![]() | This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 1 | Archive 2 | Archive 3 | → | Archive 5 |
Wikipedia is not a social networking site or free host. You clearly have no intention of contributing to this encyclopedia. Therefore you are, in my view, not entitled to a user page. You may pick up your text via the edit history but please publish it somewhere else. — RHaworth ( talk · contribs) 23:50, 15 January 2013 (UTC)
The point is that my user page reports my accomplishments on Wikipedia. You have none to report so you are not entitled to a page. — RHaworth ( talk · contribs) 23:10, 16 January 2013 (UTC)
{{
unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}
, but you should read the
guide to appealing blocks first.
Drmies (
talk)
23:13, 16 January 2013 (UTC)Geremy.Hebert ( block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser ( log))
Request reason:
Ok, after a self imposed cool down period I would like to argue for reinstatement. I now understand what would be considered acceptable. My contribution strengths would be grammatical errors and spelling, subject irrelevant. I was getting back into wikipedia via Random Article and got carried away with my own page and accomplishments outside of wikipedia. I now understand the parameters in which I am constrained and would like to be considered for unblocking. I have made marked contributions many years ago and recently felt inclined and inspired to begin again the communal maintenance of our collective knowledge. Please consider this my candid and heartfelt apology and acknowledgment of those earnest volunteers who put in more effort than I ever did and to have my user page undone to a period before I began editing, somewhere before January. Geremy.Hebert ( talk) 00:01, 1 February 2013 (UTC)
Accept reason:
Procedural; unblocked by RHaworth. Please be careful to edit within policy, or - as noted below - you may be re-blocked. Best, UltraExactZZ Said ~ Did 13:44, 1 February 2013 (UTC)
Question: you state "I was getting back into wikipedia [ sic]" and "I have made marked contributions many years ago...". Are you stating that you have previously edited Wikipedia using another account? -- Kinu t/ c 07:20, 1 February 2013 (UTC)
Yes I've had 3 I believe over a period of a decade perhaps. One I tried namechange but didn't work so abandoned and made this one. I don't even recall my first used to delete spam articles and advertisements. Geremy.Hebert ( talk) 09:28, 1 February 2013 (UTC)
Being as cynical as Peridon, I must say that this contribs history is not very impressive but does agree with your claim. I have decided to see if you can live up to your word and have unblocked you. You can revert your user page to this state yourself. Apart from that, if you write anything at all about yourself until you have a reasonable mainspace contribs history, then I am laible to re-apply the block. — RHaworth ( talk · contribs) 13:10, 1 February 2013 (UTC)
thank you
Geremy.Hebert (
talk)
21:12, 1 February 2013 (UTC)
![]() | This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
![]() | This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 1 | Archive 2 | Archive 3 | → | Archive 5 |
Wikipedia is not a social networking site or free host. You clearly have no intention of contributing to this encyclopedia. Therefore you are, in my view, not entitled to a user page. You may pick up your text via the edit history but please publish it somewhere else. — RHaworth ( talk · contribs) 23:50, 15 January 2013 (UTC)
The point is that my user page reports my accomplishments on Wikipedia. You have none to report so you are not entitled to a page. — RHaworth ( talk · contribs) 23:10, 16 January 2013 (UTC)
{{
unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}
, but you should read the
guide to appealing blocks first.
Drmies (
talk)
23:13, 16 January 2013 (UTC)Geremy.Hebert ( block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser ( log))
Request reason:
Ok, after a self imposed cool down period I would like to argue for reinstatement. I now understand what would be considered acceptable. My contribution strengths would be grammatical errors and spelling, subject irrelevant. I was getting back into wikipedia via Random Article and got carried away with my own page and accomplishments outside of wikipedia. I now understand the parameters in which I am constrained and would like to be considered for unblocking. I have made marked contributions many years ago and recently felt inclined and inspired to begin again the communal maintenance of our collective knowledge. Please consider this my candid and heartfelt apology and acknowledgment of those earnest volunteers who put in more effort than I ever did and to have my user page undone to a period before I began editing, somewhere before January. Geremy.Hebert ( talk) 00:01, 1 February 2013 (UTC)
Accept reason:
Procedural; unblocked by RHaworth. Please be careful to edit within policy, or - as noted below - you may be re-blocked. Best, UltraExactZZ Said ~ Did 13:44, 1 February 2013 (UTC)
Question: you state "I was getting back into wikipedia [ sic]" and "I have made marked contributions many years ago...". Are you stating that you have previously edited Wikipedia using another account? -- Kinu t/ c 07:20, 1 February 2013 (UTC)
Yes I've had 3 I believe over a period of a decade perhaps. One I tried namechange but didn't work so abandoned and made this one. I don't even recall my first used to delete spam articles and advertisements. Geremy.Hebert ( talk) 09:28, 1 February 2013 (UTC)
Being as cynical as Peridon, I must say that this contribs history is not very impressive but does agree with your claim. I have decided to see if you can live up to your word and have unblocked you. You can revert your user page to this state yourself. Apart from that, if you write anything at all about yourself until you have a reasonable mainspace contribs history, then I am laible to re-apply the block. — RHaworth ( talk · contribs) 13:10, 1 February 2013 (UTC)
thank you
Geremy.Hebert (
talk)
21:12, 1 February 2013 (UTC)
![]() | This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |