me runs for the hills. Bishonen | talk 18:44, 20 June 2006 (UTC).
Even though you were reverting vandalism, I don't want anyone dumb enough to support Quebec sovereignty to touch my user page in any way. Biff Loman 22:05, 20 June 2006 (UTC)
Thanks for keeping an eye out for trolls on my talk page. No harm done with the TOC thing. I was even in the process of making a report when you left the message! I'll keep an eye on that page. That user seems to have problem with being civil towards editors, as I discovered by looking through his contributions. -- getcrunk ? 02:17, 21 June 2006 (UTC)
Wow, thanks! This was a little unexpected. Well, I've accepted, though I'm a little unsure about this...:) Thanks again. Extraordinary Machine 22:25, 22 June 2006 (UTC)
You replied to my question about images in the Wikipedia_talk:Userboxes page. I was wondering if you could help me figure out how I'm going wrong with this code. I used the template and then entered the image using the correct syntax. Here's my code with nowiki and pre tags.
<pre> {{subst:Bol |border-c = #00ff00 |border-s = 5 |id-c = #ffffff |id-s = 12 |id-fc = #ffffff |info-c = #ffff00 |info-s = 8 |info-fc = #008000 |id = [[Image:Boltshirtcloseup.JPG|thumb|45px]] |info = This user is an avid listener of the Buzz Out Loud Podcast. He or she is very greatful for the work that [[Tom|Tom Merritt]], [[Molly|Molly Wood]], and [[Veronica|Veronica Belmont]] do to enrich his or her life. }} </pre>
Thanks! Alexbrewer 22:35, 22 June 2006 (UTC)
My final edits will be made on Wikipedia on June 26. After this date, the only edits I will make will be occasional pop-culture updates. Thanks for your kindness and your time. Take care! — Eternal Equinox | talk 22:58, 22 June 2006 (UTC)
Thank you for your interest in VandalProof, Getcrunk! You have now been added to the list of authorized users, so if you haven't already, simply download and install VandalProof from our main page. If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me or any other moderator, or you can post a message on the discussion page. — Xyra e l / 07:02, 23 June 2006 (UTC) 07:02, 23 June 2006 (UTC)
I left questions at your RFA. I was blocked from editing the page because I use AOL, so they are on the talk page, please move them. Hort Graz 21:02, 25 June 2006 (UTC)
I have filed an RFAR against User:Eternal_Equinox listing you as an involved party at [ [2]]. -- HeyNow10029 23:25, 25 June 2006 (UTC)
You deleted a site I added to Social Networking at the same time you deleted another. I would like it to be added back. As far as I can tell, there is no mention of the sites having to have a certain number of members. I would like clarification on how and why you feel justified in doing so. I don't mean to be rude, but, its a list of Social Networking sites. Maybe a new category should be made for the largest sites, huh? A list is a list and I think all Social Networking sites should be able to be listed as long as they are a social networking site. nilly1a 01:47, 26 June 2006 (UTC)Nilly1A nilly1a 01:47, 26 June 2006 (UTC)
I noticed the comments about ten minute vandalism reports at your RfA (which I may yet vote in). I'd suggest adding User:Voice of All/RC/monobook.js. It gives you some handy javascript tools, including a one-click report button (all you have to do is type your reason). I've been using it for a few weeks and find it great. I thought it might be worth a whirl for you. Cheers and happy vandal-fighting!-- Kchase02 T 08:41, 26 June 2006 (UTC)
Thanks for your welcome message. Wow, that was a very polite wayof saying that I did something stupid. I really didn't mean to. In your message you said "your changes were deleted/removed". But actually all changes I made are still online, as far as I can see. Could you please be more specific on what I did wrong. It would also help to me to improve my skills. Wisser 19:35, 26 June 2006 (UTC)
Is there a tag for "already been moved to commons?" The IfD tag was probably the wrong one to use for this case (at least, if it works like AfD does). Rklawton 01:37, 27 June 2006 (UTC)
Screw them don't change your username just because they want you to. ILovePlankton 04:33, 28 June 2006 (UTC)
Having supported you last time, I am supporting you this time as well (although your tastes in music are rather disquieting; I'll let that slide for the moment). I was going to ask a follow-up question to that posed by User:BigDT apropos of your username, but I'm certain it would have done more harm than good. In any case, I'll leave it here in order that you might answer it if you like, although, as you will see, it's rather a rhetorical (or at best leading) question.
Can we start marking the charts for the song? From Billboard:
Just when you thought the smoke cleared from Beyonce's chart-burning debut at No. 20 on last week's Billboard Radio Monitor R&B/Hip-Hop Airplay chart, "Call One Me" by Janet Jackson with Nelly shines one spot higher to become the best debut on the list in seven years ... The No. 19 entry is the highest at the format since TLC's "No Scrubs" landed at No. 13 in February 1999. Meanwhile, "Call's" No. 28 debut on the Rhythmic Top 40 chart gives Jackson her first appearance as a lead artist at the format since "Son Of A Gun" entered the chart in November 2001. (Why such a long time? None of the singles from Jackson's last album, 2004's "Damita Jo," charted on the Rhythmic Top 40 list.) ... "Call" also opens at No. 36 at Adult R&B and No. 38 at Mainstream Top 40 ... "Call On Me" is the first single from Jackson's ninth studio album, "20 Years Old," due out later this year.
Thank you for the help! Buzzed1 11:43, 29 June 2006 (UTC)
Hello, I would be interested in finding out how I cite references from other websites onto an article on WP. I am new to this resource and would appreciate information on this issue. Thanks for your welcome. Starsweep 14:30, 29 June 2006 (UTC)
I like what you did in rearranging Notes, Filmography, etc. Good work.
There's a "Quotations" section that seems out of place in the middle of all those fine-print-like references. I'm thinking that it belongs right above the Bibliography. Since you're the Master of Rearrangement in this area, I'll leave it to you to decide and act. Lou Sander 15:15, 29 June 2006 (UTC)
Also, Notes 1-8 are badly in need of cleanup. (Too much http://, NYT link requires membership, etc.) I'd fix it myself, but I don't know how. Lou Sander 15:32, 29 June 2006 (UTC)
Thanks for the reversion. CambridgeBayWeather (Talk) 16:57, 29 June 2006 (UTC)
Hi. I saw your post there, and it seems like you haven't received a reply. It sounds like you are looking for Wikipedia:Editor review. — getcrunk what?! 17:31, 29 June 2006 (UTC)
Thanks :). Like I said in other places, I just hope I don't break something... Extraordinary Machine 23:58, 29 June 2006 (UTC)
Hello,
An Arbitration case involving you has been opened: Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Eternal Equinox. Please add evidence to the evidence sub-page, Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Eternal Equinox/Evidence. You may also contribute to the case on the workshop sub-page, Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Eternal Equinox/Workshop.
On behalf of the Arbitration Committee, -- Tony Sidaway 11:22, 1 July 2006 (UTC)
Ah, good, someone else putting in some evidence. I noticed your two May 28, 2006 RfA diffs are the same diff. — Bunchofgrapes ( talk) 19:00, 2 July 2006 (UTC)
I am sorry to inform you that your Request for Adminship (RfA) has failed to reach sufficient consensus for promotion, and has now been delisted and archived. Please do not look upon this outcome as a discouragement, but rather as an opportunity to improve. Try to address the concerns raised during your RfA and, in a few months' time, resubmit your request. Thank you for offering to serve Wikipedia in this capacity! Redux 19:27, 2 July 2006 (UTC)